Thursday, December 08, 2016

Answering The Muslim's Letter To President Elect Trump

Muslim's Letter To President Elect Trump

 A tip o the hat to Bare Naked Islam  for posting a direct link to the letter! The letter is reproduced in full, without the signature list which may be viewed on its own site linked in the title below. Superscripts in the text are linked to my commentary which follows below the horizontal line. Click a superscript to read my commentary, then use your back space button to retsurn to your place in the text.[External links will open in a new tab.]

Open Letter: From American Muslim Leaders to President-Elect Trump

Dear President-Elect Trump,


As American Muslims committed to the values of our faith and the principles that underpin our country's democracy1, we write to express serious concerns about policies proposed during your campaign as well as announcements regarding appointments to your upcoming administration.

 

Muslims have been an integral part of the United States since its founding2 when the first slave ships arrived on its shores.  Today, millions of American Muslims are among the country’s most diverse faith groups, representing seventy-seven countries, with African-Americans, South Asians and Arab Americans making up three quarters of our community. Muslims have served and paid the ultimate sacrifice in every war since the American Revolution with more than 3,939 Muslims serving honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces, today and many more in law enforcement.3

 

In fact, Americans who are Muslim contribute positively to every aspect of our society4.  Representative examples include U.S. Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson; U.S. Olympian medalists Ibtihaj Muhammad and Dalila Muhammad; Fazlur Rahman Khan, an engineer who designed the world’s tallest skyscrapers in Chicago; Ahmed Zewail, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry; and Shahid Khan, owner of the NFL’s Jacksonville Jaguars. We serve our nation as teachers, business owners, factory workers, cab drivers, doctors, lawyers, law enforcement and firefighters.

 

The values we hold align with those of the overwhelming majority of Americans. According to a recent study by the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU), Muslims are as likely as Protestants to have a strong American identity.  American Muslims who view their faith as important are more likely to say being American is central to their identity. And, those who regularly attend mosques are more likely to be civically engaged.

 

Like other Americans, we love our country and are committed to preserving religious freedom5, equal opportunity and equal protection under the law for all.   As our President-Elect, one of your duties is to ensure our collective safety and security. This includes protecting the First Amendment rights of all Americans to freely practice their faith, without fear, intimidation or reprisal.  This is a particularly critical duty now as the FBI recently reported a 67 percent increase in anti-Muslim hate crimes in 2015.6

 

During and immediately following this year’s presidential election cycle, American Muslim organizations received more reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes than any other period of time since 9/11. Your recent denunciation of such behavior on 60 Minutes was a positive first step, and we urge you to clearly and strongly condemn bigotry, hate crimes and bias-based school bullying directed at any American, including American Muslims. We call on you to make mutual respect7 and acceptance a hallmark of your presidency.

 

Furthermore, along with many other Americans, we are deeply troubled by reports that your team is actively considering proposals that would target Muslims based on religion and violate their Constitutional rights8. Advisors and members of your transition team have proposed a registry of Muslim immigrants and visitors to this country. Shockingly, an advisor cited the internment of more than 110,000 Japanese Americans during World War II - one of the most shameful moments in our nation’s history - as precedent for targeting Muslims.

 

We call on you to appoint individuals who have a demonstrated commitment to serving and defending the Constitutional rights of all Americans9. It is deeply concerning that you have announced the appointment of individuals to your upcoming Administration with a well documented history of outright bigotry10 directed at Muslims or advocating that Muslims should not have the same rights as their fellow Americans.  We urge you to reconsider and reject such candidates.

 

Just as with previous administrations, we will continue to engage all levels of our government to make America great. As engaged citizens, we also pledge to holding you and all elected officials accountable for upholding our Constitution and the equal protections it guarantees. We will raise our voices together with all Americans who share our concerns to protect these values.

 

We wish you success in upholding our country's founding principles and for a future of progress for all Americans.

 

Sincerely,



Values & Principles

The values of Islam are in existential conflict with the principles of American Representative Republicanism.  In Islam, admission to Jannh is the "supreme success".  Jihad is the admission ticket: 9.111, 61.9-12..

    Our Declaration of Independence accepts from Deity and seizes for us the right to pursue happiness. Islam denigrates it, subordinating temporal success, wealth and family life to admission to Allah's celestial orgy. 9.38, 9.69.

    The first amendment guarantees to citizens the right to choose their  own religion or none and forbids establishment of a national religion. Islam denies freedom of religion, 3.85 declares that only Islam will be accepted. 3.110 derclares that Muslims are the best of peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks.

    Our system is designed to secure persons and property. Islam requires Muslims to wage war on the nearest disbelievers 9.123.

    Our system is one of representative self government, neither a tyranny nor a mob rule. Islam is a theocracy, only Allah and his Messenger having the right to rule, their decision not being subject to question 33.36.

Muslims Integral?

    If Muslims were an integral part of America since the foundation, how many and who were they? Which members of the colonial legislatures, constitutional convention and continental congress were Muslims?  Which signers of the Declaration Of Independence were Muslims?  

    Who attacked, conquered, enslaved and sold those slaves?  Please frame your response in the context of 33.26Sahih Bukhari 5.59.447 and  Reliance Of The Traveller Book O, Chapter 9.13.  For extra discredit, read Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386. the pertinent part of which is quoted below.

Honorable Service


    Sgt. Hasan Akbar &  Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan: such great honor!! /sarc.  
Muslims are forbidden to fight with infidels against Muslims.   Enlisting them in law enforcement and military services is the height of insanity.

Contributions


    What Muslim contributions to  our society result from the contributor's Islamic identity?  What would be different if they were Christians or apostates?  

Religious Freedom

  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.    3.2
  • Only Islam will be accepted. 3.85
  • Fight them until only Allah is worshiped. 8.39
  • Islam demands Jizya and does not allow Jews & Christians to: 
Religious freedom is for practitioners of religions, not members of crime syndicates. When we read Islamic scripture, law, tradition and biography, we discover that Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; an  Arab Mafia created for the personal emolument of its founder.  Get a clue or two here:  https://www.scribd.com/doc/227418623/Islam-s-Mercenary-Mission-Updated .

    The practice of Islam requires obedience to  Allah and his Messenger 3.32 and emulation of Moe 33.21.
Allah commanded Jihad, genocide & terrorism. Moe exemplified them.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

You will find the right to manifest, practice and propagate Islam in the same constitutional article and clause where you find the right to do those things which Islam entails. The second attack on the WTC was an Islamic act of worship according to Khalid Sheikh Mohammad: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/gitmo20090310.pdf read the second page of that short document and curse islam if you have a soul.

  Presidential Duties

    The President signs legislation into law, sees to its effective and impartial enforcement and maintains national security. He does not patrol the highways, roads, streets and alleys, state and local law enforcement officer do that.

    When anyone commits an assault or malicious destruction of property, he is a criminal, liable to prosecution and  punishment without regard to his  religion or that of the victim.  

    His duty is to American citizens in  establishing and maintaining national security.  That includes removal and exclusion of persons inimical to us; that includes Muslims.  

    President Elect Donald J. Trump does not know enough about Islam  to properly guard against terrorism. he does not know that terroristic Jihad is a communal obligation undertaken on Islamic initiative. He does not know that when we retaliate the obligation becomes individual: binding on every Muslim wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth.  

    Past Presidents  failed their duty to exclude subversive persons under the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act. They are responsible for the deaths of the terror victims in  New York, Boston, Washington D.C., Fort Hood, Chattanooga, San Bernardino & Orlando.

Constitutional rights

    Constitutional rights apply to citizens, not non-resident aliens. There is no Constitutional right to immigrate to America. There is no Constitutional right to attack, subjugate & extort us as you
 are commanded to do in 9.29. There is no right to plunder us, rape our widows or enslave our orphans Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Everything  Allah commands you  to do to us is wrong, not a right!

All Americans

    That means citizens, not enemies. You can not be  citizens because you are commanded by Allah to attack us 9.29, 9.123.

Bigotry

    Bigotry involves ignorance; hidebound adherence to unfounded opinion in the face of facts. Objection to Islam, based on knowledge of the Qur'an, hadith, tafsirs, sira & shari'ah is not bigotry, it is common sense. I object to the dictum that I must be killed or enslaved because I do not believe in Allah!  I object to slavery. I object to perpetual war. I object to terrorism. I object to genocide. So do President Trump's selected advisers and cabinet members.

mutual respect

    Respect is like credit: "Credit is given where credit is due: we pay cash and so will you!" So long as Islam is perpetual war against Christians 9.29, you get no respect or tolerance from  those who are aware.



o9.13

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.

*If you do not believe me, buy a copy from Amazon and see for yourself.

Bukhari 4.53.386 pertinent part:

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."

o11.5

o11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

*If you do not believe me, buy a copy from Amazon and see for yourself.


#KillThemWhereverYouFindThem9.5
#fightthoseWhoUntil9.29
#FightTheDisbelieversNearestYou
#IWillCastTerror8.12
#AllahCastTerror33.26
#IHaveBeenMadeVictoriousBukhari4.52.220
#InfidelsMayBeAttackedWithoutProvocationHedaya2.141
#JizyaIsAPunishmentForDisbeliefHedaya2.212
#DisbeliefToBeRemovedFromTheWorldByDeathOrIslamHedaya2.216

Monday, December 05, 2016

Uncle Vladdie Ventilates The Stink Of Jimmy Farter's Two State Solution!

Unk'sa Cmnt On Jimmy Farters Dishonest Proposal

Uncle Vladdi attempted to post this as a comment on: Venting The Stink Of Jimmy Farter: Two State Solution!  Unfortunately, Blogger did not allow it, probably because of its length. I therefore post it here for the merit of its historical citations which amplify the falsity of the Falestinian Narrative. Unk. has included a link to his own blog at the end of the cmnt., 
"Concisely and accurately stated, as usual, Dajjal!

"Palestinians?!" WHAT "palestinians?"!

Where were the Palestinians?

In the New Testament, Paul notes that Gaza was completely devoid of life, containing "not even a solitary Bedouin."

And here's a more recent timeline - from the last 300 years or so - to confirm:

In 1695-1696, the Dutch scholar and cartographer, Adriaan Reland, (Hadriani Relandi) wrote: The names of settlements were mostly Hebrew, some Greek, and some Latin-Roman. No settlement had an original Muslim-Arab name with a historical root in its location. Most of the land was empty, desolate, and the inhabitants few in number and mostly concentrated in Jerusalem, Acco, Tzfat, Jaffa, Tiberius and Gaza. Most of the inhabitants were Jews and the rest Christians.

In Jerusalem there were approximately 5000 people, mostly Jews and some Christians. In Nazareth "Outside the city of Jerusalem, we saw no living object, heard no living sound ... a complete eternal silence reigns in the town, in the highways, in the country."

In 1844, William Thackeray writes about the road from Jaffa to Jerusalem: "Now the district is quite deserted."

In 1857, the British consul in Palestine, James Finn, reported: "The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is that of a body of population."

In 1866, W.M. Thomson writes: "How melancholy is this utter desolation. Not a house, not a trace of inhabitants, not even shepherds, to relieve the dull monotony ... Much of the country through which we have been rambling for a week appears never to have been inhabited, or even cultivated; and there are other parts, you say, still more barren."

In 1867, Charles Wyllys Elliott, president of Harvard University, wrote: "A beautiful sea lies unbosomed among the Galilean hills, in the midst of that land once possessed by Zebulon and Naphtali, Asher and Dan ... Life here was once idyllic, charming ... It was a world of ease, simplicity, and beauty; now it is a scene of desolation and misery."

In 1867, Mark Twain toured the Holy Land. This is how he described the land: "There is not a solitary village throughout its whole extent - not for thirty miles in either direction. There are two or three small clusters of Bedouin tents, but not a single permanent habitation. One may ride ten miles, hereabouts, and not see ten human beings. ... We had left Capernaum behind us. It was only a shapeless ruin. These unpeopled deserts, these rusty mounds of barrenness ... A desolate country whose soil is rich enough but is given over wholly to weeds. A silent, mournful expanse... the country is infested with fierce Bedouins, whose sole happiness it is, in this life, to cut and stab and mangle and murder unoffending Christians."


Muslims don't believe in nation-state countries, they see them all as man-made, false idols. This is why these countries hadn't existed under the Arab caliphates, nor under the Turkish sultanates, for over 1,000 years.

<b>EVEN WHEN THE MUSLIMS RULED THE AREA, THEY NEVER BOTHERED TO RE-NAME IT TO "PALESTINE!" EVER!!!</b>

Originally, under the Greeks & Roman Christians, the countries in question were Libya, Syria, and Egypt (modern Jordan was part of Syria) and there was NEVER any separate "Palestine" nor "palestinian people" - EVER!


In fact, even the Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat, as well as all the kings of Arabia, have stated in public to the media that there never were, still aren't and never will be any "palestinian people!"

PLO Leader: The Palestinian People Does NOT Exist - March 31, 1977, Dutch newspaper Trouw -

PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein: “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity.

In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese.

Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism."

...

Most recently:

“FATHI HAMMAD” admits Palestinians are an invented people and are really Arabs from other Arab countries. Hamas official reveals where Palestinians came from.

Hamas Minister of the Interior Fathi Hammad Slams Egypt over Fuel Shortage in Gaza Strip, and Says:

"Half of the Palestinians Are Egyptians and the Other Half Are Saudis"
Al-Hekma TV (Egypt) - March 23, 2012

...

Obama wants to keep JUDEA and HEBRON away from Jews & Hebrews..."strange!"


And, let's not forget to mention that the reason the Turks lost these places in the first place - and why the Arabs gained them - was that the Turks had sided with Germany in WWI (and later, in WWII too)... so it's not as if any of "us" just went in there to colonialize the places; after all, the Germans always attacked first, upsetting the status-quo.

The Arabs had helped the Brits to overthrow the Turks, and so were rewarded with certain newly-carved-out countries (NONE of which was "palestine")!

And when, in 1919, the Rothschilds arranged the Balfour agreement and legally bought the previous Land of Israel back from Jordan, ALL the Arab kings and potentates agreed to the sale, laughing up the sleeves of their robes at the thought of taking so much money for what had been up until then nothing more than a literal garbage-dump. It was only after the industrious Jews, freshly exiled from Europe with knowledge of Western irrigation practices, made the dump bloom into a desert oasis, that the Arabs suddenly wanted it back, broke their words and treaties, reneged on their deals, and attacked the tiny nation en masse. And were soundly defeated for their treachery, again and again.



(Much, much) MORE, here:

http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/2016/05/palestinians-what-palestinians.html

Friday, December 02, 2016

Venting The Stink Of Jimmy Farter: Two State Solution!!

Venting The Stink Of Jimmy Farter: Two State Solution!! The "spirit of Camp David' is an odiferous fart passed by Jimmy Carter when, much to the detriment of this nation and the world, he  'served' as President.  That fart is long over due for dissipation before the wind of truth.

    'Palestine' is Israel: a corruption of a name imposed by Rome as an insult to the Jews after a rebellion.  'Palestinians' are Jews. It's Falestine, Stupid! Arabs can not pronounce the P in 'Palestine'.  Its  Roman turd, not an Arabic word.  Falestinian People is a recent invention, dating from 1920 and popularized in the '70s.

    No state of Falestine ever existed. No such people ever existed, and never will if there is any morality in international affairs.

    Carter asked Obamination to recognize Falestine and support a Security Council resolution to destroy Israel.  Pretending that he wants  Jewsish & Falestianian states living side by side in peace and security, he  wants us to believe that Falestinians share those objectives.  They don't and while they are Muslims, they won't.
    Their tactical objective is a Falestinian state instead of Israel. Their strategic objective is regional and global conquest leading to the formation of a global caliphate, a theocracy not a democracy.  Rather than rewrite an old blog post, I have embeded it below for the benefit of the details it contains.  Read it and curse Islam, Falestine,  Falestinians, the United Nations and Jimmy Carter.   

Two State Solution Peace in a Pig's Anus! by Kab Ashraf on Scribd


Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Fox News: Ohio State University jihad attacker’s motives, a "mystery"

Fox News: Ohio State University jihad attacker’s “motive remains unclear”

As spoken to above, fools among us are mystified as to why this good Muslim young man did what he did.

Thus fools state, the motives of yesterday’s would-be OSU killer are unclear.  A mystery.

Indeed, as unclear, that is, as was the motive of the killer of "Asma’ bt. Marwan of the Banu Umayya b. Zayd, who was married to Yazid b. Zayd b. Hisn al-Khatmi.”

She “insulted the Prophet, vilified Islam and incited the people against the Prophet with poetry.”

Therefore, reads the narrative,  pressed by love for sunnah thus compelled by hatred for all who oppose sunnah, came blind at ‘Umayr b. ‘Adi:

….looking for her [Asma’ bt. Marwan] in the middle of the night, and entered her home. Her children were sleeping around her, and one suckled at her breast. He touched her with his hand, and discovering the suckling babe pushed it from her. He placed his sword upon her heart and pierced her until it came out from behind her. Then he returned to pray the dawn prayer with the Prophet in Medina.

Then, with that deadly deed done, in the eyes of the “Prophet of Islam” stood a Muslim deserving of praise, honor, and emulation.

As the alleged “Prophet of Islam” made clear, stating of the said blind dagger-thrusting killer of Asma’ bt. Marwan ,using the blind killers exemplary works as those the ummah should look to and emulate: “'If you desire to look at a man who secretly helped God and His Messenger, look at ‘Umayr b. ‘Adi.'”

And  ‘Umar b. al-Khattab said of at ‘Umayr b. ‘Adi , “ 'Look at this blind one who is relentless in his obedience to God.'” 

And “the Prophet” adding, “Do not say blind one, but rather, the one with vision!” (The narrative above as cited in al-Waqidi.)

Indeed, as was yesterday’s OSU would be killer--simply a practitioner of the precepts commanded in “The Book of Allah.” One who sees clearly that called for therein.  One “Relentless in his obedience to God.”

Yet far, far too many fools among us refuse to regard basic facts of Islam.

Therefore, there will be more to come. The bloodshed and loss will continue until the “ring-leaders” of those who oppose “Allah and His Messenger” are eliminated, and the same of the incorrigible of those swayed by them, and we capitulate to the demands of the Muslims.  Certify, across the board, we yield Islam its “due” tribute.



Monday, November 28, 2016

"The Sword of Allah" at Ohio State University

Jihad at Ohio State University: Man who attacked with knife and car “tentatively identified” as Somali Muslim


In the details delineated in the above article posted at Jihad Watch, once more, we see yet more reasons to thank heavens, here in our nation, we have in the face of Islam, fools and cowards of truth for leaders. Thus, leaders, willing to fight to insure the Muslim is free to practice his “religion” here in our nation.

Therefore, once more this morning, we “enjoy” the benefits of our willingness to have among us, Islamic Communities.

The “benefits” of thus having among us, those who love the alleged “Messenger of Allah,” thus those who love his sunna, thus those who give life to that sunnah. Just as did the lot of the “Noble Companions,” as spoken to below and elsewhere:

Knife Attacks

 Many people are often squeamish of the thought of plunging a sharp object into another person’s flesh. It is a discomfort caused by the untamed, inherent dislike for pain and death, especially after “modernization” distanced males from partaking in the slaughtering of livestock for food  and the striking of the enemy in war. However, any such squirms and discomforts are never an excuse for abandoning jihad, as the All-Knowing and Most Wise said, “Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it contains that which you dislike. But perhaps you dislike a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah knows, while you know not” (Al-Baqarah 216). In compliance with this and other verses on jihad, generations upon generations of mujahidin rose for the sake of Allah e and struck the necks of the kuffar with their swords, severing limbs and piercing the fleshy meat of those who opposed Islam. “So when you meet those who disbelieve, strike their necks, until, when you have overwhelmed them with killing …” (Muhammad 4).

(1 Instead of using the term “lone wolf,” we will refer to operations in Dar al-Kufr executed by mujahidin with bay’ah to the Khalifah as “just terror operations,” “just” being the adjective form for justice.)

 The knife was a weapon with which the Sahabah j were well acquainted. ‘Abdur-Razzaq as-San’ani reported in his musannaf that a dagger, a type of knife, was the weapon used by Muhammad Ibn Maslamah h in the assassination of the Jewish taghut Ka’b Ibn al-Ashraf, whom Allah’s Messenger g ordered be killed.

One might ask why knives are a good option for an attack. Knives, though certainly not the only weapon for inflicting harm upon the kuffar, are widely available in every land and 12 Exclusive 13 thus readily accessible. They are extremely easy to conceal and highly lethal, especially in the hands of someone who knows how to use them effectively. Also, due to their accessibility, were a person to conduct a campaign of knife attacks, he could dispose of his weapon after each use, finding no difficulty in acquiring another one.

When choosing a knife, one should focus firstly on sharpness. He should then consider the the strength of the blade and handle, and seek something reasonably sized for the job at hand. Also, it should not be too large, making it difficult to conceal, nor lacking a strong grip lest it be easily disarmed. Serrated or partially-serrated blades make for good combat knives.

 It is explicitly advised not to use kitchen knives, as their basic structure is not designed to handle the kind of vigorous application used for assassinations and slaughter.

Something important that one should consider before acquiring a knife is to avoid troublesome knives, those that can cause harm to the user because of poor manufacturing. There are certain features that should be avoided when acquiring a knife.

• If it lacks a guard, which is a protruding piece of metal or other material between the blade and the handle, the wielder may be harmed during the operation, as this guard is to prevent one’s hand from sliding forward onto the blade when plunging it into a victim.

• Folding knives that do not feature a stable locking system should be avoided, for if enough resistance is met on the blade, the folding knife can collapse, cutting the wielder’s own hand.

• Knives that have a “lockback” or spine lock, which is a locking system on the spine of the handle, are not a good option, for if the person holding the knife squeezes too hard on the handle, the pressure might release the locking system, causing the blade to collapse when plunged into a target.

 The most reliable knives are fixed blade knives, where the handle and blade are crafted from a single piece of metal. This is characteristically the strongest kind of knife, since the blade extends into the handle without any moving parts.

As for choosing a target, then this is just like hunting prey. When carrying out a knife operation, it is not advised to target very large gatherings or overly crowded areas, as this presents a disadvantage and only increases the likelihood of being prevented from achieving kills. Therefore, it is advised that when conducting an operation by oneself, the target should be a smaller crowd, particularly for the one strong in build or skillful in using a knife, as such attacks are proven to inflict terror. Alternatively, for one pursuing a prolonged campaign of terror, he may target lone victims. For example, the target could be a drunken kafir on a quiet road returning home from a night out, or the average kafir working his night shift, or someone walking alone in a public park or rural forested area, or someone by himself in an alley close to a night club or another place of debauchery, or even someone out for a walk in a quiet neighborhood. One should consider canals, riversides, and beaches. It may also help to carry a baton or some other kind of concealable blunt object, such as a baseball bat, to strike the victim’s head with, thereby immobilizing him before cutting his throat or stabbing him in other lethal areas to finish him off.

 Regarding where on the body the victim should be struck, then the objective here is to kill – so the strikes should be aimed at major organs, i.e. the heart, lungs, or main arteries, which run from head to toe along the inner parts of the body. These include the inner thigh, the groin area, and under the armpits, then extending up the neck. The windpipe can be cut easily by slicing the throat, which is in direct implementation of Allah’s c command, “So when you meet those who disbelieve, strike their necks” (Muhammad 4). Due to the hardness of the skull, it is not advised to stab the head. This can risk breaking the knife or causing the blade to become stuck in the skull, thereby making it difficult to extract the weapon.

Additionally, it should be stressed that the objective of a knife attack is to attain a reasonable kill count, while equally – if not more importantly – to inflict terror on the Crusader citizens of the land in which the operation is carried out. On this basis, the more gruesome the attack, the closer one comes to achieving the desired objective. Nevertheless, it is advised to not necessarily attempt to fully detach the head, as the absence of technique can cause a person to spend a long time attempting to do so, that is, unless the individual’s circumstances and capabilities allow for such. Simply cutting the throat, just as one would slaughter a sheep, is sufficient.

When attacking a victim wearing leather, jeans, or similarly tough material, then one should avoid striking the clothed areas. Instead, he should try to strike the exposed skin of the neck, etc. However, if very necessary, a strike with enough force should clear the clothing and penetrate the skin.

The psyche of most living creatures, when they perceive a threat, is explained in the concept of “fight or flight.” This practically means that once the assault is initiated, though the target may be injured, he may still attempt to resist. A swift slice across the face should quickly subdue them, as very few people will continue to fight once the smell, feel, and sight of blood becomes apparent. If the target is alone, the aim should be to incapacitate him as quickly and as silently as possible. This should be followed up with slitting his throat.

Lest the operation be mistaken for one of the many random acts of violence that plague the West, it is essential to leave some kind of evidence or insignia identifying the motive and allegiance to the Khalifah, even if it is something as simple as a note pinned or attached to the victim’s body, or a final testament if the operation will be of a nature where the expected outcome is one’s shahadah.

The overall objective of any just terror operation is to bring horror and misery to the enemies of Allah f, and to remind them that their efforts to wage war against Islam and the Muslims will only lead to more and more mujahidin appearing in their very midst, ready to strike them mercilessly on their own soil. So, “Let them find harshness in you” (At-Tawbah 123). And remember that Allah’s Messenger g said, “Never shall the kafir and his killer be united in the Fire” (Reported by Muslim from Abu Hurayrah).

(Rumiyah, 2nd Issue, PP.  12,13.)


And from Issue One of the same, these excerpts:


“The Islam which is the religion of Allah
and for which He revealed His books and sent His messengers
… is that the slave surrenders to Allah….” (Page 5)

Thus, a person cannot be a Muslim except by adhering
to Islam….” (Ibid.)

Furthermore, Allah has clarified … in His book … His command to fight the mushrikin.
 (Ibid.)

“The Sahabah had consensus that there is no Islam
without submission….” (Ibid)

Allah said, “And when the sacred months have passed,
then kill the mushrikin wherever you find them and capture
them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at
every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish
prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed,
Allah is Forgiving and Merciful” (At-Tawbah 5). He
also said, “But if they repent, establish prayer, and give
zakah, then they are your brothers in religion; and We detail
the verses for a people who know” (At-Tawbah 11).
He also said, “Fight them until there is no fitnah and
the religion is for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to
be no aggression except against the oppressors” (Al-Baqarah
193). He also said, “And fight them until there is
no fitnah and the religion is completely for Allah. And if
they cease - then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do”
(Al-Anfal 39). He also said, “Those who believe fight
in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in
the cause of taghut. So fight against the allies of Shaytan.
Indeed, the plot of Shaytan has ever been weak” (An-Nisa
76). He also said, “Fight those who do not believe in
Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful
what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful
and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those
who were given the Book - [fight] until they give the jizyah
willingly while they are humiliated” (At-Tawbah 29).

And the Prophet commanded to fight the people until
they adhere to the manifest pillars of Islam. (Ibid, P. 7.)

………………..

He also said, “I have been commanded
to fight the people until they testify that there is no god
but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger, and
they establish the prayer and give the zakah. If they do
so, they have protected their blood and their wealth from
me, except by its right, and their reckoning is upon Allah”
(Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim from Ibn ‘Umar). (Ibid.)

………………………………

And the obligation is that the Muslims fight the
mushrikin under a single banner….

…………………………………

Allah did not only command the
“fighting” of disbelievers, as if to say He only wants us to
conduct frontline operations against them. Rather, He has
also ordered that they be slain wherever they may be – on or
off the battlefield. He said, “So when the sacred months
have passed, then kill the mushrikin wherever you find
them and take them, surround them, and wait for them at
every outpost” (At-Tawbah 5). All of this becomes all the
more apparent for those who have realized that the blood of
a kafir is cheap, filthy, and permissible to shed.

Islam is the religion of sound principles providing the
perfect foundations upon which the solid structures of
justice and glory are built. One of these great principles is
that all people must be fought until they accept Islam or
come under a shar’i covenant. This principle establishes the
prohibition of shedding Muslim and covenant-bound kafir
blood as well as the permissibility of shedding the blood of
all other kuffar. The Prophet said, “I have been ordered
to fight mankind until they say that there is no god except
Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah, and they establish
the prayer and pay the zakah. Whoever does so, then
his blood and wealth are safe from me except for a lawful
reason” (Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim from Ibn
‘Umar), and he said, addressing the Muslims, “For verily
your blood, wealth, and honor are haram to each other”
(Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim from Abu Bakrah).
And regarding the dhimmi – the one who has a covenant
with the Muslims –the Prophet said, “Whoever kills a
person of covenant shall not smell the fragrance of Jannah,
which can be found for a distance of forty years” (Reported
by al-Bukhari and Muslim from ‘Abdullah Ibn ‘Amr). These
narrations offer an explanation of the ayah, “And do not
kill a soul which Allah has forbidden except for a lawful
reason” (Al-An’am 151), about which at-Tabari said, “The
soul which Allah has forbidden is the soul of a believer or
a person of covenant, and His saying, ‘except for a lawful
reason,’ means that which permits such a soul to be killed,
as in capital punishment for murder, or stoning an adulterer
to death, or killing someone for apostasy.”

As for all others – meaning all disbelievers who have no
covenant – then their blood has not been given the sanctity
of prohibition, but remains under the command to fight
mankind, so their blood remains halal. Shedding the blood
of a non-dhimmi kafir is not sinful, but is rather rewarded
with Jannah. Allah’s Messenger said, “A kafir and his
killer will never be gathered together in the Fire” (Reported
by Muslim from Abu Hurayrah). Furthermore, his words,
“I have been ordered to fight mankind,” leave no room for
debate, as mankind includes every person in the world, and
the only ones excluded from this order to fight are those
who submit or surrender to the rule of Islam, as was previously
mentioned. (Ibid, P 35.)

…………………………..

Ibn Qudamah mentioned the harbi (the kafir who is not
under a covenant) and said, “Shedding his blood is permissible
without exception, just like swine” (Al-Mughni).
He also said, “The kuffar asliyyin [those kuffar who are not
murtaddin] shall have no protection in their own lands”
(Al-Mughni).

Ibn Rushd said, “And the principle is that what makes
wealth permissible to take is kufr, and that which protects
it is Islam, just as the Prophet said, ‘Then if they said
that, they have protected their blood and their wealth from
me’” (Bidayat al-Mujtahid). While specifically mentioning
wealth, his words clearly point to the permissibility of
bloodshed as is also in the evidence he quoted.

Al-Qurtubi, said, “If a Muslim meets a kafir who has no
covenant, it is permissible for him to kill him.”
Abu Hanifah said, regarding a kafir who is killed, “There
is no retaliation (against the killer) and the diyah (blood
money) is not to be paid, because the blood of the kafir is
permissible (to shed) unless it is established that he has a
covenant or is under dhimmah” (Al-Hawi al-Kabir). Likewise,
the famous Hanafi scholar al-Kashani said, “The principle
is that it is permissible to kill anyone from amongst
the people who are at war (with the Muslims), whether they
fight or do not fight. But it is not permissible to kill anyone
who is not from the people who are at war [meaning those
with a valid covenant], unless they fight or offer strategic
support, obedience, instigation, or otherwise. (Ibid, P. 36.)

………………………………

None of this should be surprising to any Muslim who has
studied his religion, as this matter of a kafir’s blood being
halal to shed is something upon which scholars have recorded
consensus. At-Tabari said, “They [the scholars of Islam]
have agreed that even if a mushrik were to wear the bark of
all the trees of the Haram [in Makkah] around his neck and
on his arms, that would not grant him safety from being
killed unless the Muslims gave him a covenant of dhimmah
or security.” (Ibid.)


Indeed, “None of this should be surprising to any Muslim who has
studied his religion,” nor should it be to any non-Muslim who has studied or studies the “religion” of Islam.

Back to the words of the scholars and scribes Of Islamic State, representatives of Muhammad’s Allah’s Ummah:


Muslims currently living in Dar al-Kufr must be reminded
that the blood of the disbelievers is halal, and killing
them is a form of worship to Allah, the Lord, King, and
God of mankind. This includes the businessman riding to
work in a taxicab, the young adults (post-pubescent “children”)
engaged in sports activities in the park, and the old
man waiting in line to buy a sandwich. Indeed, even the
blood of the kafir street vendor selling flowers to those passing
by is halal to shed – and striking terror into the hearts
of all disbelievers is a Muslim’s duty. There is no shar’i requirement
to target soldiers and policemen nor judges and
politicians, but all kuffar who are not under the covenant
of dhimmah are fair game. How can the disbelievers ever
dream of safety and security while Muslims suffer anywhere
in the world and while the rule of Allah is mockingly replaced
by manmade monstrosities of democracy? (Ibid.)


Yes, indeed, once more I press, it is paramount that we fight for the freedom of the Muslim to practice his religion here in our nation. And in doing so, it is certain, we will reap the rich harvest of our efforts thereto.