terrorism must not be associated with Islam

Every year the General Assembly of the United Nations resolves to shield Islam from criticism under the guise of "Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief"3

    The '13 edition is labeled:     A/C.3/68/L.48.  Six paragraphs into the draft resolution, near the top of its second page, we discover the corrupt core of the resolution, contained in one sentence. that sentence is quoted below with the crucial clause highlighted for clarity. 

Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

    Is terrorism associated with any religion?  The operative expression is "Islamic terrorism"; why is that so? What did the perpetrators of the

• Maillot massacre
• Madrid rail bombing
• London Subway bombing
• Mumbai massacre
• Beslan massacre
• WTC1
• WTC2,
  
• Fort Hood massacre
• Boston Marathon bombing

all have in common?  They pronounced the Takbir when they attacked; the same words pronounced when Muslims sacrifice hadi for Eid festivals: "Allahu Akbar". They are Muslims.

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four co-conspirators signed a bragadocious confession in which they cited relevant Qur'an verses and classified their abomination as an act of worship. 

With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest of the world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity.

    Read that again, concentrating on the highlighted clauses.   Mohammed Atta confirmed the obvious in his final message to the terrorists who hijacked the aircraft.

[...]3) Read al-Tawba and Anfal [traditional war chapters from the Qur'an] and reflect on their meanings and remember all of the things God has promised for the martyrs.[...]

[...]5) Pray during the night and be persistent in asking God to give you victory, control and conquest, and that He may make your task easier and not expose us.[...]

[...]When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers. God said: 'Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their extremities.' Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out, 'Come hither, friend of God.' They have dressed in their most beautiful clothing.

    Did Khalid Sheikh Mohammid, Mohammed Atta & associates misunderstand, twist, distort or pervert Allah's word, Muhammad's Sunnah and Shari'ah or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating Muhammad? 

I will cast terror

    Who said that?  Allah said that, in Surah Al-Imran 3.151, Allah said:  "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve". In Surah Al-Anfal 8.12, Allah said: "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved". What did Allah do?

Allah cast terror

    In Surah Al-Ahzab 33.26, Allah said:  "Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives."  In Surah Al-Hashr 59.2, Allah said: "and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. ".

But they really fear

    The real terror is Moe and his army, as revealed by Allah in Surah Al-Hashr 59.13: "Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.".

Made Victorious with Terror

    Two ahadith in Sahih Bukhari are explicit concerning how Moe was made victorious. 1.7.331: "Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey. "  4.52.220: "I have been made victorious with terror ".

Jihad Imperatives

    Why did Atta tell the terrorists to study Surah Al-Anfal & At-Taubah?   Because those chapters contain the primary Jihad imperatives and the threat and promise which motivate Muslims to implement them.

• Mutilate bodies to terrify future victims:  8.12
• Fight them until only Allah is worshiped and resistance ends. 8.39
• Treat defeated victims harshly to strike terror into those to be attacked next. 8.57
• Maximize military power to terrify intended victims 8.60
• Make a great slaughter 8.67
• Kill them wherever you find them 9.5
• Fight people of the book until they are subjugated and pay extortion 9.29
• Go to war or go to Hell 9.38, 9.39
• Believers are only those who fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed in return to the celestial bordello 9.111
• Believers are rewarded with an upgrade in the celestial bordello for any step taken to injure or enrage infidels 9.120
• Fight the disbelievers nearest you and be harsh against them 9.123

Casting Terror

    How did Allah cast terror? 

• By genocide:  33.26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
• By murder: 
  
• Kab Ashraf
  
• Asma Bint Marwan
• By devastation of date palm  groves.
  

Connect the dots

• I will cast terror
• I cast terror
• to strike terror
• to terrify
  
• I was made victorious with terror
• Every Jew in Medina was in fear for his life.
  
• An entire Arab tribe converted out of fear when Bint Marwan was murdered.
  
• Muslims terrorized Jews by destroying their livlihood.
  

Terrorism: intrinsic sacrament of Islam

    Any rational and intelligent person will come to the obvious conclusion upon examining the evidence and observing the pattern.  There is no alternative. But the United Nations Ambassadors of Australia, Azerbaijan and Egypt (and the OIC member states) would have the United Nations declare that: 
"terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion" .  Those making the declaration and those who will vote to pass the resolution in the General Assembly are traitors to the human race. The resolution and its supporters are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

    If we can not associate terrorism with its source: Islamic doctrine & practice, then we can do nothing to eliminate it. Terrorism can only be eliminated by eliminating its source: Islam. The three international human rights covenants which require legal proscription of Islam for promoting war, genocide and suppression of human rights  must be enforced.  The present resolution was crafted to shield Islam from exposure, justice and eradication.

    Citizens of the United States can transmit to their Representative & Senators a link to the evidence of human rights violations.  by signing the International Qur'an Petition. Europeans should copy the petition and email it to their Member of Parliament and MEP.

Spiegel: Trapping Wilders

Spiegel tried to entrap Geert Wilders in a confrontational interview.  The interview is displayed in three parts, the link is to the second part, which contains the quote excerpted below.  Navigation links to the other two parts are at the end of the article.

SPIEGEL: Are you familiar with this quote from the Prophet? "But these enemies of mine, who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slay them before me"?

Wilders: I have read many such passages.

SPIEGEL: The Prophet cited in this case was Jesus, from Luke, Chapter 19, Verse 27. Do you admit that there are also calls for violence in the Bible?

Wilders: There are brutal passages in the Old Testament; the New Testament takes a more moderate approach. But a key difference between Christianity and Islam is that Muslims believe that the Koran contains verbatim the word of God; it is written in the imperative. This precludes a comparison with Christianity.

    The interviewer sprang Luke 19:27 on Wilders without identifying it.  The tactic is cherry picking,  secondary to argumentum Tu-quoque.  That is an attempt to utilize Jesus Christ as a straw man, attributing to him meaning which he did not intend. Jesus was relating the parable of the talents, not issuing a command.  Examine the context.

http://kingjbible.com/luke/19.htm

11And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear. 12He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return. 13And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come. 14But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us. 15And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading. 16Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds. 17And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities. 18And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds. 19And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities. 20And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin: 21For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow. 22And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow: 23Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury? 24And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds. 25(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.) 26For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him. 27But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

28And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem.

    Nothing in the Bible and nothing Christians have done whether in obedience  or disobedience, subtracts anything from the absolute evil of Allah's conquest imperatives.  8:39 & 9:29 are imperatives, clear commands to wage offensive warfare.  Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Islamic law describes the religious obligation to wage war against disbelievers in these words: "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. [o9.1]

    In that same section, we learn that jihad is obligatory: "If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. ".  The apologists for Islam will assert that jihad means jihad an-nafs: struggling with your conscience. Unfortunately for them, o9.0 defines it differently: "Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. ". 

    The imperative to wage war upon Jews & Christians, found in Surah At-Taubah, is codified in o9.8: "The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)...".

     The imperative to wage war upon pagans, found in Surah Al-Anfal, is codified in o9.9: "The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax ...". 

    Those grasping at straws to defend Islam will claim that those imperatives are anachronisms, out of date and not being followed by modern Muslims. They can not explain the fact that Muslims are attempting to reconquer Israel.  They can not explain the fact that most of the wars currently being fought have Muslims as the aggressors. 

    Those same apologists can not explain the sermons in which Imams rant about conquering and dominating Israel, America and Rome. They can not explain the signs carried in European demonstrations declaring "Islam will dominate the world".  But I can: Islamic supremacism & triumphalism flow directly from the Qur'an & hadith. Examine these titles from Ibn Kathir's Tafsir, click them and read the explanation of the verses.

• The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
• The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
• The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
• The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
• The Good News that Islam shall prevail

    Islam's apologists in the media, academy & government pretend that Islam is a "great religion of peace".  They can not disprove the clear evidence found in Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence so they resort to logical fallacies.  Islam is not a race, it is a predatory way of life. Opposition to predation is not racism.  They are fond of implying that Islam's critics are Nazis or Fascists; they will not acknowledge the fact that we oppose Islam because it is intrinsically evil and a real, immediate & persistent threat to our security and liberty.