Sunday, November 02, 2014

Islam Is Demonic!

Islam Is Demonic This post exhibits evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that:
  • Muhammad, aka. Moe had a devil
  • Moe was demon possessed
  • Allah is Satan.
    The evidence is found in the canonical texts of Islam: Qur'an, hadith & Sira which are quoted and linked so that you can verify the quotes and examine their context. [Emphasis added for clarity.]
  
    When Moe had his hallucination in the cave at Hira, he feared for his probity and sanity. There is some interesting information in Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad Ibn Sa'd Ibn Mani' al-Zuhri al-Basrí KITAB AL-TABAQAT AL-KABIR.

Moe reported strange perceptions and feared he was becoming a sooth-sayer.

Moe: Insane


Volume 1, Parts 1.45.4
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.4
'Affan Ibn Muslim informed us: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us on the authority
of Hisham Ibn 'Urwah, he on the authority of 'Urwah: Verily, the Apostle of Allah,
may Allah bless him, said:
0 Khadijah, I see light and hear sounds and I fear I shall be a sooth-sayer. She said:
Verily, Allah will not do it with you, 0 son of `Abd Allah. Verily, you speak the truth,
return things entrusted to you and fulfil (obligations of) relationship.

He feared that he was losing his sanity.

Volume 1, Parts 1.45.5
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5

Yahya 1bn Abbad and `Affan Ibn Muslim informed us; they said: Hammad Ibn
Salamah informed us; he said: Ammar Ibn Abi `Ammar informed us; (variation)
Yahya Ibn `Abbád (only) said: Hammad Ibn Salamah said: I think (he narrated) on
the authority of Ibn `Abbas:
Verily, the Prophet, may Allah bless him, said: O Khadijah I hear sounds and see
light and I fear I am mad. She said: 0 son of `Abd Allah ! Allah will not do it with
you. Then she approached Waraqah Ibn Nawfal and related (the incident) to him.
He said: If he is true, then he is nomos as in the case of Moses. If I am alive, when he
is commissioned (to prophethood) I shall support him, help him and believe in him.

Moe Was Suicidal

    When the revelations were interrupted for a time, Moe became suicidal, intending to throw himself from a peak.

Volume 1, Parts 1.46.3
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.46.3
Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Ibrahim [P. 131] lbn Muhammad lbn
Abi Musa related to me on the authority of Dawud Ibn al-Husayn, he on the
authority of Ibn Ghatfan Ibn Tarif, he on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas:
Verily, after the first revelation to the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, that
came at Hira, it (the coming of revelations) remained suspended for a few days; since
he did not see Gabriel, he was much grieved; he went to Thabir and at another time
to Hïra with the intention of throwing himself down. When the Apostle of Allah, may
Allah bless him, was intending to do this from one of these mountains he heard a
sound coming from the heaven. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, paused
for a moment because of the thunderous sound, then he raised his head and lo ! it
was Gabriel seated in a chair between the earth and the sky. He was saying: 0
Muhammad! Thou art surely the Apostle of Allah, and I am Gabriel. The Apostle of
Allah, may Allah bless him, returned, and Allah had cooled his eye and strengthened
his heart; then revelations followed one after the other.

Is Jibrael  An Angel?

    Concerning Jibrael , how many wings do angels have?

35:1. All the praises and thanks be to Allâh, the (only) Originator [or the (only) Creator] of the heavens and the earth, Who made the angels messengers with wings, - two or three or four. He increases in creation what He wills. Verily, Allâh is Able to do all things. http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/35/1/default.htm

    Consider for a moment the consequence of an odd number of wings: imbalance. Controlled, stable flight would be difficult. How many wings does Jibrael  have?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 455:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/004.054.455.html
Narrated Abu Ishaq-Ash-Shaibani:

I asked Zir bin Hubaish regarding the Statement of Allah: "And was at a distance Of but two bow-lengths Or (even) nearer; So did (Allah) convey The Inspiration to His slave (Gabriel) and then he (Gabriel) Conveyed (that to Muhammad). (53.9-10) On that, Zir said, "Ibn Mas'ud informed us that the Prophet had seen Gabriel having 600 wings."

Was Jibrael  Real?

    Angels have 2, 3 or 4 wings, but Jibrael  had 600. Is Jibil really a divine angel?  Was Jibrael  objective or subjective, did others see him or was Moe the only one?

Sahih Muslim Book 031, Number 5997:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/031.5997.html
'A'isha, the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: 'A'isha, here is Gabriel offering you greetings. She said: 1 made a reply: Let there be peace and blessings of Allah upon him, and added: He sees what I do not see.

Revelations

    How did Moe receive his revelations?  In dreams, a voice or a bell.  A dream could be spontaneous or divinely or demoniacally inspired. Hearing a disembodied voice or an invisible friend could be auditory hallucination. What of the bell?

Hell's Bell

    Prior to the invention of Morse Code, the bell could not communicate complex information.  The bell is mentioned in hadith as Satan's musical instrument, accompanied by a devil and repellent to angels.  How then is it possible that Jibrael , averse to bells, communicated Allah's revelations through the musical instrument of Satan?  The revelations must be demonic, not divine.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 2:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/001.001.002.html
Narrated 'Aisha:

(the mother of the faithful believers) Al-Harith bin Hisham asked Allah's Apostle "O Allah's Apostle! How is the Divine Inspiration revealed to you?" Allah's Apostle replied, "Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state passes ' off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel comes in the form of a man and talks to me and I grasp whatever he says." 'Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired Divinely on a very cold day and noticed the Sweat dropping from his forehead (as the Inspiration was over).

Sahihy Muslim Book 024, Number 5277:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/024.5277.html
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Angels do not accompany the travellers who have with them a dog and a bell.

 Sahih Muslim Book 024, Number 5279:
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/024.5279.html
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 34, Number 4218:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab:

Ibn az-Zubayr told that a woman client of theirs took az-Zubayr's daughter to Umar ibn al-Khattab wearing bells on her legs. Umar cut them off and said that he had heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: There is a devil along with each bell.

Denial

    Moe's critics among the disbelievers said that he was a mad poet or sorcerer. Allah mentions them in the Qur'an.  Why did Allah see a need to raise the issue in his revelation? 

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/10/2/default.htm
10:2. Is it wonder for mankind that We have sent Our Inspiration to a man from among themselves (i.e. Prophet Muhammad ) (saying): "Warn mankind (of the coming torment in Hell), and give good news to those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Prophet Muhammad ) that they shall have with their Lord the rewards of their good deeds?" (But) the disbelievers say: "This is indeed an evident sorcerer (i.e. Prophet Muhammad  and the Qur'ân)!

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/21/112/default.htm
21:112. He (Muhammad ) said:"My Lord! Judge You in truth! Our Lord is the Most Beneficent, Whose Help is to be sought against that which you attribute (unto Allâh that He has offspring, and unto Muhammad  that he is a sorcerer, and unto the Qur'ân that it is poetry, etc.)!"

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/069-qmt.php#069.040

69:40. That this is verily the word of an honoured Messenger [i.e. Jibrael (Gabriel) or Muhammad  which he has brought from Allâh].

69:41. It is not the word of a poet, little is that you believe!

69:42. Nor is it the word of a soothsayer (or a foreteller), little is that you remember!

69:43. This is the Revelation sent down from the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists).

69:44. And if he (Muhammad ) had forged a false saying concerning Us (Allâh),

69:45. We surely should have seized him by his right hand (or with power and might),

69:46. And then certainly should have cut off his life artery (Aorta),

69:47. And none of you could withhold Us from (punishing) him.


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/081-qmt.php#081.022
81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad  is not a madman;

81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad  saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).

81:24. And he (Muhammad  withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.

81:25. And it (the Qur'ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).

Possessed

    Was Moe demon possessed? Is there any evidence in the Qur'an or hadith?  Moe's aunt had a clue.  His foster mother, Halima thought he was.

Your Lord = Your Satan!

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/006.060.475.html
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 475:

Narrated Jundub bin Sufyan:

Once Allah's Apostle became sick and could not offer his night prayer (Tahajjud) for two or three nights. Then a lady (the wife of Abu Lahab) came and said, "O Muhammad! I think that your Satan has forsaken you, for I have not seen him with you for two or three nights!" On that Allah revealed:

'By the fore-noon, and by the night when it darkens, your Lord (O Muhammad) has neither forsaken you, nor hated you.' (93.1-3)
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/093-qmt.php#093.001

Halima's fear

Source: Ishaq: "The Life of Muhammad", pg. 72. Click image for context.
Ishaq: "The Life of Muhammad" pg. 72
    Aisha's devil made her jealous of Moe but Moe was safe from his devil.

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/039.6759.html

Sahih Muslim Book 039, Number 6759:

A'isha the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), reported that one day Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came out of her (apartment) during the night and she felt jealous. Then he came and he saw me (in what agitated state of mind) I was. He said: A'isha, what has happened to you? Do you feel jealous? Thereupon she said: How can it he (that a woman like me) should not feel jealous in regard to a husband like you. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: It was your devil who had come to you, and she said: Allah's Messenger, is there along with me a devil? He said: Yes. I said: Is devil attached to everyone? He said: Yes. I (Aisha) again said: Allah's Messenger, is it with you also? He said: Yes, but my Lord has helped me against him and as such I am absolutely safe from his mischief.

    Moe had a devil who only gave him good commands!


http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/039.6757.html
Sahih Muslim Book 039, Number 6757:

Abdullah b. Mas'ud reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: There is none amongst you with whom is not an attache from amongst the jinn (devil). They (the Companions) said: Allah's Messenger, with you too? Thereupon he said: Yes, but Allah helps me against him and so I am safe from his hand and he does not command me but for good.


    To whom did Moe pray, and what did he pray for?  Moe preyed upon weaker people, as at Badr, where he supposed that Allah would give him the Meccan caravan as a prey. Read about it in "The Life of Muhammad" on page 289.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

    Moe prayed for the conquest of the wealthiest fort at Khaybar for the provision of his destitute companions. Ishaq reveals it on page 512.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n280/mode/1up

    Full comprehension of the Ishaq quote which follows requires having Surah Al-Anfal 8.67 fresh in mind. Moe wanted "the good of this world" meaning extortion & plunder. 

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/8/67/default.htm
8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

When we open "The Life of Muhammad" to page 510 beginning with the last paragraph, continuing through the first paragraph on 511, we learn that before every ghazwat, Moe prayed to the "Lord of the devils" for the worldly goods of the town and its people to be delivered into his hands.

'0 God, Lord of the heavens and what they o'ershadow
And Lord of fhe lands and what they make to grow
And Lord of the devils and what into error they throw
And Lord of the winds and what they winnow,
we ask Thee for the good of this town and the good of its people and the
good of what is in it, and we take refuge in Thee from its evil end the evil
of Its people and the evil that is in it. Forward m the name of Allah' He
used to say that of every town he entered.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

Allah: Lord of the Devils

    Who is lord of the devils but Satan?  That is who Moe directed his salat to  and he prayed for plunder and protection from possible counter attack. 

    Can you connect the dots? Moe had a devil who only gave him good commands and he prayed to the lord of the devils.   He received revelations through Satan's musical instrument, which repels angels and is accompanied by a devil.  On mention of Moe's devil deserting him, Allah revealed a new verse denying it.Allah has another clue for you.

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/022-qmt.php#022.052
22:52. Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or narrated or spoke, Shaitân (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it. But Allâh abolishes that which Shaitân (Satan) throws in. Then Allâh establishes His Revelations. And Allâh is All-Knower, All-Wise:

22:53. That He (Allâh) may make what is thrown in by Shaitân (Satan) a trial for those in whose hearts is a disease (of hypocrisy and disbelief) and whose hearts are hardened. And certainly, the Zalimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.) are in an opposition far-off (from the truth against Allâh's Messenger and the believers).

   
Do you see the contradiction between those two verses?  Allah lets Satan introduce falsehood but Allah abolishes it... as a trial for the hypocrites and disbelievers.  What did Satan throw in? What did Allah abolish?  How was any disbeliever to know about it after Allah abrogated it??

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/053-qmt.php#053.019
53:19. Have you then considered Al-Lât, and Al-'Uzza (two idols of the pagan Arabs)

53:20. And Manât (another idol of the pagan Arabs), the other third?

53:21. Is it for you the males and for Him the females?

53:22. That indeed is a division most unfair!

53:23. They are but names which you have named, you and your fathers, for which Allâh has sent down no authority. They follow but a guess and that which they themselves desire, whereas there has surely come to them the Guidance from their Lord!

53:24. Or shall man have what he wishes?

53:25. But to Allâh belongs the last (Hereafter) and the first (the world).

Satanic Verses

    Why did Allah need to abolish intercession by his daughters???  The Satanic Verses begin on page 165 of Ishaq.
http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n105/mode/1up
For the quote and commentary of Al-Tabari, Vol. 6, pp. 107-112, go to Wikiislam.
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_History_of_al-Tabari#Volume_VI:_Muhammad_at_Mecca

    Ibn Sa'd, Tabari and Muir follow Ishaq. It is easier to select text from Ibn Sa'd, so I quote from "Kitab al Tabaqat al Kabir" .
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.51.1
Volume 1, Parts 1.51.1
Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Yunus Ibn Muhammad Ibn Fudalah
al-Zafari related to me on the authority of his father; (second chain) he (Ibn Sa'd)
said: Kathir Ibn Zayd related to me on the authority of al-Muttalib Ibn 'Abd Allah
Ibn Hantab; they said:
The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had seen his people departing from him.
He was one day sitting alone when he expressed a desire: I wish, Allah had not
revealed to me anything distasteful to them. Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah
bless him, approached them (Quraysh) and got close to them, and they also came
near to him. One day he was sitting in their assembly near the Ka`bah, and he
recited: "By the Star when it setteth", (Qur'an, 53:1) till he reached, "Have ye
thought upon Al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other". (Qur'an, 53:19-20) Satan
made him repeat these two phrases: These idols are high and their intercession is
expected. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, repeated them, and he went on
reciting the whole surah and then fell in prostration, and the people also fell in
prostration with him. Al-Walid Ibn al-Mughirah, who was an old man and could not
prostrate, took a handful of dust to his forehead and prostrated on it. It is said: Abu
Uhayhah Sa'id Ibn al-'As, being an old man, took dust and prostrated on it. Some
people say: It was al-Walid who took the dust; others say: It was Abu Uhayhah;
while others say: Both did it. They were pleased with what the Apostle of Allah, may
Allah bless him, had uttered. They said: We know that Allah gives life and causes
death. He creates and gives us provisions, but our deities will intercede with Him,
and in what you have assigned to them, we are with you. These words pricked the
Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him. He was sitting in his house and when it was
evening, Gabriel, may peace be on him, came to him and revised the surah. Then
Gabriel said: Did I bring these two phrases. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless
him, said: I ascribed to Allah, what He had not said.
Then Allah revealed to him: "And they indeed strove hard to beguile thee
(Muhammad) away from that wherewith We have inspired thee, that thou shouldst
invent other than it against Us; and then would they have accepted thee as a friend.
And if We had not made thee wholly firm thou mightest almost have inclined
unto them a little.
Then had We made thee taste a double (punishment) of living and a double
(punishment) of dying then hadst thou found no helper against Us. (Al-Qur'an, 17:73-
75. This narration is not acceptable, because none of the first narrators is a
Companion. For a detailed discussion see Shibli, Sirat al-Nabi, 1st edition, p. 176)

       Moe was desperate for recruits. He wished that Allah had not revealed anything displeasing to the pagans of Mecca, so he allowed Satan to interject some verses of his own which the Meccans approved. Yeah, right.

    Review 8.67 quoted above; what does Allah want as the price of Moe's admission to his celestial bordello? "Great slaughter".  Who seeks the genocide of the human race, God or Satan?  Who runs a carnal house, God or Satan? Allahu Shaytan!!!

    If you doubt that Jannah is a carnal house, read Surah An-Naba' ! See also Surah Al-Baqarah
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/078-qmt.php#078.031
http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/2/25/default.htm

If any doubt remains, go to Book 41 of Tirmidhi for the details of Paradise.
http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1242

Wives from the Fire

    Wait a minute! Muslims only get 2 Houris in Jannah, what of the 70?  Who but Satan would take Jews and Christians out of the fire for Muslims to screw eternally???  If you go to Hell, some blessed Muslim will screw your widow for eternity.  This is a weak hadith, but the fact that a scholar included it in his sunan speaks volumes about Allah's character.

Sunan Ibn Majah 5.423
http://www.archive.org/download/SunanIbnMajah5Vol.Set/Sunan-Ibn-Majah-Volume-5-English.pdf#page=423
4337. It was narrated from Abu
Umhah that the Messenger of
Allah said: "There is no one
whom Allah will admit to
Paradise but Allah will marry him
to seventy-two wives, two from
houris and seventy from his inheritance
from the people of Hell,
all of whom will have desirable front passages
and he  will have a male member that
never becomes flaccid (i.e., soft  and limp)."' (Da'if)
Hisham bin Khalid said: "From
his inheritance from the people of ,
Hell" means: "Men who enter
Hell, and the people of Paradise
will inherit their wives, just as the , -
wife of Pharaoh will be inherited."

Rescue from Hell

    What could  be more demonic than giving your widow to a Muslim as a sex slave?  Exchanging you for a damned Muslim; you burn in his place. This is a sahih hadith: its authentic.  Allah will take Muslims from the fire and replace them with Jews and Christians.   Allahu Shaytan!!!!

http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/muslim/037.6665.html
Sahih MuslimBook 037, Number 6665: 

Abu Musa' reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: When it will be the Day of Resurrection Allah would deliver to every Muslim a Jew or a Christian and say: That is your rescue from Hell-Fire.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Kerry: Eid Idiot

Kerry Blames Israel, Ignores Islamic Aggression Where Kerry goes, feces flows. His Eid al-Adha spew is no exception.  The most egregious lies in the transcript below are linked to my comments which follow.

Remarks at a Reception in Honor of Eid al-Adha


Remarks
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Delegates Lounge
Washington, DC
October 16, 2014

SECRETARY KERRY: Shaarik, thank you very much for the introduction. Thanks for your leadership, and assalamu alaikum to all of you. Thank you, and also a late Eid Mubarak. I will tell you I’ve been having lots of phone conversations with your foreign ministers or your prime ministers or one official or another who have been at the Haaj as they’re talking to me, and they found time in between to be able to have a conversation, and I was very grateful for that. And I hope those of you who had a chance to partake in that found it as rewarding and as personal as it is supposed to be. It’s a pleasure to be able to welcome everybody here, and it’s really a pleasure for us in the State Department to have a chance to be able to celebrate Eid-al-Adha, even though we’re late – and that’s because of my schedule.

I was just in Cairo, as you know, where a terrific $5.4 billion was raised in order to help rebuild Gaza, and we could not have emphasized more times how critical it is not to rebuild it so it is destroyed again. It is imperative that we find a way to get back to the negotiations for what everybody knows is, in the end, the only way to go forward that makes sense. And the alternative is in so many ways difficult.

But what we’re trying to do here in the State Department – and Shaarik is a part of that mosaic that we’re putting together here. We have the first faith-based office; we have the office reaching out to the Islamic world. And when he started drafting our national strategic approach as a leader of a faith community, he began that strategy with two words: “religion matters.” And he’s made it his mission to reach out to faith communities to solve global problems, whether it’s been at the White House or at the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, and I couldn’t be more pleased that he has joined our efforts here at the State Department as the Special Representative to Muslim Communities.

I’ve often said to people that if I went back to college today, I would at least minor, if not major, in comparative religion – and a lot of other things that I didn’t major in, I might add – because I have found in my journeys through the world over these 29-plus years as a senator and now in the year and a half, year and three-quarters I’ve been Secretary of State, there is no place in the world where in one way or the other it isn’t affecting an outlook. And even in places where people are nonbelievers or people have a different philosophy rather than one of the major religions of the world, there are themes and currents that run through every life philosophy, every single approach, whether it’s Native Americanism or Confucianism or – you can find that there’s been this passage through history from the scriptures – from the Qu’ran, from the Torah, from the Bible – that all come together, and even from other places, where they’ve been incorporated and inculcated through the sermons and preachings and teachings of religious leaders. And we know this today.

So tonight, what we’re really doing as we celebrate late but nevertheless celebrate Eid al-Adha, is that we are celebrating sort of the meaning and importance of sacrifice and devotion in our lives. And, of course, the Jewish religion just went through its holiest moment of the year with Yom Kippur, which is also a moment of huge introspection and re-evaluation. Eid al-Adha is a special time for charity and compassion and for prayer and reflection. And during this period of time, as you all know, you’ll find everybody practicing it in their own way wherever it is that they are in the world. Young girl somewhere in New Delhi praying outside of a mosque, or kids or adults in Pakistan, girls singing songs and painting their hands with henna, or Shiites in the holy city of Najaf or fellow Shi’a celebrating Eid-e-Ghorban in Iran. They’re all these derivatives that all come the very same thing. And that’s the spirit of Eid. And in a sense, this is a moment that really shares with us a common sense at an important time about the sense of possibilities that we’re looking at in the world today.

So we all know – I look around, I see a lot of very familiar faces here, and I thank so many members of our diplomatic corps for being here with us today – this is a difficult time. It’s a very complex time, and there are many currents that are loose out there that have brought us to this moment. The extremism that we see, the radical exploitation of religion which is translated into violence, has no basis in any of the real religions. There’s nothing Islamic about what ISIL/Daesh stands for or is doing to people.

And so we all have a larger mission here. And obviously, history is filled with that. I mean, you go back to the Thirty Years’ War in Europe and other periods of time, Protestants, Catholics, others who have fought. It’s not new to us. Tragically, it’s more prominent because media is more available today, the messaging is there, everybody is more aware on an instantaneous basis of what is happening. And of course it’s exploited by people who engage in this.

So – but it’s still complicated, and for other reasons. We’re living at a point in time where there are just more young people demanding what they see the rest of the world having than at any time in modern history. And when you have 65 percent of a country, as you do in many countries in the Middle East or South Central Asia or elsewhere, in north Horn of Africa, that are under the age of 35 – 65 percent – and 60 percent under the age of 30, and 50 percent under the age of 25, you are going to have a governance problem unless your governance is really addressing the demands and needs of that part of the population. And I don’t care who you are or what kind of government you have, nobody is impregnable with respect to those demands and those needs, and they have to be responded to at some point in time.

Don’t forget that what is happening now in Syria started with young people going out and demonstrating for jobs and for opportunity and for dignity and respect. And when they were met by clubs and repression, their parents went out to defend them. They joined in and said, “No, don’t do this to our kids. We want this.” And then they were met with bullets. And that’s what has brought this incredible, chaotic moment where we now have 10 million people or so displaced – a million and a half in Lebanon, million and a half in Turkey, a million and a half-plus or more in Jordan – and internally, huge population displaced. And Eid actually speaks to that, because this is a moment of charity. This is a moment when Ibrahim is celebrated for not slaying – for being willing to slay his son in order to provide for people and to prove something.

And so we have to stop and think about that in the context of this challenge that we face today. I think that it is more critical than ever that we be fighting for peace, and I think it is more necessary than ever. As I went around and met with people in the course of our discussions about the ISIL coalition, the truth is we – there wasn’t a leader I met with in the region who didn’t raise with me spontaneously the need to try to get peace between Israel and the Palestinians, because it was a cause of recruitment and of street anger and agitation that they felt – and I see a lot of heads nodding – they had to respond to. And people need to understand the connection of that. And it has something to do with humiliation and denial and absence of dignity, and Eid celebrates the opposite of all of that.

So what we need to do is recognize that we need to build peace through specific partnerships. One partnership is specifically the effort to try to drive towards this peace, to have a compromise, to find a way to create two states that can live together side by side, two peoples, with both of their aspirations being respected. I still believe that’s possible, and I still believe we need to work towards it. We also need to figure out how – and I think what’s happening in Iraq is an interesting beginning of that, where Daesh has kind of drawn a line and made people stop and think, and Sunni and Shia are beginning to realize there’s a common problem out there and there is a way to try to work together. And the new government gives a breath of fresh air to that possibility that that could happen.

In addition to that, we remember that lots of countries are making sacrifices in the spirit of Eid-al-Adha right now with respect to the refugees that they’re taking in, with respect to the emergency food programs they’re engaged in, the emergency aid. So this is really a moment to reflect deeply on how we will deal not just with the manifestation of the symptom, which is what the violence and the extremism is, but with the underlying causes which go to this question of governance and corruption and a whole issue of how you meet the needs of people.

And that’s where our partnership has to be not just for peace but for prosperity, shared prosperity, where everybody has an ability to be able to find a job, get the education, be able to reach the brass ring, and it is not just reserved for a privileged few.

And finally, we have to build a partnership for sustainability of the planet itself, and that brings us to something like climate change, which is profoundly having an impact in various parts of the world, where droughts are occurring not at a 100-year level but at a 500-year level in places that they haven’t occurred, floods of massive proportions, diminishment of water for crops and agriculture at a time where we need to be talking about sustainable food.

So I think this is an important moment, and that’s why we’ve launched a lot of different initiatives like the Malaysia initiative, the Beehive Initiative at the Global Entrepreneurship Summit. And that’s why I’m going to Jakarta day after tomorrow to be there for the inauguration of a man who was elected president in the world’s biggest Muslim-majority country, in large part because of his commitment to good, honest governance. And that’s why we’re engaging in private sector efforts to help the young Syrian refugees. And in many places we see the desert increasingly creeping into East Africa. We’re seeing herders and farmers pushed into deadly conflict as a result. We’re seeing the Himalayan glaciers receding, which will affect the water that is critical to rice and to other agriculture on both sides of the Himalayas. These are our challenges.

So it’s a good moment to come together. I’ve talked longer than I meant to. Shaarik is going to have the chance to say a few words. I need to run to another meeting, which I hope you will forgive me for doing. But I just hope that the meaning of this moment can over this next year, by all of us in a cooperative and respectful way, mutual respect, without anybody asserting that they have a better way or a better answer, but listening to each other, that we can work together in a good spirit to be able to address these concerns. The world is looking to all of us. We are the leaders. We have this opportunity in this moment to try to make a difference. And it is imperative that every single one of us make every effort to listen to each other, to do everything in our power to be able to have an impact. And I’m confident that in the days ahead we can.

I just spent a number of hours in negotiations. I was with Lavrov talking about what we can do to change things between Russia and the United States, with Foreign Minister Zarif of Iran, where have a very tough negotiation that affects a lot of you in this room. And believe me, we are mindful of that, and we will continue to work, however, to try to find a fair and thoughtful way that achieves all of our goals. And I think we can look with pride at a young Muslim girl, the youngest ever recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, who’s shown such courage in her effort to try to fight for rights and to stand up and improve a lot of other people. And that’s part of what we should reflect on as we think about the meaning of this particular celebration.

So I really thank you for coming tonight. I wish I could stay and talk through the evening. It would be much nicer than the meeting I have to go to. (Laughter.) But I can’t and so, again, Eid Mubarak belatedly, and I wish all of you well as we work together going forward. Thank you all, and God bless. Thank you very, very much. (Applause.)

assalamu alaikum

    Kerry greeted Muslims with a traditional Arab greeting: 'peace be upon you'.  They do not want peace, they want victrory.  To them, peace is a product of successful conquest. There will be peace when the world is entirely dominated by Islam. As-Samu-Alaikum: 'drop dead' with which Jews greeted Moe, would be more appropriate and less diplomatic.

celebrate Eid-al-Adha

    Why would our State Department cecebrate a pagan festival?  Does Kerry know how it is celebrated?  Did he slit the throat of a goat, watch it slowly bleed to death and roast it for the banquet? 

rebuild Gaza

    Kerry is too stupid to learn. Gaza has been smashed and rebuilt several times. Soon after it is rebuilt, the SandMaggots will provoke the Jews again and billions of dollars will be wasted. They made their bed of rubble, let them lay on it.

negotiations

    How in the everlasting Hell do you negotiate with an existential enemy??? There is no asurdity more stupid and insane than demanding that Israel negotiate her destruction with Falestinians. 

    Muslims will never tolerate the existence of Israel because it is living proof of the fact that Alah is an impotent idol whose promise is void. Allah promises them the world through conquests, irreversibly.  Who will Allah send to continually torment and humiliate the Jews?  What must Muslims do as a prerequisite for entry into Allah's celestial bordello?

reach out to faith communities

    Reach out to Islam as Old Harry reaced out to the Japs. You want to shake hands with them, they want to amputate your hand. Quit pandering and start counter attacking.

celebrating  the meaning  of sacrifice

    Open the Qur'am to Surah Al-Anfal and read the first five verses. What is the meaning of "spend" in 8.3? What is the meaning of "go out" in 8.5? To find out, visit http://www.quranbrowser.com/  and search for those terms. Its Jihad, Stupid!  See also: 49.15.

    What do they say when they slit the throat of the hadi at Eid?  What do they say when they slit the throat of a Western Journalist?  Can you get a clue?  They sacrificed Foley to Satan.

violence, has no basis in the real religions

    Kerry tacitly admitted that Islam is not a real religion. Islam is a deen: way of life having religious, economic, military and csocial components. Its religious component: the "original religion" of Islam, is Jihad.  Jihad is preferred over commerce and agriculture as an economic model. Get a clue: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

nothing Islamic about what ISIL

    Were Moe's activities Islamic?  Is Islam defined and exemplified by something other his raving rants and bloody battles? Were the extortion letters he dictated and dispatched unIslamic? Were the seventeen ghazwat he participated in un-Islamic?  Was the rape of Safiya un-Islamic? Was the genocide of the Bani Quraiza un-Islamic?  Was the enslavement of their widows and orphans un-Islamic? 

fighting for peace

    Muslims fight for power, plunder and sex slaves. They do not fight for peace. Only those fight for peace who will exterminate Islam. The weak and disorganized fight for survival and can not obtain it.

 peace between Israel and the Palestinians

    Peace in the Muslim cemetery, otherwise in a pig's anus. While there is Islam there will be no peace. Islam is permanent war.

humiliation and denial and absence of dignity

    Islamic aggression flows from the Qur'am & sunnah, not from grievances real or perceived. As for dignity, read between the lines.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

partnerships

    Equal and inferior with Infidels is explicitly forbidden. Muslims must be superior. Exactly what part of "take not as friends" escapes your comprehension?

aspirations

    Their highest aspiration is death fi sybil Allah: martyrdom. Read their G'd'd Charter, Art. 8 to obtain a clue. Why should we want to help Falestinians accomplish genocide and politicide??

new government

    It is an Islamic government, founded on Shari'ah. It wastes every drop of blood and every cent we invested in Iraq. We accomplished nothing. Only by completely eliminateing Islam from Iraq could we have accomplished anything of value. Shi'ia and Sunni will kill each other in their rivalry for power regardless of the form and substance of their government, inclusive or exclusive.

underlying causes

    The underlying cause of Jihad is greed: the quest for power, loot and sex slaves.  Moe contrived Islam for his own personal emolument through plunder and extortion. The Qur'an sanctifies and mandates conquest. Moe's sunnah exemplifies it. Its Islam, Stupid!

how you meet the needs of people

    Let the people meet their own needs, without artificial impediment imposed by government. Kerry is trying to advance the cause of International Socialism.

Kerry is Condemned by His Lies: Its Islam, Stupid!!!

Kerry's Malignant Apology for Islam The Secretary of State, like the President who appointed him, is a G'd'd liar. His recent apology for Islam is reproduced below with crucial lies linked to my commentary which follows. In my commentary, I have cited and provided links to the Qur'an, Sahih Bukhari, Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.  Islam's scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence prove Kerry's words to be a shitspew.
Secretary Kerry: October 2014 » ISIL's Dehumanization of Women and Girls

ISIL's Dehumanization of Women and Girls


Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
October 14, 2014


Just days after we saw the best of humanity when Malala Yousafzai and Kailash Satyarthi were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, we again confront the worst of inhumanity in ISIL. No one needed a reminder of ISIL’s depravity and evil. But now we have the latest example.

ISIL now proudly takes credit for the abduction, enslavement, rape, forced marriage, and sale of several thousand Yezidi and other minority women and girls—some as young as 12 years old. Just as despicably, ISIL rationalizes its abhorrent treatment of these women and girls by claiming it is somehow sanctioned by religion. Wrong. Dead wrong.

ISIL does not represent Islam and Islam does not condone or honor such depravity. In fact, these actions are a reminder that ISIL is an enemy of Islam. The international community and religious leaders of all faiths have strongly and repeatedly condemned ISIL’s horrific acts; we urge them to reiterate their commitment by condemning in the strongest possible terms the commodification of women and children as spoils of war, including through their subjection to horrific physical and sexual violence, intimidation, and deprivation of liberty.

These acts transgress all definitions of human dignity and those individuals responsible must be identified and held fully accountable. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Cathy Russell said it best: “Such viciousness against innocents exposes ISIL's blatant rejection of the most basic progress we have made as a community of nations and the universal values that bind civilization.” The United States will not stand by as ISIL uses fear, violence and oppression to achieve its goals.

To stop ISIL’s campaign of terror and horror against the Syrian and Iraqi people, we remain steadfast in our efforts to lead the international coalition to degrade and defeat ISIL. The United States will keep tracking ISIL’s abduction, enslavement, sale, rape, forced marriage, and abuse of women and girls. We will keep working with the new Government of Iraq to respond to ISIL’s brutality against women and girls from all communities in Iraq, including vulnerable minority populations.


enslavement = sanctioned by religion

    Re-examine the crucial sentences: "ISIL now proudly takes credit for the abduction, enslavement, rape, forced marriage, and sale of several thousand Yezidi and other minority women and girls—some as young as 12 years old. Just as despicably, ISIL rationalizes its abhorrent treatment of these women and girls by claiming it is somehow sanctioned by religion."

    Secretary of state Kerry equates the evil of enslavement and rape to claiming religious sanction for it.  "Allah told us to do it" = rape & enslavement. The absurdity of the statement stands out like a sore thumb.

sanctioned by religion

    Surah Al-Mu'minun states that the believers are successful, meaning that they will be admitted to Allah's celestial bordello. It then lists several attributes of those successful believers. Two of those attributes are relevant to this issue: modesty and chastity.   The exception clause stands out like a Yaws lesion.

23:5. And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

23:6. Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then, they are free from blame;

    Tafsir al-Jalalayn: "except from their spouses, that is, to their spouses, and what [slaves] their right hands possess, that is, concubines, for then they are not blameworthy, in having sexual intercourse with them.

    Tafsir Ibn Kathir: "[...]those who protect their private parts from unlawful actions and do not do that which Allah has forbidden; fornication and homosexuality, and do not approach anyone except the wives whom Allah has made permissible for them or their right hand possessions from the captives. [...]"

  1. Captivating and enslaving women is assumed.
  2. Sexually exploiting them is explicitly permitted.

Islam does not condone

    "Right hands possess" is frequently repeated in the Qur'ran. A flagrant example is included above.  Moe not only permitted it, he  exemplified it for emulation by Muslims in all places, at all times.  Moe raped Safiya after killing her family.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 513:

Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz bin Suhaib:

Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet took Safiya as a captive. He manumitted her and married her." Thabit asked Anas, "What did he give her as Mahr (i.e. marriage gift)?" Anas replied. "Her Mahr was herself, for he manumitted her."

Click the link and read the variant ahadith which provide more detail. Moe also permitted his companions to rape captives.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:
Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."

commodification of women and children as spoils

    Surah Al-Ahzab has a clue for you: "a group o them you killed and a group you made captives"

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

    Who were the two groups?  Tafsir Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.  "[...](a group you killed, and a group you made captives.) Those who were killed were their warriors, and the prisoners were their children and women. [...]"

    Shari'ah is not silent on the matter. Reliance of the Traveller declares that captured women and children are enslaved by default.
09.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive,
they become slaves by the fact of capture, and
the woman's previous marriage is immediately
annulled.

dignity

    The Profit implicitly denied our human dignity and rights. Read between the lines.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

individuals responsible

    How in Hell do you hope to identify the specific individuals who perpetrate the war crimes?  How will you kill them?  You have not tried those most responsible for 9/11 yet.  You leave those who perpetrated the Benghazi Massacre at large.

    Did killing bin Ladin and Zarqawi  end the war?  Killing every card carrying member of ISIS won;t end it either. There will always be more Muslims to step forward to fill the gaps.  Only those who fight to make Islam dominant, killing and being killed are believers. 9.33, 9.111, 49.15.

    Muslims go to war and Allah's celestial bordello or go to Hell:9.38-.39  set the stage.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

   

    So long as Muslims believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise, they will continue to attack.  If you seek peace, cause them to apostatize or die. There are no alternatives.

keep tracking

    We need effective actions, not tracking. You stood by while thousands were enslaved and slaughtered, hundreds of thousands dispossessed and displaced. Instead of striking when the iron was hot, while a long convoy was arrayed before Mosul, you dithered; you stood by pissing & moaning when you should have sent a Warthog to strafe the column when it was an easy target. 

condemning in the strongest possible terms

    The strongest possible terms are imprecatory prayers for the immediate death and eternal damnation of the evil doers.
No Muslim will abjure these texts which sanctify, mandate and exemplify the evils you so blithely bitch about. 

3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

Curse Allah for sanctifying and commanding Muslims to engage in imperialism, genocide & terrorism. Curse Muhammad for exemplifying those acts for Muslims to emulate in all places, at all times. Curse Islam because it is a continuing war crime against humnity.

    ISIS, HAMAS, Hizbollah, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram and the rest of the alphabet soup are false fronts diverting your attention from the real enemy: Islam. Islam is the lowest common denominator of terrorism. It must be eradicated.



Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Bibi: "Its Not Islam, Its Militant Islam"; CamelShit!

Bibi: "Its Not Islam, Its Militant Islam"; CamelShit!




[Transcription] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speech at the United Nations General Assembly September 29, 2014 Thank you, Mr. President, Distinguished delegates, I come here from Jerusalem to speak on behalf of my people, the people of Israel. I've come here to speak about the dangers we face and about the opportunities we see. I've come here to expose the brazen lies spoken from this very podium against my country and against the brave soldiers who defend it.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The people of Israel pray for peace.

But our hopes and the world's hope for peace are in danger. Because everywhere we look, militant Islam is on the march.

It's not militants. It's not Islam. It's militant Islam. Typically, its first victims are other Muslims, but it spares no one. Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Kurds – no creed, no faith, no ethnic group is beyond its sights. And it's rapidly spreading in every part of the world. You know the famous American saying: "All politics is local"? For the militant Islamists, "All politics is global." Because their ultimate goal is to dominate the world.

Now, that threat might seem exaggerated to some, since it starts out small, like a cancer that attacks a particular part of the body. But left unchecked, the cancer grows, metastasizing over wider and wider areas. To protect the peace and security of the world, we must remove this cancer before it's too late. Last week, many of the countries represented here rightly applauded President Obama for leading the effort to confront ISIS. And yet weeks before, some of these same countries, the same countries that now support confronting ISIS, opposed Israel for confronting Hamas. They evidently don’t understand that ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree.

ISIS and Hamas share a fanatical creed, which they both seek to impose well beyond the territory under their control.

Listen to ISIS’s self-declared caliph,Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. This is what he said two months ago: A day will soon come when the Muslim will walk everywhere as a master… The Muslims will cause the world to hear and understand the meaning of terrorism… and destroy the idol of democracy. Now listen to Khaled Meshaal, the leader of Hamas. He proclaims a similar vision of the future: We say this to the West… By Allah you will be defeated. Tomorrow our nation will sit on the throne of the world.

As Hamas's charter makes clear, Hamas’s immediate goal is to destroy Israel. But Hamas has a broader objective. They also want a caliphate. Hamas shares the global ambitions of its fellow militant Islamists. That’s why its supporters wildly cheered in the streets of Gaza as thousands of Americans were murdered on 9/11. And that's why its leaders condemned the United States for killing Osama Bin Laden, whom they praised as a holy warrior.

So when it comes to their ultimate goals, Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas.

And what they share in common, all militant Islamists share in common: • Boko Haram in Nigeria; • Ash-Shabab in Somalia; • Hezbollah in Lebanon; • An-Nusrah in Syria; • The Mahdi Army in Iraq; • And the Al-Qaeda branches in Yemen, Libya, the Philippines, India and elsewhere.

Some are radical Sunnis, some are radical Shi'ites. Some want to restore a pre-medieval caliphate from the 7th century. Others want to trigger the apocalyptic return of an imam from the 9th century. They operate in different lands, they target different victims and they even kill each other in their quest for supremacy. But they all share a fanatic ideology. They all seek to create ever expanding enclaves of militant Islam where there is no freedom and no tolerance – Where women are treated as chattel, Christians are decimated, and minorities are subjugated, sometimes given the stark choice: convert or die. For them, anyone can be an infidel, including fellow Muslims.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Militant Islam's ambition to dominate the world seems mad. But so too did the global ambitions of another fanatic ideology that swept to power eight decades ago.

The Nazis believed in a master race. The militant Islamists believe in a master faith. They just disagree about who among them will be the master… of the master faith. That’s what they truly disagree about. Therefore, the question before us is whether militant Islam will have the power to realize its unbridled ambitions.

There is one place where that could soon happen: The Islamic State of Iran. For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words: We will export our revolution to the entire world.

Until the cry "There is no God but Allah" will echo throughout the world over… And ever since, the regime’s brutal enforcers, Iran's Revolutionary Guards, have done exactly that.

Listen to its current commander, General Muhammad Ali Ja'afari. And he clearly stated this goal. He said: Our Imam did not limit the Islamic Revolution to this country… Our duty is to prepare the way for an Islamic world government… Iran's President Rouhani stood here last week, and shed crocodile tears over what he called "the globalization of terrorism." Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran's global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries on five continents since 2011 alone. To say that Iran doesn't practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees.

This bemoaning of the Iranian president of the spread of terrorism has got to be one of history’s greatest displays of doubletalk.

Now, Some still argue that Iran's global terror campaign, its subversion of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists. They say things are changing. They point to last year's elections in Iran. They claim that Iran’s smooth talking President and Foreign Minister, they’ve changed not only the tone of Iran's foreign policy but also its substance. They believe Rouhani and Zarif genuinely want to reconcile with the West, that they’ve abandoned the global mission of the Islamic Revolution.

Really? So let's look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago: We have a fundamental problem with the West, and especially with America. This is because we are heirs to a global mission, which is tied to our raison d'etre… A global mission which is tied to our very reason of being.

And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one. He says: How come Malaysia [he’s referring to an overwhelmingly Muslim country] – how come Malaysia doesn't have similar problems? And he answers: Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order.

That's your moderate. So don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive. It’s designed for one purpose, and for one purpose only: To lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran's path to the bomb. The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces, and leave it with the capacity of thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium. This would effectively cement Iran's place as a threshold military nuclear power. In the future, at a time of its choosing, Iran, the world’s most dangerous state in the world's most dangerous region, would obtain the world’s most dangerous weapons.

Allowing that to happen would pose the gravest threat to us all. It’s one thing to confront militant Islamists on pick-up trucks, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It’s another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction. I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists. That didn't happen. And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria's chemical weapons capability. Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons. Ladies and Gentlemen, Would you let ISIS enrich uranium? Would you let ISIS build a heavy water reactor? Would you let ISIS develop intercontinental ballistic missiles? Of course you wouldn’t. Then you mustn't let the Islamic State of Iran do those things either.

Because here’s what will happen: Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charm and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. It's then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world. There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat: Iran's nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled. Make no mistake – ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The fight against militant Islam is indivisible. When militant Islam succeeds anywhere, it’s emboldened everywhere. When it suffers a blow in one place, it's set back in every place. That’s why Israel’s fight against Hamas is not just our fight. It’s your fight. Israel is fighting a fanaticism today that your countries may be forced to fight tomorrow.

For 50 days this past summer, Hamas fired thousands of rockets at Israel, many of them supplied by Iran. I want you to think about what your countries would do if thousands of rockets were fired at your cities. Imagine millions of your citizens having seconds at most to scramble to bomb shelters, day after day. You wouldn't let terrorists fire rockets at your cities with impunity. Nor would you let terrorists dig dozens of terror tunnels under your borders to infiltrate your towns in order to murder and kidnap your citizens. Israel justly defended itself against both rocket attacks and terror tunnels. Yet Israel also faced another challenge. We faced a propaganda war. Because, in an attempt to win the world’s sympathy, Hamas cynically used Palestinian civilians as human shields. It used schools, not just schools - UN schools, private homes, mosques, even hospitals to store and fire rockets at Israel.

As Israel surgically struck at the rocket launchers and at the tunnels, Palestinian civilians were tragically but unintentionally killed. There are heartrending images that resulted, and these fueled libelous charges that Israel was deliberately targeting civilians.

We were not. We deeply regret every single civilian casualty. And the truth is this: Israel was doing everything to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties. Hamas was doing everything to maximize Israeli civilian casualties and Palestinian civilian casualties. Israel dropped flyers, made phone calls, sent text messages, broadcast warnings in Arabic on Palestinian television, always to enable Palestinian civilians to evacuate targeted areas.

No other country and no other army in history have gone to greater lengths to avoid casualties among the civilian population of their enemies. This concern for Palestinian life was all the more remarkable, given that Israeli civilians were being bombarded by rockets day after day, night after night. As their families were being rocketed by Hamas, Israel's citizen army – the brave soldiers of the IDF, our young boys and girls – they upheld the highest moral values of any army in the world. Israel's soldiers deserve not condemnation, but admiration. Admiration from decent people everywhere.

Now here’s what Hamas did: Hamas embedded its missile batteries in residential areas and told Palestinians to ignore Israel’s warnings to leave. And just in case people didn’t get the message, they executed Palestinian civilians in Gaza who dared to protest.

No less reprehensible, Hamas deliberately placed its rockets where Palestinian children live and play. Let me show you a photograph. It was taken by a France 24 crew during the recent conflict. It shows two Hamas rocket launchers, which were used to attack us. You see three children playing next to them. Hamas deliberately put its rockets in hundreds of residential areas like this. Hundreds of them.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a war crime. And I say to President Abbas, these are the war crimes committed by your Hamas partners in the national unity government which you head and you are responsible for. And these are the real war crimes you should have investigated, or spoken out against from this podium last week.

Ladies and Gentlemen, As Israeli children huddled in bomb shelters and Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system knocked Hamas rockets out of the sky, the profound moral difference between Israel and Hamas couldn’t have been clearer: Israel was using its missiles to protect its children. Hamas was using its children to protect its missiles.

By investigating Israel rather than Hamas for war crimes, the UN Human Rights Council has betrayed its noble mission to protect the innocent. In fact, what it’s doing is to turn the laws of war upside-down. Israel, which took unprecedented steps to minimize civilian casualties, Israel is condemned. Hamas, which both targeted and hid behind civilians – that a double war crime - Hamas is given a pass.

The Human Rights Council is thus sending a clear message to terrorists everywhere: Use civilians as human shields. Use them again and again and again. You know why? Because sadly, it works.

By granting international legitimacy to the use of human shields, the UN’s Human Rights Council has thus become a Terrorist Rights Council, and it will have repercussions. It probably already has, about the use of civilians as human shields.

It’s not just our interest. It’s not just our values that are under attack. It’s your interests and your values.

Ladies and Gentlemen, We live in a world steeped in tyranny and terror, where gays are hanged from cranes in Tehran, political prisoners are executed in Gaza, young girls are abducted en masse in Nigeria and hundreds of thousands are butchered in Syria, Libya and Iraq. Yet nearly half, nearly half of the UN Human Rights Council's resolutions focusing on a single country have been directed against Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East – Israel. where issues are openly debated in a boisterous parliament, where human rights are protected by independent courts and where women, gays and minorities live in a genuinely free society.

The Human Rights… (that’s an oxymoron, the UN Human Rights Council, but I’ll use it just the same), the Council’s biased treatment of Israel is only one manifestation of the return of the world’s oldest prejudices. We hear mobs today in Europe call for the gassing of Jews. We hear some national leaders compare Israel to the Nazis. This is not a function of Israel’s policies. It's a function of diseased minds. And that disease has a name. It’s called anti-Semitism.

It is now spreading in polite society, where it masquerades as legitimate criticism of Israel. For centuries the Jewish people have been demonized with blood libels and charges of deicide. Today, the Jewish state is demonized with the apartheid libel and charges of genocide. Genocide? In what moral universe does genocide include warning the enemy's civilian population to get out of harm's way? Or ensuring that they receive tons, tons of humanitarian aid each day, even as thousands of rockets are being fired at us? Or setting up a field hospital to aid for their wounded? Well, I suppose it's the same moral universe where a man who wrote a dissertation of lies about the Holocaust, and who insists on a Palestine free of Jews, Judenrein, can stand at this podium and shamelessly accuse Israel of genocide and ethnic cleansing.

In the past, outrageous lies against the Jews were the precursors to the wholesale slaughter of our people.

But no more.

Today we, the Jewish people, have the power to defend ourselves. We will defend ourselves against our enemies on the battlefield. We will expose their lies against us in the court of public opinion. Israel will continue to stand proud and unbowed.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Despite the enormous challenges facing Israel, I believe we have an historic opportunity.

After decades of seeing Israel as their enemy, leading states in the Arab world increasingly recognize that together we and they face many of the same dangers: principally this means a nuclear-armed Iran and militant Islamist movements gaining ground in the Sunni world.

Our challenge is to transform these common interests to create a productive partnership. One that would build a more secure, peaceful and prosperous Middle East.

Together we can strengthen regional security. We can advance projects in water, agriculture, in transportation, in health, in energy, in so many fields.

I believe the partnership between us can also help facilitate peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Many have long assumed that an Israeli-Palestinian peace can help facilitate a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab World. But these days I think it may work the other way around: Namely that a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab world may help facilitate an Israeli-Palestinian peace.

And therefore, to achieve that peace, we must look not only to Jerusalem and Ramallah, but also to Cairo, to Amman, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh and elsewhere. I believe peace can be realized with the active involvement of Arab countries, those that are willing to provide political, material and other indispensable support. I’m ready to make a historic compromise, not because Israel is occupying a foreign land. The people of Israel are not occupiers in the Land of Israel. History, archeology and common sense all make clear that we have had a singular attachment to this land for over 3,000 years.

I want peace because I want to create a better future for my people. But it must be a genuine peace, one that is anchored in mutual recognition and enduring security arrangements, rock solid security arrangements on the ground. Because you see, Israel's withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza created two militant Islamic enclaves on our borders from which tens of thousands of rockets have been fired at Israel.

These sobering experiences heighten Israel's security concerns regarding potential territorial concessions in the future. Those security concerns are even greater today. Just look around you.

The Middle East is in chaos. States are disintegrating. Militant Islamists are filling the void.

Israel cannot have territories from which it withdraws taken over by Islamic militants yet again, as happened in Gaza and Lebanon. That would place the likes of ISIS within mortar range – a few miles – of 80% of our population.

Think about that. The distance between the 1967 lines and the suburbs of Tel Aviv is like the distance between the UN building here and Times Square. Israel’s a tiny country. That’s why in any peace agreement, which will obviously necessitate a territorial compromise, I will always insist that Israel be able to defend itself by itself against any threat. Yet despite all that has happened, some still don't take Israel’s security concerns seriously. But I do, and I always will. Because, as Prime Minister of Israel, I am entrusted with the awesome responsibility of ensuring the future of the Jewish people and the future of the Jewish state.

And no matter what pressure is brought to bear, I will never waver in fulfilling that responsibility.

I believe that with a fresh approach from our neighbors, we can advance peace despite the difficulties we face.

In Israel, we have a record of making the impossible possible. We’ve made a desolate land flourish. And with very few natural resources, we have used the fertile minds of our people to turn Israel into a global center of technology and innovation.

Peace, of course, would enable Israel to realize its full potential and to bring a promising future not only for our people, not only for the Palestinian people, but for many, many others in our region.

But the old template for peace must be updated. It must take into account new realities and new roles and responsibilities for our Arab neighbors. Ladies and Gentlemen, There is a new Middle East. It presents new dangers, but also new opportunities. Israel is prepared to work with Arab partners and the international community to confront those dangers and to seize those opportunities. Together we must recognize the global threat of militant Islam, the primacy of dismantling Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and the indispensable role of Arab states in advancing peace with the Palestinians.

All this may fly in the face of conventional wisdom, but it’s the truth. And the truth must always be spoken, especially here, in the United Nations.

Isaiah, our great prophet of peace, taught us nearly 3,000 years ago in Jerusalem to speak truth to power. לְמַעַן צִיּוֹן לֹא אֶחֱשֶׁה וּלְמַעַן יְרוּשָׁלִַם לֹא אֶשְׁקוֹט עַד-יֵצֵא כַּנֹּגַהּ צִדְקָהּ וִישׁוּעָתָהּ כְּלַפִּיד יִבְעָר.

For the sake of Zion, I will not be silent.

For the sake of Jerusalem, I will not be still.

Until her justice shines bright, And her salvation glows like a flaming torch.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Let's light a torch of truth and justice to safeguard our common future.

Thank you.



It's not Islam. It's militant Islam

    How did Egypt, Yemen, Iraq, Iran and the Levant come under Islamic domination?  Islamic conquest!  Its Islam, Stupid! Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Allah sanctified it, Moe exemplified it. Read the relevant verses and see for yourself.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

    Islam is militant by design. If it was not militant, it would not be Islam. What part of  "fight those who... until" do you not understand? Islam is neither passive nor anodyne. There is no pacifist Islam. The Qur'an ordains Jihad for Muslims in 2.216.

militant Islamists

    Muslims, no adjectives required. If they obey Allah and emulate Moe, they are violent and blood thirsty. What part of "fight them until" & "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you" do you not comprehend?

    Islamism is the call to impose Islam on the entire world by force. Ibn Khaldun, the great Islamic historian, has a clue for you. Its Islam, Stupid.
Muqaddimah Chapter3  Ch_3_31
In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.

branches of the same poisonous tree

    If it is composed entirely of Muslims acting in obedience to Allah; emulating Moe then it is Islam.  The names of the various "terrorist groups" serve to divert our attention from the real source of terrorism: the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified in he hadith and sunnah.

Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas.

    Its Islam, Stupid!  All the rest, the cloud of names obscuring the view, is designed to prevent us from identifying the enemy whose doctrine demands our destruction: Islam.

all militant Islamists share in common

    Its Islam, Stupid!  They are Muslims; they obey Allah and emulate Moe. They hope to obtain admission to Allah's celestial bordello by waging war against us.

ISIS must be defeated

    Its Islam, Stupid!  Islam must be eradicated. Muslims believe that they go to war or Hell. Fear of the fire is a terrible stick; Allah's bordello is an attractive carrot. While Muslims believe, they remain a threat. 

partnership

    Muslims are our enemies, not our partners.  Muslims are expressly forbidden to form equal or inferior relationships with infidels.  Machiavelli was wrong: the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend, he may be another enemy.

peace

    While there is one believing Muslim alive on the face of the earth, Israel will have neither peace nor security regardless of any delusion of alliance or partnership with Islamic states.  Israel is the ultimate blasphemy: living proof of the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose  promise is void.  Allah promised irreversible conquest.  Israel recovered part of her land.  Muslims can  never tolerate that.  They are obligated to reconquer Israel.

historic compromise

    Only a damned fool thinks that concessions, good will gestures and ceding land  will yield peace; they only embolden the enemy; they are signs of weakness and lack of will to defend oneself.  Like Charlie Brown, Israel never learns; Abbas, like Lucy, will always snatch the ball away at the last instant.

truth must always be spoken

    Bibi did speak some important truths in this speech, but he ruined it with one big lie: "Its not Islam...".  ISIS & HAMAS  are Islam. Their is no difference between their actions and doctrines and those of Islam as preached and practiced by Moe.