Citizen Warrior posted a video about Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff's case, also linking to a very informative
previous article. Wolff & Wilders are on trial in Europe, accused of insulting & inciting hatred against Muslims. Jail terms and heavy fines hang over their heads because they spoke openly and honestly about the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam revealed in its own canon of
scripture,
tradition,
exegesis &
jurisprudence. Others have been persecuted for truth in Australia, Canada, England and Scandinavia.
In America, at present, we can not be brought up on criminal charges for revealing the demonic core of Islam because we are protected by the free speech clause of the
First Amendment. But Justice Stephen Breyer has brought our umbrella of protection into doubt: "
And what is the crowded theater today? What is the being trampled to death?"
In the current political climate, Democrats are desperately seeking ways to squelch criticism of their policies & corruption. Some seek to resurrect the "fairness doctrine", others look to changes in the licensing requirements for radio stations. They need to silence Rush Limbaugh and others who speak truth to power.
Unfortunately, that domestic threat converges with a parallel international threat, Bolstered by the controversy of International Burn a Qur'an Day. The OIC and its member states have been screaming for international legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam. At the opening of the 15
th session of the Human Rights Council, they urged "
internationally oriented preventive measures to combat negative religious stereotyping including denigration of religions"
1 and "
It is through an outright rejection of such acts and sustained engagement at evolving norms to deal with them that we would prevail against the extremists who are out to rock the very foundations of peaceful coexistence."
2
Two phrases in that last quote need elaboration. "such acts" is a direct reference to International Burn a Qur'an Day but it expands to encompass all questioning & criticism of Islam. "Evolving norms to deal with them" may be wrongly assumed to refer to the annual Combating Defamation... resolutions but it has a more sinister reference. Few beyond the ivory tower heights of international human rights NGOs are aware of this threat to our precious liberty.
The HRC appointed an ad hoc committee to explore and elaborate "
complementary international standards"
3. The committee's lofty title and charge tell us nothing useful. It is only by scratching beneath the surface that we discover their mission: to write a binding protocol to ICERD which will give the force of international law to the defamation resolutions.
By encoding the content of the resolutions
4 into a protocol attached to ICERD
5, they will be made enforcible by the World Court. Signatories will be required by international law to legislate and enforce acts prohibiting criticism of Islam.
Steve Malzberg had a masterful rant on the subject of "hate speech" laws in the
opening hour of his September 13 radio show.
..."Even Republicans-Even the great Peter King, Congressman-said that 'Terry Jones is putting our troops at risk; I agree with General Petraeus' blah blah blah. ladies and gentlemen, if our freedom of speech can be seen as putting our troops at risk, then our freedom of speech is going away. Make no mistake about that--our freedom of speech is going away. In Canada, you can't say anything that would offend a group, like Muslims, for instance, that they might consider offensive, oh gee, they call it hate speech. Ya can't say it. ...
Who is to blame for the escalating violence over the Qur'an burning, is it the Pastor himself, is it the Obama Administration or is it the media? I said: common, you left out choice D, which is the correct choice, where it it? Those were the choices, ladies and gentlemen, A, B & C. The correct choice is .... the people responsible for the threat of violence are the scumbag terrorists. Duh. Don't you see how this makes Terry Jones's point? When he says that there's something wrong with portions of Islam? Do you see where we've progressed to or digressed to, on this issue? You can't burn a Qur'an, you can't incite the poor terrorists, you can't do something that will give Usama bin Ladin a recruiting poster, even if it is protected by freedom of speech; the First Amendment, you can't do it; we'll send the FBI to your church, we'll take files out, we'll have somebody close down/ whoever runs your web site/ your provider close it down, which is what happened. The FBI came, the provider said 'oh, you violated such and such a rule-no more web site for the church ' . And they read him the riot act. God knows what they told him. Who knows how they threatened him to get him to stop? God spoke to him and told him not to do it. Of course, first he said he had a deal 'the mosque will not be built there', yeah right, ... but don't you for one minute think that this is not the beginning of the end of the United States of America as you know it.
Remember after 9/11 some started saying well, ... how is this different from the Imam himself who said that we were 'accesory to 9/11, and Usama
bin ladin was made in the united states, that we have Muslim blood on our hands' ? So shat do you expect, how is this different from Rev. Wright; 'the chickens have come home to roost.' 'cuz we support the Israelies & dropped bombs on Hiroshima? How is this different than what they're saying, when you tell a Pastor 'if you burn that book, the terrorists are going to strike and its your fault', how is it different than what Reverend Wright and Imam Rauf and the rest of the skunks say about 9/11 and about this country deserving it ? And whose to blame for 9/11; I always thought it was the terrorists, but if you follow Barack Hussein Obama's logic; Hillary Clinton's logic' General Petraeus's logic; Defense Secretary Gates's logic and I'm sorry to say, just about everybody I've heard from's logic if he';d burned the Qur'an and something had happened, it'd be his fault. How is that?
Now, next in line will be, and we've already heard it, We've heard it from the Imam: he can't move the mosque from where he wants to build it; absolutely not, do you know why? he can't do it ('Our national security now hinges on how we do this and how we speak about it and what we do . It is important now for us to raise the bar...
if we move the radicals have shaped the discourse --the radicals have shaped the discourse on both sides and those of us who are moderates on both sides ..')...
What will they demand next? People like me, speaking up; 'you're inflaming the terrorists'; its our fault. Its terry Jones's fault, its the people who want the mosque moved's fault . Its my fault, don't you get it? Just like its the U.S. Government's fault that 9/11 happened,
And now we, not me, are starting to accept it in this country.
Well, you'd better not burn the Qur'an, don't want to inflame the terrorists, well we don't do anything to upset them-screw'em! What the Hell is going on here?
Wolff & Wilders are on trial for "hate speech" It is assumed by
Lib
Tards that revealing the core doctrines & practices of Islam inculcate hatred & incite violence. while in reality, the hatred is inculcated and the violence incited by the Qur'an, hadith, Sira & kutbah based upon them, preached in every mosque every Friday afternoon.
View
Fitna. You saw the Qur'an, in Arabic and English. You heard it recited. You saw the Imam's preaching it. You saw the rioting, death and destruction which result. Which is hate speech: the sanctification & mandate of genocidal conquest or exposing it to the world? The Imams who preach from that accursed book should be in the dock, not Geert Wilders.
This is what the Secretary General of the U.N. said about that 17 minute video.
Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about
Fitna:
“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”
The right of free expression is at stake; there is ample justification for
Fitna; none for the Qur'an. Ban ki-Moon is guilty of inverting morality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhgkN42uAJQ&feature=player_embedded
Wilders & Wolff are being tried under existing national hate speech legislation. If the OIC prevails in its pursuit of tyranny, our nation will emulate those laws and our liberty will be lost forever.
The annual resolutions are getting all the press. Who is paying attention to the activity of the Ad Hoc Cmte. which presents the real threat? The OIC outnumbers us and can out vote us. We can not prevail by lobbying efforts. We can not prevail with bland, inoffensive petitions calling for the defeat of impotent resolutions. We need to raise the political/public relations cost of the OIC's mission to enslave us. We need to use their own methods against them.
Who has the SISU to reveal the truth about Islam? Who will point out the fact that Islam's Qur'an & Sunnah are egregious static violations of existing human rights covenants?
ICERD. [Emphasis added.]
Article 4
States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of persons of one colour or ethnic origin, or which attempt to justify or promote racial hatred and discrimination in any form, and undertake to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to, or acts of, such discrimination and, to this end, with due regard to the principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights expressly set forth in article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:
(a) Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin, and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the financing thereof;
(b) Shall declare illegal and prohibit organizations, and also organized and all other propaganda activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination, and shall recognize participation in such organizations or activities as an offence punishable by law;
(c) Shall not permit public authorities or public institutions, national or local, to promote or incite racial discrimination.
States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of persons of one colour or ethnic origin,
ICCPR
Article 20
- Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
- Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
3:110.
You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)]
are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
2:91. And when it is said to them (the Jews), "Believe in what Allâh has sent down," they say, "We believe in what was sent down to us." And they disbelieve in that which came after it, while it is the truth confirming what is with them.
Say (O Muhammad Peace be upon him to them): "Why then have you killed the Prophets of Allâh aforetime, if you indeed have been believers?"
98:6. Verily,
those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad
from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell.
They are the worst of creatures.
9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm)
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians),
until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:30. And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old.
Allâh's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
Tabari IX:69
"Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us." [
Quoted by Craig Winn.]
Article 3
The following acts shall be punishable:
- (a) Genocide;
- (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
- (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
- (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
- (e) Complicity in genocide.
8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG require that Islam and its canon of scripture & tradition be condemned and proscribed by law. Who will enforce those provisions? They want to amend ICERD to use against us while it already condemns them! How shall we deal with those arrogant violators of human rights? Hoist them on their own petard! Sign, publicized & promote the
International Qur'an Petition. You can copy the
full, html format petition, complete with links to the evidence and a link to the signature page and paste it into an email, with an exhortation to sign and forward it.
- Statement of The OIC Secretary General His Excellency Prf. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu Before the 15th Session of the Human Rights Council
16 Sept. 2010 http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/8864sggenevaoic.pdf
- ibid
- The blog posts listed here contain quotes from & links to the few available documents related to the cmte.
- Combating defamation of religions
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
