May Crapped On British Terror Victims, Past, Present and Futuret

   

Update: Paul Weston nailed it!

Listen and heed his wisdom!

🚨Must Listen🚨@paulwestonlibgb of @Liberty_GB has a REAL plan 4 eliminating Muslim terrorism unlike Theresa May & Britain's 'traitor' class pic.twitter.com/tAyWWZJn8C

— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) June 5, 2017

British Prime Minister Theresa May stood before 10 Downing St. and shit upon the citizens of Britain including the innocent vectims of Islam and the rest of the world.  I found a transcript of her spew at the Independent and intend to dissect it, marking the most egregious turds with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary commentary which follows below the horizontal line.

We cannot and must not pretend that things can continue as they are¹. Things need to change² and they need to change in four important ways.

• First, while the recent attacks are not connected by common networks³, they are connected in one important sense. They are bound together by the single evil ideology of Islamist extremism⁴ that preaches hatred, sows division and promotes sectarianism.
• It is an ideology that claims our Western values of freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with the religion of Islam⁵. It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam⁶ and a perversion of the truth⁷.
• Defeating this ideology is one of the great challenges of our time, but it cannot be defeated by military intervention alone⁸.
• It will not be defeated by the maintenance of a permanent defensive counter-terrorism operation, however skillful its leaders and practitioners.
• It will only be defeated when we turn people's minds away from this violence and make them understand that our values - pluralistic British values - are superior to anything offered by the preachers and supporters of hate⁹.
• Second, we cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed.
• Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services provide¹⁰.
• We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements that regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning.
• And we need to do everything we can at home to reduce the risks of extremism online¹¹.
• Third, while we need to deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online, we must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world¹².
• Yes, that means taking military action to destroy Isis¹³ in Iraq and Syria. But it also means taking action here at home.
• While we have made significant progress in recent years, there is - to be frank - far too much tolerance of extremism¹⁴ in our country.
• So we need to become far more robust in identifying it and stamping it out across the public sector and across society.
• That will require some difficult, and often embarrassing, conversations.
• But the whole of our country needs to come together to take on this extremism, and we need to live our lives not in a series of separated, segregated communities, but as one truly United Kingdom¹⁵.
• Fourth, we have a robust counter-terrorism strategy¹⁶, that has proved successful over many years.
• But as the nature of the threat we face becomes more complex, more fragmented, more hidden, especially online, the strategy needs to keep up.
• So in light of what we are learning about the changing threat, we need to review Britain's counter-terrorism strategy to make sure the police¹⁷ and security services have all the powers they need.
• And if we need to increase the length of custodial sentences¹⁸ for terrorist-related offences - even apparently less serious offences - that is what we will do.

• Since the emergence of the threat from Islamist-inspired terrorism, our country has made significant progress in disrupting plots and protecting the public.  But it is time to say 'Enough is enough¹⁹'.

• Everybody needs to go about their lives as they normally would. Our society should continue to function in accordance with our values.
• But when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism, things need to change.
• As a mark of respect²⁰, two political parties have suspended our national campaigns for today. But violence can never be allowed to disrupt the democratic process, so those campaigns will resume in full tomorrow and the General Election will go ahead as planned on Thursday.
• As a country, our response must be as it has always been when we have been confronted by violence.
• We must come together, we must pull together, and united we will take on and defeat our enemies."

---

Continue

    Repeating the same damn fool mistakes and expecting different results is the hallmark of insanity.  You can not continue to pretend that Islam is a benign, anodyne religion and Muslims are peaceful people who share our attitudes, needs and wants. You can not continue to pretend that coexistence is possible.

change

    Change and improvement are not synonymous terms. Decline and death are not improvements. First and formost, identify the enemy: Muslims and the doctrine that makes them inimical: Islam. Second, abandon the crime/punishment paradigm and recognize Muslim attacks as acts of war requiring preemptive and retaliatory attacks.

attacts connected

    Every accursed attacker was a Muslim: Believing slave of Satan. Whether acting as a lone wolf or in packs, a 'slime's a 'slime for alla' that. Only Muslims engage in Islamic Jihad. Where there are no Muslims there will be no Jihad.

extremism

    The founder of Islam, God burn him, set the standard. What he said and did is normative Islam, not extreme. Perpetual war, genocide & terrorism are normative Islam, not extreme, radical, perverted, distorted or hijacked. Terrorism is Islamic worship!!! incompatibleincompatiblein

incompatible

    `Islam is incompatible with the values of Western Civilization!  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  That means you have no right to p;ractice Christianity. Any negative statement about Islam carries the death penalty. If you doubt that, go to Amazon, buy Reliance Of The Traveller and read book o, chapter 8 through 8.7.  There is no free speech.  Only Muslims have human rights.

perversion

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, off the shelf, normative Islam as preached and practiced by its accursed founder.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

truth

    Islam is false; malignant malarkey; there is no truth in it! Allah is not God and God is not Allah! The Koran is situational scripture! Moe's favorite child bride finked on him! Islam is mercenary! Moe contrived it for his personal emolument!

Defeating Ideology

    Muslims are the enemy. Muslims must be defeated. Muslims can only be defeated by exterminating them. The ideology:

• Islam
• Allah, the pagan moon deity worshiped by Arabs before Islam's invention, is the creator.
• Allah gave the world and everything on it to Moe, who needs Muslims to seize and hold it for him.
  
• Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.
• Jihad is ordained for Muslims.
  
• Holy fighting in Allah's cause; killing and being killed to make Islam rule the world.
• The best deed.
• The highest peak of Islam.
• https://www.scribd.com/doc/212631107/Jihad-Defined-and-Exemplified-pUpdated
• Terrorism is a sacred tactic of Jihad.
  
• https://www.scribd.com/doc/110516023/No-Justification-in-Islam-for-Terrorism-in-a-Pig-s-Anus
• Muslims who do Jihad are rewarded with forgiveness of sins and admission to Allah's celestial orgy. 
• Muslims who shirk Jihad are damned. 

    Because Muslims go to war and to Jannah or sit home and to Jannahm, they will never cease waging war until they are exterminated. Some combination of induced apostasy and kinetic action is required.  A dead Muslim is a good Muslim. An ex-Muslim is the best!

    While one Muslim lives, he will breed or recruit more until there are enough to resume the Jihad. There is no other possibility.

    Arab culture is honor/shame based. It is necessary to make Muslims ashamed of their affinity to Allah & Moe. It is necessary to show the Ummah  exactly how Moe defrauded them by inverting good and evil. Show them his mercenary motivation. Show them his treachery. Show them his rapes and murders. Show them what he prayed to and what he prayed for. Show them how the verses were 'revealed'.

our values

    Muslims do not share our values! To them, this world is but play and pass time. The real action is in Jannah: Allah's celestial orgy whose base description is found in Surah An-Naba' beginning at verse 31.  Details are scattered throughout the Koran. Search it for 'purified mates' and 'gardens'.

    There are  three ways to gain admission to Jannah: be perfect and sinless, depend on Allah's fickle mercy or the guaranteed tickets of Jihad and martyrdom.  Martyrdom gets the Mujahid more and better food & wine and more Jewish & Christian women taken from the fire for his sexual pleasure.

    To Muslims, Allah's law is the only valid law, derived from the Koran & hadith.  Laws made by men through deliberative process and compromise are rebellion against Allah.

    You can not convince believing Muslims that democracy is better than theocracy! You can not convince them that tolerance is better than killing or enslaving every infidel.

safe space

internet

    The internet is a means of communication. I am using it to inform readers about Islam: its evil mission & methods and how to defeat it.  Millions of Muslims have social media and message board accounts. Many of them have multiple accounts and they read and write in strange languages. They use codes, steganography and encrytpion.  No law or regulation can stop them from communicating and plotting. There are simply too many messsages to intercept, decrypt, translate, analyze and decode.

extremism

    It's Islam, Stupid! The belief that only Allah has the right to be worshiped. infidels must be converted, killed or enslaved,  and extorted can not be tolerated!!!  The belief that genocide and terrorism will be rewarded withBrownie Points and admission to a celestial orgy can not be tolerated!!!

Sanctuary

    There must be no safe space for Muslims. Expel them from Britain and all of  Dar al-Harb. Kick them out and keep them out! Do not let any Muslim cross our borders to occupy our territory.

    The Koran commands "kill them wherever you find them"  We should follow that dictum. Shrub should have nuked Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan immediately after the accursed abomination!

    Every terrorist training camp, barracks, staging area, bunker and convoy should be destroyed. Their funeral processions should be strafed. No place and no occasion should be safe for those with a divine mandate to conquer us!

military action

destroy ISIS

    ISIS, Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda  etc. et. al. are not the enemy, they are divisions of the enemy. There are more than 45 named terror groups. Muslims are the enemy!!  Bomb them off the face of the earth!!!!  There is no substitute for victory and victory against Islam consists only in its extinction.The conflict is existential.Us or them: your choice.

    Shrub should have nuked Afghanistan and the other nations that facilitated and financed the accursed abomination.

One united kingdom

    With zero Muslims! Where there are Muslims, there is Jihad and terror.

robust strategy

    After the bombing of the buss and subway lines, the numerous stabbings and decapitations and recent bombings and vehicular assaults, only Moron or a damnable AssWhole would claim success for a miserably failed strategy!!!

    The crime:punishment model must be abandoned and replaced by a war:preemption:retaliation model. The ShitHeads & Traitors running Britain must be replaced by intelligent patriots June 8 '17.

police

    Arm them! They must carry loaded firearms and be authorized to use deadly force. They must be trained in marksmanship and combat shooting. Until they are, they should be complemented by experienced military personnel.

    The intelligence aparatus should be authoried to use the real world equivalent of Agent 007 to exterminate known terror threats and the rest of the Muslims in Britain must be sent home.

Sentences

    Terrorists must be executed, not imprisoned! Imprisoned terrorists invite hostage taking for exchange. They also invite escape attempts. Send them to Hell where they belong. Drown them in hog farm holding tanks or feed them to the hogs. Once is enough!

Enough is enough

    One Goddamn attack is a million too many!!! There was a surplus in '05. Never again!!! Expell all Muslims immediately and do not admit any more!

cowardice not respect!

    The election is June 8, '17, three days off. The campaign should be hot and heavy. Traitors including the P.M. must be called out and culled. Corbyn must be rejected, told to go to Hell. UKIP deserves high praise for continuing their campaign. Their slate deserves the votes of patriotic Britains.

continue,change,attacks connected,extremism,incompatible,perversion,defeating,ideology,our values, safe space, internet,sanctuary,military,destroy,ISIS,united kingdom,police,sentences,enough,respect

Leahy vs Gorsuch: Incontinent Sphincter Of The Senate Demanded Travel Ban Perjury!

Fox News displayed this video of  Senator  Patrick Leahy, for whom I have the utmost contempt and hatred,  and Judge  Neil Gorsuch  in his confirmation hearing.  

    In this line of interrogation, the incontinent sphincter attempted to suborn perjury.  Watch closely as the judge ostensibly refuses to Felch.    Listening inter alia, it sounds as if Judge Gorsuch  implied that he would rule against the  travel ban which is what the 'crat  senators want to hear.

    Fox embed code does not work. I am attempting to embed Cspan's video. The relevant part begins one hour and 49 minutes into the 9 hour video.  Neither embed code works. Click fox to watch the clip, Cspan to watch the whole thing.

    I attempted to transcribe the video, both my hearing and my typing skills are poor; I do not guarantee accuracy, spelling or punctuation.  I begin with the first question, answers are inset. Superscripts in the transcript are internally linked to my comments which follow.

• Does the first amendment¹ allow the use of a religious  litmus test² for entry into the united states?
• Senator, that's an issue that's currently  being litigated³, actively, as you know 

• I'm not asking about the litigation in the ninth circuit or anything else, I;m asking about the fact⁴: is a blanket religions test- is that consistent with the first amendment ?
• Senator, we have a free exercise clause⁵ that protects the free exercise of religious liberties by all persons in this country If you ask me how I'd apply that to a specific case, I can't talk about that  for understandable reasons. 
• Well, could the Pres...
• The understandable reasons--I'm as frank and candid with you, Senator, as I can be, Senator, when you ask me to apply it to a set of facts that look an awful lot like a pending case, in many circuits now, ...
•   Would the President have the authority to ban all of Jews⁶ from the United States or All people that come from Israel⁷?
• Senator, that would be an easy question: we have a Constitution and it does guarantee free exercise it also guarantees equal protection of the laws⁸ and a whole lot else besides and the Supreme Court decided in [unintelligible] that due process rights extend even to undocumented persons in this country.  I will apply the law; I will apply the law⁹ faithfully and fearlessly and without regard to persons.
• I don't care about their religion
• Anyone, any law is gonna get a fair ans square deal with me. My job as a judge is to treat litigants who appear before me as I wished to be treated as a lawyer when I appeared with my client large or small.  I did not want them to be discriminated against because they were a large company or or a small individual with an unpopular belief¹⁰, and that's the kind of judge I try to be, Senator,  I think that's my record.
• Well, Judge, let me ask you  do you agree with me that there should not be a religious test in the United States ?
• I need to know more specifically...
• Well, let me give you an example: should there be a religious test to serve in the military¹¹?
•  Oh, Senator, that would be inappropriate, yes, it's against the law. 
• [unintelligible] Solely on their religion, solely on their religion...not based on a threat¹² or something, would you ban somebody solely on their religion?
• Senator, we have not just a first amendment free exercise clause in this country, very important protection, we have not just an equal protection guarantee of  the fourteenth amendment, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, gender ethnicity; we also have the religious freedom restoration act which Senator Hatch mentioned, which was a bipartisan bill passed by this body, with the support of Senator Kennedy and Senator Schumer when he was in the House, and that imposes an even higher standard on the government than the first amendment when it comes to religious discrimination.it says that if there is any sincerely held religious belief; honestly held religious belief, the government must meet strict scrutiny before they regulate on that basis, strict scrutiny being the highest standard known  in American law.  
• The reason I ask these questions, there is a legitimate concern, I hear stories from my grandparents that signs usta say that no Irish need apply or no Catholic need apply, I am sure that Senator Feinstein can speak about  rules of her religion.  President trump promised a Muslim ban¹³, he still has it on his web site to this day, he is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States and a Republican congressman recently  said the best thing the President can do  for his Muslim ban is to make sure he has Gorsuch on the Supreme Court before the appeals get to that point¹⁴.  
• Senator, a lot of people say a lot of silly things, my grandfather...
• [unintelligible] he wants you on the court so you can uphold a Muslim ban .
• Senator, he has no idea how I'd rule in that case and, Senator, I'm not gonna say anything here that would give anybody any idea how I'd rule¹⁵ in any case like that that  could come before the Supreme Court our my court of the tenth circuit it would be grossly improper of a judge to do that; it would be a violation of the separation of powers and judicial independence if someone sitting at this table, in order to get confirmed, had to make promises or commitments about how they'd rule in a case that is currently pending and likely to make its way to the supreme court. 

---

first amendment

 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
- See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1.html#sthash.WY6qrQZD.dpuf

    The idea was to establish  liberty by limiting the power of government.  Many of the colonists came here to escape from religious persecution.  They did not want the federal government to establish a state religion, domination or sect. They did not want their own denominations to be proscribed by law.  

    The constitution applies to citizens and residents, not non-resident aliens. It does not guarantee any rights to aliens not  under its jurisdiction.  Immigration is a privilege granted by the government under strict laws and rules, not a right.  Africans, Arabs &  Asians are not born with a constitutional right to come here.  They must apply for visas.

religious test

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

    Article six includes the supremacy clause, constitutional oath requirement and proscribes religious tests for public office.  Art. 6 does not mention immigration.  

    Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 establishes federal control over naturalization.

4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;  http://constitutionus.com/

    Where in the constitution  do you find an absolute unqualified  right  for aliens to come here?  Where do you find a prohibition on religious tests for immigrants?

current litigation

    The issue before the courts is a travel ban based on national origin, not religion.  How is it a Muslim ban while the majority of the  Ummah  is not affected by it?   The words "Muslim" & Islam are not included in the executive orders challenged in court.  

    The executive orders are irrational. 15 of the "Magnificent Nineteen" were citizens of  the Kingdom Of Saudi  Arabia  but that nation is not included in the banned list. Pakistan and Iraq also provided terrorists but they are not on the list.

    The executive orders exclude persons originating from places where the governments are unwilling or unable to provide identifying information about their citizens.  Even knowing the prospective visitor's name, patrimony and address, how would you  determine if he harbored hatred for us and had the ability & intention to do us harm?  Even if you knew that he lacked desire, ability and  intention, what is to stop him from getting them in the immediate future?  Tashfeen Malik passed five vetting interviews before she helped her husband slaughter 14 innocent victims. So much for vetting; it's vaporware!

    Exactly how  would banning the entry of Muslims violate the establishment clause?  Exactly how would it interfere unconstitutionally with the free exercise clause?  Does it interfere with the  salat, saum, hajj, zakat, shahada or Jihad of the Syrian in Syria?  No, it simply prevents him from doing it here for the next 90 days.  Do either Leahy or Gorsuch know that Jihad is the "highest peak of Islam", not one of its pillars, yet a communal and individual obligation binding on all able bodied adult Muslims?  Have either of them  bothered to read  Reliance Of The Traveller, Book o, Chapter  9.1  or page 18 of "The Book Of Jihad"?  Do they know that 9.5, 14, 29 & 123 are fard ayn: individually binding obligations since the invasion of Afghanistan?

'fact': fallacy!

    There is no religious test in the executive order!  Islam is not mentioned in it. There are 56 nations with Muslim majorities, only 6  are included in the ban.  Leahy postulates fallacy as fact.

free exercise clause

    The free exercise clause of the first amendment prohibits Congress from  enacting legislation impiring free exercise of religion.  Executive orders are not acts of congress; they are orders, not legislation.  Leahy knows the diffeence, but he is dishonest.

    What is free exercise of religion?  Congregational prayer, singing hymns, church bells, communion?  How about Jihad, genocide & terrorism?  Those are Islamic sacraments and a required part of  the practice of Islam.  

    Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and the Messenger.  They are warned to emulate Moe if they want to get into his celestial orgy.  Allah commanded Muslims to striker terror into the hearts of prospective victims my harsh treatment of defeated enemies and terrify them with maximized military might.  Moe terrorized the Jews of Medina by having Kab Ashraf assassinated and the B. Khatma tribe by  the assassination of Asma Bint Marwan; the entire tribe saw "the power of Islam" and reverted at once.  

    What do Muslims say while slitting the throat of a goat in celebration of Eid?  What do they say when they slit the throat of an Infidel?  Both are acts of worship.  The accursed abomination 9/11 was an act of Islamic worship!  

Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims. Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your attacks,are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to God.
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/gitmo20090310.pdf

    Does the free exercise clause vitiate legal proscription of terrorism?  Is the Constitution a suicide pact?  Islam entails Jihad & terrorism; is incomplete with out them. There can be no right to manifest, practice and propagate it.

ban Jews?

    Why do you want to ban Jews?  Are Jews terrorists by divine mandate?  Are  Jews raising Hell wherever they go as Muslims are?  

ban Israelites?

    There  is good cause for excluding Israeli Muslims because they are under a divine mandate from Allah to terrorize us,.

equal protection

    A Christian, Jew & Muslim have equal protection of the laws: due process.  There is also due process in immigration law.  The McCaran-Walter  Immigration Act of  '52 makes provision for exclusion of inimical persons.  

(3) Security and related grounds

(A) In generalAny alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in—

(i)

any activity (I) to violate any law of the United States relating to espionage or sabotage or (II) to violate or evade any law prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,

(ii)

any other unlawful activity, or

(iii)

any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means,

is inadmissible.

(III)

has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;

(IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of—

(aa)

a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or

(bb)

a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity;**

(V)

is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi);

(VI)

is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;

(VII)

endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;
...
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182

    Islam espouses terrorist action!!! read'em and weep, creep!
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari Vol. 4, pg. 140

apply the law

    The President and his administrative  staff & subordinates apply the law,  trial court judges determine facts and appellate judges interpret the laws & constitution.  

unpopular belief

    That means Muslims.  Even they get equal protection of the laws, not found guilty without probative evidence.

military

    What does the constitution say?

..".no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Article VI http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/6/essays/135/religious-test

Is soldier an office of public trust??   Whose cause do they fight in,  ours or Allah's ?  Remember Nidal Malik Hasan's business card?  It read "Soldier of Allah".   That is a clue for the few who can grasp a clue.

    Allah wants us defeated and gathered into Hell 3.12 , that is the role of Muslims: to do his wet work. Do you really want them in our armed services???

threat

    Islam, you damned fool, is a threat!!!  Most people, like that ignorant fool, are unaware of Moe's extortion letters. This one, part of a collection in Ibn Sa'd's sira, is the most explicit of them. Reasonable, open minded men of good will will curse Islam when they read it: http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.2.73.3

    Sahih Bukhari,  volume 9, page 237 contains a clear threat:
"How dare you
fight the people while Allah's Messenger
said, 'I have been ordered to fight the people
till they say: La ilaha illallah. And whoever
says La ilaha illallah, saves his wealth and his
life from me unless he deserves a legal
punishment justly, and his account will be
with Allah.' " '"

Muslim ban

    Candidate Trump did propose a Muslim ban and for good reason: numerous plots, some foiled, others successful by Muslims, some of them first or second generation  immigrants. That history, combined with the continuing threats from ISIS & al-Qaeda, constitute good cause for expelling and excluding the slaves of Allah who are obligated to do his wet work.

    Read the  EO at the New York Times and see if you can find "Muslim" in it. "Islam" is included  in a  defense of the  original travel ban, not in an active provision.  Exactly how is an order that affects only 40% of the Ummah a Muslim ban?  

appeals

    Assumptions make an ass of you.  Assuming that  Judge Gorsuch would vote in favor of the  EO  without first hearing the arguments and reading the briefs made an ass of Leahy.

how I'd rule

    The judge should rule after reading the briefs, hearing the arguments and   carefully examining  the precedents. Canons of judicial ethics proscribe perjury. It is not his case yet and he should neither have nor express an opinion on it.

Jihad

    Click image to enlarge.

Hilali/Khan Noble Qur'an2.190 footnote	Reliance Of The Traveller o9.0

• Al-Jihid (holy fighting) in Allah's Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry)
• (0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. 
• The literal expression is striving: extreme exertion.  The connotation is Jihad In The Way Of Allah.  "Strive hard and fight with your wealth and your lives."
• How does one get injured or killed in Jihad an-Nafs?  3.156, 157. Fighting in Allah's cause obviously means mortal combat.
• Ordained for Muslims: its Islamic law. Offensive Jihad is a communal obligation binding on the Ummah until a sufficient number have volunteered, then the rest are relieved of the obligation.  
• 2.256
• Reliance o9.1
• 
• The Book Of Jihad pg. 18

---

Islam's Highest Peak

Jamih Tirmidhi Vol. 3, pg. 40 #1658	Sunan Ibn Majah pg. 193

• 'hump (the most
  prominent) of the deeds
• head of the matter
• it's pillar 
• it's pinnacle
  

    Highest peak; pinnacle:  no deed ranks higher in Islam!  

Obamination: State of the Union: Supporting Our Troops?

In this installment on the STOTU we turn to supporting our troops.  [Click this link for the Prepared Remarks.]

" We must never forget that the things we’ve struggled for, and fought for, live in the hearts of people everywhere. And we must always remember that the Americans who have borne the greatest burden in this struggle are the men and women who serve our country."

    Only those who retain their souls share our love of life & liberty. Muslims, having sold their souls to Satan, value death over life, secure in the false conviction that they will enjoy eternity in the celestial bordello of carnal bliss once the privations of the current world have ended for them.  Those are only interested in conquering the world for Satan, a.k.a. Allah. 

    Thousands have come home from Afghanistan & Iraq in boxes. Thousands more have returned missing limbs, with horrible, disabling and disfiguring injuries, both visible and invisible.  Recently, the one who would seem to honor them mocked them for objecting to his attempt to screw them out of the medical care promised to them.  Including that paragraph in the state of the union address is political exploitation at its worst, coming from one whose party does its best to prevent their votes from being counted in a timely and effective manner.

"Tonight, let us speak with one voice in reaffirming that our nation is united in support of our troops and their families.  Let us serve them as well as they have served us – by giving them the equipment they need; by providing them with the care and benefits they have earned; and by enlisting our veterans in the great task of building our own nation."

    Reagan sent the  Marines to Beirut, as sitting ducks, to save Arafat's bacon. Clinton sent them to Somalia, with insufficient force and material.  Shrub sent them to Afghanistan & Iraq in insufficient numbers, with inadequate planning and an amorphous, ill defined  objective.  Obama subjects them to suicidal rules of engagement and now he wants to slash the defense budget. 

" Our troops come from every corner of this country – they are black, white, Latino, Asian and Native American. They are Christian and Hindu, Jewish and Muslim. And, yes, we know that some of them are gay. Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love.  And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation."

    That is a nifty combination of Balkanization and special interest pandering, exactly what we have learned to expect from Democrats.  Obama slithers into rationalization of the left wing's p.c. attitude and banning of ROTC from universities.  It was ok because Queers were rejected at the recruiting office. Yeah, right. They will invent a fresh pretext because they hate this nation and do not want it to be defended.