We Are Prey; Its Open Season: Get rid of the Predators!Bare Naked Islam posted a most revealing video,
one that must be heard to be appreciated. In this video, Yasir Qadhi
lays bare the evil core of Islam, which, fully exposed, can be
recognized as pure evil. Listen carefully to what he said,
contemplate it carefully, and contumaciously demand the
eradication of Islam from the face of the earth.
This exposure of normative Islamic doctrine flows
from the lips of the Imam of a mosque in Memphis, Tn. His accent and
the poor audio quality make listening difficult. I pulled a
transcript, which appears to be the product of speech to text software
so I will attempt to correct it as much as I can.
Full comprehension of what the Imam is preaching
will not come without reference to the canonical Islamic texts he is
teaching from. I will display the quotes he uses with links to
source texts. Note the highlighted clauses running parallel to
those in the transcript below.
Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people
till they say, 'None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says,
'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property
will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts
will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till
they say: 'None
has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so,
pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood
and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with
them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated
Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes
the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says,
'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during
the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is
a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
have."
Imam Bukhari's hadith collection is considered by Islamic scholars to
be the most authentic and accurate of all the collections. The
order to wage war, whose terminal condition is conversion to Islam,
comes from the Qur'an.
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and
the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the
world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in
Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been
forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not
the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing
submission, and feel themselves subdued. The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
give the Jizyah
Since Allah and Moe are to be obeyed and Moe is to be emulated, in all
places & at all times, the orders to wage war are binding on
Muslims at the present time.
3:32. Say (O Muhammad ): "Obey Allâh and the
Messenger (Muhammad )." But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like
the disbelievers.
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad
) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting
with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
0:00 This is the precise
definition of shirk:
0:03 to make a partner along with Allah of hannibal with them
0:07 and realized and that obviously shirk
0:10 hich is the opposite of [unintelligible] the must bind
effectively and by definition be the
0:13 most evil of all evils
0:16 Jews and Christians are mushrik our perspective of compete
as we have
0:19 studied with understand how and all of the most of their point of
these
0:24 and it is also this game
0:27 reason for the same principle of tawhid which is the first
obligation
0:31 of every single human being
0:34 that he bears witness any testified that
there is no no deity worthy of 0:37 worship
accept Allah the lesson panel with them
0:40 and it is because of the statements of delegate that the prophet
sallallaahu i
0:45 think he was better than had been commanded to do if you had
0:48 jihad using means an article in the midst of
0:52 it is a means to establish the lead on the line
0:55 only total popular not checked out your schedule and i think that
in the law i 0:59 have
been commanded to fight the people until they testified that
you have in
1:03 the law
1:04 so the whole reason why i must have had without them
1:07 has created a
1:08 i think the profits and review of the books
1:11 and differentiated i think the pundits principal and allowed could
you have
1:16 is debated ended the principle of
1:20 life
and property of ia mushrik
1:24 holds
no value
1:27 in the state of jihad
1:29 noticed i think indicated in jihad, not at all times and places
1:33 the
life and property of a mushroom becomes halal
1:36 while
in a state of jihad
1:41 out the profits a little effect on the quickly before i have been
commanded to 1:44 fight
the people until they state that there is no deity worthy of worship
except Allah and when they say 1:48 that
their life and property become protected from me
1:50 when they think that you had a lot their life and property become
protected from
1:54 me
1:55 which means if they do not
say it into law their life and property become halal
1:59 for the muslims
2:01 so the christians do commit shirk they are kuffar and they are
mushrikun and beyond which he
2:05 claimed
2:06 the mushy quote unnoticed flutie
2:09 najis
2:11 you know i think the spiritual purity which can only be clarified
by the
2:15 purity of
2:16 Allah called the mushy quit notice which is a very evil thing with
a look and
2:20 fell soda machine called barnett ist a lot of calling them notice
diner josette
2:25 if you'll be include resistance
The Imam has not only demonized us, calling us najis
(ritually unclean, equivalent to excrement), accusing us of shirk
(ascribing partners to God), but he has declared war upon us, saying
that our lives and property are fair game; implying open season without
bag limit.
Normative Islamic doctrine, which the Imams preach
in every mosque, contravenes the basis of our civilization: the
outlawing of offensive assault. It contravenes our God given
rights, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, to life &
property.
Islam is predation, sanctified by situational
scripture from a false prophet; a profiteer. Muslims are
predators. They are due no respect. They are due no tolerance. There
can be no right to engage in predation on Jews & Christians.
Muslims and their institutions must be expelled and excluded from our
land.
I urge & exhort all American citizens to sign the International
Qur'an Petition.. European lovers of life & liberty should
email this url to their Member of
Parliament & MEP.
The Innocence of Islamic Jihad: Textual Citations in the
Trailer
Several Qur'an verses are cited in the trailer; they
are quoted in this bullet list with links to their source, context and
exegesis.
9:123 O
you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those
who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
2:193
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping
of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for
Allâh (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except
against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)
Al-Mizan,
a Shi'ia tafsir, discusses the offensive jihad verses of 8:39 & 9:29, which are not mentioned in the trailer, in
the context of 2:190.
I can not link directly to it; select Surah al-Baqarah, verse 190,
which is ostensibly related to defensive/retaliatory warfare, while the
others are offensive. .
9:73
O Prophet (Muhammad )! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the
hypocrites, and be harsh against them, their abode is Hell, - and worst
indeed is that destination.
5:82
Verily, you will find the strongest among men in enmity to the
believers (Muslims) the Jews and those who are Al-Mushrikûn (see V.2:105),
and you will find the nearest in love to the believers (Muslims) those
who say: "We are Christians." That is because amongst them are priests
and monks, and they are not proud.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir
Use the Next button to continue reading in context with the next topic,
which explains the reason for revealing the verse.
3:158 And whether you die, or are killed, verily,
unto Allâh you shall be gathered.
Tafsir Ibn kathir
Use the Next button to finish reading the tafsir of this verse, which
relates to a statement of the female suicide bomber which I found
to be inaudiable. She expressed her expectation of being ushered into
the presence of Allah in al-Firdhause as soon as her deed was done.
Note that lying Muslims assert that Jihad is Jihad an-Nafs, which is
mentioned and deprecated in Islamic law,
but they never tell us how anyone died or got killed in striving
against his ego or temptations. One gets killed in Jihad Asghar, as per
9:111, not in Jihad Akbar.
Some importaint points are raised and questions
propounded in the trailerl; they are noted in the outer level of this
bullet list. My responses are indented.
>20,000 terrorist attacks since '01/
TROP features extensive charts of deadly terror attacks year
by year. Many blogs embed their badge, which is updated daily.
motivated by the doctrine of Islamic Jihad
Poverty, deprivation, repression, suppression, colonialism
& occupation are superficial pretexts, not basic motivating
factors. Imams & Mullahs first demonize the intended victims,
blaming them for every evil under the sun and equating their actions
with every imaginable injustice. Then they remind the Islamic
congregation of their obligation to Allah. The proper name for
that process is rabble rousing.
tens of thousands of innocent lives lost
Bill Warner estimates the 1,390 year total at 270*106 .
what motivates Muslims to kill?
Jihad is required by normative Islamic doctrine. Individuals
are motivated to participate by belief in Allah's imperatives, threat
& promise. Their emotions are stirred and escalated by
demonization of the infidels to be attacked.
what is Jihad?
your obligation
Jihad is ordained for Muslims: 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is
ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that
you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing
which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
Jihad is carried on with the hand, heart, tongue and
purse. Muslims unable or unwilling to take weapons in hand and
engage in the fighting should pray for victory, engage in propaganda
and spend Zakat for the upkeep of Mujahideen and their families.
Failure to perform those duties has consequences.
9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill
(others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on
Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And
who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain
which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
61:10 O You who believe! Shall I guide you
to a commerce
that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger
(Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and
fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives,
that will be better for you, if you but know!
1slamic law says that Jihad is warfare against
non-Muslims.
source?
Moe's preaching recorded in Surahs 2, 3, 8, 9, 47 & 49 exemplified in his
sunnah: the books of Jihad contained in each of the six
canonical hadith collections and codified into Shari'ah. .
objectives
Ostensibly: Islam's establishment, propagation
& maintenance; actually: Moe's personal emolument.
UBL: "battle, animosity and hatred"-"foundation of our religion"
done by crazy islamists, or does the Ummah play a role iun it?
Of course they are crazy, but they could not do it without the
support of the Ummah.
progressive triumph?
13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of
disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories)
from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His
Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.
How to defeat it?
Destroy their faith: cause them to comprehend the true
character of Allah & Moe; an impotent idol and barbarian warlord
respectively. Doubters, dissenters & deniers should refer to
the following sources:
The Life of Muhammad for the fatal facts which
will disgust anyone who retains a scintilla of vestigial morality..
How to restore peace and security?
Make the believers extinct and the world an Islam free zone by
inducing mass apostasy. Jihad can only be stopped by extinction
because of belief in Allah's imperatives, threat and promise. While men
believe that Allah commands them to conquer the world and will condemn
them to the fire if they don't go to war or admit them to his celestial
bordello if they fight in his cause, they wiull wage war. Jihad
can only end when their faith or their lives come to an end.
The Innocence of Jihad New Movie from Imran Firasat!
Great news for humanity came in the form of a ">Stand Up America press release
today. Imran Firasat in collaboration with two experts, has produced a
high quality animated cartoon which illustrates and explains the
Islamic doctrine
of Jihad. The movie is scheduled for release July 4, 2012.
The official trailer is embedded below.
I find the quality of this trailer to be orders of
magnitude above that of the trailer for The
Innocent Prophet.
The content is accurate and the presentation is excellent.
The trailer is fast paced, if anything, a little too fast. I
could catch the scripture citations because I am familiar with
them. Keep your mind open and your eyes glued to the screen as
you view this trailer.
A note to the FBI, Department of State, Military
Intelligence and Florida's State and local Police Departments:
This blog post contains information which you need to know but are
prohibited from obtaining in your formal training due to obsessive
& suicidal political correctness. The Brass may ram it up
their ass, so make a note of the url and make another visit from home,
on your own computer. Bold blue, underlined text is hyperlinked
to important source documents or other blog posts. This blog post
includes links to the Qur'an, two hadith collections, Tafsir Ibn kathir
and three books of Islamic law.
Superscripts in the text are linked to an
enumerated list below the horizontal line. Most of the items in that
list contain multiple links. To read them, click the superscripts, then
tap your Backspace key to return to your place in the text.
Muslims are motivated to maim & murder by
Allah's imperatives1, threat2 & promise3. One of those imperatives
and the promise are cited in the trailer.
Imran Firasat asks: "What is Jihad?" Literally, it
is striving with great exertion. The third word in 2:216 is a clue for you: here is the dictionary entry. Jihad is fighting,
and it involves killing
and being killed. Jihad an-Nafs: struggling against
temptation & ego, does not result in death.
Hilali & Khan, in their footnote to 2:190,
define Jihad as "....(holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force
of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is
one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established,
Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated....."
Islamic law, most clearly codified in The Reliance
of the Traveller Book O9.0, informs us that Jihad is "....to war against
non-Muslims....". Is Jihad an outdated anachronism? Sunan
Abu Dawud 14.2526 informs us that it will be "performed
continuously" until the last day; 23.3455
tells us that Jihad is the "original religion of Islam" which Allah
prefers over agriculture and trade as a means of generating income.
Is Jihad innocent? Jihad is mercenary4,
offensive5
and genocidal6,
far from innocent. Most Muslims are descended from early victims
of Islamic aggression. They are Muslims because their ancestors
were conquered and converted at sword point or impoverished by the levy
of Jizya. Many of them are unaware of the doctrines related to Jihad
& terrorism. The threat comes from Believers7 who
actively seek to obey
Allah & emulate
Moe. While they believe
Allah's imperatives, threat & promise, they will maim and kill in
order to obtain admission to his celestial bordello and avoid his fire.
Innocence of Jihad is not intended to piss off
Muslims, although it will have that effect; it is intended to alert and
inform you; to motivate you to pressure your government for
effective action to prevent further attacks and bring about the
eventual end of Jihad. Jihad can only be defeated by destroying their faith: inducing mass
apostasy.
Allah will condemn Muslims who shirk Jihad
to eternal damnation: 9:38-39, 61:10,
Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497.
Allah will admit those who fight in his
cause to his celestial bordello. 9:111,
61:10-12..
Allah promises those who perform acts of terrorism extra credit towards
an upgrade in his celestial bordello: 9:120.
There is no hint of defensive
motivation in the primary jihad imperatives previously cited. As per
the citation to their codification in Reliance of the Traveller, the
caliph "makes war upon Jews..." and "fights all other peoples until".
The actions depicted in those laws are clearly offensive, not
defensive. Kuffar are warred against both defensively and offensively, as laid down in O8.1,
"when they are in their own countries". The
obligation to attack them occurs annually. Full clarity is
obtained from Hedaya which declares that infidels may be attacked
"without provocation" in the link provided in point 1 above.
Begin your quest for information about
believers in 8:1-6. What is the meaning of "go out" and
"spend in Allah's cause"? No, I am not going to tell you! Go to http://www.quranbrowser.com/ and look them
up! You will learn more that way. 9:111
& 49:15
are more explicit and less cryptic.
Treasonous Murder of ST6: Demand Congressional Investigation!
Thanks and a tip of the hat to We The People for embedding this press conference
and bringing it to my attention.
The Gold Star Mother and her colleagues have strength & dignity far
beyond me. In their situation, I would be cursing constantly; praying
for the immediate and eternal damnation of the traitors responsible for
my loss.
This video is long and it is not easy listening. The
stories are heart rending. I ask you to watch and listen to the
whole thing. I ask you to follow up by contacting your
Congressman & Senators demanding a full investigation leading
to impeachment, conviction and removal from office of the AssWhole
chiefly responsible.
After viewing this press conference, share it with
everyone you can induce to watch it. We need to make this fact and
emotion filled press conference go viral, now, well in advance of the
next election cycle.
We are fighting a war half-hearted, unwilling to
identify the enemy and unwilling to make an effort to win. The
rules of engagement are suicidal, as emphasized by the speakers in the
press conference.
The enemy is Islam. Islam, with no qualifiers: not
"extremist", "radical", "Islamist" or "Islamonzi". "Its Islam, Stupid!". The conflict
is existential. The war will not end until Islam is triumphant or
extinct.
Islam commands global conquest until only Allah is
worshiped, "altogether and everywhere". Islam commands global
conquest until Jews & Christians are subjugated and extorted.
Islam threatens those who refuse to participate in
Jihad with Hellfire. Islam promises those who fight for Allah
admission to his celestial bordello. Islam declares that our
blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; that we have no human
rights until we become Muslims.
The full facts, if widely known, would result in a
clamor for the extinction of Islam. The following list of links
to the Qur'an & hadith offers access to the most crucial of those
facts.
We do not need to revolt. We do not need to change
our form of government. We need to remove and replace the LibTurds
& RINOs who are leading us
into Hell. We must replace them with honest, patriotic
Conservatives with enough courage to discover the truth and govern
accordingly. We need to be involved, informed and vigilant. We
must inculcate those lessons in future generations so that our error
will never be repeated.
Judicial Watch used FOIA to obtain a report on the removal of documents
from FBI training curricula. One of those documents yields a quote so
stunning that Snooper Report ran it without substantial
commentary. My quest for more information led me through WND and Judicial Watch before I found the original:
“The
Qur’an is not the teachings of the
Prophet, but the revealed word
of God.”
How in Hell does that polemic dogma justify removing
material from a training course for FBI agents? It is impossible to
prove the existence, identity and character of deity. Those are
matters of faith. The statement was made by a member of the Subject Matter Experts.
Was there any dissent among the experts? How many experts were
involved? Who are those experts; what makes them esperts? At
least one of them is a Muslim: one of the enemy. Did we let
the enemy censor our training materials in WWII and the Cold War?
Why not? What are the potential consequences of such treachersous
suuicical idiocy? Since when does any sentient person allow his
enemy to determine for him what factual information about the enemy is
relevant and objective?
Moe said that he was revealing Allah's word.
Nobody else saw or heard Jibril. Nobody shared the revelations.
Moe could and did pull anything out of his ass and attribute it to
divine revelation. His child bride has a clue for you, Morons!
Narrated Aisha: I used to look down upon those ladies
who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a
lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah
revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of
them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and
there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside
(temporarily).' (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your
Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."
Can you obtain a clue? That hadith proves that
part of the Qur'an is situational scripture, invented by Moe to give
the imprint of divine sanction to his sexual proclivities.
I already showed you evidence that Moe was a false
prophet who put words in the idol's mouth to sanctify his lustful
apetites. But that ain't all: Moe was insane and suidical.
Moe supposedly received some of his revelations in
the form of "good dreams which came true" Some of them came in
the form of "the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is
the hardest of all ". Sometimes Jibril talked to him. Witnesses described Moe losing consciousness,
falling to the ground, moving his lips and tongue rapidly and sweating
profusely even in cold weather. It becomes obvious that the
parts of the Qur'an not attributable to self-interest can be attributed
to hallucinations associated with epilepsy.
Would any sane person take orders to wagegenocidal
warfare from a "prophet" who got them in dreams, bells or voices in his
head? An estimated 270*106 people died early because
because a sufficient number of AssWholes did exactly that, motivated
by believing the imperatives,
threat & promise Moe preached to them.
CAIR vs. Pompaeo: Both are Wrong
Rep.
Mike Pompeo (R. Kan.) spent nearly five minutes calling on Islamic
leaders to denounce terrorism. I first learned of his speech from
Bare Naked Islam. As predicted by BNI, CAIR
reacted with a demand for apology.
The video clip of the speech is embedded below,
followed by my transcription of the remarks. I have placed
superscripts in the text, linked to a list of comments. To read a
comment, click its superscript. To return to the transcript, use your
backspace key.
Its been just under two months since
the attacks in Boston and in those intervening weeks, the silence of
Muslim leaders has been deafening. And that is sad, but perhaps
most importantly it's dangerous1.
There have now been at least a dozen attacks by
Muslim terrorists on U.S. soil since Ramzi Yousef's
parked rental van exploded in the basement of the World Trade
Center on February 26 of 1993. Some have caused death and injury
such as the 9-11 attacks in 2001 and Nidal Hasan's mass shooting at
Fort Hood Texas. Other attacks such as Faisal Shahzad's fizzled Times
Square bombing or the unsuccessful underwear bombing of a flight were
thwarted or aborted.
Yet failed or not, all of these attacks were
successful in scaring Americans; successful in reducing our freedom, in
the most freedom loving nation on earth. Successful in slowing our
economy and successful in demonstrating that a free and open society
can potentially be vulnerable. They were, in the former Attorney
General Mike Mukasey's
words, crimes2
that are none the less meant to send a terrorist message.
When the most devastating terrorist attacks on
America in the last twenty years come overwhelmingly from people of a
single faith3
and are performed in the name of that faith4, a special
obligation falls on those who are the leaders of that faith.
Instead of responding, silence has made these Islamic leaders across
America potentially complicit5 in these acts and, more
importantly
still, those that may well follow.
If a religion claims6 to be one of peace, Mr.
Speaker, it's leaders must reject violence that is perpetrated in its
name. Some clerics today suggest that modern Jihad is non-violent
and is only about making oneself a better Muslim. Perhaps that's
true7
for moderate Muslims, but extremists seek to revive the era
when most Islamic scholars8 understood Jihad to be
holy war.
Mr. Speaker, for decades Middle Eastern oil money have [sic]
propounded
this more extreme violent interpretation9 in mosques around the
world. Less than two months after the 9-11 atrocities an
Egyptian Brotherhood preacher who is probably the most influential
Sunni cleric today, declared suicide bombing to be legitimate. He said
"these are historic heroic commando and martyrdom attacks and should
not be called suicide.".
So, what is it that these Islamic leaders must
say? First, that there is never any justification for
terrorism10.
No political goal legitimizes terrorism11.
Terrorism is
never excusable as 'resistance'12. Imams must say
unequivocally13
that terrorist actions- killing and maiming
[unintelligible- may be: solely is wrong].
They must also publicly and repeatedly
denounce radical14
clerics who seek to justify terrorism.
There is a battle of interpretation15
within
Islam, its not enough to deny responsibility saying one's own
interpretation doesn't support terrorism. Moderate16
Imams must strive to ensure that no Muslim finds solace for terrorism17
in the Qur'an. They must cite the Qur'an as evidence that the
murder of innocents18 is not permitted
by good believing19
Muslims and must immediately refute all claims to the contrary.
Finally, Muslim leaders must say that there is no
room for militant Islamism in the religion of peace20.
These statements must be made frequently, publicly and in the
mosques. Yes, in the mosques and in the madrassahs where many
learn their Islamic religion.
You know we have to call evil by its name in order
to stamp it out21.
Downplaying atrocities and rampages assures more of them.
Every Muslim leader must unequivocally proclaim that terror
committed in the name of Islam violates the core tenets of the prophet
Muhammad22
and they must do so repeatedly, period.
My own faith has occasionally been hijacked in the
name of violence and cruelty including in Kansas my home state by Fred
Phelps and his Westborough Baptist Church. In
response, hundreds of protestant ministers preached that Mr. Phelps'
actions violate the most fundamental Christian traditions and denounced
he [sic] and his church's evil acts. Pope John Paul II similarly
apologized for the Catholic Church's failure to do more to speak out
against the evils of Nazism and to protect Jews from the
Holocaust.
Just as these religious leaders have called up those
who have acted cruelly and brutally in the name of their faith, so too
must Muslim religious leaders refute terrorist theology23.
We are now two decades into Islamic radicals
attacking Americans on U.S. soil; I know that not every Muslim supports
these actions. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for
Democracy has spoken out in a clear and consistent way so has
Zainab Al-Suwai of the American Islamic Congress but the silence
in the face of extremism coming from the best funded Islamic advocacy
organizations and many mosques across America is absolutely
deafening. It casts doubt upon the commitment to peace by
adherents of the Muslim faith. This is utterly unacceptable, it
is dangerous24;
it must end. I yield back, Mr. Speaker.
Mustafa Mashhur, General Guide,
Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt; Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Pakistan, Pakistan; Muti Rahman Nizami, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Shaykh Ahmad Yassin, Founder, Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestine; Rashid Ghannoushi, President,
Nahda Renaissance Movement, Tunisia; Fazil Nour, President, PAS – Parti
Islam SeMalaysia, Malaysia; and 40 other Muslim scholars and
politicians:
We condemn, in the strongest terms, the
incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is
grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks
on innocents.
Islamic condemnations of terrorism are the worst sort of malignant
malarkey. Islam can not condemn its own sacraments! I have dealt
with this crap before, in detail. Some links to the Qur'an, hadith
& tafsir may be broken, but the quotes are still accurate.
The OIC did not condemn the
Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it, smirking & snickering at
your gullibility. Read between the lines and between the words,
scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s canon to discover the
unpleasant objective factual reality. The OIC’s malignant
pretense is reproduced below with superscripts linked to my revelatory
evidence and comments. Click any superscript to read the comment,
then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the septic spew.
"Condemn in the
Strongest Possible Terms”04/07/11“We
condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the
strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from
Gaza,” Do you have the fortitude to view a cleaned up version of
the strongest possible terms, terms the Traitors won't use?
Terrorism Fatwa: Feces
03/04/10 A Sufi Sheikh living in Britain issued a 88
page summary of a 600 page fatwa supposedly ruling terrorism &
suicide bombing harram. I exposed his malignant malarkey.
Silence is less dangerous and
threatening than false assurances of passivity. False assertions
that Islam is the "religion of peace" lull some listeners into
inattention and apathy.
Islamic terrorist attacks are acts of war,
not civil criminal offenses. The crime-investigation-trial-punishment
model does not fit; the war-victory model is required. Because Muslims
are motivated to terrorism by Allah's imperatives,
threat & promise, Muslims will never cease from attacking
until they become extinct. Extinction is victory; anything less is
defeat.
Muslims engage in terrorism because it
is Allah's battle tactic: to so
brutalize victims
that those "behind them" will "learn a lesson"; so that they will be
terrorized and thereby rendered unable to mount an effective
resistance. The use of terms such as "fearsome example" &
"strike terror" used in the parallel translations of Surah Al-Anfal 57
will afford a clue to the intelligent reader.
Islamic terrorism is performed in
the name of Allah: "Allah hu akbar": the takbir which is
exclaimed when the attack is commenced, attaches the brand. They
shouted the takbir when they slit the throats of the flight crews; just
as they shout it when sacrificing the hadi at the eids. They
sacrificed their victims to Satan.
Imams are not complicit in terrorism
because they fail to condemn it, they are complicit because they teach,
preach and encourage it; they are Muslims--believers. Look up the
definition of believers in the Qur'an! 9:111
, 49:15.
Islam does not mean peace, it means
submission. 'You will submit or we will make peace by waging war
and exterminate you. ' Imams can not reject anything that is part
of the Qur'an or part of Moe's Sunnah. I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers, damn fools one and all, to The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7. Tell
those Islamic leaders to denounce attacks against Jews & Israel and
observe their reaction. What is the difference between the many
bus and restaurant bombings in Israel and the Boston bombing?
Open the Qur'an to 2:85,
and read it repeatedly until you understand it. Are Muslims allowed to
pick what they like from that book and reject the rest? Islam is
an all or nothing, bundled package deal; take it or leave it. Study 9:29;
what does it command Muslims to do? Does it have geographic limits?
Does it have an expiration date? What the Hell does it mean?
The Qur'an does not define Jihad.
Go to Corpus Qur'an and look up the Arabic terms used for it,
the third word in 2:216.. Hilali & Khan defined Jihad in a
footnote to 2:190. The legal definition is given in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0. Is it
Jihad an-Nafs? Now, Smart Ass, explain to me exactly how a
Mujihideen gets
killed
in Jihad an-Nafs!!! And, being so God blessed smart, explain in
another comment exactly what Moe meant when he said he would love nothing better than multiple martyrdom!!
What did Jihad mean to Moe? What did he do
about it? Why does each of the six canonical hadith collections
have a "Book of Jihad"?
Islam is static, defined in the
immutable
Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's Sunnah. It is and always will be
what it was when Moe died.
There is only one authentic
interpretation of the Qur'an: Moe's. Read his Sunnah! He
said that he was ordered to fight with men. He fought. He dictated extortion letters and dispatched them to
neighboring kings by private courier.
Allah sanctified terrorism.
He said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 3:151,
8:12.
He said that he did cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. He commanded Muslims to take actions
designed to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers: 8:57,
8:60.
Moe's tactical objective was to keep
the loot flowing. His strategic objective was global domination;
read 8:39
with particular attention to the compound terminal conditions stated
therein. What part of "altogether and everywhere" or"in the
entire world" do you not understand?
Of course, resistance is their
rationalization for terrorism in the reconquest of Israel.
Demanding that their sophistry will accomplish nothing.
Moe is considered by Muslims to be the perfect
role model, to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places; at all
times. Moe was a terrorist, by his own testimony: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220. To see examples of Moe's terrorism, read
the oldest extant biography: The Life of Muhammad;
page 368, page 523 and page 676. Rep. Pompeo demanded that Imams
renounce Moe's terrorism, which would be, under Shari'ah, a death
penalty offense.
When applied to Islam and
Muslims, terms such as "radical" & "extremist" are superfluous.
Normative Islam, as Moe preached and exemplified it, is genocidal,
terrorist & imperialist. Believers are
only those who "fight in Allah's cause": 9:111,
49:15.
The rest are hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.
Moe interpreted Allah's word with
every word he spoke and act he performed. Refer to Sahih Bukhari's books of Jihad, Khumus &
Expedition and to Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad.
Define innocent!
Extract a definition of innocent from an Imam, Alim or Qadi. Then
plant your foot in his butt because he is
a damned liar. Killing believers is expressly
forbidden. 5:32
does not mean what you think it does. Muslims will not cite 5:33
because it revels the awful truth: only Muslims are
innocent! Non-believers are not innocent, they are guilty
of rebellion: "waging war against Allah and his Messenger". Tafsir Ibn Kathir
gives us the definition of "wage war" as an inclusive set, any member
of which is sufficient to condemn us. That set includes "disbelief"
The blood and property of kuffar are not sacred to Muslims and kuffar have no human
rights until they become Muslims. The Jizya is imposed in lieu of destruction and a species of punishment for infidelity.
Believing Muslims wage war
against us. Refer to the ayat linked in #14. Imams can not refute
objective factual reality.
Its name is ISLAM!
Islam is intrinsically evil, by design. Its mission is mercenary and its method is
martial.
Repetition does not convert a
lie into truth, even if it is believed and accepted as truth, it
remains a falsehood.
Muslim leaders must
refute Islam. Yeah, right.
Painting over a skunk's stripes or
amputating a rattle snake's rattles would be a dangerous act: removing
warning signs. Urging Muslims to misrepresent their war cult as
something else is equally irrational and dangerous.