Thursday, September 22, 2016

Obamination: Spews Final UN Lies

Obamination: Spews Final UN Lies If the Almighty wanted to give the world an enema, he'd stick the tube in Obamination's lie hole. For the 8th time, Obamination spewed his lies to the UN General Assembly. I reproduce the transcript with my comments, linked to superscripts, following. Click a superscript to read a comment, then press Back Space to return to your place in the spew.


The United Nations
New York, New York 

10:29 A.M. EDT

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Mr. President; Mr. Secretary General; fellow delegates; ladies and gentlemen:  As I address this hall as President for the final time, let me recount the progress that we’ve made these last eight years.

From the depths of the greatest financial crisis of our time, we coordinated our response to avoid further catastrophe and return the global economy to growth.  We’ve taken away terrorist safe havens 1, strengthened the nonproliferation regime, resolved the Iranian nuclear issue 2 through diplomacy.  We opened relations with Cuba, helped Colombia end Latin America’s longest war, and we welcome a democratically elected leader of Myanmar to this Assembly.  Our assistance is helping people feed themselves, care for the sick, power communities across Africa, and promote models of development rather than dependence.  And we have made international institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund more representative, while establishing a framework to protect our planet from the ravages of climate change.3

This is important work.  It has made a real difference in the lives of our people.  And it could not have happened had we not worked together.  And yet, around the globe we are seeing the same forces of global integration that have made us interdependent also expose deep fault lines in the existing international order. 

We see it in the headlines every day.  Around the world, refugees flow across borders in flight from brutal conflict.  Financial disruptions continue to weigh upon our workers and entire communities.  Across vast swaths of the Middle East, basic security, basic order has broken down.  We see too many governments muzzling journalists, and quashing dissent, and censoring the flow of information.  Terrorist networks 4 use social media to prey upon the minds of our youth, endangering open societies and spurring anger against innocent immigrants and Muslims.  Powerful nations contest the constraints placed on them by international law.

This is the paradox that defines our world today.  A quarter century after the end of the Cold War, the world is by many measures less violent and more prosperous than ever before, and yet our societies are filled with uncertainty, and unease, and strife.  Despite enormous progress, as people lose trust in institutions 5, governing becomes more difficult and tensions between nations become more quick to surface.

And so I believe that at this moment we all face a choice. We can choose to press forward with a better model of cooperation and integration.6  Or we can retreat into a world sharply divided, and ultimately in conflict, along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion.

I want to suggest to you today that we must go forward, and not backward.  I believe that as imperfect as they are, the principles of open markets and accountable governance, of democracy and human rights and international law that we have forged remain the firmest foundation for human progress in this century.  I make this argument not based on theory or ideology, but on facts -- facts that all too often, we forget in the immediacy of current events. 

Here’s the most important fact:  The integration of our global economy has made life better for billions of men, women and children.  Over the last 25 years, the number of people living in extreme poverty has been cut from nearly 40 percent of humanity to under 10 percent.  That's unprecedented.  And it's not an abstraction.  It means children have enough to eat; mothers don’t die in childbirth. 

Meanwhile, cracking the genetic code promises to cure diseases that have plagued us for centuries.  The Internet can deliver the entirety of human knowledge to a young girl in a remote village on a single hand-held device.  In medicine and in manufacturing, in education and communications, we’re experiencing a transformation of how human beings live on a scale that recalls the revolutions in agriculture and industry.  And as a result, a person born today is more likely to be healthy, to live longer, and to have access to opportunity than at any time in human history. 

Moreover, the collapse of colonialism and communism has allowed more people than ever before to live with the freedom to choose their leaders.  Despite the real and troubling areas where freedom appears in retreat, the fact remains that the number of democracies around the world has nearly doubled in the last 25 years. 

In remote corners of the world, citizens are demanding respect for the dignity of all people no matter their gender, or race, or religion, or disability, or sexual orientation, and those who deny others dignity are subject to public reproach.  An explosion of social media has given ordinary people more ways to express themselves, and has raised people’s expectations for those of us in power.  Indeed, our international order has been so successful that we take it as a given that great powers no longer fight world wars; that the end of the Cold War lifted the shadow of nuclear Armageddon;7 that the battlefields of Europe have been replaced by peaceful union; that China and India remain on a path of remarkable growth.

I say all this not to whitewash the challenges we face, or to suggest complacency.  Rather, I believe that we need to acknowledge these achievements in order to summon the confidence to carry this progress forward and to make sure that we do not abandon those very things that have delivered this progress.

In order to move forward, though, we do have to acknowledge that the existing path to global integration requires a course correction.  As too often, those trumpeting the benefits of globalization have ignored inequality within and among nations; have ignored the enduring appeal of ethnic and sectarian identities; have left international institutions ill-equipped, underfunded, under-resourced, in order to handle transnational challenges.

And as these real problems have been neglected, alternative visions of the world have pressed forward both in the wealthiest countries and in the poorest:  Religious fundamentalism; the politics of ethnicity, or tribe, or sect; aggressive nationalism; a crude populism -- sometimes from the far left, but more often from the far right -- which seeks to restore what they believe was a better, simpler age free of outside contamination.

We cannot dismiss these visions.  They are powerful.  They reflect dissatisfaction among too many of our citizens.  I do not believe those visions can deliver security or prosperity over the long term, but I do believe that these visions fail to recognize, at a very basic level, our common humanity.  Moreover, I believe that the acceleration of travel and technology and telecommunications -- together with a global economy that depends on a global supply chain -- makes it self-defeating ultimately for those who seek to reverse this progress.  Today, a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself.

So the answer cannot be a simple rejection of global integration.  Instead, we must work together to make sure the benefits of such integration are broadly shared, and that the disruptions -- economic, political, and cultural -- that are caused by integration are squarely addressed.  This is not the place for a detailed policy blueprint, but let me offer in broad strokes those areas where I believe we must do better together.

It starts with making the global economy work better for all people 8 and not just for those at the top.  While open markets, capitalism have raised standards of living around the globe, globalization combined with rapid progress and technology has also weakened the position of workers and their ability to secure a decent wage.  In advanced economies like my own, unions have been undermined, and many manufacturing jobs have disappeared.  Often, those who benefit most from globalization have used their political power to further undermine the position of workers. 

In developing countries, labor organizations have often been suppressed, and the growth of the middle class has been held back by corruption and underinvestment.  Mercantilist policies pursued by governments with export-driven models threaten to undermine the consensus that underpins global trade.  And meanwhile, global capital is too often unaccountable -- nearly $8 trillion stashed away in tax havens, a shadow banking system that grows beyond the reach of effective oversight.

A world in which one percent of humanity controls as much wealth as the other 99 percent will never be stable.  I understand that the gaps between rich and poor are not new, but just as the child in a slum today can see the skyscraper nearby, technology now allows any person with a smartphone to see how the most privileged among us live and the contrast between their own lives and others.  Expectations rise, then, faster than governments can deliver 9, and a pervasive sense of injustice undermine people’s faith in the system.

So how do we fix this imbalance?  We cannot unwind integration any more than we can stuff technology back into a box.  Nor can we look to failed models of the past.  If we start resorting to trade wars, market distorting subsidies, beggar thy neighbor policies, an overreliance on natural resources instead of innovation -- these approaches will make us poorer, collectively, and they are more like to lead to conflict.  And the stark contrast between, say, the success of the Republic of Korea and the wasteland of North Korea shows that central, planned control of the economy is a dead end.

But I do believe there’s another path -- one that fuels growth and innovation, and offers the clearest route to individual opportunity and national success.  It does not require succumbing to a soulless capitalism that benefits only the few, but rather recognizes that economies are more successful when we close the gap between rich and poor, and growth is broadly based. And that means respecting the rights of workers so they can organize into independent unions and earn a living wage.  It means investing in our people -- their skills, their education, their capacity to take an idea and turn it into a business.  It means strengthening the safety net that protects our people from hardship and allows them to take more risks -- to look for a new job, or start a new venture.

These are the policies that I’ve pursued here in the United States, and with clear results.  American businesses have created now 15 million new jobs.  After the recession, the top one percent of Americans were capturing more than 90 percent of income growth.  But today, that's down to about half.  Last year, poverty in this country fell at the fastest rate in nearly 50 years.  And with further investment in infrastructure and early childhood education and basic research, I’m confident that such progress will continue. 

So just as I’ve pursued these measures here at home, so has the United States worked with many nations to curb the excesses of capitalism -- not to punish wealth, but to prevent repeated crises that can destroy it.  That’s why we’ve worked with other nations to create higher and clearer standards for banking and taxation -- because a society that asks less of oligarchs than ordinary citizens will rot from within.  That’s why we’ve pushed for transparency and cooperation in rooting out corruption, and tracking illicit dollars, because markets create more jobs when they're fueled by hard work, and not the capacity to extort a bribe.  That’s why we’ve worked to reach trade agreements that raise labor standards and raise environmental standards, as we've done with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, so that the benefits are more broadly shared.

And just as we benefit by combatting inequality within our countries, I believe advanced economies still need to do more to close the gap between rich and poor nations around the globe.  This is difficult politically.  It's difficult to spend on foreign assistance.  But I do not believe this is charity.  For the small fraction of what we spent at war in Iraq we could support institutions10 so that fragile states don’t collapse in the first place, and invest in emerging economies that become markets for our goods.  It's not just the right thing to do, it's the smart thing to do.

And that’s why we need to follow through on our efforts to combat climate change.  If we don't act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations, and cities submerged and nations displaced, and food supplies decimated, and conflicts born of despair.  The Paris Agreement gives us a framework to act, but only if we scale up our ambition.  And there must be a sense of urgency about bringing the agreement into force, and helping poorer countries leapfrog destructive forms of energy. 

So, for the wealthiest countries, a Green Climate Fund should only be the beginning.  We need to invest in research and provide market incentives to develop new technologies, and then make these technologies accessible and affordable for poorer countries.  And only then can we continue lifting all people up from poverty without condemning our children to a planet beyond their capacity to repair.

So we need new models for the global marketplace, models that are inclusive and sustainable.  And in the same way, we need models of governance that are inclusive and accountable to ordinary people.

I recognize not every country in this hall is going to follow the same model of governance.  I do not think that America can -- or should -- impose our system of government on other countries.  But there appears to be growing contest between authoritarianism and liberalism right now.  And I want everybody to understand, I am not neutral in that contest.  I believe in a liberal political order -- an order built not just through elections and representative government, but also through respect for human rights and civil society, and independent judiciaries and the rule of law.

I know that some countries, which now recognize the power of free markets, still reject the model of free societies.  And perhaps those of us who have been promoting democracy feel somewhat discouraged since the end of the Cold War, because we've learned that liberal democracy will not just wash across the globe in a single wave.  It turns out building accountable institutions is hard work -- the work of generations.  The gains are often fragile.  Sometimes we take one step forward and then two steps back.  In countries held together by borders drawn by colonial powers, with ethnic enclaves and tribal divisions, politics and elections can sometimes appear to be a zero-sum game.  And so, given the difficulty in forging true democracy in the face of these pressures, it’s no surprise that some argue the future favors the strongman, a top-down model, rather than strong, democratic institutions.

But I believe this thinking is wrong.  I believe the road of true democracy remains the better path.  I believe that in the 21st century, economies can only grow to a certain point until they need to open up -- because entrepreneurs need to access information in order to invent; young people need a global education in order to thrive; independent media needs to check the abuses of power.  Without this evolution, ultimately expectations of people will not be met; suppression and stagnation will set in.  And history shows that strongmen are then left with two paths -- permanent crackdown, which sparks strife at home, or scapegoating enemies abroad, which can lead to war. 

Now, I will admit, my belief that governments serve the individual, and not the other way around, is shaped by America’s story.  Our nation began with a promise of freedom that applied only to the few.  But because of our democratic Constitution, because of our Bill of Rights, because of our ideals, ordinary people were able to organize, and march, and protest, and ultimately, those ideals won out -- opened doors for women and minorities and workers in ways that made our economy more productive and turned our diversity into a strength; that gave innovators the chance to transform every area of human endeavor; that made it possible for someone like me to be elected President of the United States.

So, yes, my views are shaped by the specific experiences of America, but I do not think this story is unique to America.  Look at the transformation that's taken place in countries as different as Japan and Chile, Indonesia, Botswana.  The countries that have succeeded are ones in which people feel they have a stake. 

In Europe, the progress of those countries in the former Soviet bloc that embraced democracy stand in clear contrast to those that did not.  After all, the people of Ukraine did not take to the streets because of some plot imposed from abroad.  They took to the streets because their leadership was for sale and they had no recourse.  They demanded change because they saw life get better for people in the Baltics and in Poland, societies that were more liberal, and democratic, and open than their own.

So those of us who believe in democracy, we need to speak out forcefully, because both the facts and history, I believe, are on our side.  That doesn’t mean democracies are without flaws.  It does mean that the cure for what ails our democracies is greater engagement by our citizens -- not less. 

Yes, in America, there is too much money in politics 11; too much entrenched partisanship; too little participation by citizens, in part because of a patchwork of laws that makes it harder to vote.  In Europe, a well-intentioned Brussels often became too isolated from the normal push and pull of national politics.  Too often, in capitals, decision-makers have forgotten that democracy needs to be driven by civic engagement from the bottom up, not governance by experts from the top down.  And so these are real problems, and as leaders of democratic governments make the case for democracy abroad, we better strive harder to set a better example at home.

Moreover, every country will organize its government informed by centuries of history, and the circumstances of geography, and the deeply held beliefs of its people.  So I recognize a traditional society may value unity and cohesion more than a diverse country like my own, which was founded upon what, at the time, was a radical idea -- the idea of the liberty of individual human beings endowed with certain God-given rights.  But that does not mean that ordinary people in Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East somehow prefer arbitrary rule 12that denies them a voice in the decisions that can shape their lives.  I believe that spirit is universal.  And if any of you doubt the universality of that desire, listen to the voices of young people everywhere who call out for freedom, and dignity, and the opportunity to control their own lives.  

This leads me to the third thing we need to do:  We must reject any forms of fundamentalism, or racism, or a belief in ethnic superiority 13 that makes our traditional identities irreconcilable with modernity.  Instead we need to embrace the tolerance that results from respect of all human beings.

It’s a truism that global integration has led to a collision of cultures; trade, migration, the Internet, all these things can challenge and unsettle our most cherished identities.  We see liberal societies express opposition when women choose to cover themselves.  We see protests responding to Western newspaper cartoons that caricature the Prophet Muhammad.  In a world that left the age of empire behind, we see Russia attempting to recover lost glory through force.  Asian powers debate competing claims of history.  And in Europe and the United States, you see people wrestle with concerns about immigration and changing demographics, and suggesting that somehow people who look different are corrupting the character of our countries.

Now, there’s no easy answer for resolving all these social forces, and we must respect the meaning that people draw from their own traditions -- from their religion, from their ethnicity, from their sense of nationhood.  But I do not believe progress is possible if our desire to preserve our identities gives way to an impulse to dehumanize or dominate another group. If our religion leads us to persecute those of another faith14, if we jail or beat people who are gay, if our traditions lead us to prevent girls from going to school, if we discriminate on the basis of race or tribe or ethnicity, then the fragile bonds of civilization will fray.  The world is too small, we are too packed together, for us to be able to resort to those old ways of thinking.

We see this mindset in too many parts of the Middle East.  There, so much of the collapse in order has been fueled because leaders sought legitimacy not because of policies or programs but by resorting to persecuting political opposition, or demonizing other religious sects, by narrowing the public space to the mosque, where in too many places perversions of a great faith15 were tolerated.  These forces built up for years, and are now at work helping to fuel both Syria’s tragic civil war and the mindless, medieval menace of ISIL.

The mindset of sectarianism, and extremism, and bloodletting, and retribution that has been taking place will not be quickly reversed.  And if we are honest, we understand that no external power is going to be able to force different religious communities or ethnic communities to co-exist for long.  But I do believe we have to be honest about the nature of these conflicts,16 and our international community must continue to work with those who seek to build rather than to destroy. 

And there is a military component to that.  It means being united and relentless in destroying networks like ISIL, which show no respect for human life.  But it also means that in a place like Syria, where there’s no ultimate military victory to be won, we’re going to have to pursue the hard work of diplomacy that aims to stop the violence, and deliver aid to those in need, and support those who pursue a political settlement and can see those who are not like themselves as worthy of dignity and respect. 

Across the region’s conflicts, we have to insist that all parties recognize a common humanity and that nations end proxy wars that fuel disorder.  Because until basic questions are answered about how communities co-exist17, the embers of extremism will continue to burn, countless human beings will suffer -- most of all in that region -- but extremism will continue to be exported overseas.  And the world is too small for us to simply be able to build a wall and prevent it from affecting our own societies.

And what is true in the Middle East is true for all of us.  Surely, religious traditions can be honored and upheld while teaching young people science and math, rather than intolerance. Surely, we can sustain our unique traditions while giving women their full and rightful role in the politics and economics of a nation.  Surely, we can rally our nations to solidarity while recognizing equal treatment for all communities -- whether it’s a religious minority in Myanmar, or an ethnic minority in Burundi, or a racial minority right here in the United States.  And surely, Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel, but Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land18 .  We all have to do better as leaders in tamping down, rather than encouraging, a notion of identity that leads us to diminish others.

And this leads me to the fourth and final thing we need to do, and that is sustain our commitment to international cooperation rooted in the rights and responsibilities of nations. 

As President of the United States, I know that for most of human history, power has not been unipolar.  The end of the Cold War may have led too many to forget this truth.  I’ve noticed as President that at times, both America’s adversaries and some of our allies believe that all problems were either caused by Washington or could be solved by Washington -- and perhaps too many in Washington believed that as well.  (Laughter.)  But I believe America has been a rare superpower in human history insofar as it has been willing to think beyond narrow self-interest; that while we’ve made our share of mistakes over these last 25 years -- and I’ve acknowledged some -- we have strived, sometimes at great sacrifice, to align better our actions with our ideals.  And as a consequence, I believe we have been a force for good. 

We have secured allies.  We’ve acted to protect the vulnerable.  We supported human rights and welcomed scrutiny of our own actions.  We’ve bound our power to international laws and institutions.  When we've made mistakes, we've tried to acknowledge them.  We have worked to roll back poverty and hunger and disease beyond our borders, not just within our borders. 

I'm proud of that.  But I also know that we can't do this alone.  And I believe that if we're to meet the challenges of this century, we are all going to have to do more to build up international capacity.  We cannot escape the prospect of nuclear war unless we all commit to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and pursuing a world without them. 

When Iran agrees to accept constraints on its nuclear program that enhances global security and enhances Iran's ability to work with other nations.  On the other hand, when North Korea tests a bomb that endangers all of us.  And any country that breaks this basic bargain must face consequences.  And those nations with these weapons, like the United States, have a unique responsibility to pursue the path of reducing our stockpiles, and reaffirming basic norms like the commitment to never test them again.

We can't combat a disease like Zika that recognizes no borders -- mosquitos don't respect walls -- unless we make permanent the same urgency that we brought to bear against Ebola -- by strengthening our own systems of public health, by investing in cures and rolling back the root causes of disease, and helping poorer countries develop a public health infrastructure.  

We can only eliminate extreme poverty if the sustainable development goals that we have set are more than words on paper. Human ingenuity now gives us the capacity to feed the hungry and give all of our children -- including our girls -- the education that is the foundation for opportunity in our world.  But we have to put our money where our mouths are.  

And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding -- to replace the ravages of war with cooperation -- if powerful nations like my own accept constraints.  Sometimes I'm criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions.  But I am convinced that in the long run, giving up some freedom19 of action -- not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests, but binding ourselves to international rules over the long term -- enhances our security.  And I think that's not just true for us. 

If Russia continues to interfere in the affairs of its neighbors, it may be popular at home, it may fuel nationalist fervor for a time, but over time it is also going to diminish its stature and make its borders less secure.  In the South China Sea, a peaceful resolution of disputes offered by law will mean far greater stability than the militarization of a few rocks and reefs.

We are all stakeholders in this international system, and it calls upon all of us to invest in the success of institutions to which we belong.  And the good news is, is that many nations have shown what kind of progress is possible when we make those commitments.  Consider what we’ve accomplished here over the past few years. 

Together, we mobilized some 50,000 additional troops for U.N. peacekeeping, making them nimble, better equipped, better prepared to deal with emergencies.  Together, we established an Open Government Partnership so that, increasingly, transparency empowers more and more people around the globe.  And together, now, we have to open our hearts and do more to help refugees who are desperate for a home.

We should all welcome the pledges of increased assistance that have been made at this General Assembly gathering.  I'll be discussing that more this afternoon.  But we have to follow through, even when the politics are hard.  Because in the eyes of innocent men and women and children who, through no fault of their own, have had to flee everything that they know, everything that they love, we have to have the empathy to see ourselves.  We have to imagine what it would be like for our family, for our children, if the unspeakable happened to us.  And we should all understand that, ultimately, our world will be more secure if we are prepared to help those in need and the nations who are carrying the largest burden with respect to accommodating these refugees.

There are a lot of nations right now that are doing the right thing.  But many nations -- particularly those blessed with wealth and the benefits of geography -- that can do more to offer a hand, even if they also insist that refugees who come to our countries have to do more to adapt to the customs and conventions of the communities that are now providing them a home.

Let me conclude by saying that I recognize history tells a different story than the one that I've talked about here today.  There's a much darker and more cynical view of history that we can adopt.  Human beings are too often motivated by greed and by power.  Big countries for most of history have pushed smaller ones around.  Tribes and ethnic groups and nation states have very often found it most convenient to define themselves by what they hate and not just those ideas that bind them together. 

Time and again, human beings have believed that they finally arrived at a period of enlightenment only to repeat, then, cycles of conflict and suffering.  Perhaps that's our fate.  We have to remember that the choices of individual human beings led to repeated world war.  But we also have to remember that the choices of individual human beings created a United Nations, so that a war like that would never happen again.  Each of us as leaders, each nation can choose to reject those who appeal to our worst impulses and embrace those who appeal to our best.  For we have shown that we can choose a better history.

Sitting in a prison cell, a young Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote that, “Human progress never rolls on the wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God.”  And during the course of these eight years, as I've traveled to many of your nations, I have seen that spirit in our young people, who are more educated and more tolerant, and more inclusive and more diverse, and more creative than our generation; who are more empathetic and compassionate towards their fellow human beings than previous generations.  And, yes, some of that comes with the idealism of youth.  But it also comes with young people’s access to information about other peoples and places -- an understanding unique in human history that their future is bound with the fates of other human beings on the other side of the world.

I think of the thousands of health care workers from around the world who volunteered to fight Ebola.  I remember the young entrepreneurs I met who are now starting new businesses in Cuba, the parliamentarians who used to be just a few years ago political prisoners in Myanmar.  I think of the girls who have braved taunts or violence just to go to school in Afghanistan, and the university students who started programs online to reject the extremism of organizations like ISIL.  I draw strength from the young Americans -- entrepreneurs, activists, soldiers, new citizens -- who are remaking our nation once again, who are unconstrained by old habits and old conventions, and unencumbered by what is, but are instead ready to seize what ought to be.

My own family is a made up of the flesh and blood and traditions and cultures and faiths from a lot of different parts of the world -- just as America has been built by immigrants from every shore.  And in my own life, in this country, and as President, I have learned that our identities do not have to be defined by putting someone else down, but can be enhanced by lifting somebody else up.  They don’t have to be defined in opposition to others, but rather by a belief in liberty and equality and justice and fairness. 

And the embrace of these principles as universal doesn't weaken my particular pride, my particular love for America -- it strengthens it.  My belief that these ideals apply everywhere doesn’t lessen my commitment to help those who look like me, or pray as I do, or pledge allegiance to my flag.  But my faith in those principles does force me to expand my moral imagination and to recognize that I can best serve my own people, I can best look after my own daughters, by making sure that my actions seek what is right for all people and all children, and your daughters and your sons. 

This is what I believe:  that all of us can be co-workers with God.  And our leadership, and our governments, and this United Nations should reflect this irreducible truth.

Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

END
11:17 A.M. EDT

  1. "We’ve taken away terrorist safe havens" Name one!  Which terrorist safe haven is no longer breeding, training and harboring Muslim terrorists?? Afghanistan? Pakistan?? Iraq??? Iran???? Libya????? Syria?????? Which one, liar!!!!!!
  2. "Iranian nuclear issue" Worse than kicking the can down the road, you hastened Iran's nuclear accession! You helped finance it, too. 
  3. "ravages of climate change." Anthropomorphic climate change is a Socialist shibboleth; total fallacy. We need an international framework to exterminate Islam and stave off International Socialism. 
  4. "Terrorist networks" Islam is the terrorist network, the rest is persiflage. Anger at illegal immigrants: lost jobs, increased social costs, dead victims, rape victims & victims of drunk drivers; why should we be angry?  Muslims: 14 dead in California, 49 dead in Florida, 29 injured in New York; why should we be angry?  They hate us because we do not sell our souls to their demon and need to punish us for not being them. Yet you accuse us of irrational anger!  You exemplify AssWholliness!!
  5. "people lose trust in institutions" You never open your lie hole without spewing shit then you wonder why we lose trust?! You screw us at every turn and expect trust? 
  6. "integration" 13 newly liberated colonies united to form a national government, they did not integrate; becoming one, they remained 13 united states. You urge us to surrender our sovereignty and submit our health, welfare, wealth and liberty to the whims of an international mob. Go to Hell!!!  You are the great divider: stirring up race war, class envy and Balkanization/identity politics.
  7. "lifted the shadow of nuclear Armageddon;"  North Korea and Pakistan have nukes, threatening to use them. Iran is working on it and promises to use them. What is the purpose of growing wealth and populations?  Is it not to build and support mighty armies for conquest and empire building to accrue more power for the rulers?
  8. "making the global economy work better for all people" Translation: global redistribution of wealth;tax us to enrich Africa, Arabia & Asia. Take it to Hell with you!
  9. "Expectations rise, then, faster than governments can deliver" Governments do not deliver, they plunder. You spew the same old Socialist Agenda.  You demagogues raise and dash unreasonable expectations.
  10. "what we spent at war in Iraq we could support institutions" The fallacy of alternative expenditures. We should have nuked Iraq, saving thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Lining the pockets of satraps is not a valid alternative use for that money.
  11. "too much money in politics" Who raised the most early $ in the Republican primaries? Who won?  Who is raising the most in the general election campaign? Which side are the fat cats of Wall Street contributing to?  We need unfettered free speech and we do not need dead people voting  or your favorites voting twice.
  12. "Middle East somehow prefer arbitrary rule" Afghanistan & Iraq are governed by the Koran. Egypt partially escaped it. Turkey has backslid into it. Got a clue yet???
  13. "belief in ethnic superiority" Muslims are the best of peoples for the people as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. 3.110  Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80. We need to eliminate Islam! Islam can not and must not be tolerated!!! https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims
  14. "If our religion leads us to persecute those of another faith" It's Islam, Stupid! 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Exactly what part of that do you not comprehend???
  15. "perversions of a great faith" CamelShit!!! Islam is what it is: an Arab Mafia, by design, neither hijacked, perverted, twisted nor distorted.  https://www.scribd.com/doc/227418623/Islam-s-Mercenary-Mission-Updated
  16. "we have to be honest about the nature of these conflicts" You are not honest, never was and never will be. You lie every time you open your lie hole to spew. It's Islam, Stupid. It was contrived for Moe's personal emolument through the profession of piracy. War sor the sake of $$$, falsely attributed to deity. Go to war and get hair pie in the sky; stay home and go to Hell. The conflict is existential and lasts until Islam is extinct. Let us hasten that happy day! https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims
  17. "co-exist" Coexistence with an implacable existential enemy is not possible. Muslims are commanded to conquer the world.  They go to Jihad or to Jannahm. Jihad is the price of their admission to Jannah. https://www.scribd.com/doc/212631107/Jihad-Defined-and-Exemplified-pUpdated  https://www.scribd.com/doc/110516023/No-Justification-in-Islam-for-Terrorism-in-a-Pig-s-Anus
  18. "Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land." CamelShit! There was and is no 'Palestine' it's Israel, Stupid!! Rome renamed the Levant after the Philistines as an insult to the Jews after the Bar-Kochba Rebellion. https://www.scribd.com/doc/259351549/Two-State-Solution-Peace-in-a-Pig-s-Anus
  19. " giving up some freedom"  Franklin warned that those who give up liberty for security will have neither; he was correct. 

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Muslims celebrate NYC bomb: “The lions of the Caliphate roar in New York, we cause you pain inside your house”

Muslims celebrate NYC bomb: “The lions of the Caliphate roar in New York, we cause you pain inside your house”

“Oh God go against America, the head of infidels. Oh God, count them and kill them one by one, and do not spare anyone of them.”…

(Read the rest at Jihad Watch link above):


ATF officers stand near site of explosion in New York

U.S. based “soldier of the Islamic State” is Minnesota mall stabber




Islamic State says Minnesota mall stabber was a “soldier of the Islamic State” (article posted at Jihad Watch)


As spoken to in the above article posted today at Jihad Watch and elsewhere, as well as spoken to in other news there and elsewhere, anyone with hearing that has been within earshot of the news this weekend knows, this weekend has been a busy weekend for U.S. based soldiers of the Caliphate.


These soldiers simply doing what all Muslims are "Allah" charged to do:  practicing the basic tenets of their faith.

Thus, on account of such obedience, to our bloodstained collection of reasons of why we must welcome Islam and adherents to it in our nation, we add this weekend’s like-kind examples. 

Examples that are just a few more examples of the clear reasons of why, as mentioned above, we must insure in our nation we welcome those who cherish and hold sacred the faith system of the so-called prophet of Islam.

Hand in hand with that, when we do so, true to the dictates of our Constitution, we likewise must fight to ensure, here in our nation, the Muslim is free to enjoy full freedom to practice the tenets of his/her Islamic faith. 

As clearly did the good Muslim featured in the report at the above Jihad Watch provided link. As did other U.S. based soldiers of the Caliphate.



As for a final word of advice to you regarding your operation, do not make intricate plans, but instead, keep it simple and effective. If you can obtain a weapon, do so and use it, as soon as possible and in a place that will cause the most damage and panic, bringing death and injury to the enemy of Allah, the disbelievers. Just as they terrify the Muslims in the lands of Islam, so should you terrify the disbelievers in their homelands. But unlike them, your terror shall be just, an equitable response to their crimes against Islam and the Muslim nation.


(Dabiq, Issue 15, P. 29.)


 The blood of the disbelievers is obligatory to spill by default. The command is clear. Kill the disbelievers, as Allah said, “Then kill the polytheists wherever you find them” (At-Tawbah 5). How much more obligatory is doing so after the disbelievers have massacred Muslims everywhere throughout the ongoing crusade against Islam?

In this regards, the Caliph’s spokesman Abu Muhammad al-‘Adnani … said, “If the tawaghit have shut the door of hijrah in your faces, then open the door of jihad in theirs … If one of you wishes and strives to reach the lands of the Islamic State, then each of us wishes to be in your place to make examples of the Crusaders, day and night, scaring them and terrorizing them, until every neighbor fears his neighbor” (That They Live by Proof). And make no mistake, for “verily the disbelievers are a clear enemy to you” (An-Nisa 101).

(Ibid, P. 28.)



Once more this weekend, the Grace of God covers, in part, for our seemingly incorrigible foolishness on Islam and adherents to that belief system. Thus, the desired death and bloodletting of the devotees to Muhammad and his “Allah” was, this weekend, held at bay. Death averted, bloodletting at least corseted--as stated, by the Grace of God.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Trump's Hypocrisy: Radical Islam

Trump's Radical Islam Hypocrisy A transcript of Donald Trump's national security speech at Youngstown can be found here:
http://conservativetribune.com/donald-trump-just-gave-a-whopper-of-a-foreign-policy-speech/ .



    In my opinion, Trump is improving somewhat and this was one of his best speeches content wise but I have some bones to pick.

Radical Islam

    Radical refers to the root. The root of Islamic terrorism is the Qur'an & sunnah.  Terrorism is normative, not in any way exceptional in Islam.  Get a clue for Chrissake: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

    The adjective radical is prefixed to Islam by politicians & pundits to imply the existence of a normative Islam which is passive and anodyne. No such entity ever existed nor will it exist. It's Islam, Stupid.

    I call on Donald Trump and all office holders to quit lying about Islam & terrorism by calling them radical. Its time for honesty!

Keep The Oil

    Trump stepped in the bucket of crap left for him by the LibTards who chant "war for oil". The invasion was a fool's errand, but Iraq was deeply involved in the accursed abomination and should have been nuked.

Friends in the Middle East

    We have one friend in the M.E.: Israel. Muslims are our enemies, neither friends, partners nor allies.  Allah explicitly forbids inferior and equal relationships with infidels.
Get a clue, Mr. Trump.

spread of Radical Islam

    It's Islam, Stupid, and it spreads primarily by sexual reproduction and conquest.  Some members of the criminal class and some intellectual and emotional incompetents are recruited, but most Muslims are born.

    The strategic objective must be eradicating Islam, not stopping its spread.

ideological warfare

    The terrorists do not have an ideology over and above Islam; it's Islam, Stupid! The ideological war must be between Infidels and Muslims.
  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.
  • Only Allah has the right to decide and legislate.
  • Only Muslims have human rights.
  • Muslims have a divine mandate to punish infidels for not being Muslims. 
    How, Mister Trump, do you hope to cause Muslims to cease believing in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise? While they believe, the Jihad will continue if they have sufficient capacity to carry it out.  You can not win this war without destroying the Iman of the Ummah and inducing mass apostasy.

ideological screening test

    3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.3

    Concentrate on the emphasized clause in that ayat: it is the Muslim's license to lie for his own protection and the advancement of Islam.  What makes you think they are going to give honest answers to your questions?

Enemies: Muslims

We cannot always choose our friends, but we can never fail to recognize our enemies.

Muslims are our enemies, neither friends, allies nor partners. Refer to the ayat listed above that forbid friendship with infidels.

We will partner with King Abdullah of Jordan, and President Sisi of Egypt, and all others who recognize this ideology of death that must be extinguished.

Those are Muslims! They are neither friends, allies nor partners to infidels! Islam is the ideology of death that must be extinguished!

Reform is Impossible

Our Administration will be a friend to all moderate Muslim reformers in the Middle East, and will amplify their voices.

    How do you reform that which is perfected? [5.3] ...This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion....

    How do you improve that which can not be changed? 6.115, 18.27, 10.64   ...None can change His Words..... 30.30 ... No change let there be in Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ...

It's Islam, Stupid!

The common thread linking the major Islamic terrorist attacks that have recently occurred on our soil – 9/11, the Ft. Hood shooting, the Boston Bombing, the San Bernardino attack, the Orlando attack – is that they have involved immigrants or the children of immigrants.

    All of the attackers were Muslims!!! Immigrants or native born is an irrelevant distinction! Only Muslims engage in Islamic terrorism!

Muslims!

In addition to screening out all members or sympathizers of terrorist groups, we must also screen out any who have hostile attitudes towards our country or its principles – or who believe that Sharia law should supplant American law.


Ideology, not Geography!

To put these new procedures in place, we will have to temporarily suspend immigration from some of the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism.

    It makes no difference where the Muslim was born, raised or trained: his belief in Allah is what makes him inimical.


Saturday, August 06, 2016

Mr. Khan, Sir, I am compelled to question you.



Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Khizr Khan, Servant of the Global Umma


With the above article posted at Jihad Watch in mind, and all connected to it, the following:

Mr. Khan, Having heard your arguments over the past several days, and in them, your charges stating Mr. Donald Trump has spoken from a swell of “ignorance” with respect to the bases for his call for a Temporary ban on Muslims entering our nation, Sir, I am compelled to question you.

I do not know you, Sir, but in your media appearances over the last several days you have also presented an argument on your “religion,” Islam, that is a false representation of that faith. You have claimed the actions of the “terrorist” have nothing to do with Islam.

Mr. Khan, in that claim, Sir, you are patently wrong.

Though your “sacred texts” suffer from no dearth of text substantiating precisely why high-profile Muslims kill, maim, and strike terror in the hearts of non-believer, I will not draw largely from that well  in this post.

What I will do, Sir, is ask you, how, Sir, do you reconcile, that in your “sacred texts” with your son’s service in our Military, when, your “prophet” taught it was idolatry for a Muslim to fight for anything other than in the Way and for the Cause of Allah?

Mr. Khan, as I am sure you know, if you are the Good Muslim you state you are, as I am sure your beloved son also must have known, if he was the Good Muslim you state he was, “Allah’s Book” declares, “ Those who believe fight in the Way of Allah. Those who disbelieve fight in the way of false gods (Shaytan).” (Surat an-Nisa 4: 76, Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

I do not question your son, Army Captain Humayun Khan’s, motives for serving in our Nation’s Armed Forces, he looks like a good young man, absent conclusive reasons to believe otherwise, I will accept him as being just that.

That said, surely he knew, when he was deployed to Iraq, there, on the ground, the mujihadeen were fighting whom they called the infidel occupying forces. Your son, Humayun, had to have known, in taking up arms against the mujihadeen, whom were fighting in the way of Allah, fighting to make Allah’s word supreme, he would be doing what your “sacred texts” qualify as fighting against “Allah and His Messenger.” Fighting, from the Qur’anic perspective, as cited above, “in the way of false gods.”

As you surely must know, Mr. Khan, your “Book” likewise asserts, with respect to the actions of the believers against the non-Muslims, “You did not kill them, but Allah killed them, you did not throw when you threw but Allah did throw….” (Surah Al-Afal 8: 17)

Surely, your beloved son knew, the Qur’an, in speaking of the hypocrites, it declares of them, “They made their oaths into a cloak [--a covering to protect themselves and their property --] and barred [the believers from doing jihad in] the Way of Allah [by killing them and taking their property]; so they will have a humiliating punishment.” (Surat al-Mujadila 58: 16, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

Surely, Humayun knew,“Allah’s Book” declares, “If anyone is hostile towards Allah , Allah is Severe in Retribution.” (Surat al-Hashr 59: 4, al-Jalalayn.)

Surely he had to have likewise known, “Allah’s Book” declares, “You will not find people who believe in Allah and the Last Day having love for anyone who opposes Allah and His Messenger, though they be their fathers, their sons, their brothers or their clan.” (Surat Al-Mujadila 58: 21)

Surely, Mr. Khan, your son was aware of all the above and thus when he was deployed to Iraq he was so doing as a member of the said “infidel occupiers.”

Only he and God know what was in his heart. But it is certain, he either deployed to Iraq with allegiance to honor “Allah and His Messenger” above all others—as all Muslims are commanded to do—or he separated himself, in  his head and heart, from the fold of the people of the mujihadeen, and thus placed himself and his allegiance in the camp of the Non-Muslims.

“It was narrated,” reads hadith, “from ‘Abdulalh bin ‘Umar that the Prophet said: ‘Whoever  bears weapons against us, he is not one of us.” (Sahih) (An-Nasa’I, Vol. 5, Book of Fighting, P. 80, #4105)

Comments on that by the Scholars read, “Not one of us’ means outwardly. This is because killing Muslims is the act of unbelievers. If such a person goes on a killing spree” killing Muslims around as rebels do, then he would be included among the enemy combatants (who fight against Allah and His Messenger). (Ibid, FN, P. 81)

The Hadith following that reads, “It was narrated …. The Prophet said: ‘… there will be people who recite the Qur’an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out of Islam as an arrow goes through the target. They will kill the Muslims and leave the idol-worshippers alone. It I live to see them, I will kill them as the killing of ‘Ad.” (Ibid, P. 81, #4106)

We regard, regard-worthy tafsir provides, “the people of Ad were eliminated to the last man.”

(Surah Al-Araf: 7: 72, Ma’ariful Qur’an. V. 3. P.628.)

We further note, “Sa ‘d bin Abi Waqas told us that the Messenger of Allah said: “Fighting a Muslim is Kufr and defaming him is evildoing.” (Sahih.) (An-Nasa’a, Ibid, P. 84, #4109.)

We likewise note, “kufr” defined is as follows:


The state of disbelief. Its original meaning is ‘to conceal.’  This word has been used variously in the Qur’an to denote: (1) state of absolute lack of faith; (2) rejection or denial of any of the essentials of Islam that constitute to believe in Allah, His angels, His Messengers, His revealed Books ….” (3) attitude of ingratitude and thankfulness to Allah; and (4) non-fulfillment of certain basic requirements of the Divine guidance communicated through the Prophets and Messengers of God. More specifically, ever since the advent of the last of the Prophets and Messengers, Muhammad, rejection of his teaching constitutes Kufr. Killing a believer also constitutes disbelief.  (An-Nasa’a, Ibid, Vol 6, Glossary of Islamic Terms, P. 434.)


We recall and regard, The Qur’an asserts, “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him [--his Companions among the believers --] are fierce to the unbelievers, [and do not show mercy to them,] merciful to one another ….”   (Surat 48: 29; Tafsir al-Jalalayn.)

We likewise regard, speaking to the Islamic tenet borne out in, ”Surely, the worst of all the living, in the sight of Allah, are those who reject Faith, so they do not believe….” (Surah Al-Anfal 8: 55), regard-worthy tafsir provides, with respect to cherishing and thus fighting for ones family, tribe, or nation, the following:


After reaching Madinah, the Holy Prophet laid the initial foundation of political theory in Islam. The first step he took was to eliminate prejudices of country and tribe from the Muhajirin (Emigrants: those who had migrated from Makkah) and Ansar (Residents of Madinah who helped the Muhajirin). In its place, he established a new nationality in the name of Islam. (Ma’ariful Qur’an, V. 4, P 257, “Toward Islamic Nationality: The First Step.”)



From the same source, same concept, different verse, same surah:


“O those who believe, do not take your fathers and your brothers as friends, if they prefer infidelity over Faith. And whoever from you has friendship with them, then such people are the wrongdoers.” (9: 23)

…this verse has made it very clear that each relationship has its limit. Every relationship out of these, whether that of parents and children or that of real brother and sister, has to be bypassed when it stands in competition with one’s relationship with Allah and His Messenger. Should these two relationships come on a collision course on some occasion, then, the relationship that has to be kept intact is one’s relationship with Allah and His Messenger. All relationships competing against it are to be ignored. (Ibid, Vol 4. Ibid, P. 335.)


Again, speaking to the same, shedding light on the above assertions of Islamic supremacy, and the two-camp doctrine, trampling nationalism, this elucidation on that verse, under the subtitle, “The real bond is the bond of Islam and Iman—all bonds of lineage and country must be sacrificed for it”:


The relation with Allah and His Messenger should be given precedence over all relations of kinship and friendship. The relation that clashes against it deserves to be broken. This was the way of the noble Companions. This was why they rose to be the superior most people of the Muslim Ummah.  It was some trail they blazed by sacrificing all . . their life, wealth, property, relatives and bonds of all sorts, only for the sake of Allah and His Messenger…. The bond of Islam was supreme …. That the bonds of linage and tribe had to be cast aside was demonstrated when, on the battlefields of Badr and ‘ Uhud,  swords were crossed between father and son and between brother and brother. These are significant evidence of the creed they held dear. (Ibid,  V.4, P. 336.)



Then, under the heading of the “Two Nation Theory,” speaking to the concept established in, “He is One who created you, then some of you are disbelievers, and some of you are believers,” (Surah At-Taghabun 64: 1), the same tafsir, different Volume expounds as follows:


The Holy Qur’an has divided mankind here into two groups: a believing group and a non-believing one. This indicates that the children of Adam is one single brotherhood, and all human beings are members of this brotherhood. Kufr [unbelief] is the only dividing line that severs relationship with this brotherhood and creates another group. He who becomes a Kafir has severed the relationship of human brotherhood. Thus group-formation can only take place on the basis of ‘Iman and Kufr. Neither colour [sic] nor language, neither linage nor family, neither land, territory or geographical region can divide human brotherhood into rival groups. (Ibid [Ma’ariful Qur’an], V. 8, P.479.)


That clarification continues:


In the Days of Ignorance, ethnicity and tribal divisions had become the basis of factionalism, but the Messenger of Allah broke down these idols, which they pursued. By the express text of the Holy Qur’an, “All believers are but brothers’ irrespective of their county or territory, their colour [sic] or family, or their language. They all belong to one brotherhood. So likewise, the non-believers, in the sight of Islam, belong to a single community. (Ibid.)


So too this:


It is common knowledge among Muslims that the battles of Badr, Uhud and al-Ahzab were fought among individuals coming from the same families. This clearly demonstrates that Islamic nationality or brotherhood does not hinge on lineal bond or geographical or linguistic unity. Instead, it revolves round faith and deed. All believers, residents of any country, members of any family and speakers of any language, are a single nation, a single brotherhood. The Qur’anic verse: (The believers are but brothers –40:10) means just this….

….In our time, the edifices of nationalities is raised on the foundations of homeland, language or color whereby Muslims are segregated into one or the other “nation” under false banners. This is contrary to the Qur’an, and Sunnah, and amounts to rising in rebellion against the principles of political and social management enunciated by the Holy Prophet. (Ibid, Vol.4, Surah Hud [11]:45-49, P640, 641.)


Mr. Khan, it is clear, authoritative works of your faith declare, on the battlefield of Iraq, in “Allah’s” eyes, there were only two nations represented there. There likewise, only two causes fought for.  One, according to “Allah’s Book,” was the nation of believers in the way of Muhammad, and their cause was fighting in the Way of and for the Cause of Allah.

The other, again, according to “Allah’s Book,” was the nation of non-believers, and they fought against “Allah and His messenger” and those fighting in the Way of and for the Cause of Allah.

Likewise, speaking only with enforced limitedness here and now of the account of the Battle of Muraisi, and what tafsir calls “the scene of dispute” at which, once “Allah’s Messenger” learned of the situation, alighted on it, there, provides tafsir, he “expressed his indignation” on the reason for the said dispute. (Ma’ariful Qur’an, Vol. 8, P. 462, 463.)

(The said Battle and “scene of dispute,” asserts revered tafsir, was the background of Revelation behind, a verse cited earlier, “…the hypocrites …. They have prevented others from the way of Allah…. They declared their faith (apparently), then disbelieved (secretly),” [Surah Al-Maunafiqun 63: 2, 3.] “They,” affirms Qur’an, “They are the enemy; so beware of them. May Allah destroy them.”[ 63: 3])

Did so in these words: “What is this slogan of paganism [that you call for defence (sic) on the basis of regional, racial and national bias]?” (Ibid.)

Therein clarifying the Islamic above-stated precept that to divide mankind into groups by anything other than that of Iman or the absence of it is idol worship--“paganism,” in the words of your “prophet.”

Thus, the story goes, Allah’s Messenger said, “Give up the slogan. It stinks.”  (ibid, p. 464.)

Hence this exemplary Qur’an provided assertion of Ibrahim, with clarity and boldness asserting,  “Between us and you there will be enmity and hatred forever, unless and until you believe in Allah alone.” (60:4)

Mr. Khan, contrary to what some in leadership in our nation may lead you and others to believe, the U.S. of A. is not yet a nation guided solely by the din of Muhammad. As such, when we invaded Iraq in 2003, we did so with the lion’s share of our troops sent there being “non-Muslims,” unbelievers in the way of Muhammad.

Therefore, Sir, please regard these words of the men of knowledge in your din:


Jihad is … obligatory for everyone (O: able to perform it, male or female, old or young,) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (O: on everyside, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslims forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible gathering….)

(Al-Misri, Reliance of the Traveller, A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, Ahmad Ibn Naqib al-Misri, Revised, English; Text, Commentary, and Appendices Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Min Keller, amana publications [sic] , Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A., 1994, ISBN 0-915957-72-8, P. 601.)


With whatever respect is due you, Sir, I state, whether your masking of the realities of the teachings of your din is intentional or unknowingly, it is still deception.

It is still an open effort to deceive the gullible.

Surely, Mr. Khan, you know, your “prophet” spelled out who was to  be fought, for what reasons the Muslim is allowed to fight, as well as when, where, how, and unless and until what conditions were met they are to fight,

Why, Sir, are you pretending such facts are not?

What, Sir, do you do with all the above as well as with, “Fight those who neither believe in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor take as prohibited what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor submit to the Faith of the Truth …. “? (Surah Al-Taubah 9: 29)

What, Mr. Khan, do you do, Sir, with, “So, fight in the way of Allah.” (Surah Al-Nisa 4: 84) What, Sir, do you do with, “The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who fights that the word of Allah  be exalted fights in the way of Allah.”

(Muslim, Sahih Muslim, By Imam Muslim, Rendered in English by ‘Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Islamic Book Service, First Edition: 2001, Fourth Edition: 2005, ISBN: 81-7231-450-7 [Set] (Vol. III], Book of Ermitage [sic], # 1904, P. 304.)

Mr. Khan, in claiming your son was a Good Muslim and yet 100% loyal to our non-Muslim nation, what, Sir, do you do with these words and admonishes of the men of knowledge in Islam:

…one should be cautious not to fight (with the intention) to show off, or for good reputation or for dignity, or for pride and haughtiness, or for the clamour [sic] (noise) of nationalism and for false-forged slogans. Whenever the Messenger appointed a Commander-in-Chief for an army unit, he used to advise him specifically to be afraid and dutiful to Allah, and to be good to those Muslims who were accompanying him. He then used to say (to that Commander):

“Invade in the Name of Allah and for the Cause of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.”

(Al-Bakhari, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Translated by: Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1997, ISBN: 9960-717-31-3 (SET), 9960-717-40-2 [V.9] Vol. 9, Appendix, III, The Call to Jihad [Holy fighting for Allah’s Cause], P. 474.)


In concluding here, Sir, I ask you, Mr. Khan, why are you using the loss of your son, Army Captain Humayun Khan, as a vehicle with which to advance a mythical form of Islam, one that allows one to, for reasons other than subterfuge, disregard the doctrines of Qur’an and sunnah and remain Muslim?








Omar Siddiqui Mateen obeyed Allah



[siddiq: a man of truth, the siddiq is the one who believes in Allah and His Messenger by the statement of the one who reports it, not from any proof except the light of belief which he experiences in his heart, and which prevents him from hesitating, or any doubt entering him, about the word of the Messenger who reported. 1

The Siddiqin (the constantly true) are those who acquire spiritual perfection, and thus – attain the highest rank among the followers of a prophet. In common parlance, they are called Men of Allah, or saints.2]


Intro

(OD) Orlando Police Dispatcher
(OM) Omar Mateen
OD: Emergency 911, this is being recorded.
OM: In the name of God the Merciful, the beneficent [(said in) Arabic]
OD: What?
OM: Praise be to God, and prayers as well as peace be upon the prophet of God [(said in) Arabic]. I wanna let you know, I’m in Orlando and I did the shootings.
OD: What’s your name?
OM: My name is I pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State.
OD: Ok, What’s your name?
OM: I pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi may God protect him [said in Arabic], on behalf of the Islamic State.
OD: Alright, where are you at?
OM: In Orlando.
OD: Where in Orlando?
[End of call] 3


“Words and deeds”


Step with me now, away from that phone call. 

Away, for a spell, from Orlando Pulse nightclub and the carnage there that fateful 12 June early morning, and step with me into the pages of the “words of Allah,” as recorded in the Qur’an, and into the pages providing the details of the words and deeds of the man Islam presents as “Allah’s Messenger.”

Step with me into the pages of tafsir, provided to us by the toils, discipline, dedication of scholars to master the Arabic language, in their efforts to correctly understand the tenets of the Qur’an.  Thus, to serve that end, master not only Arabic but also master “vast and deep knowledge of syntax, etymology, rhetoric, and literature of the Arabic language, as well as, that of prophetic Traditions, principles governing jurisprudence and exegesis, doctrinal articles of belief and scholastics.” 4

“Tafsir,” the scholars of Islam provide, interpreted, is “‘to open’ or to explain, interpret or comment. Technically, the science of tafsir is a branch of knowledge in which the meanings of the Qur’an are explained and its injunctions and wisdoms are described openly and clearly.” 5

As the Qur’an bears out, as we will in time herein arrive at, the first tafsir—explainer, discloser—of the intended “Divine” meaning of the Qur’anic verses was none other than the one Islam calls “the Messenger of Allah,” Muhammad, “the Prophet of Islam” himself.

Though, herein, I will speak at length to that Islamic tenet, my aim in this post is by no means to do so “exhaustively.”

My aim in addressing that topic in this post is to provide the reader with information, with which, once I speak to Omar Siddiqui Mateen’s obedience to Allah, as showcased 12 June 2016, “Orlando,” the reader will have that necessary to value the works and statements of tafsir then cited. In short. I assure you, much more confirming the tenet of “Muhammad, the living tafsir,” one can provide and add to it from the Islamic authoritative texts. However, though I will speak to it repeatedly throughout the lion’s share of this write-up, that tenet is deserving of a “chapter” of its own.

That said, according to Islamic doctrine, Allah, dispatched Muhammad to this world for the express purpose of explaining, in and by his [Muhammad’s] words and deeds, the intended “Divine” meanings of the Qur’anic verses. Hence, “And We sent down the Message (adh-dhikr: The Qur’an) so that you explain to the people what has been revealed for them and so that they may ponder. ” (Surah Al-Nahl : 16:44, Ma’ariful Qur’an Translation.)

For such reasons, from the men of knowledge in Islam, exegesis such as this:


“The explanatory role of the Sunnah in relation to the Qur’an has been determined by the Qur’an itself, where we read in an address to the Prophet in sura al-Nahl (16:44): ‘We have sent down to you the Remembrance so that you may explain to the people what has been revealed to them.” 6


For such reasons, “Alif, Lam, Ra. This is a book We have sent down to you, that you may take the people out of (all sorts of) darkness into the light…” (Surah Ibrahim: 14: 1) and this tafsir on it: “… only that sense or interpretation of the Holy Qur’an is trustworthy which has been communicated to us by the Holy Prophet through his word and deed. Any interpretation contrary to it is not reliable.” 7

Thus we read this narration from al-Miqdam bin Ma ‘di Yakrib: “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Verily, I have been given the Book and something like it with it.” (Sahih) 8 That “something like it with it” is his life, his Sunnah, his living tafsir.

Speaking to the same, “And Allah has surely conferred favor on the believers when He raised in their midst a messenger from among themselves who recited to them His verses and makes them pure and teaches them the Book and the Wisdom…” (Surah ‘Al-‘Imran 3:164.)

From that explanation lived, “the Book and the Wisdom” taught by living example, witnessed by the “noble Sahabah (Companions),” the intended “divine” meaning of those verses was understood and, only then, transmitted therefrom on to the next generation that followed them, that of the “Successors (Tabi ‘in).”  And from there forward.

In all those cases, accuracy of the meaning was crucial. To pass on an unintended meaning of the Qur’anic verses was to pass on falsehood with respect to the words and deeds of “Allah’s Messenger,” because as stated above, as provided in the Qur’an, his life explained in perfection the intended meaning of Qur’anic verses.  Thus, to pass on unintended meanings, a wrong or perverted meaning of any part of those verses was to do so at the threat of the sword to ones “pharynx.” (per Abu Hurayra, Bakhari.)

For such reasons, the Islamic record provides, “on some occasions, the revered Companions had to devote years together in learning a single Surah.” 9 Because, asserts the said record, they not only learned and put to memory the words of the Qur’an verses, which they learned directly from the “prophet,” Muhammad, but along with the learning of those words they also learned from him [Muhammad] the detailed explanation of each verse.

Hence this report from the Sahabah: “There were people among us when they learnt ten verses, they would not go further unless they knew their meanings properly and acted upon them.  Thus we learnt the Qur’an and based all our actions on it.” 10

Hence, this summation from the revered scholar just-cited above, ‘Abdur Rahman I. Doi, on the above Islamic tenet and on it summarized in the verse, “Whatever the Messenger brought to you take hold of it, and whatever he forbids you of, abstain from it.” 11 (“Qur’an ch. 59:7”):


In reality, the entire life of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.), whatever he did or said, was according to the teachings of the Qur’an and hence, if all the events of his life and teachings are taken together with all the authentic Ahadith, we get a complete Tafsir of the Qur’an put into practice by the Messenger Of Allah himself, the bearer of the Divine Revelations. 12


And on account of that which was “sent down,” according to Islamic doctrine, on account of that which was “communicated to us by the Holy Prophet,”  taught through the medium of his [“Allah’s Messenger’s"] words and deeds,  “Allah” had this to state on it: “We ourselves, have sent down the Dhikr (the Qur’an), and We are there to protect it.” [15:9] And regarded tafsir provides this clarity on the just-cited promise, under the sub heading, “The Promise to Protect the Qur’an Includes the Protection of Hadith”:


As a matter of principle, all learned people agree that the Qur’an is neither the name of the words of the Qur’an alone, nor that of its meanings alone, instead, a combination of both is called the Qur’an….This tells us that the Qur’an is the exclusive name of the particular Divinely revealed Book the words and meanings of which are simultaneously protected. 13


And from the same, this, under the heading, “Hadith is Necessary to Understand Qur’an: The Rejection of Hadith is Really the Rejection of the Qur’an”:


“And We sent down the Message (adh-dhikr: The Qur’an) so that you explain to the people,” means, by consensus, the Holy Qur’an—and, in this verse, the Holy Prophet has been given the assignment of explaining the meaning of verses revealed to him before people. Herein lies an open proof that the correct understanding of the realities, insights and injunctions of the Holy Qur’an depends on the statement of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad al-Mustafa. 14


The author follows that asserting “if everyone, by simply acquiring the knowledge of Arabic language and literature, were to become capable of understanding the injunctions of the Qur’an as Divinely intended, then, the mission of explaining assigned to the Holy Prophet,” as spoken to above, “ would have been rendered meaningless.”15

Buttressing his assertions thereto, he adds as follows:


In Al-Muwafqat, Allamah Shatibi has provided detailed proof that the Sunnah of the Prophet, the whole of it, is the explanation of the Book of Allah because the Qur’an has said about the Holy Prophet , (And surely you are at the height of a sublime nature—68:4) and which was explained by Sayyidah ‘A’ishah by saying: (The Qur’an was his sublime nature). Thus, the outcome is that every word and deed which provenly [sic] issued forth from the Holy Prophet is nothing but what was said by the Qur’an…. They [the mentioned words and deed] are …  based on some kind of revelation, though it was not made part of the Holy Qur’an. Thus, that too, in a certain way, comes under the operative purview of the Qur’an itself. 16


Why is that that under the purview—that which is part of “the full scope or compass of any document, statement, subject, book, etc. [dictionary.com]--of the Qur’an is included therein “every word and deed which provenly [sic] issued forth from the Holy Prophet”?

I’ll let the scholars answer that for us: “…because according to the clarification of the Qur’an nothing that he says is prompted by his personal desire, instead of which, it is a Wahy (revelation) from Allah Ta ‘ala: (and nor does he talk from desire. It is nothing but a revelation revealed – 53:3-4).” 17

The revered Islamic scholar and author of those lines follows that affirming, “This tells us that all acts of worship, dealings with people, personal morals and habits of the Holy Prophet were, all of them,  through Divine revelation and have the same authority as that of the Qur’an.” 18

Summing it up he then adds what I stated in the opening lines of this post, “…this verse declares that the purpose for which the Holy Prophet was sent is the explaining of the Qur’an.” 19  

Indeed, explaining the Qur’an through the medium of his “sayings and doings,” those word and deeds of “the Holy Prophet” known as Hadith.

What’s more, the above-cited author then closes that section addressing this tenet of Islam with this declaration—heads up, all fools who assert the Islamic text IS, Al-Qaeda, and all “Extremist” live by are those twisted and perverted:


If today a person calls this treasure of Hadith unreliable under one or the other pretext or artifice, it plainly means that the Holy Prophet acted against this Qur’anic injunction when he did not explain what the Qur’an had said; or, that he had explained it but his explanation did not remain preserved for posterity. Under either of the two conditions, it is being suggested that the Qur’an has not remained protected as to its meaning – the responsibility of protecting which has been undertaken by Allah Ta ‘ala Himself: [We, Ourselves, have sent down the Dhikr (the Qur’an) and We are there to protect it – 15:9]. 20


Expounding on verse 15:9 [cited above] the revered scholar firmly states, “One who says that the Ahadith of the Rasul of Allah are not absolutely protected is really saying that the Qur’an is not protected.” 21

In other words, to assert the “extremist” or anyone else has twisted and changed the words and meanings of the Qur’an is to call Allah a liar.

The author adds, such a claim or its inference “is contrary to this textual authority (nass) of the Qur’an.” He thus affirms, “from here it stands proved that a person who refuses to accept the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet as a binding authority of Islam is, in reality, a denier of the Qur’an itself.”22  

Reason being so, as that provided above. As that restated below, same concept, same authoritative source, different volume, this, under the heading, “The Holy Prophet’s Words are a Revelation from Allah:


(And he does not speak out of (his own) desire. It is not but revelation revealed [to him] …. 53:3 – 4] The verses tell us that it is absolutely impossible for the Messenger to forge lies and impute them to Allah. Nothing he utters is of his own wish or desire. He only conveys to the people what he was commanded to convey, in its entirety, without additions or deletions. An analysis of the various Traditions in Bukhari indicates that there are many categories or types of wahy [inspiration or revelation]. Type one is that in which the wordings and the meaning are both directly from Allah. This is called Qur’an. Type two is the one in which only the meaning comes from Allah, and the Messenger expresses the meaning in his own words. This is called Hadith or Sunnah [Tradition]. The subject of Hadith, which comes from Allah, sometimes lays down injunctions or rules of conduct in clear and express terms, and at other times it establishes a general principle from which the Messenger derives laws on the basis of ijtihad or anology [sic] , and promulgates them. 23


Therefore, with the invaluable indispensable worthiness, from the Islamic perspective, of the words of the “prophet” established, we note the invaluable indispensable worthiness of narratives such as this:  “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion [away from Islam], execute him.’”24

When we read such we know just how such arrived thereat, we know why. We know its weight and worth in Islam.

Likewise, when we read, “It was narrated from Abdul ‘Aziz bin Muhammad, from ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr, from ‘Ikrimah, from ibn ‘Abbas who said: “ Allah’s Messenger said: ‘Whoever of you find doing the action of the people of Lut, kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.” 25  

So too with, “the Prophet called the Khawarij  ‘the worst of the people’. This is the quality of the unbelievers. He said, ‘An evil tribe under the sky. Blessings for the one who kills them or the one whom they kill.’” 

“He said, ‘When you find them, kill them as you would kill an enemy.’” 26

We move on.


Preserving and protecting “Qur’an”


Thus, with the above concept regarded, once the correct words of the Qur’anic verses were learned and memorized, the same record provides, once, along with that, their correct meanings and explanations; then was the duty of the ummah to, along with preserving the correct words of the “noble Qur’an,” likewise preserving their correct meanings.

Therein a practice, a sunnah of “Allah” noted in many a tenet of Qur’an: accomplishing his stated promises and/or threats, via the hands, heads, and hearts of the believers, in this instance: “We, Ourselves, have sent down the Dhikr (the Qur’an), and We are there to protect it” (Surah Al-Hijr 15:9).

Thus, to that end, as the scholars state, “It became necessary that the tafsir of Qur’an be preserved as a permanent branch of knowledge so that, along with the words of the noble Qur’an, its correct meaning as well stands protected and conserved for the Muslim ummah.” Thereby assuring, assert the scholars, “heretics and deviationists find no room there for distortion of its meanings.” 27

Therefore, provides that same source, the scholars assert, so important was that mission, so dedicated to it was the ummah, that it was accomplished, by nothing less than “the grace and tawfiq [success given by Allah] of Allah Almighty.”

Therefore, this, there unabashed certain affirmation: 


…this ummah accomplished this wonderful mission with such efficiency that today we can say without any fear of doubt or rejection that not only are the words of this last Book of Allah protected but also stands protected even that correct tafsir and explanation which has reached us through the Holy Prophet and his Companions who were prepared to sacrifice their lives for him. 28


Prepared to sacrifice their lives for him, as in, in this instance, do so, if need be, to insure only the clear intended meaning of the Qur’an verses, as they learned those meanings from the words and deeds of their “prophet,” as he, according to Islam, learned them from “Allah,” were the explanations provided in the preserved record of tafsir. And it is those works of tafsir, the fruits of that line of, according to Islam, reliable trustworthy sources and preservers of the “integrity” of Qur’an and tafsir, that the revered masters of tafsir rely on in what they provide to us in their respective works.

It is those revered works, with the above- cited and stated certified stamp of approval of the ummah, we have in our hands today.

There, as stated above, according to the Islamic record of such, by no less than the assiduous fastidious efforts of the ummah and by “the grace and tawfiq [success given by Allah] of Allah Almighty” to them. I therefore cite regularly from those works. The scholars and scribes of IS likewise cite from those works.

Because it is from such works IS gains their clear understanding of the Qur’an.  Thus, it is after the details and guidance provided in those works of tafsir IS provides, seemingly daily, for the world to see, Big-screen episodes of the Qur’an in living color.

Paris, San Bernardino, New York, Baghdad, Boston, Israel, Bangladesh, Libya, Istanbul, Brussels, Orlando, Dhaka, name your nation, your state, your province, your city, your mall, your airport, your nightclub, et cetera.

Those Allah-and-Muhammad’s-ummah preserved correct explanations of Qur’an, we now witness and hear the bloody details of seemingly daily in our homes as they play out across our screens, the  blueprints of them all in our hands via regard-worthy works of tafsir, are none other than those provided by the words and deeds of “Allah’s Messenger.” 

Mr. Obama, Mr. G. W. Bush, Mrs. Clinton, and all others who tell us of the twisted perverted texts that the “extremist” cite and use as their guidance and reasons for their acts of violence and terror against us and others,  take your charge of those texts and their meanings being twisted and perverted to the heads of the ummah. Lay your charges of such at the feet of “Allah’s Messenger.” Lay them at the feet of Allah. Given, according to Islamic doctrine, as spoken to above, all the Messenger did he did by the leave and guidance of Allah, neither said nor did anything on his own accord but all he did he did by Allah’s revealed guidance to him.

As shown above, according to Islamic doctrine, as the Qur’an bears out, all Muhammad did, he did in obedience to Allah’s instruction and guidance to him, as he [Muhammad] provided through the medium of his words and deeds clarity in perfection of the intended “Divine” meanings of the Qur’anic verses.  Meanings and verses Allah himself swore he would protect and defend against change or perversion.

Thus, lay your charges of “extremist” having twisted and perverted the words and meanings of the “Qur’an” at the feet of Allah himself.  Because, as stated, he himself swore that he would keep both the words of Qur’an along with their intended meanings safe from perversions or change.

Charge him then with negligence. Charge him with babbling. Charging him with lying and deceit.

Because, as the Qur’an asserts, as mentioned  above,   as tafsir, under the sub heading, “The Promise to Protect the Qur’an Includes the Protection of Hadith” clarifies, this affirmation:


As a matter of principle, all learned people agree that the Qur’an is neither the name of the words of the Qur’an alone, nor that of its meanings alone, instead, a combination of both is called the Qur’an….This tells us that the Qur’an is the exclusive name of the particular Divinely revealed Book the words and meanings of which are simultaneously protected.

This also leads us to the ruling that the practice of people who publish the translation of the Qur’an only in a foreign language and give it the, for example, an English Qur’an or … is not permissible at all – because, that is not the Qur’an. 29 


Wait a minute--this book I received to read, called “Koran,” shortly after 9/11 from an acquaintance, the wife of a former Muslim, the book the content of which, at that time, I could scarcely make heads or tails of the message contained in its chapters and verses; that was not “Qur’an”?

No, that was not Qur’an.

Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Tafsir Ibn Abbas , Ten Volumes of Tafsir ibn Kathir, Eight Volumes of Tafsir Ma ‘ariful Qur’an, the latter there, based on volumes and volumes of master of tafsir that proceeded his said work, et. al. – works with words as well as meanings of the Qur’an-- that is the “Qur’an.”

Only the content of such works provides the reader with the proper and correct understanding and thus knowledge of the authoritative “book” of guidance of the din of Islam.

Obama and line up mentioned above, only fools make your assertions there stated, only fools believe them.  But you, and for justifiable reason, trust your gullible audiences to be just that: gullible, foolish, unread on the content of the subject you so stupidly, yet “authoritatively,” speak to with either crafty prevarication or categorical ignorance of.

We wind this segment up with a visit to “the Court of Ma’mun.”


“An Episode from the Court of Ma’mun”


In the tafsir I have quoted almost exclusively from in this post, there, in the comments on the verse, “We, Ourselves, have sent down the Dhikr (the Qur’an), and We are there to protect it,” (15:9) providing clarification on that verse is a narrative credited to Imam Al-Qurtubi.  It is asserted to be “authentically reported” by him of “an event from the court of ‘Abbasi Khalifah, Al-Ma’ mun.” 30  

It goes this way:  Caliph al-Ma’mun used to regularly have to his courtroom scholars to debate “on intellectual issues.”  “All scholars were welcomed.” Thus, to that courtroom one day came a Jew.  The narrative provides, the said scholar, “by his looks, dress and manners,” appeared to be a right “elegant person.”  And when he made his debate, sure enough, he was notably “eloquent and intellectually bright.” Impressed by the man, after the debate, suspecting the man was a Jew, Ma’mun accordingly inquired just that from the man. The man confirmed indeed he was a Jew. To which Ma’mun then, seeking to confirm the man’s claim, asked the man if he wanted to embrace Islam, and thus by so doing insure he [the Jew] would “then hope to have the best treatment” from Ma’mun. 31

But the Jew said, by no means could he leave “the religion of his forefathers.” Thus the narrative relates, “the matter ended there.” The Jew left. Time past. Then, about a year later, about the same time of year, to the same court and opportunity there came the same man. But this time, he came a Muslim, and one well informed, skilled in the knowledge of Islamic jurisprudence. And on that topic in that court he spoke with noted skill and authority.

Upon seeing and hearing the said man, and being certain he recognized him for  “the Jew” he had spoken to the year before, Ma’mun  inquired of him,  was he “the same person who had come last year?”  The man answered, reads the narrative, “ Yes, I am.” Then Ma’mun asked, why the change of heart, what brought about his conversion to Islam?

To that, the narrative relates, the former Jew answered, “I am a scribe. I write books and sell them. They bring good prices.” 32 He then stated, after he left Ma’mun’s court the year before, after refusing to embrace Islam, as Ma’mun had invited him to do at that time, thinking more on his decision thereto, he said he decided to run a test of sorts.  Testing the then contemporary religions. His test went like this:


First I calligraphed three manuscripts of the Torah in which I made some additions and deletions on my own. I took these manuscripts of the Torah to the Synagogue. The Jews found them interesting and bought them. Then, I did the same things with the Injil. I calligraphed three manuscripts, complete with my additions and deletions, and took them to the Church where the Christians were pleased with these manuscripts and bought them from me. After that, I tried the same thing with the Qur’an. I calligraphed three good looking [sic] manuscripts of the Qur’an, of course with the usual additions and deletions of my own. When I went out to sell them, I faced a problem. Every buyer I went to would take the manuscript, look into it to determine if it was correct or not, and when he would notice additions and deletions made into it, he would quietly return the manuscript back to me. 33


This former Jew then stated, relates the narrative, “From this I learnt my lesson that this Book is protected, and protected by Allah Ta ‘ala Himself, therefore, I embraced Islam.” 34

Thus, from the events portrayed in the above narration, and no doubt, others similar to it, the author of Ma’arful Qur’an provides the following affirmation:  “…Allah Ta‘ala has said: (And We are there to protect it [the Qur’an] –9). Thus, When Allah Ta ‘ala Himself arranged to have it remain protected, then, despite thousands of efforts made by enemies, not a single change in one tiny dot or case mark could be made.” 35

Therefore, he declares, “Today, over fourteen hundred years have passed since even the blessed age of the Holy Prophet, and there has been a shortfall and neglect on the part of Muslims in all areas of their religious matters. Yet,” notwithstanding those shortfalls and neglects, “the continuous arrangement of memorizing the Holy Qur’an all over the world stands firmly established as it was.” 36

With strong argument,  hard countering all who claim the Qur’anic text, as defined above, have, any time, any era, any place been twisted or perverted, he continues: “In every period of time, there are millions of Muslims, old and young, male and female, always present on the scene, blessed people in whose hearts and minds the Holy Qur’an lives protected.” 37

And “before them”—those  “blessed people”--  declares this revered scholar, “not even the highest of the high religious scholars can dare recite a single letter of the Qur’an wrong, for there would be around at that time many, seniors or children, who would promptly apprehend the error.” 38

That, Mr. Obama, Mr. G.W. , Mrs. Clinton and all other fools or prevaricators who tell us of the perversion and twisting of the Qur’an by those they call “extremist,” above is the record the revered scholars of Islam know. It is the record any serious student of Islam likewise knows. It is also what every Muslim knows.

I wind up this  up with this terse exegesis on Surah 15:9, from tafsir of Ibn Kathir:  “Allah … stated that He is the One Who revealed the Dhikr to him [his messenger], which is the Qur’an, and He is protecting it from being changed or altered.” 39

Moving forward.


“Ma’riful Qur’an”
(The Wisdom of the Holy Qur’an)


The tafsir I have quoted from and will quote most often from in this essay is that of Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi, eminent Islamic scholar and professor, former grand Mufti of Darul-Uloon Deoband, prolific writer and thus author of “about one hundred books on different Islamic and literary subjects.” 34 Not the least of those works, his “last great work, Ma ‘arful-Qur’an,” a Comprehensive commentary on the Qur’an. It is that work, as noted, cited from numerous times above, will yet be often- cited in the remainder of this post. 

In that work, he has relied upon the wealth of information, doctrinal tenets, and Qur’anic explanations provided in the works of the regarded master of Tafsir in Islamic circles who preceded him. 

Highlighting the major works thereof, we begin with Tafsir ibn Jarir.  The real name of the work being, “Jami’ al-Bayan and it was compiled by ‘Allamah Abu Ja ‘far Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (died 310 Hijrah). ‘Allamah Tabari is a highly rated commentator, muhaddith (hadith expert) and historian.” 40

The said comes in thirty volumes. It holds the honor of being “a basic source for later commentaries.” 41  To my knowledge, at the time of this writing, this work is unavailable in English.

After that is Tafsir ibn Kathir, the author of that work being, “Hafiz ‘Iman al-din Abu al-Fida’ Isma ‘il ibn Kathir al-Dimashqi al-Shafi (died 774 Hijrah), a distinguished research scholar of the eighth century.” His work, In Arabic, published in four volumes, English abridged version, comes in ten volumes.  “This book holds a distinct place among all books of Tafsir.”42

Next, it the Tafsir of Al-Qurtubi.  The full name of which is, “Al-Jami ‘ li-Ahkam al-Qur’an.” It’s author is “the famous and learned writer and research scholar of Andalusia (Spain), Abu ‘Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ahmad Abi Bakr ibn Farah al-Qurtubi (died 671 Hijrah) 43  The book comes in Twelve Volumes, and to my knowledge, thus far, only Vol. 1 is available in English. Therefore, the indispensable value in Ma’ariful Qur’an, which cites oftentimes from those 12 volumes, thus providing in English much from that in Tafsir Al-Qurtubi’s 12 volumes.

After al-Qurtubi’s tafsir is that of “Iman Fakhr al-din al-Razi (died 606 Hijrah),” Al-Tafsir al-Kabir. Its real name being, “Mafatih al-Ghayb.  As with the lion’s share of al-Qurtubi’s tafsir, this work also, to my knowledge, unavailable to date in English. Hence, again, the value of it cited from repeated times throughout the eight volumes of Ma ‘ariful Qur’an. “Imam Razi is an imam of the theology of Islam.” 44 The work is known among scholars to be “a unique key to the Qur’an,” therefore, enjoys the honor of a tafsir of “high rating as far as the resolution of the meanings of the Qur’an is concerned.” 45 It comes in eight volumes.

Next major work mentioned as cited from in Ma’ariful Qur’an is Tafsir al-Bahr al-Muhit, “written by ‘Allamah Abu Hayyan al-Gharnati al-Andalusi (died 754 Hijrah).” He “was a master of syntax and rhetoric in addition to other Islamic fields of learning.”46   It also, to my knowledge, yet to be made available in English.

After that, “Ahkam al-Qur’an by al-Jassas.” This work the work of Imam Abu Bakr al-Jassas al-Razi (died 370 Hijrah), an Imam “distinguished among Hanafi jurist.” In this work, al-Razi usurps the task of providing the correct juristic details in Qur’anic verses containing such. Therefore, among works that provide clarity on juristic injunctions, “this book enjoys a prominent place among those.” 47 Once more, to my knowledge, this work yet to be made available in English.

Next comes the work , Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthur.  This, “written by ‘Allamah Jalah al-din al-Suyuti (died 910).” The full name of this work is, “ ‘al-Durr al-Manjthur fi al-Tafsir bi l ‘Ma’thur.’” In this work, al-Suyuti presents the sum of his devoted efforts to collect “all narrations about the tafsir of Qur’an,” that were available at that time, assemble, and present them all in this book. As such, in this indispensable work, he cites the works of “hadith scholars such as Hafiz ibn Jarir, Imam Baghawi, Ibn Marduwayh, Ibn Hibban and Ibn Majah and others.”48 This work also, as is so with the lion’s share of the works of the scholars of hadith just noted, to the best of my knowledge, yet to be make available in English.

Next major work in the list of such cited in Mar’arul is the work, “Al-Tafsir al-Mazhari.” The author of this work is, Qadi Thanaullah Panipati (died 1225 Hijrah). The work is named after “his spiritual master, Mirza Mazhar Jan-e-Janan Dehlavi. “ The work is said to be “very simple and clear, and extremely useful to locate brief explanations of Qur’anic verses.”49  It also, as most those above, to the best of my knowledge, at the time of this writing, unavailable in English.

The last in the list of major works cited in Ma’ariful Qur’an is that of “Ruh al-Ma ‘ani.” Full name of that work is, “ ‘Ruh al-Ma ‘ani fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al- ‘Azim wa al-Sab‘ al-Mathani. Its author, “ ‘Allamah  Mahmud al-Alusi (died) 1270 Hijrah), the famous scholar of the last period of Baghdad.” Comes in thirty volumes.  And the author of Ma’ariful Qur’an states of this “very comprehensive commentary … no future venture in connection with the Tafsir of the Qur’an can now afford to ignore its help.” 50

Thus, winding up this section, when I state, that which I cite is that from the authoritative voices in Islam, I do so for good and justifiable reason. Citing those who, their testimony is, they dedicated their lives, “in the fear of Allah,” each respective Imam, reaching back, gather up, to the very best of his ability to do so, the revered works of the regard-worthy scholars and makers of tafirs who preceded him, and from those works, concluding, and presenting their works.


“Bismillah”


With the above tabled, with the opening lines of this essay in mind—“ Orlando Police Dispatcher: Emergency 911….Omar Mateen: In the name of God the Merciful, the beneficent [said in Arabic] [“Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim”] 51…. . I wanna let you know, I’m in Orlando and I did the shootings”—to the third unnumbered page of Tafsir al-Jalalayn, where we read, “In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Beneficent.”

From there, to  verse one of "Surat” One, Tafsir al-Jalalayn, “In the name of Allah, All Merciful, Most Merciful, Praise be to Allah, the Lord of all the worlds….” 52

Imam Al-Qurtubi, in his tafsir, provides as verse one of “Surat” one, “In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful.”

With Mateen’s Bismillah in mind, we read, in the just cited work of Al-Qurtubi , the revered Imam also provides, “Scholars say that ‘In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful’ is an oath from our Lord which He revealed at the beginning of every sura.” He adds, by that oath revealed, “Allah” “swears to His slaves, ‘What I have laid down for you, My slaves, in this sura is true. I will fulfil [sic] for you all that I guarantee….” 53

Imam Qurtubi there also provides, “Some scholars say that “In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful” contains all the Shariah because it indicates the Essence and the Attributes.” 54

Al-Qurtubi also provides, “Muslim reports from Anas,” as follows:


One day while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, was among us he nodded off and then he raised his head smiling. We asked, ‘What has made you smile, Messenger of Allah?’ He said, ‘A sura was just revealed to me. It is: “In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful! Truly We have given you the Great Abundance. So pray to your Lord and sacrifice. It is the one who hates you who is cut off without an heir.’” (108)” 55


From there, into the pages of Ma ‘ariful Quran, Volume one, on the opening lines of verse one of Surah one: “(I begin) with the name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Very-Merciful.” (Surah Al-Fatihah, [The Opening] 1:1).

Under the heading, “Bismillah is a verse of the Holy Qur’an,” the author of Ma’ariful Qur’an provides, some assert that Bismillah is indeed a verse in the Qur’an and that verse is in Surah al-Naml. Others assert the Bismillah is an integral part of Surah one, verse one.  “According to the great Imam Abu Hanifah, it is not an integral part of any Surah except al-Naml, rather it is in itself  an independent verse of the Holy Qur’an … placed at the beginning of every surah,” thereby “distinguishing one Surah from another.” 56

Though there is absence on consensus on that matter, where there is consensus of the scholars, with respect to Bismillah, is that it is indeed an integral part of the Qur’an, thus likewise,  “It is a Sunnah to recite Bismillah,” because, when one does so, one is reciting Qur’anic content. 57

Additionally, “The Holy Qur’an,” provides the author of Ma’riful Qur’an, “again and again instructs us to begin what we do with the name of Allah.” He adds, “ The Holy Prophet has said that no important work receives the blessings of Allah, unless it is begun with His name.” 58

(Thus, for no trite reason Mateen’s utterance thereto, in his above cited “work” early 12 June 2016, Pulse nightclub.)

Same authoritative source also provides, as follows:


 By instructing man to begin everything with the name of Allah, Islam has given to the whole of his life an orientation towards Allah so that he may, with each step he takes, renew his allegiance to the covenant with Allah that nothing he does, not even his very being can come into existence without the will and help of Allah.  Thus, all the economic and worldly activities of man, each movement and gesture, becomes transformed into an act of worship. 59


For such reasons, Omar Siddiqui Mateen, the morning of 12 June 2016, in the above-cited phone call he made, that work dedicated to Allah, done in the name of Allah; in reciting his Bismillah thereto, his every movement, and gesture thereat that fateful blood-and-death-filled morning became acts of worship.

As Ma’ariful Qur’an speaks to the utterance of Bismillah,  which Mateen uttered that morning: “How brief is the action, which consumes neither time nor energy, and yet how immense the gain –it is a regular alchemy, transmuting the profane (dunya) into the sacred (din).” 60

And thus, according to Islamic doctrine, which Mateen believed full heartedly in, by his Bismillah utterance, he transformed his “profane” acts that morning into “sacred” acts—sacred acts of the din of Islam.

As stated above, as borne out in the authoritative texts of Islam, acts of worship.

For such reasons, we read in the revered works of tafsir, “acts of worship (‘Ibadah) are not limited merely to prescribed prayers or fasting.  Imam al-Ghazzali in his book ‘Arba ‘in has enumerated ten forms which worship can take.” 61

Among those, “Prayers, Prescribed Alms giving, Fasting, Hajj,” as one would expect to find. So too, “Reciting the Holy Qur’an, Remembrance of Allah in all possible situations,” as well as, “Earning ones livelihood in accordance with the regulations of the Shari ‘ah.” So too, “Fulfilling one’s obligations towards one’s companions and neighbors,” as well as, “Persuading people to act righteously and dissuading them from what is reprehensible and forbidden.”62

And the last of those perhaps “uncommon” but certain acts Islam counts as worship:  “To follow the Sunnah, or the practice of the Holy Prophet.” 63

Sunnah, as presented and spoken to in the opening pages of this essay, sunnah as Islam presents it being: words and deeds, sayings and doings of the “Holy Prophet.”

Thus worship is implementing and following sunnah. Sunnah that Siddiqui Mateen, true to the title he makes part of his name, believing in Allah and His Messenger, neither hesitating nor doubting the words and commands of “the Messenger,” sunnah,  “sayings and doings of ‘Allah’s Messenger,’” which, “Man of Allah,” “Saint” Matten put to task that morning in Pulse nightclub.


Sunnah (worship) at Pulse Nightclub


“I could see piles of bodies laying over the toilet seat and slumped over. And the bottom of the toilet was just covered with hand prints and blood,” she said, and recalled thinking, “I really don’t think I’m going to get out of here.”

At one point, she prayed to die.

“I was just begging God to take my soul out of my body,” Carter said.

At times, she said the shooter referenced snipers and implied he was not acting alone.
“It sounded like he was communicating with other people involved in it,” Carter said…. 64


Words of Pulse nightclub massacre survivor, Patience Carter.

From her  words we go to these words of "Allah's Messenger":


“…I heard the Messenger of Allah say: If the people see evil and do not denounce it, soon Allah will send His punishment upon them all.” 65

“The Messenger of Allah said, … there will be a people who recite the Qur’an but it will go no further than their collarbones; … Fighting them is a duty upon every Muslim.” 66

It was narrated that Suwaid bin Ghafalah said: ‘Ali said: …. I heard the Messenger of Allah say: “Some people will emerge at the end of time who are young in age and foolish. They will speak the best of words …. They will pass out of faith as the arrow passes out of the prey. If you meet them, kill them, for in killing them there will be for the one who kills them reward with Allah …. “ ‘Abdur-Rahman said: “If you meet them, then kill them, for killing them will bring to those who kill them reward on the Day of Resurrection.” 67

It was narrated that Abu Hurairah said: “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘I have been commanded to fight the people until they say La ilaha illallah. If they say it then their blood and their wealth are safe from me, except for a right that is due, and their reckoning is with Allah….’”68 

It was narrated from ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amir that the Prophet said: “The extinction of the whole world is less significant before Allah than killing a Muslim man.” 69

It was narrated from ‘Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, that the Prophet said: ‘The lives of the believers are equal in value, and they are one against others, and they hasten to support the asylum granted by the least of them. But no believer may be killed in return for a disbeliever….” 70

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah from the Messenger of Allah: “The believer is the mirror of his fellow-believer, and the believer is the brother of his fellow-believer. He protects him against ruin and looks after him.” 71

Again, now to the words of shooting victim of Pulse nightclub, Patience Carter, what she related of Mateen: “Through the conversation with 911, he said that the reason why he was doing this was he wanted America to stop bombing his country.” 72

The claimed “his” country of which this American born, raised, and residing American Muslim speaks of: Islamic State.

As Carter also said, “So the motive was very clear to us who were laying in our blood and other people’s blood who were injured, who were shot — that we knew what his motive was. And he was not going to stop killing people until he was killed, until he felt that the message got out there.” 73

Other reports relate, “just before the massacre, the shooter went on Facebook,” and there posted, “America and Russia stop bombing the Islamic state. You kill innocent women and children by doing U.S. air strikes. Now taste the Islamic state vengeance.” 74
Clearly, Qur’anic doctrine establishes, the believer is the mirror image of his fellow-believer, and a Muslim a brother to the Muslim, thus we deduce from such what is done to one Muslim is as if it were done to all.  Thus, we witness Mateen’s adherence to sunnah in reading the following: “It was narrated from Sa ‘eed bin Zaid the the Prophet said: ‘Whoever fights to protect his family is a martyr.” 75
We regard, the Qur’anic text, as described above, as provided in lines following, likewise establishes the doctrine of Qisas [equal retaliation]. Thus again, we note Mateen was armed for his actions not only with firearms there in Pulse nightclub, but also for those acts fully armed with Qur’anic blessing, guidance, and authority.
As was so with the troops of Allah who struck our nation, 9/11--there too, their claim was the hits were in return for our actions abroad in Muslim nations. What’s more, of 9/11, “high school friends “of  Mateen, child of Qur’an,  they stated he showed elation and pleasure upon witnessing that macabre. 76 
Other reports provided, “a former classmate” of Mateens, from “Mariposa Elementary School,” stated, “one day when he [Mateen] was in either 4th or 5th grade, he threatened to come in here with a gun and kill everyone.” 77
Dan Gilroy, who worked as a Security Guard with Mateen, he said of Mateen, “he said, several times, he was going to kill a large group of people, In fact, one time he said I would make the count the highest.”78
The commentators on that show that day commented on the above-cited “behavior problems” stating, “it was deep rooted…. Not something that just started yesterday or last week. It is certainly something that has been going on for a while. “
Indeed--Mateen was both born and raised an American Muslim, thus raised in a U.S. based Muslim home, raised on the Qur’an and the sunnah. Thus well versed on that in those works. Some Muslims hide their faith well. Countless reject it but must keep concealed that repudiation. Mateen seem not only to embrace his Muslim faith but also to wear it on his sleeve, its precepts ever close to the surface. Thus, his “teapot” repeatedly noted, throughout stages of his life, boiling.
Surviving mother of the youngest victim killed that morning at Pulse Nightclub, Natalie Murray, mother of Akyra Murray, she stated, her daughter was on her way with a “Full ride” Scholarship to Mercy Hurst University. Akyra’s goal there: “study criminology and sociology.” Central to that, “find out why criminals act the way they act and what caused them to tick to be able to kill and hurt people.  This is what she was going to study,”79 provided her mother in a CNN interview with Don Lemon.
Natalie stated, “ And to think that a person like that would actually take her life at such a young age, it’s just the saddest thing.” Indeed it is. Natalie stated, “I can’t – I’m at a loss for words for what was going through his head. And what made him do what he did and why he wanted to hurt those kids. That club,” she stated, “brings from 18-years-old up. These were kids….”80
My heart breaks for this momma’s loss, and for all the horrific details surrounding it… I, however, am at no loss as to what was going through Mateen’s head:  “dhirk” remembrance of Allah.
“Dhirk,” which is worship.  “Dhikru’ullah: remembrance or invocation of Allah.” 81
Neither am I at a loss as to what made him do what he did: The doctrines in the Qur’an, and the spirit behind them, made him do what he did.  The words and deeds, the sayings and doings of the “prophet” of Islam, and Mateen’s regard and devotion to such made him do what he did 12 June at Pulse Nightclub.
“Remember Me,” the Qur’an provides Allah commands his ummah, “and I will remember you. “ (Surah Al-Baqarah  2: 152.) And that “means to say,” reads revered exegetic view provided, “if men ‘remember’ Allah by obeying His commandments, He will ‘remember’ them by granting His pardon and His rewards.” 82
“He who has not obeyed Him has not remembered Him, “provides the same source, citation attributed to “commentator Sa ‘d ibn Jubayr, asserting, “'Remembrance’  of Allah as obedience and submission to him.” 83
 That explanation, “fully supported by a hadith cited by Al-Qurtubi on the authority of “Ahkam al-Qur’an by Ibn Khuwayz Mandadh.” He states, “the Holy Prophet has said that one who has been obeying Allah – that is following the injunctions with regard to the lawful (Halal) and the unlawful (Haram)—has truly been remembering Allah.” 84
“Islam,” provide the revered scholars of that faith, “signifies ‘to obey, to submit oneself, to surrender one’s will.’” 85
“What Islam requires of man,” state the same, “is that he should set aside all his desires and inclinations, and seek, in everything he does, the pleasure of his Lord.” 86 And how will such a man know what pleases his “Lord”? The scholars answer that for us, stating, “ only when he knows the commandments of his Lord, and also performs these tasks exactly in the manner He has prescribed. This,” they affirm, “ is what ‘Ibadah or worship is.” 87
They add to that, “Thus, Islam signifies total obedience to Allah, and this obedience is possible only when one follows the Sunnah, the Way of the Holy Prophet.” 88
Because all in Sunnah is Halal and thus all sunnah-following actions are obeying Allah. Neglecting one dot of following sunnah is Haram. What’s more, obeying Allah is following sunnah examples, obeying sunnah commands , thus following the injunctions of the lawful and the unlawful in Islam.
Allah’s word commands “Bid the Fair and forbid the Unfair.” (Surah “AL-‘Imran 3:104)

Speaking to that Qur’anic command, Hadith provides in  Sunan An-Nasa’i, and elsewhere, as follows: 


“It was narrated that Tariq bin Shihab said: “Abu Sa ‘eed Al-Khurdi said: “I heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘Whoever among you sees an evil and changes it with his hand, then he has done his duty. Whoever is unable to do that, but changes it with his tongue, then he has done his duty. Whoever is unable to do that, but changes it with his heart, then he has done his duty, and that is the weakest of Faith.” 89


Comments of the scholars on the above provide,   “We get to learn that witnessing the sin taking place is also a sin, except for the one who fulfills his duty imposed upon him by the Shar ‘iah.” 90  

Speaking to the same, comments on the above-cited verse, (3:104) include this citation: “the obligation—‘to bid the Fair and forbid the Unfair –has been assigned to the whole community. That they discharge this responsibility is the reason that they are placed higher over other communities.” 91

Hence, the verse, “You are the best Ummah raised for mankind. You bid the Fair and forbid the Unfair.” (Surah “AL-‘Imran 3:110.) That is they “enjoin what is good in accordance with the dictates of the Qur’an and the Sunnah.” 92

Hence these sayings of the “Holy Prophet”:


“By the One in Whose Hand is my soul!: Either you command good and forbid evil, or Allah will soon send upon you a punishment form Him, then you will call upon Him, but He will not respond to you.” 93


Footnotes thereat read as follows:


….an individual person who is capable and does his best to fulfill this duty, he will surely save himself from punishment. If no one performs this duty, then the entire community shall be considered sinning and be punished. The reason being … stopping the wrongdoer from committing wrong is a collective duty that must be performed by all. 94


Adding to the above, Allah’s word commands, “O you who believe! Fear Allah as He should be feared. And die not except in the state of Islam (as Muslims) with complete submission to Allah.” (Surah ‘ Al-Imran, 3:102.)

It provides, as mentioned and spoken to above, with respect to the “prophet” Muhammad, the one Islam asserts is Allah’s final messenger to mankind, “And We sent down the Message (adh-dhikr: The Qur’an) so that you explain to the people what has been revealed for them and so that they may ponder. ” (Surah Al-Nahl 16:44.)

Therefore, because the Qur’an establishes, as spoken to at length above, Muhammad, via his life, was dispatched for the express purpose of explaining  the intended meanings of the verses of the Qur’an, “Allah’s” word likewise repeated times throughout it commands “You who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger.”

The rest of that verse reads, “ [and obey] those in command among you. If you have a dispute about something, refer it back to (the Book of) Allah and the Messenger [himself, while he was alive, and then to his Sunna].” (Surat an-Nisa’ 4:59, Al-Jalalayn, and elsewhere.)

Therefore, this Qur’anic command and assertion:  “Say [to them, O Muhammad], “If you love Allah, then follow me and Allah will love you….” ( Surat Al-Imran 3:31, Al-Jalalayn) So too, “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.” (Surat an-Nisa’ 4: 80, Ibid.)

For such reason, from the mouth of the “Messenger of Allah,” this command: “Whoever among you lives after I am gone … you must adhere to my Sunnah and the way of the Rightly Guided Khulafa. Hold on to it and cling fast to it” 95

Why is that?

Once more, because, as the Qur’an asserts of all the “prophet” said or relayed, thus , as we note footnotes thereat from the men of knowledge in Islam on that just cited hadith read,  “Regarding the fact that the Sunnah is revelation ,” as touched on earlier in this post, “Allah has said: ‘Nor does he speak of (his own) desire. It is only a revelation revealed.’ (An-Najm 53:24 [sic] [actual verses: 3, 4.]” 96

Therefore, on the pages written by the learned on Islam, “Commentators and Imams have said that obeying the Messenger of Allah means to cling to his sunna and to submit to what he brought.” 97 They add, “Obeying the Messenger in his sunna is equivalent to obeying Allah.” 98 They state, “Sahl at-Tustari was asked about the Shari‘a of Islam and he quoted, ‘Take what the Messenger brings you.’ (59:7.)” 99

That last line bears repeating, given, with so much talk of rejecting Shariah in our nation but praising and promoting Islam in our nation, that last line gives us the basic shakedown of just what Shariah is--“Sahl at-Tustari was asked about the Shari‘a of Islam and he quoted, ‘Take what the Messenger brings you.’ (59:7.)” Indeed, therein Shariah: Sunnah of the “Prophet; Sunnah of the Prophet: Islam--the lawful therein done, the unlawful forbidden and shunned-- enacted.

Because of that basic established tenet of Islam, hadith provides, with full confidence absent one slivers thread of apology, this “prophet” asserted as follows:


“Let me not find one of you reclining on his couch, and when he hears of a command that I have enjoined or a prohibition I have issued, he says: ‘We do not know; what we find in the Book of Allah, we follow.’” (Sahih.) 100


Therein, we note, Allah’s Messenger emphatically asserts the importance of believers moving to action in obedience to, not of what Allah enjoined or prohibited, but, in his words, what “I have.”  That is so because the regarded works of Islam establishes, as shown herein and elsewhere, the sunna of the “prophet” was nothing more, nothing less than sunna of Allah.

 Thus, as spoken to above, when one obeys the former by default one obeys the latter, and when obeys the latter by default one will then obey the former. In addition, obeying and submitting to Allah is remembrance of Allah, remembrance of Allah is worship, and following Sunnah is obedience and submission to Allah and it is worship.

Regarding the above, we recall Mateen’s affirmations in the transcript of his 911 phone call: “OM: My name is I pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State.
“OD: Ok, What’s your name?

“OM: I pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi may God protect him [said in Arabic], on behalf of the Islamic State.”

We note, thus, in the following hadith, again, Mateen’s adherence to sunnah:


COMMAND ON THAT WHO TRIES TO DISRUPT THE UNITY OF THE MUSLIMS

It has been reported on the authority of ‘Arfaja who said: I have heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) saying: Different evils will make their appearances in the near future. Anyone who tries to disrupt the affairs of this nation while they are united you should strike him with the sword whoever he is. (If remonstration does not prevail with him and he does not desist from his disruptive activities, he should be killed.)

In another version of the tradition narrated on the same authority through a different chains [sic] of transmitters we have the words: “Kill him.”

It has been narrated (through a still different chain of transmitters) on the same authority (i.e. “Arfaja) who said similarly – but adding; “Killing them all.” I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) saying: When you are holding one single man as your leader, you should kill who seeks to undermine your solidarity or disrupt your unity. 101


With that in mind, we regard, the Qur’an provides, “O those who believe, the Qisas [even retaliation] has been enjoined upon you –freeman for a freeman, slave for a slave and female for a female.” (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:178) It likewise provides, “So when anyone aggresses against you, aggress against him in the like manner as he did against you.” (2: 194) It provides, “And if you retaliate, then retaliate just as you have been oppressed against. (Surah al-Nahl 16:24).

Thus, the record of sunnah provides, because, for those who wage war against Allah, his messenger, his ummah, this prescription and example of returning like-kind wounds and killings, this sunnah of “Allah’s Messenger”:


It was narrated that ‘Aishah said: “Some people raided the milk camels of the Messenger of Allah. He caught them and had their hands and feet cut off and their eyes gouged out.” 102  

It was narrated that Anas said: “The Prophet only had the eyes of those people gouged out, because they had gouged out the eyes of the herdsmen.” 103


There too, this example of “equal retaliation” against an aggressor:


It was narrated from Sumurah that the Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever kills his slave, we will kill him; whoever mutilates (his slave), we will mutilate him, and whoever castrates (his slave), we will castrates him.” 104


The above words and deeds of the “prophet” and his companions sanctioned irrespective of the prohibition in Islam to mutilate. The law of equal retaliation making the unlawful in Islam lawful. The words and deeds of the “prophet” explaining the meaning of the Qur’anic verses.

As the Qur’an provided, so explained the “prophet”: “The repayment of a bad action is one equivalent to it….if people do defend themselves when they are wronged [--and wrong those who have wronged them--] nothing can be held against them for doing that, [and there is no punishment]. (Surat ash-Shura 42: 40, 41, al-Jalalayn)

And just who is it that is to be counted as the aggressors, thus those deserving of Allah’s above provided punishment? Who is it that the Qur’an provides are those  “due” “Allah’s” punishment” if not under the law of equal retaliation than  for the “wrong” of rejecting Allah’s messenger and the message he brought—a “wrong” of which the Qur’an provides example after example of how Allah destroyed nations guilty of such a wrong?

The answer to those questions are provided in the Qur’anic chronicles of the narratives relating how Allah dealt with these “guilty” nations.  Narratives in the Qur’an, there to serve as warnings, lessons, and signpost telling nations coming after those in the “examples” what belongs to their sorrow should they reject Allah’s messenger sent to them.


“Signpost: ‘Warning!’”


“News has come to them,” states the Qur’an, come to those who reject the “Prophet” and what he brought; news “which contains a threat [--information about the destruction of the nations who denied their Messengers. It contains a harsh deterrent]. ( Surat al-Qamar 54: 4, al-Jalalayan.)

“’Ad,” provides Qur’an, “denied the truth.” What truth did they deny?

The truth that the messenger Allah sent to them was just that: “[ Their Prophet was Hud ,” but they denied he was Allah’s dispatched messenger to them and for doing so, “[… they were punished]. How terrible,” warns Allah, “were my punishment and warnings! [--My warning to them before the punishment descended on them. Then,” provides the tafsir, “ Allah explains what that punishment was.]” (Ibid [Surat al-Qamar], 54: 18)

We will return to those details shortly. For now, however, still focusing on just whom it is that is to be counted among those due Allah’s punishment, we go to go to Surah az-Zukhruf (43).  There we read, “…he [(Pharaoh)] swayed his people and they succumb to him [-- and they did what he wanted and denied Musa]…. (43: 54, al-Jalalayn)

Thus, because of those actions, the Qur’an provides, “…We took revenge on them and drowned every one of them. We made them a thing of the past, an example for later peoples. [They were a lesson for those after them so that they should not do the same as those before them did].” (Ibid, [Surah az-Zukhruf] 43: 56)

What does the Qur’an assert was the action that Pharaoh and his people did that earned their mass destruction? They denied Musa, whom the Qur’an states was Allah’s messenger sent to them. What lesson are we to gain from that Qur’an provided narrative?

The lesson that nations now who reject the one the Qur’an provides is Allah’s final messenger sent to mankind will doubtlessly likewise incur mass punishment from Allah.

Ma’ariful Qur’an, speaking of the examples of the mass punishment that was sunnah of Allah on nations who rejected his Messengers, it provides this warning:


“All these nations were the strongest and resourceful….The current set of verses [referring here to those cited above from surah 54] show how the superpowers were destroyed by Divine punishment….That is, when the Divine chastisement overtook these nations … wealth and number were killed like flies and mosquitoes.” 105


The same source, different volume, commenting on the narrative of Allah’s punishment visited on Thamud and others in Surah al-A ‘raf (7:77-79), provides, on account of the wrong actions of the people of Thamud, “ the result was: (and they were [found dead] in their homes, fallen on their knees –77).” 106 

 It expounds thereat, “The word: (jathimim) is a derivation from the verbal noun: Juthum, which means to be rendered motionless at one spot, or remaining sitting (Al-Qamus). The sense is that everyone lay dead as and where one was.” 107 Commentary also there reads, “Allah Ta ‘ala, in his infinite wisdom, has allowed these habitations of punished peoples to stay as signpost of lessons for coming generations.” 108

As mentioned above, one example among many that the Qur’an provides of those guilty of rejecting his messenger sent to them and thus those deserving and thus recipients of his punishment earned and delivered,  is, the example of the people of Thamud, the prophet Salih, and the she-camel hamstrung in the narrative. (Surat Hud  11, and others)

Therein we read, “They hamstrung her.” (Surat Hud [11]: 65, al-Jalalayn) They, being the people of Thamud.

Yet the exegesis provided there on this Qur’anic narrative states, “a man named Quddur did the action on their instructions.” (Surat Hud 11:65, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

Ma’ariful Qur’an on the account, as it is spoken to in Surat Al-A ‘raf (7: 77 – 79) provides, “Qadhar hamstrung her ….” 109

Adding, “The Holy Qur’an calls this person the most cruel and wretched among the people of Thamud: (when the one, most wicked of them, was sent [incited to kill her] -91:12),” it provides, that incitement “brought mass punishment on the people of Thamud.” 110

Surah Ash-Shams provides, “(The people of) Thamud denied the truth … when rose up the one who was most wretched of them. So, the Messenger of Allah said to them, ‘Be careful  of Allah’s she-camel ….’ But they rejected him,” states the Qur’an, “and killed her, so their Lord sent eradicating torment upon them, and made it equal, [Allah’s punishment] for all.” (91: 11 – 14, Ma ‘ariful Qur’an rendered verse)

Exegesis there provides, those such as the people of Thamud who deny the truth sent to them, and reject Allah’s Messenger sent to them; they will “receive severe punishment in the Hereafter. Sometimes, however, an instalment [sic] of punishment is meted out to them in this world as is in the case of Thamud.” 111

It provides, “the word damdama [used in the just-cited verse] refers to such tormenting scourge as is unleashed on a person or a nation again and again, until it destroys or crushes them completely.” There follows, “Fa-sawwaha [likewise used in the above verse] signifies that the scourge overtook the entire nation, men, women, children, and young and old.” 112

Tafsir al-Jalalayn provides the narrative and its explanation this way:


“Thamud denied in their excessive tyranny [and insolence; the Messenger to Thamud was Salih]. (Surat ash-Shams 91:11)

…when the worst of them rushed ahead  [--this was a man named Quddar who rushed to hamstring the camel with their approval--](vs.: 12)

…. [as a consequence … the punishment of Allah descended on them] --and they hamstrung her— … So their Lord crushed them [with the punishment] for their sin and flattened them: [ in other words, He totally enveloped them in it so that none of them escaped]. (vs.: 14.)
  

Speaking to the same incident, Surat al-A ‘raf reads, with tafsir providing the full picture concept of the event, “….and they hamstrung the She-camel  [--Quddur killed it at their command by slaughtering it with a sword --] …. So the earthquake … seized them and: morning found them [dead], lying flattened in their homes.” (7: 77, 78,  Al-Jalalayn.)

In other words, one man, with the consent, support, and approval of the populace, did the action.

Yet the Qur’anic record of that event provides, “They hamstrung her.” Does so to make clear who it was, when “The Great Blast seized hold of those who did wrong,”  just who it was that Allah held responsible for the said “wrong.” Thus just who it was, as the Qur’an declares, “morning found them lying flattened in their homes, [dead bodies on the ground].” (Surat Hud 11: 67, Al-Jalalayn.)

Therefore, from Surat ash-Shu ‘ara,’ speaking to the same account, we read, “But they hamstrung her [--with the consent of others--] and woke up remorseful,… for the [promised] punishment did come down on them [--and they were destroyed.” (26: 157, 158, al-Jalalayn.) In addition, the verse contains, “There is certainly a sign in that….”

Surat adh-Dhariyat echoes the same message, speaking of the mass destruction of the people of Ad,
“And also in [the destructions] of ‘Ad [--there is a sign--] when we unleashed against them the barren wind …. Which left nothing [--neither living person nor property--] ….” (51:41, 42. Al-Jalalayn.)

Following that, “And also in [the destruction of] Thamud [there is a Sign --].”  (51:43.)

Indeed, there is a sign—there is object lesson after object lesson: “They spurned the Lord’s command [out of arrogance, and did not obey the Messenger,] so the Blast seized them … as they watched. They could not stand upright [--being unable to rise when the punishment descended--] and they were not helped.” (Surat adh-Dhariyat 51:  44, 45, Ibid.)

Driving the message home, of just why the Qur’an devotes much time and space on these narratives, the surah continues with “and [there is a Sign in the destruction of] the people of Nuh before [who were destroyed by Allah ….]” (51: 46, Ibid.)

Indeed, as stated earlier, as is clear in all these Qur’an provided examples, there is a sign, there are numerous clear object lessons. Those lessons being, when Allah’s punishment came, it came to all the incorrigibly unrepentant who allowed the “wrong” done to be done; Allah’s punishment came, affirms tafsir, to the entire “area and tribe” (Surat Hud 11: 68, Al-Jalalayn.)

Therefore, as cited above, the Qur’anic narrative of that event reads, “morning found them lying flattened in their homes, [dead bodies on the ground].” (11: 67, .Ibid) In other words, “Morning found,”  asserts Qur’an, not only Quddur’s dead body “on the ground,” but there also and in like condition, the same of all those who supported him, instructed him, and approved of his said “wrong, ” though it was Quddur alone who did the actual act.

Thus, in summary we read, “Yes indeed! Thamud rejected their Lord, So away with Thamud! [This means both the area and the tribe.]” (Surat Hud 11:68, Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

Much the same telling is told of the Ancestors to the people of Thamud, the people of ‘Ad.

Tafsir on object lesson “the people of Ad” goes this way: “… their gardens and mansions, and palaces,” were “leveled to the ground. Their men and animals went up in the air and zoomed back hitting the floor with their heads.” 113

The narrative adds, “Thus, the people of Ad were eliminated to the last man.” 114

Thus made clear the meaning in “And we eradicated those who belied Our signs. And they were not believers.” (Surah Al-A-‘raf 7: 72)

Likewise, there in Surah Al-Araf for our benefit to learn from the story sunnah of Allah is the example of his sunnah dealing with the people of Lut.

That example of Allah’s sunnah therein in Surah Al-Araf reads this way: “And (We sent) Lut, when he said to his people, “Do you commit the shameful act in which nobody has ever preceded you from all the worlds? [80] Surely, you come to men lustfully instead of women. No, you are a people who cross the limits.” [81]

Tafsir al-Jalalayn renders verse 81 this way: “You … come with lust to men instead of women. You are indeed a depraved people, [going beyond the lawful into the unlawful.” (7:81)

Thus, the judgment the Qur’anic record there states thus visited on the people of Lut in their city of Sadum (Sodum) for their above crossing of Allah’s limits is, “We rained down upon them a rain. So look,” chides Allah, “how was the fate of the sinners! [84]” (Surah Al-A-‘raf , 7:84, Ma’ariful Qur’an rendition.)

Tafsir Jalalayn provides the verse this way: “”We rained down a rain [of backed stones] upon them [which destroyed them]. See the final fate of the evildoers!” (7:84)

Surah al-Hijr speaks to the same event, stating, “”We turned the place [(their cities)] completely upside down [--Jibril lifted them to heaven and turned them over and dropped them back to the earth --] and rained down on them stones of hard-backed clay.” (Ibid [Al-Jalalayn], 15: 74)

“There are certainly signs in that,” affirms the Qur’an, at least that is, “for the discerning.” (15: 75.) And just in case some of the expected-to-be discerning are slow to that task, “Allah” affirms of these examples again, “There is certainly a Sign [(a lesson)] in that for the believers.” (Vs. 77.)

“The people of the Thicket [--a reference to a thicket of trees close to Madyan; they were the people of Shu ‘ayb --] were also wrongdoers [--in denying the prophethood of Shu ‘ayb],” reads verse 78 of surah al-Hijr (Al-Jalalayn). We will return to find the fate of this example “Allah” has provided for the believer regarding those who reject the prophethood of the messengers Allah sends to mankind. But for now, we read more of the Allah’s punishment, specifically, for the people of Lut.


The Qur’anic view on the sin of “the people of Lut”


“Ask the men of Knowledge, if you yourselves do not know,” counsels the Qur’an, (Surah an-Nahl, 16: 43), therefore, we do just that. 

Given the hit in Orlando was on a “Gay Nightclub,” we delve into the authoritative works of Islam to see just what the revered elders of Islam provide as the Qur’anic view on homosexuality.

We start with that on it in Surah 7, as cited above. Do so, recalling and regarding, Allah having pressed, these examples are provided for neither entertainment nor fillers, they are there for the believer to see how Allah deals with those who reject his messengers sent, as stated above. The examples the Qur’an provides, as the text of surah seven cited earlier speaks to, are to allow the believer to “See the final fate of the evildoers!” (Surat Al-A ‘raf 7: 84, Al-Jalalayn.)

Because, as spoken to in other parts of this essay, as spoken to numerous times throughout the regard-worthy Islamic authoritative works, Allah now uses the hands of his believers to deliver his punishment.

Therefore, the necessity of certifying that the readers of Qur’an, who read that book believing it came from God, and thus, is a sacred book with inviolable instructions and commands, clearly understand what they should “see” in the harvest, if you will, the end result of the “work” of their hands.

Therefore, serving that end, Tafsir on the above just-cited verses provides the reasons for the narrative being part of Qur’an, as well as clarity, it was no gentle rain rained down on the dwellers of Sodum, as we read:


The Sahabah, the Tabi ‘in and Mujtahid Imams have declared this crime and sin to be far more grave than other acts of shame. Imam Abu Hanifah has said: The punishment given to the person who commits this act should match the punishment which came upon the people of Lut, by the command of Allah Ta ‘ala – that rocks rained from the skies and the floor of the earth flipped upside down. Therefore, this person should be pushed down from a high mountain and rocks should be thrown from above on top of him. According to a narration of Sayyidna Ibn ‘Abbas, in the Musnad of Ahmad, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and ibn Majah, the Holy Prophet said about the people who commit this evil act: that is, the doer of this evil deed and his passive partner (al-maf ‘ul u bih i: with whom it was done) should both be killed. (Ibn Kathir) 115


Who is going to be “delivering” this prescribed punishment of Allah? Thus who is going to be seeing to it “this person should be pushed down from a high mountain and rocks should be thrown from above on top of him”?

The believer is. As the Qur’an, ahadith, sira, tafsir, and works of Islamic jurisprudence, “Fiqh” bear out.

Tafsir on surah four recommends much the same punishment for the sin of the people of Sodum, and we are on our way to it. But first, we read what hadith, words of the “Prophet of Islam,” state on the topic.

We start in Sunan Ibn Majah:


It was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbas that the Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Lut, kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.”

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet said concerning those who do the action of the people of Lut: “Stone the upper and the lower, stone them both.” 116


Comments from the men of knowledge in Islam on the just cited ahadith read, “Sodomy is one of the most immoral actions and a mortal sin. Its punishment is more severe than the punishment of illegal sexual intercourse.
……………..
“The Punishment of this crime is death whether committed by married or unmarried persons.” 117

Next, from Jami ‘ At-Tirmidhi, the following:


Ibn Abbas narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whomever you find doing the actions of the people of Lut then kill the one doing it, and the one it is done to.” 118


Additional notes provided along with this hadith provide the following:


….Muhammad bin Ishaq reported this Hadith from “Amr bin Abi ‘Amr, so he said: “Those who do the act of the people of Lut are cursed.” And he did not mention killing in it. He did mention: “Those who have relations with a beast are cursed.” This Hadith has been reported from ‘Asim bin ‘Umar, from Suhail bin Abi Salih, from his father, from Abu Hurairah, from the Prophet saying: “Kill the doer and the one it is done to.”
……………………………..

The people of knowledge differ over the legal punishment for the sodomite. Some of them held the view that he has to be stoned, whether married or not married. This is the view of Malik, Ash-Shafi ‘I, Ahmad and Ishaq.

Some of the people of knowledge among the Fuqaha from the Tabi ‘in [those learned in the application of Shari ‘a, and specifically here, those from the  Second generation of Muslims, the Followers of the Companions]—among them Al-Hasan Al-Basri, Ibrahim An-Nakha ‘im, ‘Ata’ bin Abi Rabah, and others—said that the legal punishment for the sodomite is the illegal punishment for illegal sexual relations. 119


Shortly here, we will thus visit the “legal punishment for … illegal sexual relations,” but for now, scholars’ Comments posted on the above read as follows:


….The punishment of a sodomite, married or unmarried is stoning….This is the correct point of view.

Sodomy and lesbianism are among the most disgusting forms of sexual satisfaction. Old civilizations were destroyed and stones were rained upon such people, as stated in Surat Hud Verse 82. “We turned (the cities) upside down and rained down, on them stones of baked clay, spread layer on layer.” 120


Additionally, the following from Sunan Abu Dawud on the subject:


It was narrated from Abdul ‘Aziz bin Muhammad, from ‘Amr bin Abi ‘Amr, from ‘Ikrimah, from ibn ‘Abbas who said: “ Allah’s Messenger said: ‘Whoever of you find doing the action of the people of Lut, kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.” 121

It was narrated from Juraij: “Ibn Khuthaim informed me, he said: ‘I heard Sa ‘eed bin Jubair and Mujahid narrating from Ibn ‘Abbas, concerning a man who was never married and is found committing the act of the people of Lut; he said: “He is to be stoned.” 122


Comments thereat of the revered scholars of Islam read as follows: “Regarding the punishment of a sodomite, both sentences, stoning to death and killing by sword, are valid in the light of above mentioned narrations. 123

Certainly understandable, as both punishments would be a form of hell raining down on the said guilty, his/her world being turned upside down. Because, as spoken to earlier in this work, part of what Islam requires of a man, thus, what Allah was quick to provide the details of, part of what Islam counts as worship, is for man to know “the commandments of his Lord.” And being thus informed, be fully able to perform “these tasks”-- “the commandments of his Lord”—“exactly in the manner He [“Allah”] has prescribed. This,” the elders of Islam affirm, “is what ‘Ibadah or worship is.” (as cited earlier herein.)
Thus, delivering Allah’s punishment is, according Qur’anic doctrine, simply worship.
And the details on the “prescribed” manner in which that “worship” is to be done the Qur’an, the full purview of it, amply provides. Does so to insure, one will know he has followed the said “prescribed” manner in the same way one will know one has correctly followed a cake recipe: that which one produces mirrors the end result described in the example, so too, the snapshot of the “cake” that the recipe provided.
Now, recalling that cited above from at-Tirmidhi on “the legal punishment for the sodomite is the illegal punishment for illegal sexual relations,” we return once more to the counsel of the master of hadith and makers of tafsir, to the pages of Ma’ariful Qur’an on just what it states of the “legal punishment” prescribed for all “illegal sexual relations.”

In Surah 4 of the Quran, we read as follows:


These are the limits set by Allah. And whosoever obeys Allah and His Messenger, He will admit him to gardens beneath which rivers flow …. [13] And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him, He shall admit him to the Fire, remaining there for ever. And for him there is humiliating punishment. [14]

And those of your women who commit the shameful act, then have four witnesses from among you. So, if they do testify, then confine those women to their homes until death overcomes them or Allah prescribes a way for them. [15] And those two of you who commit it, torture them both. But if they repent and amend, turn away from them. Surely, Allah is Most-Relenting, Very-Merciful. [16] (Surah Al-Nisa 4: 13 – 16, Ma’ariful Quran rendition)


Exegesis on the above verses, our focus here primarily on the mentioned prescribed “torture,” the revered scholars provides:


No definite Hadd (punishment) has been described in these two verses of the Holy Qur’an. What has been said here is limited to “torture them” and “confine the fornicating women to their homes.” No particular method of such “torture” has been described either, and this has been left to the discretion of the authorities. 124


Further clarification on the above verses read as follows: 


 ‘And those two of you who commit it (the shameful act), torture them both”.

Here the Arabic word used for ‘those two of you’ is a masculine pronoun which presumes males on both sides. On this basis, these commentators have opined that this verse relates to two males committing unnatural shameful act [sic], i.e. homosexuality. 125


The said Tafsir goes on stating, though some refute the notion that the above verse is speaking of homosexuality, nonetheless, because there is consensus of the scholars that homosexuality is indeed, according to Islam, illegal sexual activity, it is therefore, they affirm, “pertinent here to give some details about the severe prohibition of homosexuality.”  They then provide, along with the Qur’anic and tafsir narrative of the people of Lut, a harsh example of how the ‘four Caliphs’ dealt with such: in short, they “condemned those guilty of sodomy to the fire.” 126

They sum up the discussion on punishment due those engaging in “the shameful” “the unnatural” acts stating, “the nature of such punishments reported by them is as severe as it can be, such as, burning into fire, bashing under a wall felled over, throwing down from a height, stoning and beheading with a sword.” 127 In reading the just cited, we recall Surah Al-Araf’s provided and called for prescribed punishment for those guilty of the sin of the “people of Lut”; recalling such, we likewise note, once again, precisely why IS deals as it does with those guilty of homosexuality:


this person should be pushed down from a high mountain and rocks should be thrown from above on top of him. According to a narration of Sayyidna Ibn ‘Abbas, in the Musnad of Ahmad, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and ibn Majah, the Holy Prophet said about the people who commit this evil act: that is, the doer of this evil deed and his passive partner (al-maf ‘ul u bih i: with whom it was done) should both be killed. (Ibn Kathir) 128


In short, the Qur’an is loaded with reasons authorizing Mateen’s actions at Pulse nightclub that fateful morning. But the truth is, he was armed from the same source to strike any number of places and gatherings—evidenced by the Nice, France promenade hit, evidenced by the “word of Allah”: “whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger and crosses the limits set by Him …. For him there is a humiliating punishment.” (Surah Al-Nisa 4:14)

It is both certain and clear, for the reasons Mateen stated, for the reasons presented in this write up, and for many not listed herein but that substantiate the same, Mateen had Allah’s punishment to deliver, and that he did. Did it according to the Qur’anic prescribed manner.

Still many may press, why Pulse?

More likely than not, it was one, perhaps his first choice, among the options or “routes” he had elected that would have the “scenery” he would most enjoy on his supposed way to Paradise. Reports stated, just hours before the terror began at Pulse, Mateen appeared to still, even then, be casing various “opportunities” for terror. 

Obviously, to have “success” in a hit, one needs, at least to a degree, favorable conditions. Thus one would lean to the “opportunity” that seemed to hold the best possibility for success. That night, as is clear by the carnage the hit yielded, Pulse looked promising.

We now return to one of the verses mentioned earlier:  Verse 83 of Surat Hud.

There we read of that rained down on the people of Lut, “…each one earmarked by your Lord [--each stone bore the name of the person for whom it was intended].  And they [(the stones or their land)] are never far from the wrongdoers.” ([11:83] Al-Jalayan, Tafsir.)

Tafsir ibn Kathir provides this on the verse, “Marked from your Lord; and they are not ever far from the wrongdoers” 129 : “ ‘Marked,’ meaning the stones were marked and sealed, all of them having the names of their victims written on them….” 130

“… and they are not ever far from the wrongdoers,” This means that this vengeance [of Allah] is not far from similar wrongdoers.” 131

Speaking of the area visited for “this vengeance of Allah” due the “people of Lut,” Ma’ariful Qur’an relays the narrative in surah Hud this way:


Reports say that those habitations were composed of four major towns where those people lived. These very habitations have been named as  ’ al-mu’tafikat’ (the towns overturned) elsewhere in the Holy Qur’an (9:70; 69:9). When the Divine command came, the archangel Jibrail al-Amin, dissected the base of the land mass holding all those towns on top of it with his wing, raised all of it upwards in a way that everything stayed where it was, even water in a water vessel. It was in the backdrop of human, animal and canine voices coming from the sky the he heaved all these habitations straight up towards the sky and, then, threw the whole thing back upside down – as appropriate to and as called for by the evil they indulged in. 132


Focusing in on Allah’s promise, and threat, in the last cited verse, the revered work provides this warning:


At the end of the verse (83), after having mentioned the actual punishment that hit the people of Sayyidna Lut, it was to warn the contemporary peoples of the world that it was said: (And it is not far from the transgressors). It means that people who insist upon indulging in this shameful act should not consider themselves very far from this punishment. It can come even today. The Holy Prophet said, ‘even in my Ummah, some people will do what the people of Lut used to do. When this starts happening, then wait, for they too would be subjected to the same punishment that was inflicted on the people of Lut. 133


As we read all these statements attributed to “Allah” and “His Messenger,” we do so, of course, knowing the words and statements of the two mean little, if anything at all, to the Ummah.

“It can come even today” --“It” both can and does.

And come, just as the Qur’an, ahadith, sira, tafsir, and maghazi provide how “Allah” came to the Jewish tribe of the Banu Nadir.  When, in short here, there were past the time of kindness. Past the time for peace agreements. Because they had rejected the message brought by the “prophet.” And when charged by him for plotting his murder, and thus, informed of his verdict concerning them, they likewise rejected his verdict.

Waqidi’s account of the story puts the order, verdict, and threat of the “prophet” in these words respectively:  “Leave my land [the homeland of the Banu Nadir Jews]. I have granted you a period of ten days. Whoever is seen after that, his head will be cut off.” 134

The brief on the narrative of the account goes, in short, the Banu Nadir dug in.  Refused to leave. Instead, with their cattle, their wives, and their children, took to their fortresses. 135

Therefore, it was, asserts the Qur’anic record, “They deemed that their fortresses would protect them from Allah. But Allah came to them from where they did not expect, and cast fear in their hearts when they were spoiling their homes with their own hands and with the hands of the believers. So learn a lesson, O those who have eyes.” (Surah Al-Hashr 59: 1, as rendered in Ma’ariful Qur’an Vol. 8.)

How did Allah come to them from whence they did not expect? In that instance, with life-threatening fire and smoke.

Fire and smoke, from fires set by the hands of the believers: “The Jews took refuge in their forts and the apostle ordered that the palm-trees should be cut down and burnt.” 136

How did Allah “cast fear in their [the Banu Nadir] hearts?” Via the actions of the hands of the believers. 

For that reason, Sahih Muslim relates, “on the authority of ‘Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ordered the date-palms of Banu Nadir to be burnt and cut.” 137

Therewith setting the precedence, establishing the sunnah, of creativity in Islam with respect to  weapons-- “weaponizing” what one least expects one would use as weapons. Weaponizing that that the “enemy” provides at hand, as in weaponizing date-palm orchards, boarding passes, American Airlines.

Weaponizing, if such will serve the cause, one’s vocational skills and “earned” “trustworthiness.”

 Thus, enabling one to strike with that, when, where, and how one would least expect. For such reasons, when “fitting,” doing just that is a practice commonplace with the followers of Sunnah.

“Allah’s” punishment visited upon the Banu Nadir as delineated above is just one more example of Allah’s “vengeance,” as cited earlier, ever near, at the ready, thus, in line with Qur’anic doctrine, in an instant visited unawares upon those who rejected “Allah’s Messenger,” rejected the message he brought.

Ibn Kathir, as noted earlier, speaking on this ever-near “vengeance of Allah” [11:83], for the said “guilty,” thus those “deserving” Allah’s painful punishment, via that deduced from the words and deeds of the “Explainer” of the Qur’an, the revered scholar provides this clarity on the meaning in this “not ever far from” “vengeance of Allah”:


Verily, it has been reported in a Hadith of the Sunan collections from Ibn Abbas, which he attributed to the Prophet, “Whoever you find doing the deed of Lut’s people [homosexuality], then kill the doer and the one who allows it to be done to him (both partners). 138


This calls to mind, also in the revered works of tafsir, explaining the meaning of “Say to the believing men they must lower their gazes….” (Surah An-Nur 24: 30), so too, speaking to the same injunction of Hijab (seclusion of the woman) in Surah al-Ahzab (33: 53 – 55), alongside the prohibition for men to see more than the one needed eye of potentially marriageable females is the prohibition for them to look at the beardless boys. 139

Why? Because as is so with the female, if the Muslim man sees the eyes, the hand, the feet, God forbid, the forearm and so forth, there is danger of lust.

So it is with the beardless boy, according to the works of the revered scholars of Islam.

Therefore, the prohibition comes under the Islamic tenet of prevention--barring the way and means to the final act of sin, by making illegal and “sinful” all acts leading to the final act of sin.

Therefore, in brief, clarifying the meaning in, “the one whom Allah curses you shall find no helper for him” (Surah Al-Nisa 4: 52), hadith provides, "Allah curses the ogler and the ogled at." 140

As the same source provides on the just-cited hadith, "It means that the curse of Allah falls on anyone who looks at someone in an evil way, someone who is a non-Mahram; that is, someone outside the count of those in the family he is permitted to see because marriage with them is forbidden for ever [sic] ." 141

It goes on, providing, "this is why such a nazir, the onlooker of the other, comes under the curse of Allah. As for the manzur ilaihi, the one looked at lustfully, the same curse will apply subject to his or her having deliberately and invitingly caused such a look to be cast." 142

As mentioned above, with respect to "Allah's curse," Surah Al-Nisa provides, “…the one whom Allah curses you shall find no helper for him.” (Vs. 52.) Including in exegesis on the verse, the same stated source above, and others, relate, hadith provides, the Messenger of Allah said, “Cursed is he who does what the people of Lut used to do.” It adds on that, the hadith was “Narrated by Razin and appearing in Mishkat, the reference is to the male homosexual.” 143

But hadith also includes the female in the above said curse, as we read in the following hadith and others:


The Holy Prophet has cursed the effeminate from among men (who, in dress and looks, emulate women – like transvestites) and he has cursed the masculinized from among women (who, in dress, looks and ways, act man-like), And he said: ‘Expel them from your homes’” (Bukhari, from Mishkat) 144


And the same revered work provides, on those who earn the curse of Allah, “’la ‘nah” being the Arabic Qur’anic word.  “la ‘nah’ (translated as ‘curse’ in absence of a more exact equivalent) means being far removed from the mercy of Allah, extremely debased and disgraced.” It continues, “For such accursed ones admonitions are very stern.” 145

It continues, providing, “The Holy Qur’an says: (The accursed, wherever they be, are to be caught and killed massacre-like.) (33:61) This is their disgrace in the present life.” 146

Therefore “Orlando” – as it was with the “people of Lut,” they, in short, were “caught” unawares of Allah’s at-the-ready waiting-in-the-wings as it were due punishment. Their world turned upside down, hell raining down on them.

“Orlando” echoes the death cries of former nations, it bespeaks of the details of Qur’anic narratives of recipients of Allah’s punishment. As do all accounts of terror at the hands of “believers.”

 “News has come to them,” states Qur’an, speaking to those who reject the “Prophet” and what he brought, News, “which contains a threat [--information about the destruction of the nations who denied their Messengers. It contains a harsh deterrent].”  (Surat al-Qamar 54: 4, al-Jalalayn.) Harsh threat indeed, and that threat is this, as mentioned already in many a Qur’anic verse: people, take note of what happened to former nations who rejected “Allah’s Messenger,” be assured, what happen to them will likewise happen to you, should you reject “Allah’s Messenger” and thus reject the message he brought: the doctrines of “the Qur’an.”

Recall if you will what we read earlier on the details of Allah’s punishment visited on Thamud and others in Surah al-A ‘raf 7:77-79: “ the result was: (and they were [found dead] in their homes, fallen on their knees –77).” Recall, how we read, in part, the additional details on that account, of when the “earthquake seized them.” Tafsir provides, along with the earthquake “from down below the earth,” “from above tore in a horrendously shrill cry.” And that “cry,” provides tafsir, “ caused everyone to die, instantly and simultaneously, fallen upside down, (like some dead bird landing on the ground on its breast – see ‘J athim in in Mufradat al-Qur’an.) ….


“The word: (jathimim)," expounds tafsir, "is a derivation from the verbal noun: Juthum, which means to be rendered motionless at one spot, or remaining sitting (Al-Qamus). The sense is that everyone lay dead as and where one was.”  148

That is how Surah Al-Araf describes Allah’s punishment delivered on the people of Thamud.

This is how Joshua Stephany, Chief Medical Examiner of Orange County, Florida described Allah’s punishment, Sunnah of Allah, at Pulse Night club, 15 June 2016:


It’s almost like time stopped. There were still things, background TVs playing, lights blinking, drinks that are just in poured, checks that about to pay [sic] , food half eaten, and that’s not even thinking about the bodies on the ground I’m just looking around, and seeing it’s like time stood still. All of the sudden everything is gone, everything stopped.

…when you actually see everyone lying down in one place or went down in one place or their final positions, you can feel it.149


And in the words of Survivor Christian Cortez, this description: “the lights went off, it was so dark. I can see people falling dead in front of me. I could see everything was everybody was dead. Everybody was like a truly massacre or something like that.” 150

Christian stated, he and one of his buddies ran to take cover in “the dark bathroom with about 30 other frightened people.” He stated, “We can see the blood was coming from under the door, like it was like water when you break water it goes on the floor. It was the same thing but it was blood. It was getting under the floor. It was very horrible.”151

Horrible indeed. Moreover, indeed, Sunnah of Allah at Pulse Nightclub that fateful morning.

Recall the “people of the Thicket” I mentioned earlier, of whom the Qur’an states, “were also wrongdoers [in denying the prophethood of Shu ‘ayb],” rejecting the message he brought? (Surat al-Hijr 15:78, Al-Jalalayn.)

Surah Al-Alraf provides this concerning them and their stated “guilt”: “So, the [strong] earthquake seized them, and morning found them [dead], lying flattened in their homes.” (7: 91) Others versions render, “…they were [found dead] in their homes fallen on their knees.” (Ma’ariful Qur’an rendered.)

Found dead, in other words, where they felt safe, where they relaxed, in the place, one can say, that was to them a place of refuge.

And on the punishment visited on the “people of the Thicket,” the people of Aikah, 152  those whom, because of their rejection of the prophet Shu ‘ayb sent to them, the Qur’an identifies as “wrong doers,” those who cross the limits set by Allah, tafsir provides this narrative:


….Attracted by the shade and cool breeze there, all inhabitants of the locality assembled under the shade of that cloud. As Divine arrangement would have it, here were its criminals walking on their two feet and reaching the exact spot where they were to be destroyed, without a warrant of arrest and without a police gun pointed at them. Once they were all there, the clouds rained fire and the earthquake shook the earth. That killed them all. 153


Why that punishment of “Allah” visited upon the people of Maydan to whom the Qur’an asserts Allah’s messenger Shu ‘ayb was sent?

Because “The ruling circle of those of his people who were [too] arrogant [to believe] said, ‘We will drive you out of our city, Shu ‘aub, you and those who believe along with you…. (Surat Al-A ‘raf 7:88)…. “The ruling circle of those of his people … disbelieved….” (Ibid, vs.90)

Therefore, as stated above, “So, the earthquake seized them, and they were (found dead) in their homes fallen on their knees.” (Vs. 91) Therefore, boast “Allah,” “We seized them suddenly [with the punishment] when they were not expecting it.” (Vs. 95.)

Making it clear just why this punishment was due thus delivered on these people, “Allah” continues, seemingly bemoaning having been forced to send his stated punishment on the said people, “If only the people of the cities [who denied] had believed [in Allah and His Messenger] …. But they denied the truth [(the Messengers)], so We seized them [and punished them] for what they earned.” (Vs. 98)

Therefore, “Allah,” adds, “See the final fate of the corrupters, [which was utter destruction on account of their unbelief!”] (Surat Al-A ‘raf 7: 103)

Thus, regarding Allah’s amply provided examples and prescription indicating his sunnah of mass slaughter, not a bit surprising, as shooting victim, Tiara Parker, survivor from Pulse night club massacre stated, “I thought I was going to die. I thought it was over when he [Mateen] said he had enough bombs to light up a city block.” 154

For no slight reason, “How terrible,” provides Qur’an, “Were my punishment and warnings!” (Surat al-Qamar 54: 21.) “Thamud denied the warnings.” (Vs. 23) And  “Early morning brought them enduring punishment. ‘Taste’” proclaims Allah, “My punishment and warnings!” (Vss. 38, 39.)

Warnings such as, “When Our Signs (the Qur’an) are recited to him, he says, ‘Just myths [(lies)] of previous peoples!” (Surat al-Qalam 68: 15, al-Jalalayn) “So a visitation from your Lord came upon it while they slept….” (Vs. 19) “Such [--the punishment of these people--] is the punishment that will alight on those unbelievers of Makka and others who oppose Allah’s command];….” (Vs. 33)

Making certain readers of Qur’an get it clear, just how Allah deals with unbelievers--those who reject the Messenger Allah sends to them and reject the message he brings--Qur’an provides, “Warnings came to Pharaoh’s people [on the tongue of Musa and Harun, but they did not believe]. (Vs. 41.)

“They dismissed everyone of Our [nine] Signs …. And so We seized them [with the punishment--] with the seizing of One who is Almighty, All-Powerful….” (Vs. 42.)

Lines preceding that, tell of the messenger, Nuh, stating, “Before them (Quraysh) the people denied the truth.” How did they deny the said “truth”? “They denied Our slave [--Nuh--]….” (54:9.)

Thus, Qur’an provides, Allah rewarded Nuh and punished those who rejected him and his message, “… a reward for him who had been rejected [--help for Nuh by drowning them. That was their punishment].” (Surat al-Qamar 54:14.)

Why does IS use drowning as a punishment for those transgressing the limits established in Qur’an and Sunnah? For the same reasons they use beheadings: because it is one of the examples, that in the blueprint, Allah provides in his book of examples of how he delivered his punishment on unbelievers.

Tafsir on Surat al-Anfal, on, “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, so strike their neck s [sic] [(behead them)] and strike all their fingers and joints,” 8:12 (al-Jalalayn), it provides, during the Battle of Badr, Allah sent Angels to reinforce the Muslim, and sent them with the above orders.

Therefore, the Muslims at Badr followed the Allah-provided example of how to deal with that enemy. Therefore, reads tafsir, “It happened that a man would go to strike at the neck of an unbeliever and his head would fall off before his sword was able to get there.” (8:12 Al-Jalalayn.)

“This,” affirms the verse following that, “[punishment] was [visited on them] because they were hostile to [and fought against] Allah and His Messenger. If anyone is hostile to Allah and His Messenger, Allah is severe in retribution [to him].” (Surat Al-Anfal, 8: 13, al-Jalalayn.)

Thus of those the Muslims killed at Badr, to show the believers how he sees this work of their hands, Allah declares, “You did not kill them [at Badr through your own strength]: it was Allah who killed them.” (Surat Al-Anfal, 8: 17, al-Jalalayn.)

Ma’ariful Qur’an on the verse calls this order to the alleged angels dispatched to Badr “the fifth blessing which was beamed at Muslims in this battlefield of Badr.”155 What’s more, it provides, at Badr, “Allah” worked through the hands of the believers, guiding those hands by the said actions and example of the alleged dispatched angels, and “by sending punishment on disbelievers through Muslims they [the disbelievers] were chastened….” 156

“In other words,” provides the said tafsir, “what is being said here is: This is a little punishment from Us. So taste it and better realize that, after this, the punishment of the fire of Jahannam is due….”157

Same source provides, “the enemies killed at their hands [the hands of the believers] were not really killed by them, rather, they were killed by Allah Ta ‘ala.” 158

Volume Two of the same, speaking to the Badr Battle said “blessing,” as it is mentioned in Surah ‘Al-Imran 3: 124, reads, “According to some hadith narrations, when an angel decided to attack a disbeliever, the head of the disbeliever slid of [sic] his body all by itself.”  (“From Sahl ibn Hanif Al-Hakim and Baihaqi.”) 159

Waqidi’s al-Maghazi relates of “the blessing,” Sa ‘d said, “ I saw two men on the day of Badr, fighting with [alongside] the Messenger of God, one on his right and the other on his left. I saw him look at one and once at the other, happy for the assistance that God most high granted him.” 160

Those were the alleged angels beheading the disbelievers at Badr, teaching the Muslims how Allah wills to deal with unbelievers. Thus making sunnah of Allah sunnah of the “prophet” thus sunnah of the ummah.

Thus the same record relates, among others, this narration:


Muhammad b. Yahya related to me from Abu ‘Ufayr from Rafi b. Khadij from Abu Burda b. Niyar, who said: I came on the day of Badr with three heads and placed them before the Messenger of God, and said, “O Messenger of God, I killed two heads. As for the third, I saw a tall white man strike it and it rolled before him, and I picked it up.” The Messenger of God said, “That was one of the angels.”  161


Speaking to the same “blessing” as well as the alleged reason for it, the same record provides, Ibn Abbas said, “The angels took the form of those known among the people to motivate them.” 162 Thus it relates of the event and the disbelievers slaughtered thereat, “The angels and the believers killed them.” 163

Tafsir Ibn Kathir on the noted “fifth blessing” at Badr, reads this way:


…Ali bin Abi Talhah Al-Walibi reported that ibn Abbas said, “Allah supported His Prophet and the believers with a thousand angels, five hundred under the leadership of Jibril on one side and five hundred under the leadership of Mika’il on another side. “ Imams Abu Ja ‘far bin Jarir At-Tabari and Muslim recorded that Ibn Abs said, “While a Muslim man was pursuing an idolator [sic] (during the battle of Badr), he heard the sound of a whip above him and a rider saying, ‘Come, O Hayzum!’ Then he looked at the idolator [sic], who fell to the ground. When he investigated, he found that the idolators [sic] nose had a wound and his face torn apart, just as if he received a strike from a whip on it, and the entire face had turned green. 164


Certifying the believe understands precisely what scene Allah expects from this work of their hands,  the tafsir adds, “so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes,” “over the necks” refers to striking the foreheads to tear them apart and over the necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet.” 165

It provides, “Ar-Rabi ‘ bin Anas said, “In the aftermath of Badr, the people used to recognize whomever the angels killed from those whom they [the believers] killed, by the wounds over their necks, fingers and toes, because those parts had a mark as if they were branded by fire.” 166

(That calls to mind, a testimony of a 911 survivor, who, during the Democratic National Convention 2016, telling of her injuries suffered that day, stated, where the limbs were severed, so intense was the heat of that which severed them, that the wounds appeared cauterized.)

The record relates, “Ibn Jarir commented that this Ayah commands, ‘O believers! Strike every limb and finger on the hands and feet of your (disbelieving) enemies.’” (Per At-Tabari 12:431.) 167  

Because as Qur’an states, “This is because they defied and disobeyed Allah and His Messenger. And whoever defies and disobeys Allah and His Messenger, then verily, Allah is severe in punishment.” (Surah 8. Al-Anfal : 13, as rendered in Ibn Kathir, Tafsir).

“This,” provides the Qur’an, “is (the torment), so taste it.” (8:14) And this, provides tafsir on that: “ This Ayah addresses the disbeliever, saying, taste this torment and punishment in this life….” 168

And, as spoken to above, Tafsir ibn Kathir provides, “Allah states that He creates the actions that the servants perform and that whatever good actions they take, it is He Who should be praised for them, for He directed and helped them perform these action.” 169.  

As Qur’an asserts, “You killed them not, but Allah killed them.” (Surah Al-Anfal : 8:17, Ibn Kathir, Tafsir rendered.)

Yes, indeed, “Allah” helped the Muslim perform the beheadings at Badr, just as “Allah” help Mateen perform his high-profile actions at Pulse nightclub, just as “Allah” helped the beheaders of 84 year old Catholic Priest, Rev. Jacques Hamel deliver “Allah’s” painful punishment that morning at the Saint-Etienne-du Rouvray Church in Normandy.170

Hence, asserts the Qur’an, of all the above provided examples and others like them, “We left it (this action) as a Sign [for anyone who reflects, because knowledge of it is widespread and will continue to spread].” (Surat al-Qamar: 54: 15, Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

I assure you, the Scholars, scribes, soldiers, citizens, and patrons of IS reflected on Allah’s word and thus gain from the signpost and patterns provided therein clear understanding. Thus their actions.

 “So leave,” declares “Allah,” “anyone who denies this discourse [(the Qur’an)] to Me! We will lead them, step by step, [--little by little--] into destruction from where they do not know.” (Surat al-Qalam 68: 44, al-Jalalayn.) He boast, “We destroyed those of your kind [--like you in respect of unbelief--] in the past [nations]. But is there any rememberer [sic] there? [This is a command, meaning, ‘Remember and be warned!’” (Surat al-Qarm 54: 51, al-Jalalayn.)

“Taste [(experience)] My punishment and warnings!” (54: 37, Ibid.)

Just as Mateen echoed in his facebook post as cited earlier herein, just before the massacre began: “Now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”

What was Mateen doing in posting that Facebook post? Following sunnah, obeying Allah.

Allah commanded, “And give those who disbelieve the ‘good’ news of a painful punishment.” (Surah Al-Taubah: 9: 3, Ma’ariful Qur’an, Vol. 2 rendition.) He follows that up with, “Kill the Mushriks wherever you find them.” (Surah Al-Taubah: 9: 5.)

[mushrik: (plural) mushrikun): someone who commits shirk (shirk—the unforgivable wrong action of worshipping something or someone other than Allah or associating something or someone as a partner to Him.) 171

He follows that with, “Fight them, so that Allah should punish them at your hands and disgrace them, and help you win against them and bring relief to bosoms of a believing people, [14] and remove the rage of their hearts…. [15.]” (Surah Al-Taubah : 9, as stated, Ma’ariful Qur’an rendered.)

Tafsir on that provides: “As for the enemies [the disbelievers, they have already become deserving of Divine punishment because of their evil deeds but this punishment will not come down upon them from the heavens or up from beneath the Earth.” No, now, as we will read shortly from tafsir ibn Kathir, “Instead of that,” provides tafsir, “says the verse, that is, ‘Allah shall punish them at their hands’” [i.e., the hands of believers]. 172

Tafsir ibn Kathir speaks to that sunnah of Allah with these words:


These are points of wisdom for which Allah has legislated performing Jihad, by the hands of the believers against the disbelievers. Allah used to destroy the previous nations that denied the Prophets, using various disasters that encompassed these rebellious nations. For instance, Allah destroyed the people of Nuh with the flood, ‘Ad with the wind, Thamud with the scream, the people of Lut with an earthquake and the people of Shu ‘ayb by the Day of the Shadow. After Allah sent Musa and destroyed his enemy Fir ‘awn and his soldiers by drowning, He sent down the Tawrah to him in which He legislated fighting against the disbelievers, and this legislation remained in the successive Laws. Allah said,

“And indeed We gave Musa –after We had destroyed the generations of old—The Scripture as an enlightenment.” [28:43]

It is more humiliating for the disbelievers and more comforting to the hearts of the faithful that the believers kill the disbelievers by their own hands. Allah said to the believers of this Ummah,

“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands, and disgrace them, and give you victory over them, and heal the breast of a believing people [9:14].”  173


Therefore, “Allah,” following his sunnah, now using the hands of the believers to deliver his punishment. “Allah,” thus, piling up the dead, ratcheting up the dead-count, now, by that delivered by the hands of the “believers.”  

Piling up the dead and/or mangled bodies on concert hall floors, on office floors, on toilet seats, on roadways, on sidewalks—as I write these very lines, “Breaking news” again delivering “the ‘good’ news” of Allah’s punishment.

Punishment delivered, “this” day, on the streets of Nice, France.  Today’s weapon of choice and attack of choice: firearm, weaponized delivery truck, weaponized “earn trustworthiness,” and of course, “the Dhikr of Allah … a weapon in its own right, special and spiritual, something known to Muslims only….” 174 Striking the unbelievers when, where, and how they would least expect it, just as Allah’s word promises “He” will do.

Thus far today’s the dead count thereat: “60…73 … still climbing…” 175

Yes, indeed, yet another “‘soldier of Islamic State,’” another child of the Qur’an, another good Muslim, on the move for Allah.  This one, via a delivery truck delivering His “painful punishment.” 

As reports state, Islamic State asserting of him, as they did of Mateen, as they have done, and will doubtlessly do of others, “the person who carried out”  this days attack, is a soldier of Islamic State, “and carried out the operation in response to the calls to target nationals of the coalition which is fighting the Islamic State.” 176

Therefore, racking up the dead, following sunnah, thus looking to produce the scene of which Allah boasted was his sunnah to produce with those who rejected his messengers and the message he brought: scatter, spread, or lay dead mangled bodies in mass on the ground or elsewhere. Fling these bodies in the air, burn them, mangle them, dismember them, etc, all in line with Qur’an provided sunnah of Allah to be emulated by his believers.

 “But they have rejected it [--The Book which has come to them, meaning the Noble Qur’an--] and they will soon know [the result of their unbelief],” asserts the Qur’an. (Surat as-Saffat 37:170, Al-Jalalayn)

As we read earlier, “‘Ad denied the truth.” In other words, the people of ‘Ad “rejected” the messenger and message of Allah sent to them.  “[Their Prophet was Hud and they were punished]” for having so done. 

Thus, “How terrible were My punishments and warnings!” Boasted “Allah.” “[Then,” provides tafsir on the cited verse (54:18), “Allah explains what that punishment was.]” (Al-Jalalayn.):


We unleashed a howling wind against them on a day of unremitting horror ….(Surat al-Qamar 54: 19, Al-Jalalayn.)

It plucked up men like uprooted stumps. [It sucked people up form pits in the earth in which they had taken refuge. It threw them on their heads and tore their necks so that their heads were ripped off their bodies. They looked like the stumps of palm trees cut down and fallen on the earth. They are likened to palm trees because of their height]. (V. 20, ibid.)

How terrible were My punishments and warnings! (Vs. 21)


Surat al-Haqqa renders the narrative this way:


‘Ad were destroyed by a savage howling wind. [It made a loud noise and had immense strength with which it struck ‘Ad, who considered themselves strong]. (69:6, Al-Jalalayn.)

Allah subjected them to it [--sent it against them with force--] …. [It is said that the word used here , husum, is the plural of hasim, from hasm, which means cutting, as one cuts for cauterization for an illness again and again until it is finished (tahassama).] You could see the people flattened in their homes [--dead and prone--] just like the hollow stumps of uprooted palms. (Ibid, Vs. 7.)


That is how “Allah” explained his punishment delivered on the people of ‘Ad that fateful day.

Here follows how a witness of the Nice, France attack, Andres Farfan, described “Allah’s” punishment delivered at the Nice Bastille Day Fireworks that dark horrific day.

Reports state, he said he was celebrating having just “finished his university degree in Nice when he heard screams coming from the beachfront.” 177

Looking out his window, he said he saw “the truck speeding on the footpath of the road.” He said, “It was going pretty fast, I guess 60 or 75 kph…” 178 People screaming, some leaping down onto the beach side if they could.

Andres said, seeing the crowd all bunched together as they were, seeing the oncoming and plowing to and through the crowd delivery truck, he had to look away, “I couldn’t watch it. I closed my eyes, and went inside the apartment.”179

But some of his friends, he said, did just the opposite: “they went outside.” And what they saw there made them weep, made them scream … will undoubtedly haunt them for life …

“They say they saw bodies flying in the air when the truck hit them.” 180

From another witness to the carnage, this witness, also a survivor of the hit, Nice resident, 16-year-old, Kimberley Torres. Her mother said, her daughter called her in tears, frantically telling her, “Mum, there are dead everywhere, severed heads, severed people, there’s blood everywhere, mother, come.” 181

In other words, in the carnage of Bastille Day Fireworks 2016 in Nice, witnesses to it saw shades of “Allah’s”  punishment delivered to the people of ‘Ad and others: “it plucked up men like uprooted stumps,” flung them into the air, and by the force of such, arms and legs were torn from cores, “heads were ripped off their bodies.” (Surat al-Qamar 54: 20, Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

Why was this Muslim--claimed as a soldier of Allah, one who, like Mateen, responded to Abu Bakr al-Bagdhadi’s calls for retaliation against nations attacking Islamic state—doing what he was doing there on that Nice beach? What was he aiming to produce?”

He was obeying Allah.  He was following sunnah—just as did Mateen that fateful morning in Pulse nightclub.

Thus, just as Mateen did in Orlando 12 June 2016, the “Bastilli” killer aimed to produce the scenery, the harvest—the carnage—from the seeds of Allah’s word sown into his heart, mind and soul. He aimed to yield the fruit in kind with that that Allah’s word provided is “fruit,” scenery, covering the area on which his punishment has descended.

Did so, because, for the true believer, the good Muslim, Allah’s law, Allah’s sunnah, it comes first to the negation of all other laws and guidance. For such reasons, Allah’s Messenger commented then asserted “What about people who impose conditions which are not present in Allah’s Book (Laws)?  Whoever imposes conditions which are not found in Allah’s Book (Laws), his conditions will be invalid even if he imposed them a hundred times.” 182

Mateen, the Nice, France attacker, Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, Muhammad Ata and his 9/11 comrades and countless other Muslims who kill and are killed for the sake of Allah, they are following that in “Allah’s Book.” Following it and thus making invalid laws and “conditions which are not found in Allah’s Book (Laws),” imposing conditions spelled out in therein. Which is precisely what every Muslims is commanded to do.

 According to Islam, the alleged “prophet” of Islam, Muhammad, was Allah’s final messenger sent to mankind. Sent with the final Shariah (Code of conduct and life).

The Qur’anic text bears-out thus tafsir spells out, “The Holy Prophet is the last of all prophets and messengers of Allah, and his Shari’ah”—take note all who froth and fling at Shari’ah but welcome Islam—“is the last Shari ‘ah of all Shari ‘ahs and is to remain valid upto [sic] the end of time….”183  

“Guide us on the straight path,” provides Surat Al-Fatihah (1:6) . What path is that, according to Islamic doctrine? Doi and others of like caliber in Islam answer that: “Shari’ ah is an Arabic word meaning the Path to be followed.” 184

Speaking to the straight path to be followed, Ma’ariful Qur’an provides, “It would seem that in order to define the straight path it should have been sufficient to call it ‘the path of the Prophet,’ or ‘the path of the Qur’an….” It continues, stating, “ for the whole of the Holy Qur’an is really an explanation of the straight path, and the teachings of the Holy Prophet.” 185

Dr. Mohammad Hasim Kamali, in his work, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, he provides, “Sunnah means a clear path or a beaten track … also … normative practice, or an established course of conduct.” 186

Qadi Iyad’s Ash-Shifa, speaking of that “clear path,” that “beaten track, that “Path to be followed,” provides, speaking of the birth of Muhammad, al ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abdu ‘l-Muttalib indicated in poetic lines, “When you were born, the earth shone and the horizon was illuminated by your light. We travel in that illumination and in the light and the paths of right guidance.” 187

What path according to Islamic doctrine is that? What path is that which is Shari ‘ah, which is, as cited above, “the Path to be followed” the “Straight Path” spoken to in Surat 1 of the Qur’an?

Once more, speaking here now only with great limitedness to this Islamic fact, “ Sunnah literally means way, practice, rule of life; and refers to the exemplary conduct or the model behavior of the Prophet in what he said, did or approved.” 188

‘”Allah’s’ Book” provides, “You have an excellent model in the Messenger of Allah ….” (Surat al-Ahzab 33:21, al-Jalalayn.)

It is clear as well as irrefutable, Islamic doctrine is built on following Sunnah: words, deeds, counsel, etc, of the so-called prophet, as spoken to often herein. Because the so-called prophet was, as spelled out above, the explainer of all in “Allah’s Book.” Thus all that was sunnah of Allah was thus sunnah of his messenger. 

And that sunnah is to be followed. Implemented. That is what “’Allah’s’ Book” commands.

That is the “Path to be followed,” which is, as cited above, what Shariah is. That path is following all within the limits set by “Allah,” disregarding all limits established by others should they infringe on commands within “Allah’s limits.”

And as we read above, for those who reject that in “The Book,” (“But they have rejected it [--The Book which has come to them, meaning the Noble Qur’an--]”) “they will soon know [the result of their unbelief],” asserts the Qur’an. (Surat as-Saffat 37:170; Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

“…and watch them,” it states, “[when the punishment befalls them], for they will soon see [ the consequences of their unbelief].” (Vs. 175, Ibid.)

What is the punishment for? For their unbelief in the Qur’anic message.

“They will soon know” and “soon see” what? “The punishment” descending.

And, “When it descends,” states the Qur’an, and descends “in their courtyard [ --the word used here, saha, means the courtyard around a house] …. How evil will be the morning of those who were warned!” (Vs. 177, Ibid.)

Surat az-Zumar 39:55, and other verses, speaking to the same, pointing to that “Straight Path,” that “Path to be followed,” that “beaten track” state, “Follow the best that has been sent down to you from your Lord [(the Qur’an)] before the punishment comes upon you suddenly when you are not expecting it [--unaware of its time of arrival];”  (al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

“Woe [-- in other words they will be punished--],” warns the Qur’an, “ to those whose hearts are hardened against the rememberance of Allah” -- as it is defined earlier in this text: “He who has not obeyed Him [Allah] has not remembered Him” – “[preventing them from accepting the Qur’an]!” (39:22, Ibid.)

“The wrongdoers,” it proclaims, “will be told, ‘Taste what you have earned.’” (Vs.24)

“Those before them,” it states, “also denied the truth [--by denying their Messenger’s warnings about Divine punishment --] and the punishment came upon them from whence they did not expect [-- in a manner which had not occurred to them].” (Vs. 25)

“So Allah made them taste disgrace [--humiliation and debasement--] in the life of this world [--in the form of … being killed and other things --]….” (Vs. 26) “We have given all kinds of examples to peoples in this Qur’an,” declares “Allah,” “so that perhaps they will pay heed—“ (Vs. 28, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

Regarding all the above, I ask, is there any where we or the people of France, and others, have fallen short of following Allah’s commands? Are there any among us who reject that in the Qur’an, thus reject following sunnah, thus, reject following the Shariah of “Allah’s Messenger”? Of course there is. Of course they are. 

Therefore, according to Qur’anic doctrine, Allah’s punishment is due us. It is our “earnings.” Thus, ready to be delivered anytime, anywhere by the hands of his believers.

That is simple sunnah of Allah, thus sunnah of his “messenger,” sunnah which “Allah” commands must be followed, thus such is sunnah of the ummah.

For such reasons, as reported at Jihad Watch just days before writing these lines, and as provided in an  8 July 2016 Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Virginia, press release, good Muslim, Haris Qamar, was arrested on charges to provide material support and resources to Islamic state. Part of that support and those resources being photos of potential targets in the D.C. area for future “lone wolf” attacks.

“On June 3,” reads the said report, “a conversation was audio and video recorded when CW picked up Qamar in a vehicle and they drove to area landmarks on the list Qamar had developed.  Qamar allegedly said “bye bye DC, stupid ass kufar, kill’em all”. 189

“Kill’em all,” dreams and states this good Muslim? Kill all the kufar in the D.C. area?

Where in this world does he get such an idea? I will tell you where: “Allah’s Book.”

As I posted at Jihad Watch commenting on that report, as I have spoken to in numerous places in this essay, “Could it possibly be ‘Allah’s’ Qur’an-provided object lessons? Say, as in just for one therefrom, the object lesson of ‘the people of Ad’?

“A people of whom Qur’an and reliable regarded Tafsir tell us, ‘… their gardens and mansions, and palaces,’ were ‘leveled to the ground. Their men and animals went up in the air and zoomed back hitting the floor with their heads.’190

The narrative adds, as mentioned above, “Thus, the people of ‘Ad were eliminated to the last man.”

Thus the elucidated meaning in ‘“And we eradicated those who belied Our signs. And they were not believers.”’” 191

We regard, the same works tell us, as mentioned above, in times past Allah used “various disasters” to deliver his punishment, but now, since first giving Moses the order to fight, now, because it is more humiliating for the unbelievers, and more mollifying to the hearts of believers, now he delivers his punishment via the hands of believers.

And as we have read herein, as one will easily find provided through-out the Qur’an, Allah’s word provides for his following no shortage of object lessons and examples of his sunnah, his practice of dealing death to unbelievers. Moreover, oftentimes, as we have read repeatedly, the Qur’an-provided blueprint the believer is to follow in his Qur’anic authorized and sanctioned death-dealing is one that yields the end result of mass destruction.

What’s more, we know all these examples in the Qur’an are there neither for filler, nor entertainment but for the sole purpose of instruction. Enabling one thus to draw conclusions from the story. Derive therefrom “spiritual principles,” principles that are sunnah of Allah, thus sunnah of Islam.  

As revered tafsir confirms: “The Holy Qur’an does not tell stories for the sake of telling stories…. The real intention … is to draw certain conclusions from the stories, and to illustrate or point out certain spiritual principles. Now, the various episodes of a story help to bring out various principles.” 192

And for that reason and that only, are all stories in the Qur’an included therein: sign post, object lessons, illustrations and blueprints for believers to follow.

Why then, many will ask, have we not yet suffered this mass destruction spoken of in “Allah’s Book”?

Shortest answer to that: God’s grace. Included therein are all successes thus far that have, thus far, prevented such. It is not for lack of effort, planning, or instructions thereto. It is God’s mercy thus far spread over us.

Aiming to wrapping this section up, we note, the second of the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs, Ibn ‘Umar, fully understanding the reason for as well as the meaning of the verses of Qur’an, “Ibn ‘Umar said: A boy was assassinated. ‘Umar said, ‘If all the people of San ‘a took part in the assassination I would kill them all.’” 193

We likewise regard, when the Qur’an states the following, it does so with all the principles related to the following end as spoken to herein regarded, and the verse means precisely what it states:


And such days we rotate among the people, so that Allah may know those who believe and let some of you be martyrs—and Allah does not like the unjust [140] –and so that Allah may purify those who believe and eradicate the disbelievers.” [141] (Surah ‘Al-‘Imran 3, Ma’ariful Qur’an rendered.)


 Tafsir al-Jalalayn renders the verses this way: “We send days to people in rotation …. so that Allah can purge [and purify] those who believe … and wipe out [and destroy] the unbelievers.” (3: 140-141.)


Conclusion


In his rally speech in Atlanta Georgia, 15 June 2016, then Presumptive Nominee of the Republican party, Mr. Donald J. Trump, speaking of the numerous horrors suffered by the victims in Pulse Nightclub early Sunday 12 June 2016, Mr. Trump stated, as one hears of such accounts, one is compelled to ask, “How can this be happening in our country?”

I will tell you how it is happening in our nation, “Mr. President”: in our nation, we have freedom to practice our religion, and to practice it full and freely. We also have in our nation those who have as their “religion” the way of Muhammad. That way being following the guidance provided in the Qur’an.  That is why and how, Sir, what happened at Pulse Nightclub that death-filled June morning: a “believer” practiced the tenets of his faith system.

That is why and what happened 9/11. 

That is what happened countless other days in our nation, in our world, as the blood flowed, as limbs were severed, faces marred and disfigured, lives snuffed out: a “believer” obeyed Allah.

A “believer”—with the stomach for armed jihad--followed Qur’an and sunnah guidance. The instructions and blueprints therein.  That is precisely the reason why and what happened in Orlando Sunday morning 12 June 2016: “Allah’s” word, “Allah’s” guidance, thus, the traditions of his messenger, Muhammad, in full play and on display for the world to see.

Allah’s word asserts, with respect to the mission of Muhammad, “This Qur’an has been revealed to me so that I may warn you [and frighten you] by it, [people of Mekka] and anyone else it (the Qur’an) reaches [among jinn or man] . (Surat al-An ‘am 6: 19, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

In verse 47 of that same chapter, Allah speaks to the unbelieving lot, asking, “What would you think if Allah’s punishment were to come upon you by night or openly by day, would any but the wrongdoing people (the unbelievers) be destroyed?” He follows that up with admonishing his messenger and those who follow him (Vs. 51), “Warn [and alarm] by it (the Qur’an) … so that perhaps they will be godfearing [sic]  [… so that they will perform acts of obedience].”

Allah’s word likewise warns, (....These [rulings] are the rulings of Allah's limits. The unbelievers will have a painful punishment. (al-Mujadila [58]: 4, al-Jalalayn.)

It promises, “Those who [disagree and] oppose Allah and His Messenger will be subdued and overcome as those before them were also subdued and overcome [when they opposed their Messengers before]….The unbeleivers will have a humiliating punishment.” (Ibid, Vs. 5.)

What’s more, on that “painful punishment,” as spoken to above, and on the unbelievers it is promised to, Allah’s word provides this spurring on and this promise to his ummah: “Fight them! Allah will punish them [by killing them] at your hands, and disgrace them [by capture and defeat] and help you against them, and heal the hearts of those who believe.”  (Surat at-Tawba: 9:14, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)

As mentioned above, Verse 15 there provides, “Allah” elects to use the hands of the believers because by using the hands of the believers to deliver the said punishment of Allah “earned,” thereby, “He will remove the rage [and grief] from their [the hearts of the believers] hearts.” (9:15, al-Jalalayn.)

We regard, the Qur’an reminds the believers of the following contract they have with Allah:


Allah has bought from the believers their selves and their wealth [which they expend in obedience to Allah on things like jihad] in return for the Garden. They fight in the Way of Allah and they kill [(read as yaqtuluna wa yuqtaluna or as yuqtaluna wa yaqtuluna “are killed and kill”]) and are killed. It is a promise binding on Him in the Torah, the Gospel and the Qur’an; and who is truer to his contract than Allah? [There is no one truer than Allah when He promises. Rejoice then [--changing to the second person from the third--] in the bargain you have made. That [transaction] is the great victory [which obtains the Goal]. (Surat at-Tawba 9:111, al-Jalalayn, Tafsir.)


On the heels of that spotlighted contract, with these words Allah spurs on his believing community: “O Prophet, do jihad against the unbelievers [with the sword] and [against the] hypocrites [ … ] and be harsh with them [through rebuke and hatred]….” (Surah 9: 73. Al-Jalalayn.)

The revered works of tafsir on that verse by the revered Imam, Ibn Kathir, read this way:


Allah commanded His Messenger to strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and to be harsh against them…. (“Strive hard against the disbelievers and hypocrites,”) “With the hand, or at least have a stern face with them. Ibn Abbas said, “Allah commanded the Prophet to fight the disbelievers with the sword, to strive against the hypocrites with the tongue and annual lenient treatment of them. Ad-Dahhak commented, “Perform Jihad against the disbelievers with the sword and be harsh with the hypocrites with words, and this is the Jihad performed against them. Similar was said by Muqatil and Ar-Rabi. Al-Hassan and Qatadah said, “Striving against them includes establishing the (Islamic Penal) Law of equality against them.” 194

In summary, in the early morning hours of 12 June 2016, in the early days of Ramadan 2016, honoring the tenets of his “religion,” enjoying the freedom in our nation to do just that, America- born devotee to Allah, thus follower of Muhammad, prayed his prayers, and in his words, for “his country,” Islamic State, killed and was killed.
In other words, true to his title in his name—“Siddiqui—Mateen neither hesitated nor doubted as to the truthfulness of the commands of the “Messenger of Allah," but in full obedience to them, from his Bismillah to his dying in the way of Allah, Mateen obeyed “Allah.”
Did so, following that “Straight Path,” as spoken to above in what is indeed remembrance of Allah: Mateen knew and understood “the commandments of his Lord,” therefore, with respect to the “tasks” provided in the contract that the believer has with “Allah,”Mateen performed “these tasks exactly in the manner He [Allah] has prescribed.”
Therefore, 12 June 2016 Sunday morning’s slaughter in Orlando.












Notes and Works Cited


  1. A Glossary of Islamic Terms, Aisha Bewley, Ta-Ha Publishers, LTD, 2009; ISBN - 13: 978 1 897940 78 5, First Publishing, Reprint, 2009. P. 223.
  2.  Ma’ariful Qur’an, A Comprehensive commentary on the Holy Qur’an, By Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi; Volume 1, translated by, Prof. Muhammad Hasan Askari, Prof. Muhammad Shamim, Maktaba-e-Darul- ‘Uloom, Karachi, 14 Pakistan: Second Authorised [sic] Edition 2005. Vol. 1, P. 78. No ISBN provided in this Volume of Eight.
  3. http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/breaking-doj-releases-unredacted-transcript-after-criticism.html/
  4. Ma’ariful Qur’an, Ibid, P. 42.
  5. Ibid, P.36.
  6. Kalami, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Dr. Mohammad Hasim Kamali, The Islamic Texts Society, UK, 2003, Reprinted 2006, 2008, 20011; ISBN: 978 0946621 82 8, paper, P. 81
  7. Ma’ariful Qur’an, Ibid, Vol 5,  Translated by Muhammad Shamim, Forurth Authorised [sic] Edition, 2007;P 239.
  8. Dawud, Sunan Abu Dawud, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu Dawud Sulaiman ibn Ash ‘ath, Ahadith edited and referenced by: Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Translated by: Nasiruddin al-Khattab (Canada), Final Review by: Abu Khaliyl (USA); First Edition,2008, Darussalam, Global Leader in Islamic Books, Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York); ISBN: 978-9960-500-11-9 (SET), 978-9960-500-16-4 (Vol. 5); The Book of the Sunnah, P. 160, # 4604.
  9.  Ma’ariful Qur’an, Vol. 1, Ibid. P. 37.
  10. Doi, Shariah: The Islamic Law, ‘Abdur Rahman I. Doi, Ta Ha Publishers LTD, London, UK, 1984/ 1404, Reprint 1997, ISBN 0 90746138 7 (Paperback); as cited in text, credited to being narrated by Ibn Masud. No ahadith source provided. P. 46.
  11. Ibid, as cited in text. P. 47.
  12. Ibid.
  13. Ma’ariful Qur’an, Vol. 5, Ibid, P. 299, 300; 15:9.
  14. Ibid, Surah Al-Nahl: 16: 43-44, P. 363.
  15. Ibid.
  16. Ibid.
  17. Ibid. P. 363.
  18. Ibid.
  19. Ibid, P. 364.
  20. Ibid.
  21. Ibid, P. 300.
  22. Ibid, P 364.
  23. Ma’ariful Qur’an, Ibid, Vol. 8, Translated by Maulana Ahmad Khalil Aziz, Forurth Authorised [sic] Edition, 2007, 53:1 -18, P.202.
  24. Dawud, Ibid, 978-9960-500-16-4 (Vol. 5); Chapter 1, Book of Legal Punishments, (Hudud), Chapter 1. Ruling on One Who Apostatizes, P. 15, # 4351. 
  25. Ibid, Chapter 28. One Who Does The Action of The People of Lut, P. 78, #4462.
  26. Iyad, Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yasubi, Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley translation, Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa, Seventh print, 2008/ 1429H, ISBN 1 874216262, British Library Cataloguing,  As cited in text. P. 422; P. 423 (Muslim and al-Bukhari, from Abu Sa ‘id al-Khurdi).
  27. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol.1, P. 37.
  28. Ibid.
  29. Ibid, P. 299, 300;15: 9.
  30. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 5, P. 298.
  31. Ibid, P. 298, 299.
  32. Ibid as cited in text.
  33. Ibid.
  34. Ibid.P. 299.
  35. Ibid.
  36. Ibid.
  37. Ibid.
  38. Ibid.
  39. Ibn Kathir, TAFSIR IBN KATHIR [ABRIDGED], ABRIDGED BY A GROUP OF SCHOLARS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF SHAYKH SAFIUR-RAHMAN AL-MUBARAKPURI, Second Edition, July, 2003, DARUSSALAM, , Global Leader in Islamic Books, Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York; ISBN 9960-892-71-9, (Set), Vol. 5 ISNB 9960-892-76-X, P. 382 (Qur’anic Text: parenthetical).
  40. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid,Vol. 1, Forward.
  41. Ibid, PP 45, 46.
  42. Ibid.
  43. Ibid, as cited in text.
  44. Ibid, as cited in text.
  45. Ibid, as cited in text.
  46. Ibid.
  47. Ibid.
  48. Ibid.
  49. Ibid. P. 49.
  50. Ibid.
  51. Ibid, P. 54; http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/breaking-doj-releases-unredacted-transcript-after-criticism.html/, as ctied earlier. 
  52. Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir Al-Jalalayn,  Jalalu’ D-Din Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Al-Mahalli and Jalalu’ D-Din as-Suyuti, Aisha Bewley’s Translation , Dar Al Taqwa Ltd. London, 2007; ISBN 1-870582-61-6 [Exegesis of text is that within brackets.])
  53. Al-Qurtubi, TAFSIR AL-QURTUBI, Classical Commentary of the Holy Qur’an, Translated By AISHA BEWLEY, VOLUME I, DAR AL-TAQWA, 2003,ISBN 1-870582-22-5, PP.78 -79. 
  54.  Ibid.
  55. Ibid, P. 81.
  56. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. V, P. 55.
  57. Ibid, P. 60.
  58. Ibid. P. 55 - 56.
  59. Ibid, P. 56.
  60. Ibid
  61. Ibid. P. 70.
  62. Ibid. P. 72.
  63. Ibid.
  64. http://www.abqjournal.com/791914/survivor-on-orlando-gunman-he-was-not-going-to-stop-killing-people-until-he-was-killed.html
  65. Hanbal, Musnad Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Abu Abdullah Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Hanbal Ash-Shaibani, English Translation by Nasiruddin Al-Khattab, Edited by Huda Al-Khattab, Maktaba Dar-us-Salam,  2012. ISBN: 978-603-500-107-6 (set), 978-603-500-108-3 (vol. 1), Musnad Abu Bakr Siddeeq, # 53, P. 53.
  66. Ibid, Musnad Ali Ibn Abi Talib, #1346, P. 607.
  67. Ibid, #1086, P. 510.
  68. An-Nasa' i, Sunan An-Nasa’i, English Translation, Compiled by: Iman Hafiz Abu Abdur Rahman Ahmad bin Shu‘aib bin ‘Ali An-Nasa’i, Ahadith edited and referenced by: Hafiz Abu’ Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Translated by: Nasiruddin al-Khattab (Canada), Final review by: Abu Khaliyl (USA), Darussalam. Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York; ISBN: 978-9960-58-760-8 (set), 978-9960-58-765-3 (Vol. -5), The Book of Fighting, # 3976, P.18.
  69. Ibid, #3992, P. 26.
  70. Ibid, The Book of Oaths (Qasamah), #4739, P. 39.
  71. Dawud, Ibid, (Vol. 5), The Book of Etiquette, #4918, P. 320.
  72. http://www.abqjournal.com/791914/survivor-on-orlando-gunman-he-was-not-going-to-stop-killing-people-until-he-was-killed.html
  73. Ibid.
  74. CNN Transcript, Dr. Drew Pinsky, HLN, Dr. Drew Show, as cited in show by Pinsky, 15 June 2016.
  75. An-Nasa'i, Ibid, (Vol. -5), The Book of Fighting, #4099, P. 78.
  76. CNN Transcripts, Newsroom, 15 June 2006.
  77. Dr. Drew Show, Ibid.
  78. Ibid.
  79. CNN Transcripts, CNN Tonight with Don Lemon, 14 June 2016.
  80. Ibid.
  81. A Glossary of Islamic Terms, Aisha Bewley, Ta-Ha Publishers, LTD, 2009; ISBN - 13: 978 1 897940 78 5, P. 206.
  82. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 1, P. 399. 
  83. Ibid.
  84. Ibid, PP. 399- 400.     
  85. Ibid, P. 345.
  86. Ibid, P. 347.
  87. Ibid.
  88. Ibid.
  89. An-Nasa'i, Ibid, Vol. 6,  978-9960-58-766-0 (Vol. -6), The Book of Faith and Its Branches, #5012, P. 31.
  90. Ibid, F.N.
  91. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 2, Translated by Muhammad Shamim, Forurth Authorised [sic] Edition, 2007, P. 143.
  92. Ibid, P. 142.
  93. At-Tirmidhi, Jami At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-
    Tirmidhi, Translated by: Abu Khaliyl (USA), Ahadith edited and referenced by” Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Final Review by: Islamic Research Section, First Edition, 2007, Darussalam, Global Leader in Islamic Books, Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York. ISBN: 978-9960-9967-38 (set), 978-9960-9967-7-6 (Vol. -4), 
    Chapters of Al-Fitan, P. 229, #2169.
  94. Ibid.
  95. Dawud, Ibid, Vol. 5, The Book of Sunnah, P. 162, #4607.
  96. Ibid, F.N.
  97. Iyad, Ash-Shifa, P. 215.
  98. Ibid.
  99. Ibid.
  100. Dawud, Ibid. narrated from ‘Ubaidullah bin Abi Rafi’, from his father. # 4605, P. 161.
  101. Muslim, Sahih Muslim, By Imam Muslim, Rendered in English by ‘Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Islamic Book Service, First Edition: 2001, Fourth Edition: 2005, ISBN: 81-7231-450-7 (Set), Vol. III, Book of Ermitage [sic],  #1852, 1852R11852R2, respectively, P. 278.)
  102. An-Nasa'i, Ibid, (Vol. 5), Book of Fighting, #4042, P. 52.
  103. Ibid, #4048, P. 54.
  104. Ibid, #4740, P. 393.
  105. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 8. P. 248.
  106. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 3, Translated by Muhammad Shamim, Forurth Authorised [sic] Edition, 2007; P. 640.
  107. Ibid.
  108. Ibid, P 641.
  109. Ibid, P 639.
  110. Ibid.
  111. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 8, P. 803.
  112. Ibid.
  113. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, V. 3. P. 628 (Surah Al-Araf: 7: 72).
  114. Ibid.
  115. Ibid, as cited in M. Q. V, 3, P. 645.
  116. Ibn Majah, Sunan Ibn Majah, English Translation, Compiled by: Imam Muhammad Bin Yazeed Ibn Majah Al-Qazwini, Ahadith edited & referenced by: Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’I, Translated by: Nasiruddin al-Khattab [Canada], Final review by: Abu Khaliyl [USA], First Edition June 2007, DARUSSALAM, Global Leader in Islamic Books, Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York; ISBN: 9960-9881-3-9 (set), 9960-9919-6-2 (vol. 3); The Chapters of Legal Punishments, #2561, 2562, respectively, P. 469.
  117. Ibid.
  118. At-Tirmidhi, Ibid, ISBN: 9960-9967-6-9 Vol. 3)The Chapters of Legal Punishment, #1456, P. 241.
  119. Ibid, F.N. P. 242.
  120. Ibid, P. 243.
  121. Dawud, Ibid, Vol. 5, The Book of Legal Punishments, #4462, P. 78.
  122. Ibid, #4463, P. 79.
  123. Ibid, F.N. P. 79.
  124. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 2, PP. 357, 358 respectively.
  125. Ibid, PP 359 - 360.
  126. Ibid, P. 361.
  127. Ibid, P. 162.
  128. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 3, p. 645, as cited earlier.
  129. Ibn Kathir, Ibid, (Vol. 5), P. 93, Surah Hud 11: 83.
  130. Ibid, P. 94.
  131. Ibid, P. 95.
  132. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 4, Translated by Muhammad Shamim, Muhammad Wali Raazi, Surah Hud 11: 83, P. 662.
  133. Ibid, PP 662 - 663.
  134. Al-Waqidi, The Life of Muhammad, Al-Waqidi’s Kitab al-Maghazi, Translated by Rizwi Faizer, Amal Ismail, and AbdulKader Tayob, Routledge; New York, NY, 1st Publication, 2011; ISBN: 978-0-415-57434-1 (hbk), ISBN: 978-0-203-84458-8 (ebk); Chapter of The Raid of the Banu Nad ir, P. 180.
  135. Ibid, as cited in text, and elsewhere.
  136. Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, Translated by A. Guillaume, Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan, 1955/1967/2006; ISBN 0 19 636033 1, P. 437.
  137. Muslim, Ibid, (Vol. III), The Book of Holy Struggle, Chapter on Permissibility of Cutting Down the Tree and Burning Them, # 1746, P. 186.
  138. Ibn Kathir, Ibid, (Vol. 5), P. 93, Surah Hud 11: 83.
  139. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 6, Translated by Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Third Authorised [sic] Edition 2007, P 409; Vol. 7, Translated by Muhammad Shamim, Third Authorised [sic] Edition 2007, P. 224, 225 in that order.
  140. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 2, P. 458, as cited in text.
  141. Ibid.
  142. Ibid, PP. 458 - 459.
  143. Ibid, P. 457.
  144. Ibid, P. 459.
  145. Ibid.
  146. Ibid.
  147. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 8, P. 248.
  148. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 3, P. 640, as cited earlier (106).
  149. CNN transcript: interview per Sanjay Gupta, 15 June 2016.
  150. Ibid.
  151. Ibid, per Gary Tuchman reporting and interview.
  152. “Aikah means a dense forest ….there was a dense forest near Madyan.” Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 5, P. 324 (15: 78).
  153. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid (Vol. 3), P. 650, on Surah 7:91.
  154. CNN Transcripts, per Don Lemon interview, 14 June 2016.
  155. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 4, P. 176.
  156. Ibid, P. 177.
  157. Ibid.
  158. Ibid, P. 182.
  159. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 2, P. 182.
  160. Waqidi, al-Maghazi, P. 40.
  161. Ibid.
  162. Ibid.
  163. Ibid, P. 42.
  164. Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Ibid, Vol. 4, ISBN 9960-892-75-1 (Vol. 4), P. 266, commenting on Surah 8:12.
  165. Ibid, P. 274.
  166. Ibid.
  167. Ibid.
  168. Ibid, P. 275.
  169. Ibid, P. 279.
  170. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/07/robert-spencer-in-the-detroit-news-another-casualty-in-the-war-against-jihadism
  171. Bewley, Glossary.
  172. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 4, P. 322.
  173. Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Ibid, (Vol.4), PP. 268 - 269.
  174. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol. 4, P. 237, tafsir on, “…remember Allah much, so that you may be successful.” (8: 45).
  175. Erin Burnett, OutFront, CNN. 14 July 2014; 1825.
  176. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/16/europe/france-attack-on-nice-isis/.
  177. Ibid.
  178. Ibid.
  179. Ibid.
  180. Ibid.
  181. Ibid.
  182. Al-Bakhari, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Translated by: Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1997, ISBN: 9960-717-31-3 (SET), 9960-717-31-1 (v.1), The Book of Salat (The Prayer), P. 289, # 456.
  183. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol.1, PP 172 - 173.
  184. Doi, P. 2.
  185. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol.1, P. 79.
  186. Kamali, P. 58.
  187. Iyad, Ash-Shifa, P. 86.
  188. Doi, P. 7.
  189. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/07/virginia-muslim-tried-to-join-islamic-state-prayed-allah-give-strength-to-mujahideen-to-slaughter-every-us-military-officer/comment-page-1#comment-1475599; https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/virginia-man-charged-attempting-provide-material-support-isil
  190. Mar'ariful Qur'an, Ibid, Vol.3, P. 628, comments on Surah Al-Araf: 7: 72.
  191. Ibid.
  192. Ibid, Vol. 1, P. 217.
  193. Al-Bakhari, Vol. 9, The Book of Ad-Diyat [Blood-money], #6896, P. 29.
  194. Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Ibid (Vol. 4), commenting on Surah At-Tawbah 9: 73, P.P. 474 - 475.