Saturday, June 22, 2013

The Innocence of Jihad: New Movie from Imran Firasat!

The Innocence of Jihad New Movie from Imran Firasat! Great news for humanity came in the form of a ">Stand Up America press release today. Imran Firasat in collaboration with two experts, has produced a high quality animated  cartoon which illustrates and explains the Islamic doctrine of Jihad. The movie is scheduled for release July 4, 2012.  The official trailer is embedded below. 

    I find the quality of this trailer to be orders of magnitude above that of the trailer for The Innocent Prophet.  The content is accurate and the presentation is excellent.   The trailer is fast paced, if anything, a little too fast.  I could catch the scripture citations because I am familiar with them.  Keep your mind open and your eyes glued to the screen as you view this trailer.

    A note to the FBI, Department of State, Military Intelligence and Florida's State and local Police Departments:  This blog post contains information which you need to know but are prohibited from obtaining in your formal training due to obsessive & suicidal political correctness.  The Brass may ram it up their ass, so make a note of the url and make another visit from home, on your own computer.  Bold blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to important source documents or other blog posts.  This blog post includes links to the Qur'an, two hadith collections, Tafsir Ibn kathir and three books of Islamic law.

     Superscripts in the text are linked to an enumerated list below the horizontal line. Most of the items in that list contain multiple links. To read them, click the superscripts, then tap your Backspace key to return to your place in the text.


    Muslims are motivated to maim & murder by Allah's imperatives1, threat2 & promise3.  One of those imperatives and the promise are cited in the trailer.

    Imran Firasat asks: "What is Jihad?" Literally, it is striving with great exertion.  The third word in 2:216 is a clue for you: here is the dictionary entry. Jihad is fighting, and it involves killing and being killed.  Jihad an-Nafs: struggling against temptation & ego, does not result in death. 

    Hilali & Khan, in their footnote to 2:190, define Jihad as "....(holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated....."

    Islamic law, most clearly codified in The Reliance of the Traveller Book O9.0, informs us that Jihad is "....to war against non-Muslims....".  Is Jihad an outdated anachronism?  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526 informs us that it will be "performed continuously" until the last day; 23.3455 tells us that Jihad is the "original religion of Islam" which Allah prefers over agriculture and trade as a means of generating income.

    Is Jihad innocent?  Jihad is mercenary4, offensive5 and genocidal6, far from innocent.  Most Muslims are descended from early victims of Islamic aggression.  They are Muslims because their ancestors were conquered and converted at sword point or impoverished by the levy of Jizya. Many of them are unaware of the doctrines related to Jihad & terrorism.  The threat comes from Believers7 who actively seek to obey Allah & emulate Moe.  While they believe Allah's imperatives, threat & promise, they will maim and kill in order to obtain admission to his celestial bordello and avoid his fire.

    Innocence of Jihad is not intended to piss off Muslims, although it will have that effect; it is intended to alert and inform you; to  motivate you to pressure your government for effective action to prevent further attacks and bring about the eventual end of Jihad.   Jihad can only be defeated by destroying their faith: inducing mass apostasy. 


  1. Fight them until... 8:39, The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
    Fight those who until...9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
    Fight those of the disbelievers nearest you...9:123, The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas
    Imperatives confirmed in ahadith:  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.196, 1.8.387, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635.
    Imperatives codified in Islamic Law: The Reliance of the Traveller, Hedaya, Risala.
  2. Allah will condemn Muslims who shirk Jihad to eternal damnation: 9:38-39, 61:10, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497.
  3. Allah will admit those who fight in his cause to his celestial bordello. 9:111, 61:10-12..
    Allah promises those who perform acts of terrorism extra credit towards an upgrade in his celestial bordello: 9:120
  4. How did Moe earn his income? By the tip of his spear! Read the ahadith quoted in the second paragraph of this topic in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
    How did Allah make Moe wealthy? By conquests!  What was Moe's prime motivating factor? Loot! What did Moe receive from Allah while he was sleeping? The keys to the treasures of the world!  Who gets the spoils? Moe! 8:1, 41
  5. There is no hint of defensive motivation in the primary jihad imperatives previously cited. As per the citation to their codification in Reliance of the Traveller, the caliph "makes war upon Jews..." and "fights all other peoples until". The actions depicted in those laws are clearly offensive, not defensive. Kuffar are warred against both defensively and offensively, as laid down in O8.1, "when they are in their own countries". The obligation to attack them occurs annually.  Full clarity is obtained from Hedaya which declares that infidels may be attacked "without provocation" in the link provided in point 1 above. 
  6. Moe wanted loot; Allah wanted "great slaughter"; he wanted Muslims to kill and wound "many of them", and Moe did: 33:26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
  7. Begin your quest for information about believers in 8:1-6.  What is the meaning of "go out" and "spend in Allah's cause"?  No, I am not going to tell you! Go to http://www.quranbrowser.com/ and look them up!  You will learn more that way.  9:111 & 49:15 are more explicit and less cryptic.

2 comments:

Uncle Vladdi said...

Western jurisprudence (based on the Eastern, Chinese concept of the Golden Rule of Law as described by Confucius: Do Not Attack

First!) is based on cause and effect, free-will, "intent" and self-reliant personal responsibility, and so the acceptance that

we only have one right - to not be attacked first - and only one responsibility - to not attack (thereby innocent) others

first. When one chooses to breach this social contract, the only way to achieve justice is for the victims to defend

themselves, and/or for society to counter-attack the criminals, by punishing them at a later time.

Eastern crime (the simple observation of which is slanderously derided as mere racist prejudice or 'orientalism' by it's

leftist gangster defenders here in the West) is based on the exact opposite - on the infantile delinquent's criminally

negligent notion of predeterminism and victimology; on the false and backwards rationalizing excuse that there is no cause and

effect, that there can in fact be no real crimes nor criminals, "because we all do it too," (as their favorite slander, the

argumentum tu quoque deflection has it, by pretending that merely comparing non-associated wrongs will magically turn one of

them into a right,) and because we're all really only helpless victims and slaves of our environments, society, and allah - we

have no free will choice, so when crimes - and other shit - happens, it would really only be a crime to blame the helpless

criminals! This is the basis of islamic 'Submission:' the evil and vile criminal's notion that it's "offensive" and "hurtful"

of "haters" to try to blame criminals (moslems) for their crimes, especially since that might "force" those criminals to

"defend" them selves by committing even MORE crimes (adding victim-blaming insult to the initial injuries):

"How dare you say we're not really only helpless victims and slaves of allah?! How dare you accuse us of being criminals just

because we commit our crimes against you?! Defending your selves is just as bad, so you should learn to become better victims!

SUBMIT!"

;-(

unclevladdi said...

Western jurisprudence (based on the Eastern, Chinese concept of the Golden Rule of Law as described by Confucius: Do Not Attack

First!) is based on cause and effect, free-will, "intent" and self-reliant personal responsibility, and so the acceptance that

we only have one right - to not be attacked first - and only one responsibility - to not attack (thereby innocent) others

first. When one chooses to breach this social contract, the only way to achieve justice is for the victims to defend

themselves, and/or for society to counter-attack the criminals, by punishing them at a later time.

Eastern crime (the simple observation of which is slanderously derided as mere racist prejudice or 'orientalism' by it's

leftist gangster defenders here in the West) is based on the exact opposite - on the infantile delinquent's criminally

negligent notion of predeterminism and victimology; on the false and backwards rationalizing excuse that there is no cause and

effect, that there can in fact be no real crimes nor criminals, "because we all do it too," (as their favorite slander, the

argumentum tu quoque deflection has it, by pretending that merely comparing non-associated wrongs will magically turn one of

them into a right,) and because we're all really only helpless victims and slaves of our environments, society, and allah - we

have no free will choice, so when crimes - and other shit - happens, it would really only be a crime to blame the helpless

criminals! This is the basis of islamic 'Submission:' the evil and vile criminal's notion that it's "offensive" and "hurtful"

of "haters" to try to blame criminals (moslems) for their crimes, especially since that might "force" those criminals to

"defend" them selves by committing even MORE crimes (adding victim-blaming insult to the initial injuries):

"How dare you say we're not really only helpless victims and slaves of allah?! How dare you accuse us of being criminals just

because we commit our crimes against you?! Defending your selves is just as bad, so you should learn to become better victims!

SUBMIT!"

;-(