Islam Must Be Completely Rejected! Writing at Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer criticizes the writing of Douglas J. Feith and Seth Cropsey and Andrew McCarthy's criticism of their article. While his criticism is generally accurate, I have one bone to pick: [Emphasis added.]
a distinction does indeed need to be made in American law between Islam as a religion and Islam as a political system that is authoritarian, supremacist, and at variance with our Constitutional principles and freedoms in numerous ways.
I dissent!!!: Spencer stated the truth's polar opposite. Islam is a unitary Deen: way of life:> intraspecies predation. No part of it is acceptable in a civilized nation.
2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.
8:39, 9:5, 9:29, 9:38-39 9:111, 9:120, 9:123 & 33:26-27 are inseverable parts of Islam, entailed in the practice thereof. It is impossible to properly worship Alllah without them. Allah and Moe must be obeyed. Moe must be emulated. Is there a right to pillage, plunder, genocide, rape & enslave? If so, all our rights are abrogated and forfeit. If not, there is no right to propagate and practice Islam. If Jihad: offensive warfare against infidels, is not performed in any year when it is possible, all who know of the fard al-kifaya are sinners.
O9.1...If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year....
When their numbers are sufficient to confer impunity, the bloodshed begins. Act now, before it is too late: send an email to your Representative & Senators demanding that Islam be defrocked, cast out of the free exercise clause's penumbra of protection and proscribed by law.Please sign, send your emails, like, tweet and spread the petition by email with an exhortation to forward it.
Bare Naked Islam posted a two video set featuring a CAIR representative, a Sikh and a retired intelligence officer who slickly spewed a stream of lies in calumniation of Islam's critics. I only display these obnoxious videos to you so that you can better appreciate the truth about Islam and Islamophobia. http://www.barenakedislam.com/2012/10/01/muslim-hate-group-cair-recruits-left...
Should we outlaw anti-semitic and anti-Christian cartoons & works of art? Would that really make a difference?
Are anti-Islamic attacks and MDP caused by knowledge of the damnable doctrines of Islam or by individuals with mental health issues?
Should ignorance of and false assumptions about Islam be promoted as a means of preventing a few attacks, thus inviting more Islamic attacks in the future?
Rate of growth of anti-Muslim hate groups trippled.
Define hate group.
Prove that the definition fits.
How is hate relevant?
Exactly what is wrong with hating a sworn enemy that murdered 3000 people in three barbarian attacks and promises more and larger attacks with a stated objective of destroying our society and subjugating us?
Ramadan hate crimes ranging from desecration of graves to arson.
Exactly who incites such reprehensible illegal acts?
Who suggests that they should be performed?
Who expresses approval of them?
Islamophobia has unfortunately become an epidemic in the United States.
What is Islamophobia?
Phobia implies irrational fear.
What is irrational about fear and loathing of a war machine that has murdered an estimated 270*106 innocent people since 623?
Who & what are the "roots of Islamophobia & intolerance" and what can we do to root them out?
Thus begins the straw man argument and calumniation of critics of Islam who expose its rotten core to public view.
...Embrace Muslims as Americans and embrace Islam as another mainstream religion.
Only damned fools would do such a stupid thing! Muslims are not Americans, they are an enemy fifth column. The purpose of Islamic emigration is to begin a slow process of demographic conquest, the consequences of which are manifesting in France with riots & streets clogged with AssLifters. In Scandinavia, they manifest in rapes and brutal assaults with No Go Zones in major cities. As the Muslim population increases, the violence escalates.
Damned fools believe that they have Muslim friends; that we have Muslim partners and allies in Islam's war against us. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following Qur'an verses for a dose of objective factual reality.
Islam is not a mainstream religion. Islam is not a religion, it is a "deen" best translated as way of life. Islam prescribes strict rules for every aspect of human life from conception to burial. The "original religion of Islam" is Jihad. If Muslims abandon Jihad in favor of commerce, trade or agriculture as a means of generating income and wealth, Allah will curse them with disgrace until they return to their "original religion". I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455 to obtain a God blessed clue.
Religions are presumed to be spiritual, theological, moral, anodyne & beneficent. Islam does not fit that pattern: its mission is mercenary and its method is martial. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters and deniers to the following blog posts for a dose of reality from Islam's canonical texts.
Muslims will assure you that they revere Jesus Christ as a "Prophet of Islam". I have news for you:The Islamic version of Jesus Christ is a genocidal warlord who will "will fight the people for the cause of Islam", break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah." Jizya will be abolished because there won't be any Jews or Christians left alive to pay it. He will lead the Muslims in the final genocide of Jews. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following canonical references to obtain a God blessed clue.
For the ignorant damned fools who know that Jihad is a spiritual struggle, I submit links to authoritative sources: the translators of the Noble Qur'an and the all purpose handbook of Shari'ah: Reliance of the Traveller. Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!
"embrace Islam" * is a code phrase for submit: if you embrace Islam, you become a Muslim; a slave of Allah. That code phrase was frequently used in Moe's extortion letters.
The Project: The Brotherhood's 20 year plan to defeat America. Long and detailed, but worth the effort to read. The Brotherhood is nothing special, it is simply an aggregation of believers. Your problem is, that, as an ignorant damned fool, you do not know what a believer is nor what a believer does. Read these verses to obtain a God blessed clue for Chrissake!
8:1-6What is the meaning of "go out" and " spend in the way of Allah"?
CAIRwants you to think that there is a matching pattern in distrust of Catholics and Muslims. You need to understand something: Muslims are obligated to conquer the entire world. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following sources to obtain a God blessed clue.
And for good reason: they are sworn enemies, obligated by their demon, to conquer the entire world. This nation's first foreign war was fought against Muslims in 1805. Read this Wikipedia article about the First Barbary war to obtain a God blessed Clue. if these AssWholes had their way, Jefferson's report to Congress would have been illegal.
Offensive and imperialist system.
Not just the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Arabia; the whole damn thing: Islam! As a wise man wrote: "Its Islam, stupid!". Islamic law mandates a minimum of one military expedition against passive infidels in every year. If it is not performed when it was possible, everyone knowing of the obligation is in sin. War must be carried out, at all times, by some party of the Muslims and Infidels may be attacked without provocation. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Shari'ah for a God blessed clue.
At war with an increasing segment of the Muslim world because of our policies.
Exactly what American policy provoked the Barbary Pirates in 1786? Did we have troops in Saudi Arabia? Were we supporting Israel, which was dominated by the Ottoman Empire? Tripoli's Ambassador to London told Jefferson why they attacked us; the reason has not changed in the intervening centuries: Islamic law requires it! I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to obtain a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!
The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.
Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims. Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their religion as a whole.
I want this to sink in through your thick skull, so it bears repetition:
Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your infidelity.
Can you obtain a clue? Islam is at war with anyone and everyone who ain't Muslim.
Muslims hate freedom and liberty--that is nonsense.
That is true. Muslims hate infidels: any and every non-Muslim. Infidels are objects of hatred, to be killed as punishment for infidelity. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: ignorant damned fools one and all, to the following Islamic texts to obtain a God blessed clue. Islam considers mere disbelief as constituting rebellion against Allah, a death penalty offense.
5:33 which prescribes hudud: amputation, crucifixion, execution or expulsion for those who "wage war against Allah and his Messenger" The verse does not define "wage war"; for that, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
Islamic law imposes death as the penalty for infidelity. In the case of pagans, it means "destruction of the sword". Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians may purchase their lives, from year to year, by paying jizya in lieu of destruction.
The smug, smarmy AssWhole is trying to tar Islam's critics with the brush of Nazism. Go look up Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, find out who he was, where he spent the WW2 years and what he did there. Hitler admired Islam, preferring its militancy to christianity's "flabbiness".
Replacement enemy.
That is a popular theory, but it would apply to governments, not to individual citizens and their associations.
Cherry pick the worst images.
Open the Qur'an to Surah two and read through Surah nine, keeping notes of the violent verses which exhort Muslims to engage in offensive conquest, promising great rewards for compliance and threatening terrible punishment for shirking. Open Sahih Bukhari to Book 52, read it and continue through Book 53, then read Book 59. What was Moe commanded to do? What did he do? What was his attitude toward spoils of war? What was his attitude toward terror as a battle tactic? Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 9 and read through O9.14. What is Jihad? What is the obligation to perform it; on whom is it binding and how frequently? On whose initiative is jihad undertaken? What does the Caliph do? What happens to captured women and children? This is not cherry picking, it is pattern matching. Allah said, Moe said; Moe did; the words and actions fit hand in glove. Get a clue!
They hate our foreign policy.
Exactly what foreign policy did the Barbary pirates hate? What explanation did they give for attacking us? What did Khalid Sheikh Mohammadwrite about why they attacked us?
Israel was conquered by caliph Umar in 638. They took it from the Romans but, instead of giving it back to the Jews, they occupied Israel and continued their occupation through WW1, which they lost. The Jews got a tiny fragment of their land back from England, and Muslims can't tolerate it because it is proof that Allah is an impotent idol whose threat and promise are vain. Allah promised victory; a two to one kill ratio. He promised permanence, that Islamic conquest was irreversible. Israel puts the lie to Allah's promises. I disrespectfully direct doubter's dissenters & denier's to the Qur'an & hadith to obtain a God blessed clue.
The smug, smarmy AssWholes are asserting that our support of Israel is based on racism, and results in Islamic aggression. Israel was not in the picture when the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping and nearly bankrupted us with demands for tribute. Israel has a historic, legal and moral right to her land, Muslims do not, they are the occupying invaders and genocidal attackers of civilians.
Antisemitism sticks out like a sore toe. It is very poorly concealed in this video, we need only stop and think clearly for a moment to recognize it. While Muslims use our foreign policy as a pretext, there is no real linkage. They are implacable existential enemies who can not be appeased.
Undermining the Constitution.
Shari'ah is 180° out of phase with the Constitution. It imposes barbarous corporal punishments. It allows child marriage and divorce. It allows polygamy and divorce by triple talaq. A divorced woman loses child custody if she remarries and can not obtain it if she is not Muslim. A Muslim woman inherits half as much as her brother. The indemnity for killing a woman is one half that for killing a Muslim; the indemnity for killing a Christian is one third. Infidels can not testify in court against Muslims.
8:56 into the second video, it is suggested that Jihad is a minor part of Shari'ah.
In fact, it spans ten pages in Reliance of the Traveller and close to a hundred pages in Hedaya. It seems that the requirement of annual raids on passive infidels is of no importance. The Qur'an's 8:39, 8:67, 9:29, 9:120 & 9:123 are meaningless abstractions. Take another look at what KSM wrote and get a clue.
Straw man / red herring.
In the last 30 years, 50 cases involving Shari'ah have passed through American courts. Many of them involved divorce and child custody issues. Read Books M and N of Reliance of the Traveller to discover how foreign those rules are to our system of law.
Islam must be made extinct because it is an implacable predator which can be neither appeased nor reformed. In modern times, with atomic weapons and other WMD, the existence of intra-species predation can not be tolerated. Once they couple nukes with effective delivery systems, they will use them on us, and the oil revenue is greasing the skids toward that cataclysm.
It is not possible to obtain homeland security while we are under occupation by Islam's fifth column. They must be expelled and excluded. The mosques, masjids, madrassahs and Islamic centers must be closed. Can there be a right to attack "those nearest you", seize their property, rape their widows and enslave their children? If not, there can be no right to practice Islam. A Muslim either goes to Jihad or goes to Hell. Jihad is an essential part of Islam because Allah ordained and commanded it. Moe practiced it, and Muslims are commanded to emulate him. When their numbers begin to confer impunity, the violence begins as it has in France and Britain already. The free exercise clause of the First Amendment is for legitimate religions, not war machines. Open the Qur'an to Surah Al-Anfal and read it carefully. Then read Surah At-Taubah. To whom do the spoils belong? What legitimate religion contemplates accrual and distribution of spoils of war? Read "Islam's Mercenary Mission" and pay attention to the details revealed in hadith. Allah made spoils lawful for Moe because he saw Moe's weakness and humility. Moe wanted loot, Allah wanted great slaughter. Moe's provision was under the shade of his spear and anyone who disobeyed his order would be humiliated and abased. That is not the attitude of a Prophet of God. Moe went on slave raids and raped captive women. What prophet does that? Moe had critics assassinated for reciting mocking poetry. That is not the work of a prophet of God. Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters; what prophet of God does that? The penumbra of free exercise clause protection must be removed from Islam. Islam must be declared subversive, aggressive and seditious, which it indisputably is. It must be outlawed; its adherents expelled and excluded. We must get the attention of Congress and motivate them to investigate Islam and discover exactly what it is and what it does. For this purpose I urge you to sign the International Qur'an petition, sending emails to your Representative & Senators. Urge everyone you can influence to sign and promote the petition.
We urge all those who hate to release the burden of hate from their hearts, and respect their fellow human beings and our universal human rights.
I was not able to find the wall post of which they complain. The older posts link was not functioning. The complaint concerns a wall post on SIOA's Facebook page. The post linked to a blog post about legal considerations for banning Islam.
A quick visit to the About Us link discovered a familiar name: Jeffrey Imm. I have read several articles written by him about Islamic supremacism, and I agreed with them.
Founder’s Summary: Our non-partisan group is focused on a consistent support of our universal human rights in all parts of the world, with emphasis on these four areas: – 1. ensuring religious freedom and pluralism / defying religious supremacism – 2. supporting racial harmony / defying racial supremacism – 3. supporting gender equality / defying misogyny – 4. defending human liberty / defying totalitarianism
It is not possible to oppose supremacism, misogyny & totalitarianism without opposing Islam. Those three evils are all intrinsic and foundational to Islam. Allah demands that Islam be made superior; dominant over all religions. That objective is to be obtained by offensive warfare. That warfare is the foundation of the relationship between Allah and Muslims.
Islam is a way of life: jihad-- predation upon the human race. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of productive pursuits, Allah will curse them and not lift the curse until they return to jihad. Aggressive warfare, genocide & terrorism are intrinsic sacraments of Islam.
Islamic law requires a minimum of one or two military attacks on disbelievers in every year, failing only in a year when Islam lacks sufficient men or material.
If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1]
Do you have a right to live? If so, then others have an obligation not to kill you. If you are a not Muslim and are not living as a dhimmi under a treaty of protection in return for paying extortion, then Islam is at war against you. Your blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.
Do you have a right to worship or not as you choose? If so, then others have an obligation not to interfere with your worship. But Muslims are obligated to fight you until only Allah is worshiped; until Jews and Christians are subjugated and extorted.
Islam is 180° out of phase with the values of Western Civilization. If it can't defeat us militarily, it will out breed us and defeat us demographically. Recent shootings, attempted bombings and vehicular assaults should be a clue for you.
We need to get rid of Islam. So long as Islam wears the false mantle of religion, the free exercise clause of the First Amendment protects it. Only an amendment to the Constitution can remove that camouflage and enable Congress to outlaw Islam.
Here is something you can do: Outlaw Islam! Amend the U. S. Constitution to exclude Islam from the definition of religion. Copy the blog post with the petition text, signature link, and links to the evidence presented. Paste it into an email and broadcast it widely!!
There is something else you can do: demand enforcement of international human rights law. ICCPR
Article 20
Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The Qur'an is an egregious violation of those provisions, it can not be changed, so Islam must be outlawed.
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
8:67, which states that a Prophet must make a great slaughter before ransoming captives and 47:4, which directs Muslims to kill and wound "many of them" are obvious violations of 3(c) as the infamous genocide hadith.
Our only recourse is to demand that the World Court enforce those provisions, proscribing Islam by law. That is the mission of the International Qur'an Petition. If you love life and liberty, you will sign the International Qur'an Petition, copy it, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it.
While Muslims have a 'right' to practice Islam, all our rights are forfeit. It is not possible that there can be a right to attack, kill, rape, enslave and plunder.
If Islam is a terrorist org., and it is, than why don't we draft a bill to outlaw it from our country and encourage other countries to do the same. That is the real petition we should be getting out there. Richard Margarit
We can not outlaw Islam with an act of Congress because of the First Amendment. The free exercise clause forbids such legislation. Removing Islam from the penumbra of the free exercise clause requires an amendment to the Constitution. The amendment must recognize the fact that Islam is a predatory way of life with a religious component, not a religion in the normal sense of the word.
Today, 37 people clicked through from Islam Exposed to Freedom Ain't Free and one more came from another source. Yesterday, the petition was viewed five times. Only one of those 43 readers clicked through to sign the petition. The total number of page views is 1,857.
It is up to us, Richard, to read & sign the petitions and share it with others. The list of on line petitions in the sidebar at Islam Exposed was one of the reasons cited by Pakistan's Ministry of Telecommunications for banning the blog.
This blog does not deal in pornography beyond an occasional quote from the hadith about Moe's malignant activities. We are here to expose Islam as an intra-species predator which presents a real, proximate and persistent threat of injury and death to the entire human race.
We use quotes from Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis and jurisprudence to establish the truth of that which would be obvious to any sentient person who would take the time to read those texts. We slog through that crap so you don't need to.
But for the curious few, we include links to source texts so that you can verify the quotes and explore the context. Some of those texts are available for downloading from the expanded library at http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/ where you will find other resources that will be useful when you decide to join the fray with a blog of your own.
For those who prefer videos to text, we recommend Barenakedislam. For those who want to do something to counter the jihad, our sidebar contains links to on line petitions which you should sign and tell your friends about. The International Qur'an Petition is the most important of them.
Barenaked Islam posted a CAIR video featuring audio clips critical of Islam, labeling them Islamophobia. Barenaked Islam exploits the definition of Islamophobia.
It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you.
Phobia means irrational fear. Since the death of thousands nearly nine years ago, we know that fear of Islam is rational.
Those who have sampled Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, biography, exegesis and jurisprudence know that revulsion is a rational reaction to Islamic doctrine & practice.
The video is entitled "Islamophobia A growing problem". What is problematic? A slowly growing segment of our society is becoming aware of Islam, the hatred it inculcates and the violence it sanctifies and incites.
CAIR does not want us to know that Islam is intrinsically violent; that it has declared and is prosecuting war and subversion against us.
The unspoken subtext is "Islamophobia" breeds intolerance, contempt and assault". Intolerance of the intolerable is a good thing. Islam can not be tolerated because it is intolerant, supremacist and genocidally aggressive.
Knowing the truth about Islam and Muslims, awareness of the fact that we need to get rid of them does not imply assault, murder or arson. Those acts are crimes in our society, and offenders are prosecuted. Reasonable people are not advocating murdering Muslims or bombing Mosques. We advocate outlawing Islam, closing the Mosques and deporting the Muslims for our protection and the preservation of our way of life.
The video begins with a clip from a Dan Fanelli campaign spot. The narrator says "Rising Islamophobia in our nation endangers the rights of American Muslims and creates unjustified fear and hostility towards Islam."
What rights are endangered? How are they endangered? Is there a right not to be recognized as a threat to our system of government and way of life?
Able bodied adult male Muslims who are not indebted nor enslaved are bound by a "religious obligation" classified as fard al-kifaya, to engage in attacks against nearby disbelievers. That obligation is specified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1.
The second segment begins with this heading "U.S. Senator James Inhofe advocating profiling of Middle Eastern men when speaking at a Senate hearing. "
The clip shows the Senator saying "I believe in racial and ethnic profiling."
CAIR is attacking common sense. All of the recent Islamic terror attacks were perpetrated by young Muslim males. Anyone not suspicious of young men from areas of the world where Islam predominates is several cards short of a full deck.
When it comes to Islamic terrorism, Muslims are the natural prime suspects. Lets solve this problem by excluding all Muslims from all mass transit.
Congresswoman Sue Myrick is up next "there are people who literally are willing to blow themselves up like this guy did--to commit jihad because they believe in a bigger cause and that cause is what they want to do to us: they want to destroy western democracies, they want to bring down America, they want us to live by their rules."
CAIR's objection to her honest statement of fact speaks volumes about CAIR and about Islam.
Next we are treated to a sign, outside the Dove World Church, which says "Islam is of the devil.". The narrator says "Anti-Islam rhetoric has become more explicit and more extreme since the 9/11 attacks."
No mention of relevance or veracity, just how explicit and extreme it is. We are to assume that Islam and Christianity share a common deity since both are monotheistic. If there is only one deity, they must be the same. But "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son...". Contrast that with Allah, who rubbed Adam's shoulders to produce one group of people for the fire and another for Paradise. In Surah al-Anfal 67, Allah told Moe that he could not hold captives for ransom until he had "made a great slaughter". He said Moe wanted booty, but Allah wanted to get Moe into Paradise. Does the Christian God require genocide? If the Dove World Church believes and wants to tell the world that Allah is demonic, that is their right, ain't it?
Next we have Congressman Peter King saying "Unfortunately, we have too many Mosques in this country, there is too many people sympathetic to radical Islam, we should be looking at them more carefully. "
I view that as a rare episode of candor, of which we need more, not less. CAIR views it as "Islamophobia".
The narrator says "anti-Islam views expressed by elected officials, can severely impact the ability of American Muslims to engage in the positive civic participation that is every American's right.". That statement comes over the image of Geert Wilders speaking at an American synagogue.
"Admit that Islam is not a religion, admit that Islam is a totalitarian ideology, in other words, the rights to religious freedom do not apply to the totalitarian ideology called Islam."
That is a pretty tough admission to make, and, to the best of my knowledge, no American elected officials have made it.
The fact is that Islam is not a religion; it is a way of life: intra-species predation. Islam's religious component serves as a control mechanism to motivate Muslims to go to war and as a camouflage to prevent us from recognizing it as a predator.
The caption for the next segment is "Right-wing commentator Ann Coulter". She says: "I said we are at war with all these fanatics and we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.".
Ann just told you why we are losing in Afghanistan & Iraq: they are still Muslim. That is a fatal fact, too hot for most to suggest, far to hot for politicians to state explicitly.
Next up: "Christian televangelist Pat Robertson", who cuts loose with this classic remark. "...then if the religion involves beheading infidels and pouring boiling oil down their throats"....
Islam is not a religion, but it does involve beheading infidels, as we saw in the case of Nick Berg and others. The boiling oil comes later, after we arrive in the Hell fire. But the decapitation is commanded in Surah al-anfal 12.
Pastor Rod Parsley is up next. "Islam is an anti-Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world."
Horrible! Pastor Parsley confused deen with religion, which is only part of the deen. We see Islamic advertisements that claim Jesus Christ as a "Prophet of Islam". But those advertisements do not tell us that, according to their scripture, Jesus was not crucified, did not die and was not resurrected. Nor do they tell us that he will return to lead the Muslims in battle and the final genocide against us. Lying is as much by what they conceal as what they dissemble.
Franklin Gaham is up next. "True Islam can not be practiced in this country. You can't beat your wife, you cannot murder your children if you think they have committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in some..."
True, Islam does permit wife beating and honoricide. It also permits having as many as four wives at once. It permits a Muslim to divorce his wife by saying "I divorce you" three times. All of those things are contrary to American law.
Next up, saving the best for next to last, we have Pamela Geller, among signs endorsing liberty, memorializing the slain and condemning Codoba House, telling it as it is.
"This is an insult, it is demeaning, this is humiliating, that you would build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired the attacks of 9/11".
Geller is followed by a man I do not recognize saying "This house of evil will be the birthplace of the next terrorist event."
Perhaps, but the plot could, and likely will be hatched somewhere else. But the fact remains, that in every Mosque, Jews and Christians are cursed five times every day when they recite the first Surah of the Qur'an as part of their prayers. Fifteen Muslims died in a Mosque in Afghanistan when the bomb they were building detonated prematurely.
Our narrator returns. "Whether it is anti-Muslim commentators, extremist religious leaders, Muslim bashing politicians or fear mongering dvds sent to millions of American homes, Islam and the American Muslim community are being targeted by hate and intolerance. But with your help, Islamophobia can be challenged and overcome through education and understanding. "
The wise gentlemen who founded this nation gave us something most of the world lacks: the right of free inquiry and expression. we are free to investigate institutions and issues; free to share what we learn. Our founders knew that the right to accurate criticism of government policy and candidates for office is an absolute requirement for the preservation of liberty. If we can not identify threats to our liberty and accurately describe them, we can not preserve liberty.
Islam presents a clear, proximate & persistent threat to our liberty. Islam, through the offices of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, seeks to criminalize all criticism of Islam. Islamic law forbids, under penalty of death, the reviling of Allah, Moe & Islam. If you are a conquered Christian living in Egypt or Pakistan, any negative statement ab out Islam, true or not, gets you tortured and killed.
Every year, they ram "defamation of religion" resolutions through the UNHRC & General Assembly. Those resolutions specifically condemn and demand the criminalization of all association of Islam & terrorism. Casting terror is sanctified by 3:151 and commanded by 8:12. It is exemplified by 33:26-27. Moe bragged about it, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220. If they get their way, they'll be able to fine me and throw me in prison for publishing this fatal fact.
In November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Contemporary Standards will meet again to formulate their proposed protocol to ICERD. The protocol will have the force of law, trumping the First Amendment. We absolutely must stop those fiends from stifling free speech! We must rise up as one, disrespectfully demanding the preservation of our hard won rights. Once lost, recovering those rights will be a difficult, bloody, costly and probably impossible quest.
It is a little know fact that unenforced provisions of ICERD, ICCPR & \CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law. We need to obtain enforcement of those human rights covenants before Islam can modify them to use against us. We have one instrument we can use:
For the love of liberty, sign that petition, copy it, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can influence. Urge the recipients to sign and forward it. Make it go viral. Put a link to it on your blog or web site. If you won't do that, you don't value your life and liberty enough to deserve them.
It was not without good reason that Moe warned his companions not to carry the Qur'an into Dar ul-harb .
Malik's Muwatta Book 21, Number 21.2.7: Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade travelling with a Qur'an in the land of the enemy. Malik commented, "That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it."
They need to make it illegal to criticize Islam. We need to stop them. What's Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm contains what you need to know about Islam, the documentation of the facts revealed above.
Ad Hoc Committee On Compelmentary standards (126.1K pdf) Compiled from a series of blog posts about a proposed protocol to ICERD which will criminalize all criticism of Islam. The cmte meets from Oct. 19-30 '09 to write the protocol.
Ad Hoc Cmte Draft Document 120KB pdf containing Google's Translation of the French language draft plus links to references and blog posts.
“Defamation” Resolutions: Restricted Liberty Impaired Rights 01/04/10 Several excellent articles have been written about the (unintended?) consequences of the UN’s resolutions Combating Defamation of Religions. Now two courageous writers have added a new dimension to the discussion by generalizing about the consequences on the ground and naming the prime offender.
A son of Hector Aleem sent an update message through Facebook. I am transmitting his message to you so that you can more fully comprehend why lovers of life and liberty must never accept Islamic blasphemy laws in any time or place, in any form, to any degree no matter how they are disguised. I have added bold font emphasis to the message, it is otherwise unedited.
It is obvious to me that Hector Aleem has almost certainly joined the blessed martyrs waiting under the heavenly altar for divine justice. Murder: its what Islam is; what Muslims do. Simon does not want to confront that reality. I sympathize with him, but I have no hope of a good ending.
Ignore the cloaking prose of the legislation on Pakistan's books. Look through it to Shari'ah and witness the execrable reality of Islam, which causes reasonable men to curse it.
Chapter O8.0: Apostasy from Islam (Ridda)
(O: Leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst. It may come about through sarcasm, as when someone is told, ``Trim your nails, it is sunna,'' and he replies, ``I would not do it even if it were,'' as opposed to when some circumstance exists which exonerates him of having committed apostasy, such as when his tongue runs away with him, or when he is quoting someone, or says it out of fear.)
O8.1
When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.
O8.2
In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.
O8.3
If he is a freeman, no one besides the caliph or his representative may kill him. If someone else kills him, the killer is disciplined (def: o17) (O: for arrogating the caliph's prerogative and encroaching upon his rights, as this is one of his duties).
O8.4
There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).
There is no doubt about the penalty prescribed for apostasy. Nor is there any doubt concerning its definition. The list of acts and attitudes is long, I cite here those most relevant.
O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam
-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
-6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
-15- to hold that any of Allah's messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;
(n: `Ala' al-din' Abidin adds the following:
-16- to revile the religion of Islam;
-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;
-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet's message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala'iyya (y4), 423-24). )
That Islamic law applies to Muslims, how does it affect me? Take another long hard look at item 20 above. What part of that do you not comprehend: Islamic law has global applicability. Another paragraph lists the limits on conquered Christians. Yet another paragraph identifies acts which abrogate a Christian's treaty of protection, subjecting him to immediate execution. Five items are listed, one is relevant.
O11.10
The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
The OIC has pushed through resolutions condemning "defamation of Islam" every year since '05. Now they are campaigning to make those resolutions legally binding on U.N. member states. The Ad Hoc Cmte. meets again at the end of November. Very few people are aware of this threat to our lives & liberties. Only a few organizations such as Art. 19 & IHEU are publicizing it. Almost nobody is paying attention.
Ad Hoc Committee On Compelmentary standards (126.1K pdf) Compiled from a series of blog posts about a proposed protocol to ICERD which will criminalize all criticism of Islam. The cmte meets from Oct. 19-30 '09 to write the protocol.
Ad Hoc Cmte Draft Document 120KB pdf containing Google's Translation of the French language draft plus links to references and blog posts.
The linkage between Islamic genocide and Islamic scripture is direct and immediate. I have pointed that out in numerous blog posts. In Australia, Great Britain, Denmark and Finland I could be fined and imprisoned for that revelation. Thank God and the Founding Fathers, America has the First Amendment. But not for long. Soon, we shall be led dumb, like lambs to the slaughter.
I want you to do something about it. I want you to sign the International Qur'an Petition, send its url to everyone in your email address book and exhort them to sign and forward it.
It is to inform you all that Hector Aleem has been disappeared suddenly from Jail. We can’t find him anywhere. When our lawyer sent legal papers in jail to get them signed by Hector Aleem then the Jail authorities told that Hector Aleem is NOT in jail and some agencies took him somewhere. We are trying for three days to confirm that where is daddy but no one is able to tell us anything. Our lawyer has searched him in each and every Police Station of Rawalpindi/Islamabad but we couldn’t find him anywhere. Three days have passed now and we still don’t have any clue about daddy. We don’t know if he is being tortured somewhere or being kidnapped. Even Jail authorities can’t tell where he is now. They just say, “Some agencies took him”. But they don’t tell us that where he is and who took him? Please pray for him and tell your friends and family to pray for daddy. If you got your blogs then please publish it in your blogs, and if your friends got any kind of blog then please tell them to publish this news. This is not fair that daddy is not even safe inside the jail, and we don’t know where he is now.
Please keep on donating for Hector Aleem’s lawyer, his legal expenses and his food and clothes. You can donate through Pay Pal or you can donate through any other way.
And if you want to donate through any other way then please contact Mohammad Shouman who is a group admin.
And also keep writing to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad for the Asylum of Hector Aleem and his family, you can write by yourself or you can print the petition, get it signed by your friends and family and send it to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad Pakistan.
Dr. Yahya's critique derisively focuses on form, but his original post was mis formated, and several cross posts which I have seen, including the present case, copy that mis format, making them difficult to read. To make matters worse, the article has no indentations or double spacing, it is one large block of text. These brilliant, wise, all knowing scholars don't know how to use html or make their writing readable.
The article criticized the Ban Islam Petition, which has, at the time of this writing, 889 signatures. Since the petition does not supply evidence to support the charges it makes, its appeal is to people who are already familiar with the evil doctrines and practices of Islam.
I have extracted selected statements from Dr.Yahya's article, placing them in the outer level of an unordered list, with my own comments and evidence in deeper levels of the list. .
[H]e brings the honorable Prophet of Islam, which Bernard Shaw, the Irish philosopher described as the top of 100 historical personalities in history, found on earth as a great leader.
The petition wanted to bring Muhammad (SAAS) the Prophet of Islam like Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, and Hitler for the Holocoust, and the Butcher of Bosnian Muslims of Checkoslovakia. Which I believe is a completely ignorant and unfounded claim.[...]
Moe died in 632, he is beyond the reach of the World Court. His 'crimes' were cited in the petition because they are sunna, exemplary acts to be emulated by Muslims in all places, at all times. It is Islam, not Moe in the dock, Dr.Yahya resorts to reductio ad absurdum, suggesting that petitions against David and Solomon would be parallels to the petition against Islam. He ignores the fact that Judaism & Christianity underwent reformations while Islam remains and will always remain fixated in the 7th century.
In this petition there is comment number: 16, which shows Sir Winston Churchill stated in 1899, that Muslims utilize cruel rules and practices early in his life when he was ignorant in politics and of Islam as a great religion. By generalizing his view for all Muslims. [...]
Churchill served as a British Army officer & war correspondent in Somalia & India where he had ample opportunity for exposure to Islam.
Not withstanding the incomplete sentence, Churchill wrote about Islam, not Muslims. The cited comment does not appear at the specified location in the petition signatures, but may be seen in a blog comment.
Then you have comment number: 184, for William S. Arnott, Ph.D who strongly encourages such petitions. My comment: He has a Ph.D, to say the man is an authority, in fact the carrier of this Ph.D wrote: “Their [the Muslims] deterministic religion is not for the freedom of anyone but is for control of everyone.” I think the use of “anyone,” and “everyone” over generalizes in a situation when specificality is needed rendering his opinion out of the scientific circle by any quantitative or qualitative measurement.
With a little research, I discovered that Dr. Arnott is a retired psychologist, with degrees appropriate to his occupation. His critic has degrees in Educational Psychology & Sociology. How does Dr. Yahya have any more credibility than Dr. Arnott?
In support of this position the petitioner cites comments from a range of contributors listed by numbers as follows: 16, 184, 536, 518, 82, 653, 655, 654, and 659. Comment number 536, which he breached as an innocent adolescent shool boy that “the muslims are a victim of islam. make no mistake about that.” And calls to rescue “the helpless victims of islam” and help them to be “a free people” He then proceeds to call on Saudi Arabia to change its ways. This stikes me as somewhat odd. Someone as learned as the petioner would claim to be would undoubtly understand that Saudi Arabia is a small portion of the Muslim world, which includes over 1.5 Billion followers. Its population according to almanac 2007, was 27 million. That is less than 2% of the overall Muslim population worldwide. Thanks for the advice, I am sure Saudi Arabia appreciates it.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contains the focal point of Islam: the Kaaba, in the Grand Mosque in Mecca. The K.S.A. finances the spread of fundamentalist Islam all over the globe.
Comment 518, the comment is written in French. Unfortunately, I do not speak French. I did, however, recognize some catalystic words. Words such as; Islam, Cathiliques, genocide, massacre, religions, Bouddiste, hindu, religion impose, and psychologiques, and sects, among others. My ethical resolve does not allow me to comment on something that I do not fully understand. I only wish the petitioner had such ethical standards.
Without reading the comment, Dr. Yahya concludes that the commenter has low ethical standards, writing about a subject he does not comprehend. Dr. Yahya's hypocrisy is obvious.
Islam calls for the enslavement of Muslims against Muslims, Jews and Catholics. This religion calls for genocide by the mass slaughter of atheists and other religions are not "book" (Buddhists, Hindu, etc.). that religion imposes a law (Sharia), which is terrible for humanity (eg stoning of women, sexual slavery of non-Muslim, etc.). This religion uses psychological manipulation tools found in sects.
Upon examination of the translated comment, I find therein nothing contrary to the truth; it is an accurate description of Islam.
Comment 655. a comment from someone; s/he says: “The use of religion to torture, kill, malign, coerce and condone maltreatment of any living creature is heinous.” I agree so far. But on this statement I disagree. s/he said: “Islam does all of these things.” According to whom? This is your basic stereotypical mentality and wreaks of ignorance. Many of the comments are like this, one persons account or opinion but completely unsubstantiated and lacking in real value in understanding.
The answer to the provocative question is contained in the Qur'an. Read it all and reflect upon it. Moe created Islam for his personal emolument & empowerment through the professional practice of piracy. This fact is documented in Islam's Mercenary Mission. For real understanding of the Qur'an, turn to the writings of a qadi, who spent his entire adult life learning, teaching & applying Islam's canon of scripture, tradition & exegeses. The proof is in these tafsir by Ibn Kathir.
Comment 654. says:”In the interest of world peace ban islam.” S/he agrees on false claim or petition to ban Islam. I wonder to myself as I am reading this comment: what level of bigotry and racist view are these? I am appalled as a sociologist to see such free acceptance of illogical statements in a petition that is to be taken seriously. This comment is written by a blind follower. You could say anything and the “yes, count me in” mentality kicks in. I could probably go around and gets quotes from random people saying that they hate football. That doesn’t mean I will go forward with a petition to ban football.
Islam is permanent war. 8:39 commands Muslims to make war on pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. 9:29 commands Muslims to make war on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated & extorted. Those commands are confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 & other hadith and codified in Reliance of the Traveler O9.8 & 9.9. Islamic law requires [O9.1] that a minimum of one military attack be mounted against kuffar in every year. Al-Shafi'i made the matter crystal clear.
Finally, the sponsor of the petition, his name is Lorenzo Bouchard, and his email, is labouchard@shaw.ca A final comment is what about the other numbers of comments which may be redicule the petition or call for peace and harmony in America in logical sense From the 659 or may be more comments? Just a question. Americans are not fools to accept such a racist and discriminative petition. Forty years ago, blacks compared with whites were less intillegent and some racist scientist like the one with Ph.D, the petitioner brought, claimed that in the 1980s, Today, Obama proved that blacks are not less than any person on earth if they have the chance and opportunity. For this I proudly say, long live America. And I feel sorry for this ill-guided petition to incite hatred in a healthy society like the USA.
What is the relevance of the name and contact information of the author of the petition? Let the petition stand or fall on its intrinsic merit.
Dr. Yahya arbitrarily dismissis comments in support of the petition. Why should we blindly accept criticism of it?
The petition is not racist; Islam is a war cult, not a race. Islam is not limited to Arabia, Arabs conquered North Africa, nearly half of Asia and much of Southern & Eastern Europe. It has enslaved people of several races. Rejecting a pseudo religion which commands its votaries to conquer the world, performing acts of terrorism & genocide in the process is not evil, it is a wise decision based on verifiable facts and sound judgment.
A newer petition, urges the World Court to grant injunctive relief against Islam.It presents evidence of Islam's static violation of international human rights conventions. It is carefully formatted and its evidence is linked to source documents for easy verification & contextual exploration. The International Qur'an Petition, published August 18, has 116 signatures at present.
Muslims, seeking to impose their blasphemy laws onto the entire world, assert that all criticism of islam is racism and hate speech, intended to incite violence against Muslims. Those assertions are intended to shut off debate, precluding all questioning of Islam's bona fides. That is the purpose of the Defamation of Religions resolution being debated by the Third Committee and a proposal to add a protocol to ICERD, being written by the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards.
The resolution and the protocol seek to use international human rights law against us, rendering us defenseless in the ideological war which Islam is waging against our liberties. The International Qur'an Petition is our way of turning the tables on Islam, using their tactic against them. Islam's canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence contravenes ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG. The petition offers proof of that fact. If the international human rights covenants are to have any meaning and effect, Islam must be proscribed by law.
I am asking you to read the International Qur'an Petition and evaluate the evidence for yourself. If you agree that Islam must be proscribed, sign the petition and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it. You can copy the petition's text and paste it into an email or download it in the form of a 14kb pdf file for use as an email attachment.
Proscribe Islam Petition Rough Draft is a71kb pdf file containing the full quotes of the the evidence of Islam's guilt. .Islam vs Human Rights 64kb chm file compiled from 7 blog posts exposing Islam's static violations of ICCPR.
The fact, revealed by the codified oral traditions of Moe's companions, is that Islam's mission is mercenary, its method is martial and its founder was a lecher, pedophile and su borner of murder. That is truth, not hate speech. That is condemnation of Islam, not an exhortation to assault or murder Muslims.
The Danish Cartoons depict Moe as a terrorist. They exaggerate; Moe never possessed a bomb because he died before the invention of explosives. But he was, by his own admission, a terrorist. The cartoons do not suggest attacks against Muslims. The violence was spawned by the preaching of radical clerics, not by the cartoons. Fitna, the short video documentary by Geert Wilders, illustrates that fact most effectively. It shows Allah's commands and the cleric's raving along with the resultant rioting. Fitna is neither hate speech nor incitement, it is an expose of Islam's hate speech and incitement to violence.
