Shaykh Shit: Abdallah Bin Bayyah And The Fez Plan Of Action
I stand firmly, by God, on the right of free expression, without which,
according to President Washington, "we would be led, dumb
like sheep, to the slaughter". The free speech clause of the
Constitution guarantees it and I will not yield!!!
I disrespectfully and contumaciously reserve and
exercise the right to name, shame, curse, condemn and demand the
extinction of the enemy of the human race: Ummah al-Islamia, its false
deity, its false prophet and its damnable doctrines.
As part of my condemnation of the false and
malicious Fez Plan Of Action, I therefore now point out, with
superscripts internally6 linked to my comments and the fatal facts, the
damnable lies of the Shaykh. [Bold font added.]
Friday, 14 July
ECOSOC Chamber
United Nations Headquarters,
New York
At the United Nations Headquarters today, Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah
was invited to speak at the Launch of the Plan of Action for Religious
Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to
Atrocity Crimes. The meeting began with opening remarks by the United
Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres followed by a speech from
Shaykh Bin Bayyah. (full text of the speech can be read below)
The Shaykh delivered his intervention from the role and perspective
of religious leadership, through a theological and spiritual approach,
highlighting profound religious philosophy and its exalted objectives,
such as seeking out good reasons for peace and well-being, rather than
justifications for civil strife and war, a critical need so as to
neutralize instigations of violence and hatred, as well as provocation
and tension that we see so prevalent in today’s age.
The program was hosted by Adama Dieng,
Under-Secretary-General/Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide
from The United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the
Responsibility to Protect. Five regional action plans were developed
and presented by religious leaders and actors from around the world.
These pioneering documents are the first to focus on the role of
religious leaders and actors in preventing incitement to violence that
could lead to atrocity crimes and the first to develop context specific
regional strategies with this objective. The meeting was designed to
bring together Member States, the United Nations, international and
nongovernmental organizations to adopt and launch the Plan of Action
and the regional action plans and discuss strategies for their
implementation.
Full speech of Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah delivered at the UN on
Friday 14th July.
In the Name of God, the Most Gracious the Most Merciful
Prayers and Benedictions on the Prophet Muhammad and upon all of the
Messengers and Prophets
His excellency, Secretary General of the United Nations, Dr. Antonio
Guterres His Excellency, Mr. Adama Dieng
His Excellency, Faisal Bin Mu’ammar
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The subject we have gathered here today to discuss is extremely
important in the life of nations ever since our species first walked
the earth on this journey of stewardship. Ever since the time of the
sons of Adam—Cain and Abel—the problem of violence has been the
preoccupation of Prophets, reformers, and philosophers, as well as
politicians and legal experts.
Despite that long-standing concern, violence and its incitement, in
all of its dimensions—hidden and manifest, internal and
external—continues to engender a most distressing disease and its cure
remains elusive. Perhaps the most important problem is the abject
failure of our contemporary civilization, which for the first time in
history has placed our collective future in the hands of human
ingenuity embodied in our weapons of mass destruction, the use of which
is now determined by the impulsive desires and impetuous outbreaks of
humans. This is the result of the absence of the ethical question: Why?
Esteemed colleagues, you have convened here to address one of this
problem’s deepest roots, and to battle with one of its highest
fortresses: I mean, of course, incitement to violence. Such incitement is a call to use force
unjustly against individuals or groups of people simply due to their
religion, color, ethnicity, or social class1. Despite the many and varied
approaches that have tried to address this issue over time—legal,
ethical, and philosophical—it still remains clouded and requires
experts to re-examine it, clarify its limits and remove the ambiguities
surrounding it, weighing the ethical considerations on the one hand,
and the legal ramifications on the other.
Approaching this from the role of religious leadership, I will speak
about a theological and spiritual approach that is built upon profound
religious philosophy and its exalted objectives so I may present a
discourse that seeks out good reasons for peace and well-being, rather
than justifications for civil strife and war, and that works to
neutralize instigations of violence and hatred, as well as provocation
and tension.
Since its inception in 2014, The Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim
Societies has exerted tremendous efforts in deep research in the
foundations of Islam, and in our shared humanity, to restore forgotten traditions of peace2,
its neglected aims, and calling attention to long lost values, and long
buried Islamic jurisprudence. The Forum’s goal has been to dismantle
the violent rhetoric point by point, and concept by concept in order to
make clear its faults and reveal its methodological errors, and to
prevent this ongoing perversion that these misguided
understandings have caused due to an absence of authentic regulatory
knowledge. The Forum has done this by deconstructing their arguments
and reconstructing a correct understanding, so it can remove this
ethical confusion that the discourse of incitement to violence has
used, and to remove the garment of religious legitimacy in which it has
been cloaked.
Among the most important initiative that The Forum undertook was to
issue the historical Marrakech Declaration in January 2016, which
addresses the rights of religious minorities in Muslim majority
countries. Our hope is that this Declaration, based upon the Madinah
Charter of Prophet Muhammad, will shed light on the history of Arabic
and Islamic civilization, and contribute to the establishment of a new
phase that can lead to a deep understanding of the religious legacies
that can enable us to establish conviviality now and in the future.
Thus, the Marrakech Declaration was built upon a religious text and
used the legitimate tools of textual interpretation that reveals its
authentic teachings of tolerance3,
harmony, and peaceful coexistence4.
This Declaration embodies the role of the religious leader in regards
to his religious texts and heritage and historical analogies in search
of sound foundations for mutual co- existence and a rejection of
violence and hatred.
However, in looking at the French context in the 19th century that
led to the legal formation of the crime of incitement to violence, we
find that the definition of incitement become more complicated, and
this leads us to call for an understanding of the connection between
the principle of freedom of expression, which is held sacred in the
current dominant civilization, and the principle of responsinbility for the consequeces of the
expression itself5.
So despite any positive aspects this freedom may have, we hold the
conviction that among the most important incitements to violence are
those practiced by modern media outlets; they have mastered the art of
broadcasting disputes, to such a degree that as soon as the conflict
starts these media outlets begin to categorize the various sides,
giving each an epithet to defend, and continue to broadcast day and
night to the ignorant public who have no protection or immunity that
can prevent them from responding to the call of wars and self
destruction. And its been long said: wars begin with words.
For this reason, it is advisable that the intellectuals,
philosophers, politicians, and legal experts review the principle of
freedom of expression with a pragmatic approach that examines the
public impact, especially in the developing countries where we see as a
result of this misguided media thousands of victims who die. They are
seeking a type of freedom they never acquire, and happiness they never
attain. The net result is total destruction of peoples and places. Not
to mention other elements such as political, religious, and ethnic
sectarianism, the effects of which remain undeniable.
For this reason, I am calling upon the religious leaders from all of
our various traditions to take resolute steps to remove these elements
of incitement, and to distance these inflammatory interpretations from
our religious practices. This is exactly what the Forum is engaged in
by implementing accurately the Islamic principle of “commanding to the
common good, and forbidding the socially reprehensible” within the
constraints of Islamic legal tradition.
It is incumbent upon the religious leaders to grasp that an attack
on any religion is an attack on all religions. We can use anti-Muslim
sentiment and anti-Semitism as examples of this very problem. The reconciliation among religions6
without which, according to Has Kung, peace cannot be achieved, is not
enough unless religious solidarity is realized.
Indeed, the establishment of the International Center for Counter
Terrorism (‘Itidaal) in Riyadh toward this end represents an effective
tool to counter hate speech.
Another important effort is that laws should develop out of the
needs of the local environments they are addressing, away from laws
that do not take into consideration the particularities of places,
peoples and their differences. Moreover, they neglect the accumulations
of historical and social grievances. Therefore,
the call to freedom of desecration of sacred symbols, and denigration
of human figures, that we know the very meaning of existence has
arrived to us through them, this is also from the category of
incitement to violence and hatred, and gives license to a breakdown of
public order.7
Along these lines, let me remind
you of examples from some of the Arabic and Islamic countries in
placing a legal and legislative framework to protect co-existence and
counter violence, specifically the recent law adopted by the United
Arab Emirates to counter discrimination, hate speech, and denigration
of religions8, because it takes into
consideration the local context and clarity of purpose. So from one
point of view it looks at the reality of the society wherein it is
being applied; and, from another point of view, it aims to protect the
society and immunize it against hate speech and incitement to violence.
In conclusion, I sincerely wish a positive outcome to your endeavor,
and I fervently pray for your success.
Shaykh Abd’Allah Bin Bayyah
President
Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies.
Abu Dhabi
UAE
incitement
The most accursed Qur'an, denigrated by reasonable
people as the "Unholy Koranus", is full of incitement to violence.
-
4:95. Not equal are those of the believers who sit
(at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or
lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh
with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades
those who strive
hard and fight with their wealth and their lives
above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good
(Paradise), but Allâh
has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who
sit (at home) by a huge reward;
- 5:35. O you who believe! Do your duty to Allâh and
fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive
hard in His Cause as much as you can. So that you may be
successful.
- 9:19. Do you consider the providing of drinking
water to the pilgrims and the maintenance of Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at
Makkah) as equal to the worth of those who believe in Allâh and the
Last Day, and
strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh? They are not equal
before Allâh. And Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn
(polytheists and wrong-doers).
- 9:41
- 9:73
- 9:86
-
8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge
the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons
amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred
steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who
disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not
understand.
-
8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.
-
9:29. Fight
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they
pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
-
9:38. O you who believe! What
is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the
Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are
you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But
little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the
Hereafter.
9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.
- 9:123. O you who believe! Fight
those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them
find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the
Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
Allah says: "strive hard and fight with your wealth
and your life", that is better for you. Allah says the Believers
do it
9:111 and he says that only those who do it are
believers
49:15. Allah says "fight them" and "fight
those nearest you".
That is offensive, not defensive war, as per
"Reliance Of The Traveller" o9.1, o9.8,
Hedaya 2.144 &
Risala Ch. 30.2(b).
Any sentient adult with a functioning brain knows that you do not stop
and issue dawah for three days before responding to an attack! Al-Misri
gives it away when
due to their religion
"Those who disbelieve", "people of the book",
"disbelievers" 8:39, 9:29 & 9:123. Accursed liar: I call you out!
You played the victim card, projecting the evil of Islam onto us. Go
directly to Hell, do not pass GO, do not collect Jizya!!!
forgotten traditions of peace
In a pig's anus!!! For twelve years, in Mekkah, the
accursed Profiteer had no army and few supporters. he preached
tolerance and forbearance. After subverting Yathrib, he preached
defensive/retaliatory warfare. When his army grew strong enough, he
preached offensive warfare as outlined above. According to
Reliance o9.0, Moe participated in 27 ghazwat and dispatched 47 sariya.
74 battles: a fine tradition of p;eace!
tolerance
Kiss my fat, disfigured foot, hypocrite! Islam is
supremely intolerant!
- 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion
other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the
Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
- 8.39
- 9.29
Making war on people because they do not share your superstition is a
great example of tolerance!!!
peaceful
coexistence
"Fight them until"; Jihad will be performed
continuously until Judgment Day
Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526.
Perpetual war
≠ peaceful coexistence!!! Slap the crap
out of that liar and there'd be nothing left but an empty uniform.
Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs can not reject
violence because that would entail apostasy and condemn them to death.
Look it up in Reliance o8.0-7. Denial of any part of Islam or its
law carries a death sentence.
responsibility for the consequeces
That turd is right out of HRC Res 16/18 & the
Istanbul Process. It means that they would persecute the Danish
Cartoonists for Muslim riots in Pakistan and Salman Rushdie for the
murders his detractors committed against translators and publishers of
his book. They do not raise Hell because of what we draw, say and
write, they raise Hell 'cuz they are God damned slaves of Satan
and for no other reason! Those who riot, loot, burn and
murder bear responsibility for the consequences and should suffer
deadly force in the process.
reconciliation among religions
Those who have never been conciled can not be
reconciled! After subverting Yathrib, Moe sanctified permanent
war against Christians, Jews & Zoroastrians. We can not
be reconciled with existential enemies.
freedom of desecration
By God and the Constitution! I am free to declare
the truth about the enemies of the human race, no matter how much they
dislike it and protest. And I will fight to the death to maintain
that freedom!!!
There is nothing sacred about Allah, who is an
ancient pagan moon deity otherwise known as Hubal, Moloch, Baal and
Satan. The Unholy Koranus, two sahihs, Sunan Abu Dawud and Ishaq's Sira
contain the smoking gun evidence which proves beyond doubt that Allah
is Satan, not the God of Abraham, Issac & Jacob.
There is nothing sacred about Moe, a pagan Arab who
bestowed upon himself an undeserved honorific title, married a six year
old girl, attacked innocent people, raped captive women, pillaged,
plundered, extorted and couched his Arab Mafia as a religion!
r>
