Monday, April 11, 2016

Salah Abdeallah, "hiding in plain sight": Citidal a la Ummah

On 18 March, 2016, Brussels and French police found and arrested missing since last November “ringleader” of the 2015 November terror hits in Paris, Salah Abdeallah;  found him, as they put it, “hiding in plain sight."

Speaking to the same, 23 March 2016, Mailonline featured an article written by one Jake Wallis Simons, “City of Jihad: Chilling map reveals how Isis fanatics established network of terror where they could plot under noses of police,” in which the writer delineates how, in short, a small band of Islamic brothers, childhood friends, brought Europe “to its knees.” 1

Did so via terror. Did so obeying Allah, thus did so obeying “Allah’s Messenger,” thus did so following sunnah of that messenger.

What’s more, they did so aided by the medium of the nursery and garden, if you will, in which they were planted, sprouted, rooted, and matured in--their Islamic community: Citadel a la Ummah; therein, they planned and prepared their actions of terror.

In other words, just as seeds, if they are to know fruition of the “fruit” within them, demand, from germination through fruition, proper care, agreeable climate, arable soil, water, and protection from potential destructive elements, so it is with the Muslim fit and willing to answer the Islamic obligation for violent armed jihad.

In the words of Hilary Clinton, “It takes a village.”

And that “village,” that needed environment, the Islamic community provides.

How such a thing can happen stuns many.  How can a “peace-loving,”  supposed, God-fearing, Muslim community provide the necessary environment that ensures, in the “soil” of hearts and minds within their community, the life, and death, in the seeds of their faith-system survive, as noted above, from germination to fruition?

One will only know such wonder if one is unfamiliar with the guidance in the “Book” the Muslim regards as sacred. The book that defines the Citadel a la Ummah. The “Book” that bears out fear of “Allah” in place of fear of God.

In that “Book” we read as follows: “You who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in command among you. If you have a dispute about something, refer it back to (the Book of) Allah and the Messenger [himself, while he was alive, and then to his Sunna].” 
( 4:59) 2

Therein we read: “Say [to them, O Muhammad], “If you love Allah, then follow me and Allah will love you….” (3:31) So too, “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.” (4: 80.) 3

What’s more, the following from the revered tafsir (Qur’anic commentary) work of the venerated ibn Kathir:

            This is the Ayah of the Sword

(So when the Scared Months have passed, then fight the Mushrikin wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform the Salah, and give the Zakah, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [9:5] (V. 4. P 375.)


 (then fight the Mushrikin wherever you find them), means, on the earth in general, except for the Sacred Area, for Allah said,


 (and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush), do not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam, (P.376.)


Abu Bakr As-Siddiq used this and other honorable Ayat as proof for fighting those who refrained from paying the Zakah. These Ayat allowed fighting people unless, and until, they embrace Islam and implement its rulings and obligations …. (P. 377.)

(I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, establish the prayer and pay the Zakah.)

This honorable Ayah (9:5) was called the Ayah of the Sword, about which Ad-Dahhak bin Muzahim said, “It abrogated every agreement of peace between the Prophet and any idolator, every treaty, and every term.” Al-‘Awfi said that Ibn ‘Abbas commented: “No idolator [sic] had any more treaty or promise of safety ever since Surah Bara‘ah was revealed. (ibid.) 4

Add to the above the following:

“The worst of all animals in the sight of Allah are those who disbelieve … (this was revealed about the Banu Qurayza).” Anfal (8: 55, Tafsir Al-Jalalayn.)

Vs.: 57: “ So if you come upon such people in war, make a harsh example of them (to mark them out by punishment in order) to deter (and admonish) those coming after them so that perhaps they will pay heed. (ibid.)  5

More on the just cited verse from the above-cited Ibn Kathir tafsir:

Allah states here that the worst moving creatures on the face of the earth are those who disbelieve, who do not embrace the faith …. This Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them. This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a lesson from their end. (P. 341) 6

There’s more prescribed for these "Allah-identified" as "worst moving creatures on the face of the earth" :

So when you meet in Allah’s cause those who disbelieve, smite (their) necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (free them without ransoms), or ransom  (according to what benefits Islam), until war lays down its burden. ( P.267.)

“Perform Jihad against the people in Allah’s cause, whether they are near or far, and do not fear the blame of the blamers, as long as you are in Allah’s cause. Establish Allah’s rules while in your area and while traveling. Perform Jihad in Allah’s cause, for Jihad is a tremendous door leading to Paradise. Through it, Allah saves one from (sadness) and grief.” (P.320.)

And more, for both believers and disbelievers:

“And so there are days (good and not so good), that We give to men by turns, that Allah may test those who believe, and that He may take martyrs from among you. And Allah likes not the wrongdoers. ‘And that Allah may test (or purify) the believers (from sins) and destroy the disbelievers .” [3:140-141] 8

Tafsir al-Jalalayn provides  clarity on the just referred to verse this way: “We send days to people in rotation …. So that Allah can purge [and purify] those who believe … and wipe out [and destroy] the unbelievers. (3: 140-141, Tafsir al-Jalalayn.)

We add to the above Islamic instruction and tenets, these also:

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated: “ The Messenger of Allah was asked: ‘Which deed is the most virtuous? And which did is the best?’ He said: ‘Faith in Allah and His Messenger.’ It was said: ‘Then what of Messenger of Allah? He said: ‘Jihad is the hump (the most prominent of deeds.'


Abu Sa ‘eed Al-Khurdi narrated that the Messenger of Allah was asked: “Which of the people are most virtuous?” He said: “A man who take [sic] part in Jihad in Allah’s cause.”9

Footnotes thereat provide the following:

The Hadith tells us that one of the paths leading strait to Paradise is to take part in Jihad and confront the enemy fearlessly, under the shadow of swords and other weapons. (Ibid.)


Al-Miqdam bin Ma'diykarib narrated that the Messenger of Allah , said: "There are six things with Allah for the martyr: He is forgiven with the first flow of blood (he suffers), he is shown his place in Paradise, he is protected from punishment in the grave, secured from the greatest terror, the crown of dignity is placed upon his head — and its gems are better than the world and what is in it - he is married to seventy-two wives among Al-Hüril- 'Ayn of Paradise, and he may intercede for seventy of his close relatives." (Hasan)

[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is
Hasan Sahih.


The purpose behind recounting the special favors bestowed upon the martyr is to awaken in our hearts the desire to sacrifice our lives and all that belongs to us in the path of Allah. 10

Taking into account, not all in the Ummah may have the penchant for partaking in armed jihad, for those, the following hadith, and others, from the same source:  “Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani  narrated that the Messenger of Allah said, “Whoever prepares a fighter in Allah’s cause, he has participated in a military expedition, and whoever watches after the family of a fighter, he has participated in a military expedition. (P. 386.) 11

Expounding on the above, footnotes thereat read as follows:

Helping a Mujahid with money and material is an act of such great virtue that it is considered as good as one’s physical participation in Jihad. Similarly, taking care of the family of the Mujahid in his absence and helping them with their daily needs and necessities is also considered as good as one’s physical participation in Jihad. 12

And all the more so "an act of great virtue" taking care of a Mujahid in his presence, "helping them in their daily needs and necessities," "considered as good as one's physical participation in Jihad."

Then  to the above basic doctrines of Islam, rules and guidelines of Citadel a la Ummah, we add the follow teaching and tenets of Islam and its “prophet”:

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah said: “Beware of suspicion, for suspicion is the falsest of speech. Do not eavesdrop on one another, and do not spy on one another.” (Sahih.)

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah from the Messenger of Allah: “The believer is the mirror of his fellow-believer, and the believer is the brother of his fellow-believer. He protects him against ruin and looks after him,” (Hasan) 13

Returning now to Sunan Abu Dawud, we add  to the above makings of the Ummah, the following:

It was narrated from “Uqbah bin ‘Amir that the Prophet said: “Whoever sees a fault and conceals it, is like one who brought back to life an infant girl who had been buried alive.” (Hasan) (P. 307, # 4891.)


It was narrated from Salim, from his father, that the Prophet said: “ The Muslim is the brother of his fellow Muslim. He does not wrong him or let him suffer. Whoever takes care of his brother’s need, Allah will take care of his need; whoever relieves a Muslim of some distress in this world, Allah will relieve him of some distress on the Day of Resurrection; and whoever conceals a Muslim (faults), Allah will conceal him (his faults) on the Day of Resurrection.” (Sahih) ( P. 308, # 4893.)


“….The Prophet said: “It is not permissible for a Muslim to alarm a fellow Muslim.’” (P 359, #5004.)


It was narrated from Anas bin Malik that a man looked into one of the apartments of the Prophet and the Messenger of Allah stoop up, carrying an arrowhead, or arrowheads. It is as if I can see the Messenger of Allah, looking for him to stab him. (Sahih) ( P. 442, # 5171.)

It was narrated from Suhail, from his father, who said: “Abu Hurairah narrated to us that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: “ Whoever looks into some people’s house, without their permission, and they pluck out his eye, no recompense is due.’” (Sahih) (Ibid, # 5172.)


It was narrated that Qais bin ‘Ubad said: “Al-Ashtar and I went to Ali, and he said: ‘Did  the Messenger of Allah give you any instructions that he did not give to all the people?’ He said: “No, except what is in this document of mine’” ….: ‘ The believers’ lives are equal (in value) and they are untied against others….’”  ( P.  121.# 4530.) 14

Speaking to the same precept, this from al-Bakhari:

“Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: ‘Allah’s Messenger said, “ A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim. So he should neither oppress him nor hand him over to an oppressor. And whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs.” 
( Vol. 9, P. 66, #6951.) 15

Add to the above, authoritative Islamic works provide, The Messenger of Allah said, “The blood of the Muslims is the same. The least of them can offer their protection. They are a single hand against other people.” 16

They assert, he said, “People are like the teeth of a comb.” 17

So too, Allah’s Messenger said, “Those I love most among you and those who will sit nearest to me on the Day of Rising are the best of you in character—those who give shelter, those who protect and bring together." 18

 And add to those, this example of the above concept: “The Prophet said, ‘A believer to another is like a building whose different parts reinforce each other.’ The Prophet then clasped his hands, with the fingers interlaced (while saying that).’” 19

So too the follow al-Bukhari provided example of sunnah:

 “Narrated ‘Ali: We have nothing except the Book of Allah (the Qur’an) and this written paper from the Prophet (wherein it written [sic]): …. The asylum (of protection) granted by any Muslim is to be secured (respected) by all the other Muslims; and whoever betrays a Muslim in this respect incurs the curse of Allah, the angels, and all the people.  (Ibid, P.69, #1870.)

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Messenger said, ‘A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs; whoever brought his (Muslim) brother out of a discomfort, Allah will bring him out of the discomforts of the Day of Resurrection, and whoever screened a Muslim, Allah will screen him on the Day of Resurrection.” (ibid, P. 361, #2442.)

Next we go once more to the pages of Jami At-Tirmidhi:

“Abu Harairah narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: ‘the Muslim is one from (the harm of) whose tongue and hand (other) Muslims are safe, and the believer is the one with whom the people trust their blood and their wealth.’”

“[Abu Eisa said: This hadith is Hasan Sahih].”

“It has been related that the Prophet was asked: ‘ Which of the Muslims is the most virtuous?’ He said: ‘From (the harm of) whose tongue and hand (other) Muslims are safe.”  21

Hence, this Footnote comment provided in the just cited source: “Only that person has the right to be called a Muslim if other Muslims are safe from his tongue and hand.”  22

Additionally, driving home the seriousness of the above basic tenets of Islam--which comprise the components of the foundation, pillars, building blocks of the Ummah--this: “[Abu ‘Eisa said:] I heard Abu Mus ‘ab Al-Madani say: ‘ Whoever said: “Faith is merely statements’ then he should be told to repent, and he either repents or his neck should be severed.’”23

In the above, we clearly see the Islamic tenet for the obligation for the Muslim to protect the Muslim Brother, as much as possible, shield, and screen him from both censure and prosecution, in brief, from answering to anyone other than “Allah ta ‘ala.” 24  

In it we likewise see, those most loved by Allah and his Messenger are those who “give shelter,” and protection and “bring together” the body of believers, the ummah of Muhammad-- the young, the old, the “extremely” pious, the seeming Muslim in name only.

Bring them all together as one brick wall—Citadel a la Ummah. One hand, defending the believer.  Sheltering him, shielding him, provided for him.

In other words, all in the ummah, be they “moderates” or otherwise are Allah-and his messenger charged to, to the best of their ability to do so, protect and defend all in the Ummah from the hand and from the inspection of the unbeliever: keep that hand, keep those eyes, outside the stated brick wall.

Outside of Citadel a la Ummah.

Winding this essay up, we regard, “Narrated from ‘Aishah: “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever introduces something into this matter of ours that is not part of it, he will have it rejected.’” (Sahih.) 25

In other words, all concepts, precepts or ideas in conflict with the above spelled out Islamic tenets are, by believers, if indeed believers, soundly rejected.

Therefore, in concluding here, it is clear, the question we should be asking is not that posed in the opening paragraphs of this essay: Paraphrased: How can a "peace-loving" "God fearing" Muslim community produce and when need be protect and defend jihadist such as Salah Abdeallah and others like him?

Rather, the questions we should be asking is, given  all the above citations from the revered Islamic texts represent mainstream basic Islamic doctrine; considering such, how could hearts and minds given to such doctrines fail to produce Salah Abdeallah and others like him? How could the ummah of Muhammad regard Allah’s Book and all in it and not rear and protect such children of their loins and wombs?


1. Jake Wallis Simons, “City of Jihad: Chilling map reveals how Isis fanatics established network of terror where they could plot under noses of police,”,  23 March 2016,

2. Tafsir Al-Jalalayn,  Jalalu’ D-Din Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Al-Mahalli and Jalalu’ D-Din as-Suyuti, Aisha Bewley’s Translation , Dar Al Taqwa Ltd. London, 2007; ISBN 1-870582-61-6; (Exegesis of text is that within brackets).

3. Ibid.


5.   As-Suyuti ,  Jalalu’ D-Din, Tafsir Al-Jalalayn.

6.  Kathir, Tafsir, Vol. 4.

7.    Ibid.

8.  Ibid.

9.  At-Tirmidhi, Jami At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-
Tirmidhi, Translated by: Abu Khaliyl (USA), Ahadith edited and referenced by” Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Final Review by: Islamic Research Section, Darussalam, First Edition, 2007; Vol. 3, The Chapter of the Virtues of Jihad, P. 407, #1658; P. 408, #1660.

10.  Ibid, P. 408, #1660, P.410, #1663, Comments,  FN respectively.

11.  Ibid, The Chapter of the Virtues of Jihad, P. 386, #1631.

12. Ibid, FN.

13.  Sunan Abu Dawud, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu Dawud Sulaiman ibn Ash ‘ath, Ahadith edited and referenced by: Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Translated by: Nasiruddin al-Khattab (Canada), Final Review by: Abu Khaliyl (USA); First Edition, Darussalam, 2008; ISBN: 978-9960-500-11-9 (SET), 978-9960*500-16-4 (Vol. 5); The Book of Etiquette, Chapter 48 & 49, Regarding Suspicion, Regarding Sincere Council and Protection, pp. 325, 326, #4917, 4918 respectively.

14.  Ibid, Chapter 38, Concealing (The Faults of) A Muslim; P. 307, # 4891, (Ibid, Chapter (…) Brotherhood, P. 308, # 4893;P 359. P. #5004; P. 442, # 5171; # 5172; Book of Ad-Diyat, P.  121.# 4530, respectively.

15.  Sahih Al-Bukhari, Translated by: Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1997, Vol. 9, Book of Al-Alikrah (Coercion), p. 66, #6951.)

16.   Abu Dawud and an-Nasa ‘I; Ibn Lal respectively, as cited in Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yasubi, , Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley translation, Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa, Seventh print, 2008, 1429H, P.40.

17.  Ibid.

18.  Ibid, Tirmidhi, P. 41.

19.  Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, Book of al-Mazalim, p. 362, 2446.

20.  Ibid, Book About the Virtues of Medina, p. 69, #1870; P. 361, #2442 respectively.

21.  Jami At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-
Tirmidhi, Translated by: Abu Khaliyl (USA), Ahadith edited and referenced by” Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Final Review by: Islamic Research Section, Darussalam, First Edition, 2007; Volume 5, Chapters on Faith, p. 35, # 2627.

22.  Ibid.

23.  Ibid, P. 31, #2622.

24.  A Glossary of Islamic Terms, Aisha Bewley, Ta-Ha Publishers, LTD, 2009; ISBN - 13: 978 1 897940 78 5, P. 30.

25.  Dawud, Vol. 5, Book of Sunnah, P. 161, # 4606.

Sunday, March 20, 2016

Al-Wala Wal Bara: Fountainhead of Islamic Hate

Al-Wala Wal Bara: Fountainhead of Islamic Hate
Islam hates me, this I know
for the Koran tells me so.
Muslims all to Hell can go
for the evil deeds they sow.
Half ass Chump campaigns on this
might as well drink camel piss
whats going on he does not know
Koran's  a place his eyes won’t go.
Yes, Muslims hate us,
yes, Muslims hate us,
yes, Muslims hate us,
for Allah's sake you know.  

    While recognizing the  volcano of Islamic hatred for us, Donald J. Trump seems to be ignorant of its source.  It is the concept of  Wala Wal Bara: 'love and hate for the sake of Allah'.

 Muslims must love what Allah loves and hate what Allah hates as you will see in a quote from Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

    This list of critical clauses is extracted from the most relevant ayat and linked through a superscript . To read the complete verse,  click the superscript, then use your back button to return to your place in the list.  To read parallel translations, click the ayat number in the list. To read the Quranic context in the Hilali/Khan translation, click the ayat number in the full quote below.

    Our concentration is on the  Quranic fountainhead of hatred but Uncle Vladdie has included in his litany a list of  ayat and ahadith  detailing  the consequences of that hatred. Read it in his comment at Jihad Watch.

  • 2:276...Allâh likes not the disbelievers1
  • 3:140... Allâh likes not the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers 2       
  • 30:45...Verily, He likes not the disbelievers 3­   
  • 39:7...  If you disbelieve, then verily, Allâh is not in need of you, He likes not disbelief for His slaves. 4
    Those ayat, while not expressly  using hate in the Hilali/Khan translation, make it clear that  disbelievers  are on Allah's enemies list.  I found two relevant tafsirs in Ibn Kathir. I quote the crucial clauses in this list, with the full paragraphs reproduced below.

  •  Whenever Allah hates a servant of His, He calls Jibril and says, "O Jibril, verily I hate so-and-so, so hate him.'' Thus, Jibril will hate him. Then, he (Jibril) will call out amongst the dwellers of the heavens, "Verily, Allah hates so-and-so, so you too must hate him.'' Then the dwellers of the heavens hate him and hatred for him will be placed in the earth.) 5
  •  And the disbelief of the disbelievers adds nothing but hatred of their Lord.) means, the longer they persist in their disbelief, the more Allah hates them 6
    How intense is Allah's hatred for us?  So  hot that he curses us, the angels curse us and Allah's slaves  curse us.
  • is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind 6
  • 9:30...Allâh's Curse be on them, 7
    Who will wise up Mr. Trump by sending him a link to this post?  Who will help him to learn about Islam by sending him this page link?

2:276. Allâh will destroy Ribâ (usury) and will give increase for Sadaqât (deeds of charity, alms, etc.) And Allâh likes not the disbelievers, sinners.

3:140. If a wound (and killing) has touched you, be sure a similar wound (and killing) has touched the others. And so are the days (good and not so good), We give to men by turns, that Allâh may test those who believe, and that He may take martyrs from among you. And Allâh likes not the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

30:45. That He may reward those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), and do righteous good deeds, out of His Bounty. Verily, He likes not the disbelievers.

39:7. If you disbelieve, then verily, Allâh is not in need of you, He likes not disbelief for His slaves. And if you are grateful (by being believers), He is pleased therewith for you. No bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then to your Lord is your return, so He will inform you what you used to do. Verily, He is the All-Knower of that which is in (men's) breasts.

(Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet said, Verily, whenever Allah loves a servant of His, He calls Jibril and says, "O Jibril, verily I love so-and-so, so love him.'' Thus, Jibril will love him. Then, he (Jibril) will call out to the dwellers of the heavens, "Verily, Allah loves so-and-so, so you too must love him.'' Then the dwellers of the heavens love him and he will be given acceptance in the earth. Whenever Allah hates a servant of His, He calls Jibril and says, "O Jibril, verily I hate so-and-so, so hate him.'' Thus, Jibril will hate him. Then, he (Jibril) will call out amongst the dwellers of the heavens, "Verily, Allah hates so-and-so, so you too must hate him.'' Then the dwellers of the heavens hate him and hatred for him will be placed in the earth.) Al-Bukhari and Muslim reported narrations similar to this.

(And the disbelief of the disbelievers adds nothing but hatred of their Lord.) means, the longer they persist in their disbelief, the more Allah hates them, and the longer they persist in it, the more they and their families will lose on the Day of Resurrection. This is in contrast to the believers, for the longer they live and do good deeds, the higher their status in Paradise will be, the greater their reward, and the more beloved they will be to their Creator.

2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

9:30. And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

David Wood addressing Fantasy Islam

Take a stroll with Brother D.W. into the balmy meadows and airy peaks of fantasy Islam, then, drudge back down into the cold dense wood of reality and fact-based Islam.

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 7~At War With Islam

Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 6~Terrorist Rhetoric
Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 7~At War With Islam

And, by the way, the notion that America is at war with Islam ignores the fact that the world’s religions are a part of who we areWe can’t be at war with any other religion because the world’s religions are a part of the very fabric of the United States, our national character.  (Applause.) 

So the best way for us to fight terrorism is to deny these organizations legitimacy and to show that here in the United States of America, we do not suppress Islam; we celebrate and lift up the success of Muslim Americans.  That’s how we show the lie that they’re trying to propagate.  (Applause.)  We shouldn’t play into terrorist propaganda.  And we can’t suggest that Islam itself is at the root of the problem.  That betrays our values.  It alienates Muslim Americans.  It’s hurtful to those kids who are trying to go to school and are members of the Boy Scouts, and are thinking about joining our military.

at war with Islam

    Islam is a state of permanent war with the rest of the human race and has been so engaged since the Battle Of Badr. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to:
Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine Of Permanent War.  Its Dar ul-Islam vs Dar ul-Harb. Islamic Peace is only after Dar ul-Harb is entirely conquered.

    In the 18th century, Barbary Pirates attacked our merchentmen.  Paying tribute nearly bankrupted the new nation. Adams, Jefferson & Franklin were commissioned to find out why.  The answer was a bit convoluted, but runs parallel to what a Muslim general told a Persian general when asked why they attacked.  Get a clue:
The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master. Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386
    After the USS Cole, two embassies in Africa, Khobar Towers, WTC1, WTC2, Boston Marathon Bombing, Fort Hood Massacre and San Bernardino Massacre, its high time we recognize the war,  declare it and retaliate.

War with other religions

    Are Christianity, Judaism or Buddhism  waging war against us?  Why should we attack them?  Only Islam has declared  and is waging war against us.

National fabric

    The founders were Deists and Christians, not Muslims. Islam is no more a part of the fabric of this nation than Communism or National Socialism.  The slave owning southern states were part of this nation, and fought a war against it.  Obamination is so full of crap that it flows from his lie hole.

deny legitimacy

    Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, al-Qaeda and their offshoots are authentically Islamic.  Their members are Muslims. Their doctrines flow directly from the Qur'an. Their actions emulate Moe's sunnah.  

Islam is illegitimate

    It was fabricated from bits of Judaism, Christianity and Arab paganism for the purpose of propagating and perpetuating war because Moe derived his income from plunder & extortion.  Moe's favored child bride finked on  the profiteer and false prophet.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:

Narrated Aisha:

I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).' (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."
    Islam is Satanic and mercenary. Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament. The original religion of Islam is Jihad: war against the rest of the world.  Demand proof? This is a blog post, not a book. Rather than rewrite and include old posts, I list them here. Read'em and curse Islam for it is evil.

suppress Islam

    We need to outlaw it and exterminate it.  Send the occupying enemy combatants home, do not let any more in and wage the war to the end on both kinetic and ideological planes.  

    Suppression, repression and containment will not suffice. The world must be rid of believing Muslims or the war will never end.  While one Muslim lives he will reproduce or recruit more, regroup, re-arm and renew the Jihad.  Muslims go to war or to Hell. While they believe, they will wage war to avoid the fire and get into the orgy.

fight terrorism

    Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy. Muslims are the enemy. Islam is the doctrine that makes them inimical to us.  Terrorism is asymmetrical warfare; a force multiplier.  Terrorism can only be overcome by inducing mass apostasy among the ummah and killing the recalcitrant recidivists.

Islam Is The Problem!

    The basics you need to know are in this file:
It contains quotes from Islam's canon with links to the source text so you can verify them and read the context.  Islamic scripture, oral tradition and jurisprudence form a congruent pattern that fits hand in glove.  It will all click into place for you when you see the quotes together.

our values

    Our values do not include passive surrender to conquest.  They do not include denial of objective factual reality. They do not include national suicide.  Telling the truth about the identity, character and doctrines of the enemy does not conflict with our values.

    Islam conflicts with our values. It is violent. It rewards acts of terrorism as righteous good deeds. It is intolerant. It engages in slavery. It engages in genocide. It denies human rights, dignity and equality. It denies freedom of speech and religion.


    Islam denies nationalism except for Ummah al-Islamiya: the nation of Islam. Their loyalty is to Allah, not to the USA.  How can we enlist Muslims in our military and appoint them to high places in government when the doctrine they believe in is inimical to our way of life?  Their duty to Allah is to wage war against us as Nidal Malik Hasan did at Fort Hood.  They are not alienated by acknowledging what they are, they are alienated by Islam.

Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 6~Terrorist Rhetoric

Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 6~Terrorist Rhetoric Obamination: Mosque Visit; Freedom Of Religion Part 6~Terrorist Rhetoric

Which brings me to my next point:  As we protect our country from terrorism, we should not reinforce the ideas and the rhetoric of the terrorists themselves.  I often hear it said that we need moral clarity in this fight.  And the suggestion is somehow that if I would simply say, these are all Islamic terrorists, then we would actually have solved the problem by now, apparently.  (Laughter.)  Well, I agree, we actually do need moral clarity.  Let’s have some moral clarity.  (Applause.) 

Groups like ISIL are desperate for legitimacyThey try to portray themselves as religious leaders and holy warriors who speak for Islam.  I refuse to give them legitimacy.  We must never give them that legitimacy.  (Applause.)  They’re not defending Islam.  They’re not defending MuslimsThe vast majority of the people they kill are innocent Muslim men, women and children.  (Applause.) 

reinforce terrorist rhetoric

    LibTards  deny the fatal facts of Islam because they  falsely equate eradicating  predators to the Shoa.  They can not bear the truth: Islam is an all encompassing way of life which preys upon the human race.  

    LibTards can not acknowledge the Islamic character of the Islamic State because that would destroy their "religion of peace" house of cards.

    Recognizing ISIS as Islamic does not legitimize  or rationalize ISIS, it just recognizes it as part of Ummah al-Islamiyya.

    Outside of using modern weapons and technology, ISIS is not doing much Moe and his companions did not do. They can cherry pick hadith to justify their works.    

moral clarity

    Islam's position is: Allah, as creator, owns the earth and all that is on it. He gives it to whom he wills. He gave it to Moe. Muslims have a divine mandate to seize it by force and impose Allah's rules on the whole human race. Allah will surely make Muslims successors in the earth, he gives it to them by conquests.  How moral is  that?

    Moe said: "I am raised for Jihad and I am not raised for tillage". He said that when Muslims hold the tails of oxen and abandon Jihad, Allah will curse them with disgrace until they return to their "original religion. Moe said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear.  How moral is that?

    Moe, speaking for Allah, said "fight them until" only Allah is worshiped and Christians are subjugated and extorted.  He raped captive women and allowed his companions to seize and rape women.  Moral is that?  

    Captured women and children are enslaved by default. How moral is that?  Infidels may be attacked without provocation. How moral is that?  

    Moe, speaking for Allah, said: "I will cast terror",  "Allah cast terror",  "You [and your army] are more a terror in the Jew's hearts than Allah." and "I have been made victorious with terror..." How moral is that?

Its Islam, Stupid!

    ISIS, HAMAS and the rest of the alphabet soup of Islamic terrorism are believing Muslims,  obeying Allah and emulating Moe, nothing more. They add  nothing to and subtract nothing from Islam.


    "Radical Islam" is an accursed lie  "Extremists" is an accursed lie. Its Islam, Stupid!  It is what Allah commanded and Moe did.  Its Sunnah.  Its Shari'ah.  There is no "moderate Islam".  There is no anodyne, benevolent Islam. The "golden age" of Islam was conquest and empire.

Identification is no solution

    Obamination uses a straw man argument, redolent of the feces gluing  the straw together. While identifying the enemy is  essentially necessary to victory, it is far from sufficient. We do not win by identifying Islam as the enemy, we win by freeing the earth from its infestation.

    We can not  take the first steps on the road to victory without identifying the enemy and recognizing the existential necessity of  its extermination.


    Its Islamic law: Shari'ah, Stupid.  "Allah said.", Moe said., Moe did.  It is based on the Qur'an, hadith and sira.   Get your head out of your anus, wipe the drek from your eyes and get a Godblessed clue for Chrissake!!!

The above listed ayat and ahadith are essentially necessary to understanding  Islamic terrorism.  Click each one and read it carefully.  What part of "I will  cast terror"  do you not comprehend?  What part of "Allah cast terror" do you not understand?  What part of  rewarding acts of terrorism as righteous good deeds do you not comprehend?
Re-read those ayat and ahadith until reality sinks in and you get a clue.

    One  Arab spoke for Allah and his word is final; I gave you links to it above.  ISIS is acting for Allah: fighting in his cause just as Moe did in the seventh century. 

defending Islam

    Islam has enemies: everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy; waging war against Allah.  Read 5.33, then consider this quote from Tafsir Ibn Kathir:
 `Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
    To us, Islamic imperialism is offensive warfare, from their point of view, its defending Islam.