Sunday, March 18, 2012

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization The Draft Resolution "Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief" contains only minor changes, essentially maintaining the malignant malarkey of HRC 16/18  passed last year. 

    Now that the draft has been submitted and posted to the web, you can expect to see and hear more assertions of victory.  The self-appointed experts will tell us that the "defamation of religions' meme has been abandoned; proved by the boiler plate paragraphs carried over from last year's resolutions. 

    The draft will be discussed and probably adopted by consensus  Tuesday March 20, 2012.  There is nothing we can do to stop it. The good news is that the resolution has no enforcement mechanism, its only effect is adding false moral support to Islam's victim card narrative and its persecution of indigenous minorities. 

    The draft was submitted by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC; its initiative is Islamic. 

free expression

   Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and
expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information
can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,

    Am I the only one who perceives the inversion of fact and fantasy?  Freedom of opinion & expression is the central target of the resolution.  They demand that we tolerate the intolerable: perpetuation, propagation & promotion of the concept of divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world through deception, aggressive wars of conquest and terrorism.  Islam asserts a divine mandate to kill us; rape & enslave our widows and orphans while seizing our real & personal property.

    The strategic objective of the resolution is the enactment & enforcement of national & international legislation criminalizing all criticism of Islam.  When I write "Muhammad was a terrorist.", which is substantiated ty Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220, I mention something impermissible and should be killed according to Islamic law.  They want that law enforced! That is the purpose of the draft resolution. 


    While the defamation meme is implicit rather than explicit in this resolution, the Draft Resolution on "Freedom of religion or belief" contains, in the seventh paragraph on its second page, an important clue to reality.  Do not overlook this clue!

Emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have
adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all
members of the religious community concerned;

freedom to terrorize

Allah said that he would cast terror: 3:151 & 8:12.  Allah said that he cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and emulate Moe.  If Islam is equated with terrorism, then it must be prohibited by law. 

    Islam is an inseverable package deal: all or nothing, specified in 2:85. Believers fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed specified in  9:111.  Believers who take any step to injure or enrage disbelievers get extra credit for an upgrade to their seat in Allah's Celestial Bordello. 

    My right to freedom of opinion & expression; to state the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, must be subordinated to the Muslims' right to engage in terrorism. 


    Islam imposes the death penalty for apostasy, including reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.  The penalty is explicitly stated in Reliance of the Traveller O8.1; the list of apostatizing acts in O8.7 tells us what is impermissible to mention.  The rule is extended to dhimmis (conquered Jews & Christians) in O11.10.  Islam does not tolerate criticism of Moe & Allah.  Moe had critics murdered

    The OIC is demanding, through the agency of the Human Rights Council, that we be exhorted and compelled to tolerate a war cult, disguised as a religion, which perpetuates genocidal conquest

Expresses deep concem at the continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping,
negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,
as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and
groups aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular when condoned by Governments;

derogatory stereotyping

    "Muslims are genocidally violent" has meaning as a derogatory stereotype precisely because Islam is genocidally violent (alleged defamation) and Muslims are adherents to Islam.  History shows us that the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were perpetrated by Muslims, on orders of the caliph.  The defamation meme is malignantly false, ostensibly eliminated yet deeply embedded in the resolution.  That which is intrinsically infamous can not be defamed. 

programmes and agendas

    What they have in mind is the Dutch, Swiss & Austrian freedom parties and "Islamophobic" comments and campaign advertisements by American politicians. 

Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and
related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this
context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take
effective measures, as set forth in the present resolution, consistent with their
obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such


    The reference is to Fitna, the 15 minute documentary by Geert Wilders, the Motoons, International Burn the Koran Day & International Judge the Koran Day.   If it is critical of Islam and receives high profile public attention, it is an incident, according to the OIC. 

advocacy & incitement

    Words have meanings, but the standard meanings do not apply when Muslims utter them.  Spoken by Muslims and their dhimmis, words mean what Muslims want them to mean, not what we expect them to mean.  Exposing Islam's advocacy of hatred and incitement to genocidal violence is, in their double speak, advocacy & incitement.   Nothing illustrates that fact better than this Mooning. 

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."


Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on
religion or belief;

measures to criminalize

    Anyone not suffering from cranial-rectal juxtaposition should recognize that as a demand to outlaw Fitna, the Motoons and every expression critical of Islam. 

No comments: