Monday, July 17, 2017

Archbishop Bernardito Auza On The Fez Plan Of Action

Archbishop Bernardito Auza On The Fez Plan Of Action     The Vatican's UN Observer held forth on the Fez Plan Of Action, which consolidates the popular delusions about Islam: a peaceful, equally valid religion sharing common ground, goals and values with Christianity. In reality, Islam is evil by design, from its inception Mercenary & martial. 

    The Archbishop recited a long screed, full of redundant turds, I shall attempt to mark them with bold font emphasis  and deal with them as topic headers in my commentary below the screed. Particularly egregious concepts may be marked with superscripts internally linked to my comments.

    Since I did not discover this until early Sunday morning, and found statements by the Secretary General and Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah along with the Fez Plan, I will try to limit the time wasted on each screed and re-use as much commentary as I can.

    The Fez Plan Of Action is a 30 page report full of the usual standard United Nazis boilerplate including references to HRC Res 16/18, which, implemented by the Istanbul Process, is designed to strip us of our right to free expression.



Intervention of Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations

Launch of the Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes

United Nations, New York, 14 July 2017

Excellencies, Distinguished Fellow Panelists,

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am very pleased to be present at the launch of this Plan of Action, which is meant to help “better understand, articulate and encourage the potential of religious leaders to prevent
incitement and the violence that it can lead to, and to integrate the work of religious leaders within broader efforts to prevent atrocity crimes” (p. 3).

The fruit of three years of hard work, the Plan is intended primarily for religious leaders and workers, but also helpfully includes detailed recommendations for States and state institutions, civil society organizations, and the media, conscious that preventing genocide,
war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity requires the contributions and collaboration of each of us and all our communities and institutions.

While the Holy See is not able to support every one of the 177 targets flowing from the Plan’s nine groups of thematic recommendations and 35 objectives, the plan as a whole represents a major, practical step forward in fostering a culture and society consistent with what the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit called the Responsibility to Protect.

I would like to share three brief reactions.

First, I wish to underline the emphasis in the Plan that “States have the primary responsibility to protect populations from atrocity crimes, as well as their incitement.” This is in line with Articles 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome, which states the responsibility to protect falls primarily, but not exclusively, on national authorities. Then the international community is called upon, “as appropriate, [to] encourage and help States to exercise this responsibility.” This encouragement and help can take many forms, among which I would like to recall the duty to refrain from inciting tension and conflict in third States that could constitute the prelude, the scene or still worse, the breeding ground for committing the hateful crimes in question.

There has been some focus recently on the role of religious leaders in preventing atrocity crimes — and this is good, because religious leaders have much to contribute — but, at the end of the day, religious leaders and organizations obviously do not have the resources by themselves to stop atrocities. While they can influence behavior and mentalities, they do not possess the resources and instruments of stopping mass atrocities that only States possess, like law enforcement agencies and armed forces. While I heartily welcome the spotlight on the helpful role of religious leaders, it is important to maintain the crucial focus on the primary responsibility of national governments and the international community to act to protect the innocent from savage acts.

My second point is that, as the Plan helpfully emphasizes, “religious leaders and actors can” — and I would add, do — “play a particularly influential role” in preventing atrocities, “because they have the potential to influence the behavior of those who follow them and share their beliefs.”1

Negatively, this influence has been abused by those religious leaders who have misused their authority and influence to spur or justify atrocities. Positively, it has been seen in the many more religious leaders who have condemned such abuses, stressing that violence against others in the name of God is a great blasphemy against the name of God and the greatest disservice to religion itself.2

Religious leaders and communities are called to uphold the Responsibility to Protect by engaging in interreligious dialogue and promoting peace in their communities. Their vocation is to carry out and inspire actions aimed at helping the building of societies based on respect for life and human dignity, charity, fraternity2.5, which goes far beyond tolerance, and solidarity.

The Plan offers religious leaders many helpful good and best practices in order to inoculate those who come to their houses of worship from the half-truths that ideologues can use to incite them to hating rather than loving, and attacking rather than serving, their neighbor3. The very existence of a Plan directed toward religious leaders is also a humble recognition by the international community that those who are being incited by pseudo-religious motivations for violence aren’t going to be effectively persuaded out of it by secular argumentation from so-called infidels or by economic materialism. They need, rather, valid religious arguments that show that extremists’ violence-inducing exegesis is unfaithful to the text and to the God they’re claiming to serve; they need persuasive counterarguments that plant the seeds of peace and eradicate the weeds of violence.4

The phenomenon of religiously motivated violence is a particular challenge with regard to the defense and protection of Freedom of Religion or Belief.5 Understanding the motivations that lie at the root of terrorism and violence is complex and requires careful reflection and analysis, all the more so when there is a religious dimension to it6. Religious leaders are uniquely placed to offer such reflection. Pope Francis has helped to open up spaces for this reflection to occur so that religious leaders are able to contribute to the sensitive debate about religiously motivated terrorism.

Acknowledging explicitly the religious dimension of some expressions of violent extremism is fraught with danger7, and we can understand the reluctance of governments and international bodies to do so. Thus, the most important contribution of religious leaders to this debate is to help people understand that acknowledging the religious dimension of some violent extremism, or more precisely the manipulation of religion for violent ends8, does not mean equating religion, or a particular religion, or an entire religious community, with violence.9

In his April 28 address to the participants of the International Peace Conference in Cairo, Pope Francis emphasized that “religion is not a problem but a part of the solution10.” In order to “counter effectively the barbarity of those who foment hatred and violence,” he said, “we need to accompany young people, helping them on the path to maturity and teaching them to respond to the incendiary logic of evil by patiently working for the growth of goodness, … daily turn[ing] the polluted air of hatred into the oxygen of fraternity.”

For religious leaders to carry out this service, he said, it’s essential that religion not “be relegated to the private sphere, as if it were not an essential dimension of the human person and society,” because such secularizing tendencies can add fuel to the fires being stoked by those who want to instrumentalize religious motivations toward violent ends. Confining religion only to the intimate sphere of the person risks the development of a culture of intolerance, which is one reason why national authorities must recognize and ensure religious freedom as an inalienable fundamental human right.

The public good that comes from religion needs to be appreciated and promoted so that religious leaders can better, Pope Francis continued in Cairo, “unmask the violence that masquerades as purported sanctity, … denounce violations of human dignity and human rights, … expose attempts to justify every form of hatred in the name of religion11, and … condemn these attempts as idolatrous caricatures of God.” 12

My third and last point involves the importance of religious leaders’ participation in meaningful interreligious dialogue, which is the focus of the fifth thematic recommendation.

This is something that Pope Francis has been stressing by both word and action since his 2013 election. “Interreligious dialogue,” he wrote in the exhortation that charts the path of his pontificate, “is a necessary condition for peace in the world.” He elaborated on that conviction this January in his annual address to the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See. He described how interreligious dialogue, beyond the many direct fruits that come from it for believers, provides the peoples of the world a paradigm to discuss their differences, grow in mutual appreciation of others’ perspectives, and journey together toward peace and other common goals.

Religiously motivated men and women, moved as they are by the call of God to reverence the other’s God-given dignity and love their neighbor, he said, have a special responsibility to show everyone how to converse about the deepest and most important matters and to work respectfully through what may divide. Moreover, they show adherents how to fight injustice and root out the personal and social causes of discord that can lead to war, to renounce violence and vengeance in vindicating one’s rights, to transcend selfishness and the hatred that calcifies through lack of forgiveness, and to carry out the works of mercy that build a culture of peace.13

That’s why the role and work of religious leaders and believers in general, and interreligious dialogue in particular, are crucial not just in preventing incitement to violence among susceptible coreligionists, but in fostering incitement to virtue and thereby creating the type of peaceful and inclusive societies in which atrocity crimes are ethically unacceptable, indeed, unimaginable.

Thank you for your kind attention.


religious leaders

    Jews and Christians are not raising Hell, Muslims are. And their 'religious leaders' spur them on. Only damned fools dream that Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs will suddenly reverse course and tell Muslims to quit raising Hell. The plan is designed to lull us into thinking that is possible. Those are Mafia leaders, not leaders of a religion.

  Here's a 'religious leader' for you: https://www.memri.org/tv/sheik-yousuf-al-qaradhawi-allah-imposed-hitler-upon-jews-punish-them-allah-willing-next-time-will
Here is another;





incitement

       "Prophet, urge the Believers to fight!"  "Stimulation of the desire for Jihad"; those are clues for you who are clueless. Muslims are commanded to do Jihad and threatened with eternal damnation if they do not. They are promised great rewards in this world and the next if they comply. What is the "best deed" in Islam?  What is its' highest  peak? Ignorant, clueless damned fool!!!

hatred

    Wala wal' Bara: Love and Hate for the sake of Allah!!! We went astray and earned his wrath. He curses us., He calls us the worst of living creatures. He wants Muslims to torment, terrify and kill us in this world and he will burn us in the next.  Pious Muslims who observe the five compulsory salat curse us 17 times every day!  It is not possible to expunge the hatred from Islam!!! It is built in.

    The most accursed Qur'an, denigrated by reasonable people as the "Unholy Koranus", is full of incitement to violence.
  • 4:95. Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good (Paradise), but Allâh has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward;

  • 5:35. O you who believe! Do your duty to Allâh and fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive hard in His Cause as much as you can. So that you may be successful.
  • 9:19. Do you consider the providing of drinking water to the pilgrims and the maintenance of Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah) as equal to the worth of those who believe in Allâh and the Last Day, and strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh? They are not equal before Allâh. And Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers).

  • 9:41
  • 9:73
  • 9:86
  • 8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

  • 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

  • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
    Allah says: "strive hard and fight with your wealth and your life", that is better for you.  Allah says the Believers do it 9:111 and he says that only those who do it are believers 49:15.  Allah says "fight them" and "fight those nearest you".

    That is offensive, not defensive war, as per "Reliance Of The Traveller" o9.1,  o9.8,  Hedaya 2.144 & Risala Ch. 30.2(b). Any sentient adult with a functioning brain knows that you do not stop and issue dawah for three days before responding to an attack! Al-Misri gives it away when he writes "provided he has first invited them to Islam".

pseudo religious

    Craig Winn called it the "Profitable Prophet Plan" in "The Prophet Of Doom".  Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. Islamic clerics have nothing to do with God or genuine religion. Islam's faith component is false & malignant, serving to disguise it and motivate Muslims to murder.

violence

    Such as the ongoing wars in Iraq & Syria and the terror attacks scattered all over the world?

prevent atrocity crimes

    There is only one way to prevent war crimes: exterminate the warmongers. the Pope has no influence on Muslims and the Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are spurring them on. Only a damned fool thinks that will be reversed.

genocide

       Why would a believer in Allah try to suppress genocide? Ever read Surah Muhammad 47.4? 'When you have killed and wounded many of them'...  Then there is Surah Al-Anfal 8.67 wherein Allah tells Moe that his price of admission to the celestial oir orgy is "great slaughter". 

    Did Moe really mean tht?  What did he do?
    What mental illness makes an Archbishop dream that Muslims clerics will suddenly reverse course and abjure what Allah commanded and Moe did?

war crimes

    The war is a crime!  Attacking innocent people, plundering their goods and enslaving them is criminal in itself.  The ostensible purpose of Jihad is Allah's good pleasure through establishing and extending Islam's domain. The real purpose of Jihad is accrual of spoils.   Hedaya is the fiqh of the Hanafi madhab, used in India and the Ottoman Empire. Get a clue for Chrissake!!!




    This is a pull yer head outta yer arse moment: Infidels may be attacked without provocation and the purpose of Jihad is slaves  & plunder. It's the law! 

states

    The only way, in the short term, to prevent terror attacks is to remove all of the potential terrorists from Dar al-Harb. Leave no Muslims where Allah's writ does not run. No Muslims, no terrorism. 

    In Dar al-Islam, where Sunni & Shi'ia frag each other, take the F out of way and the E out of elephant.

breeding ground

    Terrorists are bred in the wombs of Muslimas,  regardless of geography. First world, third world, Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Harb is irrelevant. Terrorism springs from Allah's imperatives, threat and promise, not from poverty, illness, ignorance, repression, occupation, unemployment or any other maundering fantasy of LibTards.

role of religious leaders

influential role

    The Pope does not rule the world! He has no influence over Muslims.  They do not give a damn what he says. They could  not care less about the sermons of Franklin Graham.  And their Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are spurring them on to Jihad.


negative influence

    Islam is not a religion, it is a Mafia and Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are not religious leaders, they are Mafia leaders. Allah is Satan, not God. Allah commands Muslims to do Jihad, terrorism & genocide and threatens them with his fire pit if they do not. He promises them eternity in his celestial orgy if they do.  That is what Islamic leaders preach and nobody can change that reality.

respect

life



dignity

    Until you testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped, your blood and wealth are not sacred to Muslims and you have no human rights!

charity

    Islamic charity is for Muslims only. Zakat is not paid to infidels.  Look it up in Reliance, if memory serves, it is in book h.

fraternity

    Fraternity, like charity, is for Muslims only.  Muslims are commanded not to befriend infidels and to shun their infidel fathers and siblings.
 3:28, 3:118,   4:894:1394:1445:515:57, 9:23 , 58:1458:2260:160:13

tolerance

    Yeah, right. Kill them wherever you find them, fight them... curse them... very tolerant!!! /sarc

half-truths

    Malignant malarkey! There is no truth in the Unholy Koranus!  No distortion, twisting, perverting or hijacking is required to inculcate hatred, incite violence and provoke genocidal terrorism. That crap is built into the Medinan verses. The hadith and sunna are full of it. Check the table of contents of Ishaq's Sira as translated by Guillaume. Raid! Ghazwa! Attack! Murder! Assassination!  With numerous iterations of each. There might be a reason for that. Can you get a clue?  27 Ghazwat & 47 Sariyas in ten years!  That is a clue for you.

freedom of Religion

    Freedom of religion is for religions, not Mafias. How in the name of Christ can you leave anyone free to believe he has a divine commission to convert, kill or enslave you, which ever comes first?  Muslims are obligated to wage war until pagans are Muslim or dead and we are subjugated and pay extortion in a state of subjection.  What part of that do you not comprehend?

    They are told Allah will burn them if they do not fight us and admit them to his orgy if they do.  They prefer hair pie with cherries to the fire pit.  Their freedom ends where our rights begin!!!

    Islam entails obedience to Allah, who commands Muslims to wage war against us. Islam entails emulation of Moe, who enslaved,raped, murdered and plundered infidels. Muslims who do not do those things are liable to the fire. They meet Allah with a sign of hypocrisy.  According to its mastermind, 9/11 was an act of worship!!!

    "Only Allah has the right to be worshiped."  That outlaws Christianity, you Damned Fool!!! Jews & Christians conquered by Muslims, in a state of dhimmitude, are forbidden to pray aloud in public, hold processions, ring bells, sell wine or pork, build or maintain churches.  Read the Pact Of Umar!!! Read Reliance Of The Traveller!!! Get a God Blessed clue for Chrissake!!!

religiously motivated

    "Boy, does you believe?"  "Then go kill some infidels and I will admit you to my whore house in the sky after you die. " !
Islam is presented to them as a religion, supposedly from the creator of the world. He gave it all to Moe and their role is to seize and hold it. Believers are only those who fight in his cause, killing and being killed.  How will you break their Iman???

religious dimension

    Get your head out of your anus! Wipe the crap from your eyes and read the Unholy Koranus. Read Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4 along with it. Moe created an Arab Mafia disguised by a thin veil of false faith. Muslims believe it, which makes them implacable  existential enemies to the human race. 

    The root word of religion means '"to bind". Moe met his companions under a tree, shook their hands and took their bayah to wage Jihad as long as they live. That is one binding part.

    The penalty for not doing Jihad is eternity in the fire. That is another binding part. Then there is the penalty for apostasy: death in this world and fire in the next.  What real religion recruits and retains by force?  What real religion rewards its acolytes with loot?  What real religion awards Brownie Points for acts intended to injure or enragedisbelievers? 

    There are two possible solutions: make them quit believing or quit breathing. Which will it be?

extremism

    Islamic violence is intrinsic; not bida. The alphabet soup of terrorist groups added nothing to Islam but new weapons & tactics.  They are not perverting, hijacking or distorting Islam, they are obeying Allah and emulating Moe.

manipulation of religion

    The concept is false & malignant!! Islam was created from ancient Arab Paganism, bits of Zoroastrianism and bits of the Bible & non canonical texts.   The mission of Islam is mercenary: Moe's personal emolument. The Unholy Koranus and sahih ahadith collections contains clues for the clueless. Moe said his provision was under the shadow of his spear. Fath al-Bari says that means war plunder.  He said the spoils belong to Allah and his messenger. Allah told him that his interest was ransom money but Allah's was "great slaughter".  He said that Allah made him "wealthy through conquests".  He said that Ceasar & Khosrau  would be ruined and his companions would spend their treasures in Jihad. He said he was made victorious with terror and the keys to the treasures of the world were brought to him and placed in his hand. He said that spoils of war were not allowed to previous Prophets but Allah saw his weakness and humility so he made spoils lawful for him.

    Only an Idiot, Cretin, Moron or damned fool can fail to connect those dots and see Islam for what it is: Arab Mafia disguised in religious vestments.  Islam was created to induce Muslims to do just what they are doing!!! It has not been manipulated, twisted, distorted, perverted or hijacked!

equating Islam to terrorism

    CamelShit!!!  Malignant Malarkey!!! Right out of the numerous United Nazi Resolutions endlessly reaffirming that terrorism can not and must not be equated to or associated with any religion. The Fez Action Plan includes that boilerplate by reference.

Who said:
  • "I will cast terror"
  • "I cast terror"
  • "To strike terror"
  • "to terrify"
  • "to injure or enrage"
  • "you are more of a terror"
  • "I have been made victorious with terror" ???????
Extra discredit question: who wrote:  "Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself. "?

religion is not the problem

    Islam is the problem!!! Islam is not a religion, it is a predatory way of life with religious, social, economic, governmental and military components. The religious component serves as a disguise and troop motivator. 

    Victims see the religious texts and ritual, so they can not recognize the wolf pack. Believers fight to the death because they believe they will be rewarded by hair pie with cherries in a celestial orgy or damned in eternal fire if they sit at home.

religion is not the solution!

    Muslim clerics are part of the problem, not the solution. They perpetuate the lies that motivate Muslims to raise Hell.  That can not change. They can not be reformed short of apostasy which would cost them their street cred. 

    The Pope and most of the Cardinals, Bishops and Priests are part of the problem, not the solution. They deny the objective factual reality of Islam's true nature, mission and works. They peddle the 'great religion of peace' delusion.  They support the delusional Goddamned Fool United Nazi resolutions that deny the truth and demand censorship of those who tell it.

interreligious dialogue

    Totally worthless & useless; counterproductive.  Muslims lie, they play semantic games, manipulating the meaning of words. They conceal the doctrine of abrogation. They conceal damning verses in the Unholy Koranus and hadith. They love 5.32 but never cite the verse that follows it.  They will never tell you that "wage war against Allah"  "includes disbelief".  They can expel, execute, crucify or mutilate you just because you do not believe in Allah.

    Entering into dialogue with Satan's slaves without first reading the Unholy Koranus, hadith & sira is a damned fool's errand. Don't do it!

weeds of violence

    There is no element of truth In Islam. It is all malignant malarkey. Violence is intrinsic to Islam, by design. The Archbishop should know that if he had read the Unholy Koranus and one of the six canonical hadith collections.  Who will get a clue?

common goals

    Peace in a pig's anus!

    Peace is the condition of the world after Islam has completed its global conquest. Until that happy day, there is permanent war.  Moe said Jihad would abide until Judgment Day.  Allah commands Muslims not to be weak and sue for peace. But you don't know that 'cuz you did not read the Unholy Koranus and Sunan Abu Dawud.

    The goal of Islam is enriching Moe and his successors through accrual of spoils: ransom, fei, jizya & ganimah.  The goal of Muslims is the supreme success: admission to Jannah, hopefully al-Firdhaus, where they will spend half the day popping cherries and the other half wining and dining.

    Thee is no common ground. We have nothing in common. We do not share values. We do not share a deity. We do not share goals.  Only liars and damned fools pretend otherwise.

Believers

    Believers are defined in three surahs of the Unholy Koranus.
    The first five verses of Surah Al-Anfal are a bit obscure. Comprehending the meaning of Believers requires looking up instances of spending and going out.

    Surah At-Taubah and  Surah Al-Hujuraat leave nothing to chance: Believers 'fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed'.
Allah's cause  is to make Islam dominate; rule the world as per 9.33Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65.

Attacking Neighbors

    How can an a Moron rise to the rank of Archbishop?  If he was of normal intelligence, he might glean a clue from Surah At-Taubah 9.123, which commands Muslims to attack the disbelievers nearest them.

idolatrous caricatures of God

    Allah hates his creation. He created the Black race "for the fire" and said "I don't care". Turn to the third volume of Mishkat ul-Masabih, page 117 and get a clue. Allah guides whom he will and misguides whom he will, the great deceiver. Allah will pluck Muslims from the fire and replace them with Christians. And their ain't 70 virgins, you only get two, the rest if so lucky, are Jewish and Christian women pulled from the fire for your sexual gratification . You are an ignorant damned fool 'cuz you will not read the Unholy Koranus and hadith!!!

culture of peace

    Everything in that paragraph is CamelShit! Islam affords no dignity to Infidels, denying the sanctity of our blood & treasure and denying our human rights. Read Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and get a God Blessed Clue for Chrissake!!!

    Muslims only love other Muslims!  They hate infidels 'cuz Allah hates us and requires them to share his loves and hates as documented in another comment above.

    Islamic love, compassion, mercy and respect are for Muslims only!!!  Peace is only after Islamic conquest is complete and Dar al-harb has been subsumed by Dar al-Islam. Islam is permanent war. 'Culture of Peace' is the ultimate CamelShit!  There is and can be no such entity while one damned Muslim lives on the face of the earth. One Muslim Believer will always breed or recruit more and resume the Jihad.  Failure to do so assures his eternal damnation.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Antonio Guterres On the Fez Plan Of Action:CamelShit!

Antonio Guterres On the Fez Plan Of Action:CamelShit! I have marked the most egregious turds with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary commentary below the horizontal line.


Authority of Religious Leaders Critical to Preventing Incitement of Violence, Secretary-General Says at Event Launching Fez Action Plan

Following are UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ remarks on the launch of the Fez Plan of Action, in New York today:

Let me begin by thanking you for coming together in this deeply meaningful way — and on such a timely initiative.

I firmly believe in the power of faith leaders to shape our world for good.  As High Commissioner for Refugees, I made a special effort to reach out to faith leaders.  I did so out of personal conviction.  But, I also did so for very practical reasons.  After all, to the vast majority of people uprooted from their homes, faith is an anchor in a stormy sea of fear, loss, separation and destitution.

We worked together with religious leaders on a project that focused on the roots of modern refugee law and Islamic law.  We did it in close cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and with the support of Nayef University in Riyadh.  More broadly, we brought in UNHCR [the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees], religious leaders together for a dialogue on faith and protection.

Again and again, I have been struck by the consonance of key precepts and core values between the different faiths1.  Indeed faith is central to hope and resilience.  Yet, around the world, we see how religion is being twisted — cynically manipulated — to justify incitement to violence and discrimination2.  We see an alarming rise in online and offline hate speech — messages that spread hostility and hatred and encourage populations to commit violence against individuals or communities, often based on their identity.

Hate speech3 sows the seeds of suspicion, mistrust and intolerance.  Over time, it can play an important role in convincing people that violence is logical, justifiable, even necessary.  And so, it is no surprise that hate speech is one of the most common warning signs of atrocity crimes — genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Since we know the warning signs, we can also take early action to prevent these crimes.  The voice, the authority, and the example of religious leaders are critical4This conviction led to the development of the initiative we launch today.  The Fez Plan of Action is the product of two years of consultations, led by my Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide.  It involved religious leaders representing different faiths around the world, as well as faith-based organizations and many others.  I would like to pay tribute to the critical role of many partners, and in particular KAICIID, the Network for Religious and Traditional Peacemakers and the World Council of Churches.

The Plan is based on a unifying commitment to promote peace, understanding, mutual respect and the fundamental rights of all people.  This includes the rights to freedom of religion and belief, opinion and expression, and peaceful association.

The Plan of Action sets out a broad range of ways in which religious leaders can prevent incitement to violence and contribute to peace and stability.  It stresses the importance of women and youth in all prevention initiatives.  It also contains recommendations for States and the international community.

All religions teach respect for life and recognize human beings as fundamentally equal5.  These principles summon us to show respect for all human beings, even those with whom we might profoundly disagree or whose cultures might seem alien.  I urge the widest possible dissemination and implementation of this Plan of Action.  It can help to save lives, reduce suffering and realize our shared vision of a peaceful, inclusive and just societies in which diversity is valued and the rights of all individuals are protected.

Let us work together to prevent and end atrocity crimes and all affronts to human rights and dignity.



consonance of key precepts

    Is there no limit to arrogant AssWholliness?

Jesus Christ!

  • Crucified, dead, resurrected or not?
  • Prince of Peace or Barbarian War Lord who will kill the last Jews & Christians?
  •  Son of God or slave of Allah?
  • Moe's paternal half brother and step son? 

religion is being twisted

to justify incitement

    Accursed Liar!!! Go to Hell and be damned! Do not pass GO, do not collect Jizya!  Islam was contrived for the purpose of propagating perpetual war  because war was the source of Moe's income.  Moe got 100% of the fei & Jizya and the top 20% of the ganimah produced by his conquests.

Hate speech

    Seventeen times each day, pious Muslims curse us by reminding Allah why he wants to burn us: they recite Surah Al-Fatiha.
Surah Al-Baqarah 2.286 is one of the most popular superogatory salat. When they recite it, they ask Allah to grant them victory over us.  The Qur'an calls us "worst of living creatures" and curses us.


religious leaders

    Here's a religious leader for you: https://www.memri.org/tv/sheik-yousuf-al-qaradhawi-allah-imposed-hitler-upon-jews-punish-them-allah-willing-next-time-will
Here is another;


All religions

    Islam is an Arab Mafia, not a religion and it does not teach respect for life, equality and human dignity.

respect for life

  • kill them wherever you find them
  • Fight them
  • dignity

    • Until you testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped, your blood and wealth are not sacred to Muslims and you have no human rights!
    • Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
  • equality

    • Blood wit for accidental death:
      • Muslim: 100 camels  Reliance Of The Traveller o4.2
      • Muslima: 50 camels
      • Christian: 33 camels.
    • testomony

      • muslim: 1  Reliance o24.7
      • Muslima: 2
      • Christian: can not testify.

4

Shaykh Shit: Abdallah Bin Bayyah And The Fez Plan Of Action

Shaykh Shit: Abdallah Bin Bayyah And The Fez Plan Of Action
I stand firmly, by God, on the right of free expression, without which, according to President Washington, "we would be   led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter".  The free speech clause of the Constitution guarantees it and I will not yield!!!

    I disrespectfully and contumaciously reserve and exercise the right to name, shame, curse, condemn and demand the extinction of the enemy of the human race: Ummah al-Islamia, its false deity, its false prophet and its damnable doctrines.

    As part of my condemnation of the false and malicious Fez Plan Of Action, I therefore now point out, with superscripts internally6 linked to my comments and the fatal facts, the damnable lies of the Shaykh. [Bold font added.]

Full speech of Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah delivered at the UN on Friday 14th July.

Friday, 14 July
ECOSOC Chamber
United Nations Headquarters,
New York

At the United Nations Headquarters today, Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah was invited to speak at the Launch of the Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes. The meeting began with opening remarks by the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres followed by a speech from Shaykh Bin Bayyah. (full text of the speech can be read below)

The Shaykh delivered his intervention from the role and perspective of religious leadership, through a theological and spiritual approach, highlighting profound religious philosophy and its exalted objectives, such as seeking out good reasons for peace and well-being, rather than justifications for civil strife and war, a critical need so as to neutralize instigations of violence and hatred, as well as provocation and tension that we see so prevalent in today’s age.

The program was hosted by Adama Dieng, Under-Secretary-General/Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide from The United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. Five regional action plans were developed and presented by religious leaders and actors from around the world. These pioneering documents are the first to focus on the role of religious leaders and actors in preventing incitement to violence that could lead to atrocity crimes and the first to develop context specific regional strategies with this objective. The meeting was designed to bring together Member States, the United Nations, international and nongovernmental organizations to adopt and launch the Plan of Action and the regional action plans and discuss strategies for their implementation.

Full speech of Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah delivered at the UN on Friday 14th July.
In the Name of God, the Most Gracious the Most Merciful
Prayers and Benedictions on the Prophet Muhammad and upon all of the Messengers and Prophets

His excellency, Secretary General of the United Nations, Dr. Antonio Guterres His Excellency, Mr. Adama Dieng
His Excellency, Faisal Bin Mu’ammar

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The subject we have gathered here today to discuss is extremely important in the life of nations ever since our species first walked the earth on this journey of stewardship. Ever since the time of the sons of Adam—Cain and Abel—the problem of violence has been the preoccupation of Prophets, reformers, and philosophers, as well as politicians and legal experts.

Despite that long-standing concern, violence and its incitement, in all of its dimensions—hidden and manifest, internal and external—continues to engender a most distressing disease and its cure remains elusive. Perhaps the most important problem is the abject failure of our contemporary civilization, which for the first time in history has placed our collective future in the hands of human ingenuity embodied in our weapons of mass destruction, the use of which is now determined by the impulsive desires and impetuous outbreaks of humans. This is the result of the absence of the ethical question: Why?

Esteemed colleagues, you have convened here to address one of this problem’s deepest roots, and to battle with one of its highest fortresses: I mean, of course, incitement to violence. Such incitement is a call to use force unjustly against individuals or groups of people simply due to their religion, color, ethnicity, or social class1. Despite the many and varied approaches that have tried to address this issue over time—legal, ethical, and philosophical—it still remains clouded and requires experts to re-examine it, clarify its limits and remove the ambiguities surrounding it, weighing the ethical considerations on the one hand, and the legal ramifications on the other.

Approaching this from the role of religious leadership, I will speak about a theological and spiritual approach that is built upon profound religious philosophy and its exalted objectives so I may present a discourse that seeks out good reasons for peace and well-being, rather than justifications for civil strife and war, and that works to neutralize instigations of violence and hatred, as well as provocation and tension.

Since its inception in 2014, The Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies has exerted tremendous efforts in deep research in the foundations of Islam, and in our shared humanity, to restore forgotten traditions of peace2, its neglected aims, and calling attention to long lost values, and long buried Islamic jurisprudence. The Forum’s goal has been to dismantle the violent rhetoric point by point, and concept by concept in order to make clear its faults and reveal its methodological errors, and to prevent this ongoing perversion that these misguided

understandings have caused due to an absence of authentic regulatory knowledge. The Forum has done this by deconstructing their arguments and reconstructing a correct understanding, so it can remove this ethical confusion that the discourse of incitement to violence has used, and to remove the garment of religious legitimacy in which it has been cloaked.

Among the most important initiative that The Forum undertook was to issue the historical Marrakech Declaration in January 2016, which addresses the rights of religious minorities in Muslim majority countries. Our hope is that this Declaration, based upon the Madinah Charter of Prophet Muhammad, will shed light on the history of Arabic and Islamic civilization, and contribute to the establishment of a new phase that can lead to a deep understanding of the religious legacies that can enable us to establish conviviality now and in the future. Thus, the Marrakech Declaration was built upon a religious text and used the legitimate tools of textual interpretation that reveals its authentic teachings of tolerance3, harmony, and peaceful coexistence4. This Declaration embodies the role of the religious leader in regards to his religious texts and heritage and historical analogies in search of sound foundations for mutual co- existence and a rejection of violence and hatred.

However, in looking at the French context in the 19th century that led to the legal formation of the crime of incitement to violence, we find that the definition of incitement become more complicated, and this leads us to call for an understanding of the connection between the principle of freedom of expression, which is held sacred in the current dominant civilization, and the principle of responsinbility for the consequeces of the expression itself5. So despite any positive aspects this freedom may have, we hold the conviction that among the most important incitements to violence are those practiced by modern media outlets; they have mastered the art of broadcasting disputes, to such a degree that as soon as the conflict starts these media outlets begin to categorize the various sides, giving each an epithet to defend, and continue to broadcast day and night to the ignorant public who have no protection or immunity that can prevent them from responding to the call of wars and self destruction. And its been long said: wars begin with words.

For this reason, it is advisable that the intellectuals, philosophers, politicians, and legal experts review the principle of freedom of expression with a pragmatic approach that examines the public impact, especially in the developing countries where we see as a result of this misguided media thousands of victims who die. They are seeking a type of freedom they never acquire, and happiness they never attain. The net result is total destruction of peoples and places. Not to mention other elements such as political, religious, and ethnic sectarianism, the effects of which remain undeniable.

For this reason, I am calling upon the religious leaders from all of our various traditions to take resolute steps to remove these elements of incitement, and to distance these inflammatory interpretations from our religious practices. This is exactly what the Forum is engaged in by implementing accurately the Islamic principle of “commanding to the common good, and forbidding the socially reprehensible” within the constraints of Islamic legal tradition.

It is incumbent upon the religious leaders to grasp that an attack on any religion is an attack on all religions. We can use anti-Muslim sentiment and anti-Semitism as examples of this very problem. The reconciliation among religions6 without which, according to Has Kung, peace cannot be achieved, is not enough unless religious solidarity is realized.

Indeed, the establishment of the International Center for Counter Terrorism (‘Itidaal) in Riyadh toward this end represents an effective tool to counter hate speech.

Another important effort is that laws should develop out of the needs of the local environments they are addressing, away from laws that do not take into consideration the particularities of places, peoples and their differences. Moreover, they neglect the accumulations of historical and social grievances. Therefore, the call to freedom of desecration of sacred symbols, and denigration of human figures, that we know the very meaning of existence has arrived to us through them, this is also from the category of incitement to violence and hatred, and gives license to a breakdown of public order.7

Along these lines, let me remind you of examples from some of the Arabic and Islamic countries in placing a legal and legislative framework to protect co-existence and counter violence, specifically the recent law adopted by the United Arab Emirates to counter discrimination, hate speech, and denigration of religions8, because it takes into consideration the local context and clarity of purpose. So from one point of view it looks at the reality of the society wherein it is being applied; and, from another point of view, it aims to protect the society and immunize it against hate speech and incitement to violence.

In conclusion, I sincerely wish a positive outcome to your endeavor, and I fervently pray for your success.

Shaykh Abd’Allah Bin Bayyah
President
Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies.
Abu Dhabi
UAE




incitement

    The most accursed Qur'an, denigrated by reasonable people as the "Unholy Koranus", is full of incitement to violence.
  • 4:95. Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good (Paradise), but Allâh has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward;

  • 5:35. O you who believe! Do your duty to Allâh and fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive hard in His Cause as much as you can. So that you may be successful.
  • 9:19. Do you consider the providing of drinking water to the pilgrims and the maintenance of Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah) as equal to the worth of those who believe in Allâh and the Last Day, and strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh? They are not equal before Allâh. And Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers).

  • 9:41
  • 9:73
  • 9:86
  • 8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

  • 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

  • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
    Allah says: "strive hard and fight with your wealth and your life", that is better for you.  Allah says the Believers do it 9:111 and he says that only those who do it are believers 49:15.  Allah says "fight them" and "fight those nearest you".

    That is offensive, not defensive war, as per "Reliance Of The Traveller" o9.1,  o9.8,  Hedaya 2.144 & Risala Ch. 30.2(b). Any sentient adult with a functioning brain knows that you do not stop and issue dawah for three days before responding to an attack! Al-Misri gives it away when

due to their religion

    "Those who disbelieve", "people of the book", "disbelievers" 8:39, 9:29 & 9:123. Accursed liar: I call you out! You played the victim card, projecting the evil of Islam onto us. Go directly to Hell, do not pass GO, do not collect Jizya!!!

forgotten traditions of peace

    In a pig's anus!!! For twelve years, in Mekkah, the accursed Profiteer had no army and few supporters. he preached tolerance and forbearance.  After subverting Yathrib, he preached defensive/retaliatory warfare. When his army grew strong enough, he preached offensive warfare as outlined above.  According to Reliance o9.0, Moe participated in 27 ghazwat and dispatched 47 sariya. 74 battles: a fine tradition of p;eace!

tolerance

    Kiss my fat, disfigured foot, hypocrite! Islam is supremely intolerant!
  • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • 8.39
  • 9.29
Making war on people because they do not share your superstition is a great example of tolerance!!!

peaceful coexistence

    "Fight them until"; Jihad will be performed continuously until Judgment Day   Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526.
 Perpetual war peaceful coexistence!!!  Slap the crap out of that liar and there'd be nothing left but an empty uniform.

    Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs can not reject violence because that would entail apostasy and condemn them to death. Look it up in Reliance o8.0-7.  Denial of any part of Islam or its law carries a death sentence.

responsibility for the consequeces

    That turd is right out of HRC Res 16/18 & the Istanbul Process. It means that they would persecute the Danish Cartoonists for Muslim riots in Pakistan and Salman Rushdie for the murders his detractors committed against translators and publishers of his book.  They do not raise Hell because of what we draw, say and write, they raise Hell 'cuz they are  God damned slaves of Satan and for no other reason!  Those who  riot, loot, burn and murder bear responsibility for the consequences and should suffer deadly force in the process.

reconciliation among religions

    Those who have never been conciled can not be reconciled!  After subverting Yathrib, Moe sanctified permanent war  against  Christians, Jews & Zoroastrians. We can not be reconciled with existential enemies.

freedom of desecration

    By God and the Constitution! I am free to declare the truth about the enemies of the human race, no matter how much they dislike it and protest.  And I will fight to the death to maintain that freedom!!! 

    There is nothing sacred about Allah, who is an ancient pagan moon deity otherwise known as Hubal, Moloch, Baal and Satan. The Unholy Koranus, two sahihs, Sunan Abu Dawud and Ishaq's Sira contain the smoking gun evidence which proves beyond doubt that Allah is Satan, not the God of Abraham, Issac & Jacob.
    There is nothing sacred about Moe, a pagan Arab who bestowed upon himself an undeserved honorific title, married a six year old girl, attacked innocent people, raped captive women, pillaged, plundered, extorted and couched his Arab Mafia as a religion!
   

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Bigotry and Intolerance Exemplified: ABC News

Bigotry and Intolerance Exemplified: ABC News
ABC News exposed their  bigotry & intolerance of truth by removing my comments and banning me.  When you read my commentary, reproduced below, you will see that thee was no good cause for the ban and censorship.  You will see that ABC News is biased in favor of Islam and against its critics.

This is a direct link to an article about adverse reaction to Face Book posts by the President of a small town in Michigan.

    Government employees and office holders do not alienate their first amendment rights by reason of employment or office.  But they need to be aware of the fact that if they criticize LibTards or Muslims they will be subject to vicious attacks.

    They should keep their commentary factual and well documented. It is not prudent to post on social media accounts that expose identifying information.  I communicated that in a private message to Jeff Seiting. I hope that he will maintain his courageous stand and disregard the hoard of harpies kvetching about it. Never apologize! Never resign! Aways counter sue for tortuous interference or defamation.

    While commenting on that article, I received a ban notice. A screenshot of the comment and the ban notice follows this sentence; the deleted comments follow immediately below the image. [A list of links to cited texts follows below the comments.]


Discussion on ABC News 226 comments

Michigan official stands by call for killing of all Muslims

Dajjal

The nation was founded as secular. The establishment clause of the first amdt. is intended to prevent establishment of a national denomination. The founders did not want the government dictating theology.

Islam is predatory and subversive. Refer to Muquaddimah, pages 199 & 303 in the pdf file easily found on the web. See also Maududi's "Jihad In Islam", page 10.

The Qur'an contains clear verses with Allah's commands which all Muslims are bound to obey. Check out 8:39, 9:29 & 9:123, then look up Khalid Sheikh Mohammad's "response To The Nine Accusations". Search therein for "great duty" . Muslims are obligated to terrorize us and the second WTC attack was an Islamic act of worship.

The practice of Islam is incomplete and imperfect without attacking, plundering, raping & enslaving infidel neighbors. Moe did those things and Muslims are obligated to emulate his wors by 33:21.

Dajjal

The USA is defined by its own organic law: the Declaration Of Independence & Constitution.

Islamic law contravenes both. Muslims are obligated to subvert them.

Dajjal

The O.T. is largely a cultural narrative, not imperative. The Qur'an is more imperative. The N.T. is no match for Anfal & Taubah.

Moe had the chance to fix anything he did not like, instead he doubled down on it.
Visit corpusquran.com/ , open it to 9:29 and select and click interesting Arabic words. After checking the dictionary, click thru to the concordance. The word translated as fight is the most interesting. If my spelling was bad, there is a link at the bottom of each page at islamawakened.

Dajjal

Go to Wikiislam, look up Islamic Misogyny, find the page reference to The Life Of Muhammad and read it for yourself. the Muslim purchases a Muslima's gentital tract with his mahr and thence forward owns her like a slave or domestic animal. Ishaq used one metaphor, Tabari used the other.

Dajjal

Theirs was a life or death enterprise. They knew that if they did not hang together they would all hang separately. Several of the signers lost everything and died in penury.

Dajjal

The Klan was founded by Democrats at a beer party. Roof is a drug crazed lunatic and McVeigh a lapsed Catholic who needed assistance from a Muslim to make his bomb work.

Unlike Islam, Christianity does not have Jihad/terror/genocide imperatives.

Dajjal

Inclusion of Islam in the Virginia Statute was Jefferson's worst mistake. Failure to define religion turns the first amendment into a suicide pact.

Dajjal

President John Q. Adams was the most informed about Islam. Franklin & Jefferson were also wise to it. Adams & Jefferson owned and read Qur'an translations, unlike our recent Presidents and current President.

Dajjal

Visit Wikipedia, look up the "First Barbary War" and read what Tripoli's Ambassador told Thomas Jefferson when asked why we were attacked by the Barbary Pirates. Then read Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386 and see how a similar Persian question was answered. Get a clue.

Dajjal

If you want to stop hate mongering, stop the publication of the Qur'an; preaching & propagation of Islam. The concept of Wala wal' Bara must be new to you. it is Love & Hate for the Sake of Allah. Muslims must hate what Allah hates, and he hates disbelievers, wants Muslims to kill us so he can burn us. Try reading Surah Al-Baqarah and Surah Al-Imran of the Qur'an.

Pious Muslims who observe the five compulsory salat curse us 17 times each day by reciting Surah al-Fatiha, reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.

Michigan official stands by call for killing of all Muslims

Dajjal

There is a difference between Muslims, Jews & Christians. Of the thee, only one is bound by commands, unlimited in time or geography, to conquer the world and make "great slaughter".

Try reading the Qur'an, Sahih Bukhari Vol. 4 and pages 139-218 of the second volume of Hedaya. For the short course, read the Jihad chapter of Riyad us-Saliheen.

Dajjal

So it is divisive to stand up against those whose cohort declared Africans good only for slavery, enslaved them and sold them to colonists? Explore pages 125 & 197 of the pdf file containing Muquaddimah, which was written by a North African Muslim historian.

Dajjal

Moe was dishonorable; a false prophet and genuine profiteer. His claim to fame is the creation of an Arab Mafia disguised as a religion which has slaughtered an estimated 270*10^6 innocent victims since 624. Let doubters, dissenters & deniers read pages 108 & 140 of the fourth volume of Sahih Bukhari wherein Moe said his income was under the shadow of his spear and he was made victorious with terror.

Informed opposition to the dictum that one must embrace Isam or be slain is common sense, not bigotry. President Jefferson was not engaged in bigotry when he sent the Marines to Tripoli.

Dajjal

Common sense dictates that officers & employees not identify their affiliation on social media profiles used to discuss sensitive issues. Those who do must be able and stand ready to cite factual evidence to support their opinions.

LibTards, Muslims & Dhimmis seek to destroy their critics. You must be ready and able to defend your position and reply with contumacious defiance.



Cited texts: