In this viewer's opinion, an hour is not sufficient to plunge the depths of the life of Muhammad. Perhaps too much time was spent on his childhood and not enough on his prophetic career.
Concerning brigandry before 610, I recall seeing nothing to suggest it. Running Kahdija's camel caravans and trading should have kept him too busy for that. The brigandry began after the hijira, with the Battle of Badr. As for Moe convincing Kahdija that he was a Prophet, I find it to be a reversal of the story told in the generally accepted sources. He was terrified by the encounter in the cave and ran home to hide under her skirt. His wife comforted him with assurance that he had encountered an angel, not a demon in the cave. The issue of mercenary motivation should have been given more detail as it was in this blog post on the subject: http://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/ . The issue of false prophecy deserves detailed exposure. Moe's child bride gives us an earful in Sahih Bukhari 6.60.311. Those and other issues received more detailed coverage in my documentation of "The Innocence of Muslims": http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the .See also: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocent-prophet-divine-mission-or-self-procl . The curious viewer who wishes more detailed information about the life and works of Moe should read at least one of the following books.
Islamophobia remains a source of great concern for us. We have, at the OIC, exerted considerable and dedicated efforts to combat this phenomenon whose pace has increased recently as shown in the reports of the OIC Islamophobia Observatory, the last of which is the fifth report submitted to you. We have raised this issue with political and religious elites we have met in different parts of the world, underscoring its dangerous impacts on the prevalence of international peace and security. Thanks to these efforts, we managed to convince the UN Human Rights Council, consistent with the eight points I proposed, to adopt the consensual resolution 16/18which includes a genuine condemnation of the defamation of religions and discrimination against people on religious grounds. Paragraph 6 of the resolution provides for the adoption of measures to criminalize incitement to violence based on religion or belief. The UN General Assembly adopted the resolution by consensus under number 66/167. To enhance the chances of these two resolutions being implemented on the ground, I put forward 'the Istanbul process' initiative in July 2011 which reaffirms the two resolutions, followed by a similar initiative in Washington in December of the same year. A third initiative will follow in England in the name of the European Union in December this year. Meanwhile, we are still struggling to overcome the obstacles preventing the actual implementation of these initiatives. The adoption of these two consensual resolutions by the UN Human Rights Council and the General Assembly respectively is indeed a positive development that gives us the opportunity to concentrate on important issues away from politicization and polarization. It also gives us the opportunity to introduce the 'Istanbul Process'. I am convinced that the confidence-building efforts exerted in the 'Istanbul Process' meeting and approved by international and regional stakeholders will pave the way for increased confidence and cooperation between all parties. After the launch of the defamatory film 'Innocence of Muslims' which insults Islam and Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), and the subsequent disorders which caused many deaths including the killing of the US Ambassador in Libya, I condemned in the strongest terms the film, the killing of US officials and the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo, insisting that the expression of anger and condemnation should not be through killing or the destruction of property. Moreover, we issued a joint statement with the European Union, the League of Arab States and the African Union denouncing strongly the perpetrators of these crimes.
International peace & security are not threatened by fear & loathing of Islam. Peace and security are not negatively impacted by factual exposure of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam. Peace and security are threatened by the damnable doctrines of Islam and the efforts of Muslims to implement those doctrines.
Muslims riot and raise Hell because of their arrogance, supremacism & triumphalism; roused by the rabid rants of their Imams at Jumah Salat, not because of anything we utter and publish. Take a fresh, close look at FITNA and what Ban Ki-moon said about it. The movie is not hate speech neither is it incitement, it is an exposure of hate speech and incitement.
Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."
defamation of religions
Elimination of the defamation meme from the most recent UN resolutions was the critical selling point that facilitated their passage by acclamation. If the defamation provisions had remained in the resolutions, tere would have been votes, many of them against the resolutions.
Take a fresh, close look at how human rights NGOs praised and celebrated the new resolutions and how I condemned them. My analysis is confirmed, Article 19 & Human Rights First are shown to be willing victims of al-Taqiyya.
Previous resolutions complained bitterly about associating Islam with terrorism:
L.32/Rev.1Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief Oral revision not reflected in this version.
10. Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned; ————————————————————————————– 7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism; [combating defamation/vilification of Islam]
Who created the association? Moe did it! The proof is outlined below the horizontal line with citations to the Qur'an, hadith, tafsir & Sira. This is what they are bitching about; what they seek to outlaw. They want to persecute me, fine, imprison and decapitate me for revealing these fatal facts to you.
Web definitions:
a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions.
Falsity is a critical element of defamation. If it ain't false, it ain't defamatory. Exactly what is false in FITNA? Exactly what is false in the outline of fatal facts below?
Is terrorism intrinsic to Islam or is it not? Was Moe a bastard? Neither hadith nor Sira indicate that, is it really important? His paternity has been a subject of scholarly speculation. He did claim, in one hadith, to be Christ's paternal half brother. Did Moe hide under his wife's skirt? Yes, he did, its in the Sira. Did her cousin fake the Qur'an? I doubt it, I find no evidence for it, but the bit about the gap in revelations is in the Sira. Did Moe converse with a donkey? It is in an obscure book by Ibn kathir and it is found in the Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith. Was Moe a lecher? Did he put words in the idol's mouth to sanction it? Yes, its in the hadith. Was Moe an extortioner? Yes, his extortion letters are on record. Did he marry a six year old girl? Yes, its in the hadith and Sira. Did he have an old lady murdered? Yes, its in the Sira. Did he have Kinnana tortured to death? Yes, but not exactly as depicted. Its in the Sira. Did he do it with Miriam in Hafsa's bed? Yes, its in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Was Moe queer? Did he jigger his camels? I don't know, I did not see it in the movie and I did not find it in the books. I bring that up because I found another analysis of the trailer to which I have added links. It is included immediately below. I find that, on the whole, the trailer is not false and defamatory, its major conceptual content is true. [Note: the file linked here is 141MB. It will be easier to obtain hard copy from Amazon. The alternative is to load it once and use the page numbers in subsequent links to navigate through the pdf.]
Imran Firasat's upcoming video is sure to outrage Muslims. Here is the trailer. Note: Firasat has juxtaposed Chapter & Verse. [Big deal.] The military intelligence offices of the U.S. & Canadian governments have been seeking information about this video, presumably because they expect it to influence enemy activity against our forces in the field.
They should learn tha fatal facts of Islam herein referenced and wise up to the fact that Islamic violence is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. Did the Almighty Creator select as his final Prophet and Messenger an unrepentant pederast, lecher, false prophet, murderer and genocidal warlord? Or is Islam the world's most successful con game? If Moe was a false prophet and Islam is a con game; a continuing criminal enterprise guilty of war crimes against humanity, then why in Hell should warning the world about it be a criminal offense? If Moe was a true Prophet, Allah is the Almighty Creator and Islam is true, a perfect religion innocent of offensive, genocidal & terrorist conquest then post proof in a comment: refute each and every fatal fact presented and documented below the horizontal line. Good luck with that.
5:33Prescribes the death penalty for 'waging war against Allah'.
Understand what follows in the light of 9:29, which establishes payment of jizya as part of the terminal condition of perpetual war against peopl;e with scriptureal religions.
Hedaya, Volume 2, Book 9 contains the Hanifi School's laws of war. On page 141, we learn that "The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.".
On page 212, we learn that jizya is a payment in lieu of destruction.
On pages 216 & 217 we learn that jizya is a punishment for infidelity: not being Muslim.
Reliance of the Traveller, Book W4.1(2) declares Christianity & Judaism to be abrogated by Islam: invalidated.
(2) Previously revealed religions were valid in their own eras, as is attested to by many verses of the Holy Koran, but were abrogated by the universal message of Islam, as is equally attested to by many verses of the Koran.
Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310 informs us that Jesus will return to "fight the people for Islam", "break the cross", "kill the swine" and abolish all other religions.
