Showing posts with label hate speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hate speech. Show all posts

Sunday, September 03, 2017

Guterres Israel Museum Speech

Guterres Israel Museum Speech     The Secretary General Spewed again, pretending that Muslims will make peace and Trump is at fault for their depredations. That AssWhole never ceases to outrage me!  No words can express my hatred and contempt for the United Nazis and their leadership but they can reveal the cause of my contempt. 

    The most egregious turds in the following transcript have been marked with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary commentary below.  Hover your mouse pointer over the superscripts for the short form.[Bold font emphasis added.]


Tel Aviv, Israel
30 August 2017
Secretary-General's speech at the Museum of the Jewish People


Dear Prime Minister, Ambassador, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear Friends,

I am honoured to speak to you today after visiting the Museum of the Jewish People, which tells a story stretching over millennia and to all corners of the world.

This remarkably rich mosaic is a Jewish legacy. But it is also an important part of the collective heritage of humanity, a showcase of its highest summits and its lowest depths.

One cannot escape the fact that so many communities, where Jews lived and thrived for centuries, no longer exist because of countless waves of persecution and genocide1.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

For one of my first speeches as Secretary-General, I took part in the International Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony in the UN General Assembly Hall.

The Holocaust was an incomparable tragedy and an incomparable crime in human history2.

The world has a duty to remember that the Holocaust was a systematic attempt to eliminate the Jewish people, together with some others.

Let us also recognize that the Holocaust was the culmination of thousands of years of hatred3 and discrimination targeting the Jews – what we now call anti-Semitism.

I am ashamed that my own country, Portugal, is marred by this history, and I was deeply moved by the eloquent testimony in the museum about the history of Portuguese Jews, their predicament, and their success around the world.

The persecution reached its height with the order by King Manuel I in the 16th century, expelling all Jews who refused to convert.  This was a hideous crime that caused tremendous suffering.

 But it was also a colossally stupid act  that  deprived Portugal of much of the country’s dynamism and led to prolonged periods of cultural and economic stagnation.

Many Portuguese Jews went to the Netherlands, and we have seen a model of that wonderful building, the Portuguese Synagogue of Amsterdam, and they helped that country become one of the 17th century’s leading economies and innovators.

When I became Prime Minister in 1995, I felt it was my duty to demonstrate my country's remorse for the Portuguese Inquisition and centuries of merciless attacks against the Jews.

In 1996, the Parliament revoked the letter of expulsion.  This was an admittedly symbolic act, but the spirit of repentance was genuine.  Several descendants of expelled families have now exercised their right to regain Portuguese nationality.

And I then was able to visit the Portuguese Synagogue in Amsterdam to formally present a copy of that decree and apologize on behalf of my country.

I was impressed, as everybody can be, looking at the model right here, by the beauty of that Synagogue, and moved by what I learned about the vibrancy of Jewish life in the years before the Second World War.  But sadly, in the Netherlands too, the Jewish community was almost completely destroyed by the Holocaust. As we have seen again and again, anti-Semitism tends to come back.

After the Holocaust, the founding of the United Nations generated hope4 that the world could avoid such hatred and violence and would work together to advance equality and human rights for all.

Yet, anti-Semitism and intolerance remain disturbingly widespread.

There are still people who, despite the facts, deny the Holocaust or diminish its scope5.  There is even a tendency in some countries to rewrite the history around the Second World War and to rehabilitate some of the figures that were themselves involved in the crimes and the tragedy of the Holocaust.

The Internet and social media are filled with hate speech and anti-Semitic imagery6.

We hear on the streets of democratic societies the repeating of some of the most vile Nazi chants and charges, just a few weeks ago, “blood and soil” or “the Jews will not replace us”.7

Today, anti-Semitism, along with racism, xenophobia,
anti-Muslim hatred8 and other forms of intolerance9, are being triggered by populism and by political figures who exploit fear to win votes10.  Immigrants, refugees and minorities11 across the world are also among the most frequent targets of this animus.

Let me stress that when I talk about anti-Semitism, I include calls for the destruction of Israel. Israel is a Member State of the United Nations. It bears all the responsibilities and enjoys all the rights of every other Member State and, therefore, it must be treated as such.

As Secretary-General of the United Nations, I am determined to do everything I can to stand against anti-Semitism and to all other forms of bigotry12 and discrimination.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Three months from now, we will mark the 70th anniversary of the vote at the General Assembly on the “Partition Plan” that led to the creation of the state of Israel. Seventy years later, however, the promise of peace13 has not yet been delivered. Decades of conflict have cost thousands of lives and left deep scars in virtually every Palestinian and Israeli family.

The United Nations remains committed to providing Israelis and Palestinians with all possible assistance and support to reach the goal of a comprehensive two-state solution.14

I have observed this process over the years with great concern, as someone who cares deeply about this land and its people.

As Prime Minister of Portugal and in other political capacities, I worked with Israeli and Palestinian leaders and was impressed by the genuine desire they have shown to provide a secure and dignified future for their peoples, hoping to see a negotiated solution of two states based on relevant UN resolutions.

Like many here and around the world, I have gone from great hopes about the peace process15, to frustration over its stagnation.

It is my deep belief that a two-state solution is the only way forward – the only path towards the historic compromise that can settle this conflict and lead to a better future for all.

That is why I have been, and will continue to be, expressing my disagreement when it’s the case, with unilateral measures and facts on the ground that can or could undermine that solution –including settlement activities16, but also continued violence, terror and incitement.

I am well aware of the suspicious polarization and despair that have kept each side from seeing the other as a partner.  I am equally cognizant of the political difficulties faced by each side’s political leaders.

Yet I believe there is no alternative to a negotiated solution17 between the two parties.

It is equally clear that we in the international community cannot simply turn away and allow the situation to deteriorate. We have a role and a responsibility to support the parties in resolving this conflict.

The basic premise has not changed – this land is the ancestral homeland18 of two peoples.

Both have an undeniable historic and religious bond with it; both have a right to live on it independently and as a free people, as masters of their own fate.

Anyone visiting Israel is left with no doubt that it has fulfilled the rights and national aspirations of Jews throughout generations.

Your country has become renowned worldwide for its great cultural, scientific, technological and scholarly achievements.

We had the opportunity just two days ago to see some remarkable examples of innovation that can be of extreme utility for humankind all over the world in fighting climate change or in  accomplishing the Sustainable Development Goals.

You have succeeded in protecting your security against many threats, and signing peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, and building successful international alliances.

Most importantly, you have created, for the first time in 2,000 years, a home for your people.

It is now overdue that the Palestinians also fulfill their legitimate rights and national aspirations19.

I am deeply convinced that, when they do, when they are citizens of their own state, living side by side in peace and security with Israel, Jews will enjoy greater security – as it needs to be guaranteed, prosperity and recognition, and it will be an even greater source of pride for Israelis and for Jews around the world.

I know that many in Israel share this conviction.

Young men and women, including many of you here today, have the power to challenge physical and psychological barriers and seek to build a common future.

Allow me to pay tribute to Palestinians and Israelis who are taking positive actions in their daily lives, often very quietly, to promote tolerance, cooperation and understanding between the two peoples.

I was deeply moved this morning. We visited Nahal Oz, a kibbutz close to the Gaza Strip, that has been bombarded several times and in which one child has been killed by a rocket.  I had the enormous pleasure, when talking to the families of  the kibbutzim, to note that instead of what would be natural, a feeling of anger in relation to what is an attack on civilians and a violation of international humanitarian law,  I have seen from them an extraordinary message of peace and reconciliation, asking us to help the Palestinians in Gaza to overcome their tragic humanitarian problems and being themselves ready to help and to provide support to the Palestinian community in Gaza.

It was a fantastic example of solidarity, of humanity, of tolerance, that I want to pay tribute here publicly today. 

The voices of these true peacemakers must not be drowned out by the strident voices and violent actions of the far fewer agents of hate and division.

Let us not forget that those individual peacebuilders represent the best faces of their communities and serve as the human foundation so essential for a lasting peace, here and everywhere.

Thank you very much.


waves of persecution & genocide

    Islam is responsible for many of those waves, beginning with Moe's attacks on the Jewish settlements surrounding Yathrib. Marking Jews with wide belts and yellow stars was not Hitler's idea, it is Islamic. When the Bani Quraiza surrendered after a two week siege, Moe slaughtered all the men and boys who had grown pubic hair. That genocide is sunnah, to be emulated.

Holocaust

    The brainchild of Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who spent the war years in Germany.

hatred

    Can you get a clue? Hatred of Jews is intrinsic to Islam and can not be severed from it. 17 times each day pious Muslims remind Allah why he wants to burn the Jews, who "who earned Your Anger".  Allah and his slaves curse Jews & Christians.
    Moe repeated distorted & perverted  stories from the Bible and prayed towards Jerusalem in hopes of suckering the local Jews. Most of them saw through the fraud and laughed him to scorn. Because of that, he hated Jews.

    Allah "does not like" disbelievers.

    Wala Wal Bara

    Muslims must love what Allah loves and hate what he hates!

hope

    Hope that the United Nazis would foster peace and eliminate hatred and violence was a false hope because they included in their membership the worst exponents of hate & violence: Muslims. The OIC is the largest voting block in the UN.

Holocust deniers

    Who might they be? Iran? Why would there be a Holocaust denial cartoon contest??

Anti Semitic Hate Speech

    And the source is: your own damn staff!!!  United Nazis are part of the problem, not the solution.

Nazi chants

    The Charlottesville affair is irrelevant. A small minority of Americans are Jew haters. The first amendment's free speech clause would be worthless if it was not universal.  Muslims have marched chanting "back to the ovens" and nobody gave a damn.

    Why was an advertisement placed soliciting actors & photographers?  Why were marchers carrying identical torches? Who supplied and payed for them? Were all of those torch bearers hired shills? 
 
    A Canuck journalist infiltrated the AssWhole's chat room and took screen shots which exposed violent intent; intent to use vehicular assault. If a journalist was there, it is likely the Feds were, too. So why were the security services told to let the crap hit the fan?  There is something very damn rotten in Virginia!!!

    I have the same contempt for Nazis, Klansmen & supremacists in general as I have for Muslims and the corrupt politicians who seek to shield them from criticism & condemnation. To Hell with the lot of them! 

    I have the same contempt for the Black Supremacists & racists, including Black Lives Matter, Antifa and their allies. With the exception of the vehicular assault, they instigated the violence. There is nothing immoral , illegal or hateful about objecting to their demands to tear down historical monuments. I do not object to peaceful demonstration against tearing down the statues.,
    President Trump's statements about the Charlottesville  were fair and accurate.  Those bitching about what he said have earned the contempt of rational men of good will.

anti-Muslim hatred

    Islam & Muslims are, and of right must be, objects of hatred, reviled and rejected by men of good will. Islam & Muslims deny the human dignity and rights of all who are not Muslims.

    Islam declares and Muslims wage perpetual war against the remainder of the human race. Who can get a clue?  Can you?
I now exhibit to you direct links to relevant ayat, ahadith & Islamic law. Read them and curse Islam!!!
  • 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari Vol. 4, pg. 140
  • Risala is the fiqh of the Maliki madhab. Read the Jihad chapter!
  • Hedaya is the fiqh of the Hanafi madhab, used to rule India and the Ottoman Empire. Continue through page 216. 
  • Reliance Of The Traveller, fiqh of the Shafi'i madhab, is the best known code of shari'ah. Go buy it from Amazon and verify these quotes from Book o, chapter 9. O9.8 declares it's scriptural basis: 9.29 but o9.9, obviously based on 8.39, does not.  Note the requirement of dawaa as a  condition precedent to attacking; it proves that Jihad is offensive, not defensive.
    • o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
      The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
      "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),
      the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
      "I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"
      this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).
    • o9.9
      The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi' (y21), 6.48-49) ).

intolerance

    AssWhole!!! You accuse Islam's opponents of intolerance while Islam is supremely intolerant! Get a God Blessed Clue for Chrissake! Why in Hell should we be expected to tolerate intolerance?!

    • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
    • 3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).
      • Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

        Narrated Abu Huraira:

        The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

political figures

    Who doubts that Guterres had President Trump in mind when he spewed that calumny? Our representative republic has elections. Politicians campaign to win our votes. Those who are caught lying to us tend to be defeated. Your anointed Bitch Goddess lost, get over it!

   While campaigning, Trump said that we have a Muslim problem.  > 3000 slain by Muslins in the last 16 years; no probmem, right?  Muslims are a problem because they believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise and attempt  to actualize them.

    He said that "they hate us" but he did not know why. That is 'cuz he has not read the ayat and ahadith linked and quoted above.

    He proposed a Muslim ban and was reviled for it. His proposal was Moronic 'cuz it was not total, complete, permanent and retroactive. There is no need to "figure out what the Hell is going on" 'cuz it is clear on the face of Islamic scripture, exegesis, history, biography & oral traditions.  Muslims are engaged in global conquest by asymmetrical  and demographic warfare.

    "Radical Islamic Terrorism" is CamelShit!  With the exception of deliberate killing of children, women and clerics, everything the Islamic State does is sunnah.  Terrorism is normative Islam as Moe preached and practiced it, not exceptional!

    Trump, Orban & Wilders are patriots trying to spare their nations from misery, not demagogues.

Gimmigrants & Rapefugees

    They come to sponge off our welfare systems, rape our wives & daughters and subvert our government and economic systems. It's Hijrah, Stupid!!! Just what Moe did to Yathrib, now called Medina.

    Legal immigrants are not the problem; those who cross the borders illegally, bringing subversion, untreated tropical disease, drugs & crime are the problem.  You who bitterly bitch about our border fence are part of the problem, not the solution!

bigotry

    Hidebound adhesion to prejudice in the face of facts is bigotry; resistance to Islam based on study of it's canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, history & jurisprudence is not bigotry, it is common sense. Your bitter bitching about our free expression of vital truth is bigotry and AssWholliness.

promise of peace

    No damn Muslim ever made a sincere promise of peace in good faith and none ever will. Islam is false and Muslims are liars!
Muslims are licensed to practice Taqiyya  for self protection and the advancement of Islam. The Profit said that he who tesifies that only Allah has the right to be worshiped "saves his wealth and his life from me". That is a clue for the few who can grasp it.  He sent a letter to the rulers of Ayala explaining why he intended to make war on them. God bless you, I quote from it:
"I will not fight against you unless I write to you (in
advance). So, join the fold of Islam or [P. 29] pay the jizyah." [...] "If you send them (my messengers) back and do not please them, I shall not accept anything from you, and shall wage war against you and make your young ones captive and shall stay your elders. "[...]

    The Islamic definition of peace is total global conquest, when Dar al-Harb is entirely subsumed by Dar al-Islam.  Only damned fools think that Israel can have peace while the world is infested with Muslims.

two-state solution

    There is only one possible solution: eradication of Islam. Instead of re-inventing the wheel, I link to a previous post which documents the fatal facts: https://www.scribd.com/doc/259351549/Two-State-Solution-Peace-in-a-Pig-s-Anus

peace process

    Defensive warfare is the peace process. Victory is the objective. In an existential conflict, victory consists only of the extermination of the aggressor. For the details, read the file linked in the previous paragraph.

impediment to peace

    There is only one and it ain't settlements! Islam is the only impediment to pace. Islam is existential war against the human race. Muslims will stop Jihad when the Ummah al-Islamiyya  stops believing or stops living.

negotiated solution

    Exactly how do you propose to negotiate a solution to existential conflict? Should the Jews offer to let the Muslims drive half of them into the sea? Would that satisfy the Muslims?  Are you a damned fool? What part of  the infamous genocide hadith do you not understand?  What the Hell did Allah mean when he said that he would continue to send someone to torment and humiliate the Jews? And what will the Muslims do just prior to Qiyama? Let him who is able grasp a clue.

ancestral homeland

    Israel is the ancestral homeland of Jews, with a 3000 year history. Umar invaded in 6358, that does not make Israel Arab homeland!!!  Go to palestinefacts.org and get a few clues.

aspirations

   The Falestinian aspirations are two: re-conquest of Israel and conquest of the rest of  the world. There is nothing legitimate about that.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Antonio Guterres On the Fez Plan Of Action:CamelShit!

Antonio Guterres On the Fez Plan Of Action:CamelShit! I have marked the most egregious turds with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary commentary below the horizontal line.


Authority of Religious Leaders Critical to Preventing Incitement of Violence, Secretary-General Says at Event Launching Fez Action Plan

Following are UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ remarks on the launch of the Fez Plan of Action, in New York today:

Let me begin by thanking you for coming together in this deeply meaningful way — and on such a timely initiative.

I firmly believe in the power of faith leaders to shape our world for good.  As High Commissioner for Refugees, I made a special effort to reach out to faith leaders.  I did so out of personal conviction.  But, I also did so for very practical reasons.  After all, to the vast majority of people uprooted from their homes, faith is an anchor in a stormy sea of fear, loss, separation and destitution.

We worked together with religious leaders on a project that focused on the roots of modern refugee law and Islamic law.  We did it in close cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and with the support of Nayef University in Riyadh.  More broadly, we brought in UNHCR [the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees], religious leaders together for a dialogue on faith and protection.

Again and again, I have been struck by the consonance of key precepts and core values between the different faiths1.  Indeed faith is central to hope and resilience.  Yet, around the world, we see how religion is being twisted — cynically manipulated — to justify incitement to violence and discrimination2.  We see an alarming rise in online and offline hate speech — messages that spread hostility and hatred and encourage populations to commit violence against individuals or communities, often based on their identity.

Hate speech3 sows the seeds of suspicion, mistrust and intolerance.  Over time, it can play an important role in convincing people that violence is logical, justifiable, even necessary.  And so, it is no surprise that hate speech is one of the most common warning signs of atrocity crimes — genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Since we know the warning signs, we can also take early action to prevent these crimes.  The voice, the authority, and the example of religious leaders are critical4.  This conviction led to the development of the initiative we launch today.  The Fez Plan of Action is the product of two years of consultations, led by my Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide.  It involved religious leaders representing different faiths around the world, as well as faith-based organizations and many others.  I would like to pay tribute to the critical role of many partners, and in particular KAICIID, the Network for Religious and Traditional Peacemakers and the World Council of Churches.

The Plan is based on a unifying commitment to promote peace, understanding, mutual respect and the fundamental rights of all people.  This includes the rights to freedom of religion and belief, opinion and expression, and peaceful association.

The Plan of Action sets out a broad range of ways in which religious leaders can prevent incitement to violence and contribute to peace and stability.  It stresses the importance of women and youth in all prevention initiatives.  It also contains recommendations for States and the international community.

All religions teach respect for life and recognize human beings as fundamentally equal5.  These principles summon us to show respect for all human beings, even those with whom we might profoundly disagree or whose cultures might seem alien.  I urge the widest possible dissemination and implementation of this Plan of Action.  It can help to save lives, reduce suffering and realize our shared vision of a peaceful, inclusive and just societies in which diversity is valued and the rights of all individuals are protected.

Let us work together to prevent and end atrocity crimes and all affronts to human rights and dignity.



consonance of key precepts

    Is there no limit to arrogant AssWholliness?

Jesus Christ!

  • Crucified, dead, resurrected or not?
  • Prince of Peace or Barbarian War Lord who will kill the last Jews & Christians?
  •  Son of God or slave of Allah?
  • Moe's paternal half brother and step son? 

religion is being twisted

to justify incitement

    Accursed Liar!!! Go to Hell and be damned! Do not pass GO, do not collect Jizya!  Islam was contrived for the purpose of propagating perpetual war  because war was the source of Moe's income.  Moe got 100% of the fei & Jizya and the top 20% of the ganimah produced by his conquests.

Hate speech

    Seventeen times each day, pious Muslims curse us by reminding Allah why he wants to burn us: they recite Surah Al-Fatiha.
Surah Al-Baqarah 2.286 is one of the most popular superogatory salat. When they recite it, they ask Allah to grant them victory over us.  The Qur'an calls us "worst of living creatures" and curses us.


religious leaders

    Here's a religious leader for you: https://www.memri.org/tv/sheik-yousuf-al-qaradhawi-allah-imposed-hitler-upon-jews-punish-them-allah-willing-next-time-will
Here is another;


All religions

    Islam is an Arab Mafia, not a religion and it does not teach respect for life, equality and human dignity.

respect for life

  • kill them wherever you find them
  • Fight them
  • dignity

    • Until you testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped, your blood and wealth are not sacred to Muslims and you have no human rights!
    • Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
  • equality

    • Blood wit for accidental death:
      • Muslim: 100 camels  Reliance Of The Traveller o4.2
      • Muslima: 50 camels
      • Christian: 33 camels.
    • testomony

      • muslim: 1  Reliance o24.7
      • Muslima: 2
      • Christian: can not testify.

4

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Condemning Advocacy Of Religious Hatred That Incites Violence

condemning advocacy of religious hatred that incites violence A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues by condemning advocacy of religious hatred that incites violence.
Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print,
audiovisual or electronic media or any other means;

    The condemnation is highly abstract and so broad as to be devoid of meaning. Precisely what are they bitching about?  The United nations bitch about any and every criticism and exposure of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has an example for you, please pay close attention. 

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for or hate speech incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."
Please watch the video, carefully noting the source of each and every incidence of hate speech and incitement. 

The following quotes and links provide ample documentation for the validity of the video's conceptual content.

Each of the above listed ayat is linked to ten parallel translations.

The text of the violent ayat in the list above: [Links to Ibn Kathir's Tafsir supplied when available.]

  • 2:191 And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]
  • 3:139-141 So do not become weak (against your enemy), nor be sad, and you will be superior (in victory) if you are indeed (true) believers. If a wound hath touched you, be sure a similar wound hath touched the others. Such days (of varying fortunes) We give to men and men by turns: that God may know those that believe, and that He may take to Himself from your ranks Martyr-witnesses (to Truth). And God loveth not those that do wrong.  And that Allah may test (or purify) the believers (from sins) and destroy the disbelievers. [Hilali &Khan]
  • 4:91 Ye will find others who seek to gain your confidence as well as that of their own people: So oft as they return to sedition, they shall be overthrown in it: But if they leave you not, nor propose terms or peace to you nor withhold their hands, then seize them, and slay them, wherever ye find them. Over these have we given you undoubted power.[Rodwell]
  • 8:39  And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.[Hilali & Khan]
  • 9:29  Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.[Rodwell]
  • 47:4 When ye encounter the infidels, strike off their heads till ye have made a great slaughter among them, and of the rest make fast the fetters. And afterwards let there either be free dismissals or ransomings, till the war hath laid down its burdens. Thus do. Were such the pleasure of God, he could himself take vengeance upon them: but He would rather prove the one of you by the other. And whoso fight for the cause of God, their works he will not suffer to miscarry;[Rodwell]

Riyad us-Salaheen, Book 11, Ch. 234 cites  many ahadith in proving the obligation of Jihad. It does not mention the above cited ayat, but does cite several others.  Reliance of the Traveler specifically offers 9:29 as justification for declaring war on Jews and Christians.

The Reliance of the Traveller. BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29)


Note the use of fitna in 8:39 as casus belli. It is also mentioned in 5:33 Muslims love to cite 5:32, but never quote its successor to Kuffar. Why is that?

5:32  Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing the major sins) in the land!
5:33 The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Ibn Kathir's tafsir of  5:33 has a blood curdling implication. Note the emphasized phrases.

`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil.

Mere disbelief in Allah is sufficient to subject you to the hudud listed in the ayeh above cited! Now you rightly understand that Geert Wilders is not exaggerating in his video presentation.

    Without exception, the hate speech and incitement displayed in Fitna flow from Islam's canonical texts and the mouths of rabble rousing Imams, not from Geert Wilders.  The Secretary General does not condemn Allah, his Book, his Messenger or his rabble rousing preachers, he condemns the video which exposes them.

    Fitna is neither hate speech nor incitement, it is objective and factual; an exposure of the damnable doctrines of Islam and accursed practices which flow from belief in  them.

    The sentence quoted from the draft resolution is a lie: the UN does not condemn "any advocacy of religious hatred", instead, they condemn and seek the criminalization of any exposure of it, including this blog post.

Thursday, August 04, 2011

Hillary Clinton: Traitor; Collaborating With the Enemy

From IINA comes notice on August 1 that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to host coordination meetings with the OIC on how to implement HRC Resolution 16/18 "on combating defamation of religions, and how to prevent stereotypes depicting religions and their followers; as well as disseminating religious tolerance". 

    This quote from the P.R. is crucial.

According to informed sources in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the two sides, in addition to other European parties, will hold a number of specialized meetings of experts in law and religion in order to finalize the legal aspect on how to better implement the UN resolution.

    Does anyone remember how the promotion of the resolution claimed that the "defamation concept" was deprecated in favor of "negative stereotyping" so that freedom of expression is not threatened by the resolution? 

    Methodologies supposedly include education (indoctrination) controverting speech and "inter-religious dialog".  So why involve legal experts?  Whence comes the need or mandate for legislation? 

    How could any such legislation possibly be squared with the First Amendment?   The next paragraph reinforces its predecessor, pay careful attention:

The sources said that the upcoming meetings aim at developing a legal basis for the UN Human Rights Council’s resolution which help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions.
  • enacting domestic laws
  • formulating international laws
    • preventing
      • inciting hatred
      •  
        • continued defamation of religions
    How is it possible create a justiciable  definition of "defamation of religions" ?  Why in Hell is anyone seriously considering the matter?   Religions are not subject to proof, they are matters of faith.  Either you believe or you don't. Its your choice, and everyone else has the same choice.  If others have differing opinions of your personal superstition and express them, what harm is done? Is your faith so weak that it can not withstand questioning?  

    Geert Wilders truthfully illustrated the nexus between Islamic doctrine expressed in the Qur'an and exemplified in the hadith with modern examples of rabble rousing, mob violence & terrorism.  His documentary was condemned as "hate speech" and "incitement to violence". He was tried twice and acquitted.  Wilders did not incite mob violence, Imams did at Jumah Salat. The riots happened after Friday prayer services; no coincidence. 

    Had Hitler claimed divine revelation and founded a pseudo religion, Churchill could have been brought up on charges of defamation for criticizing Hitler's cult.   That is exactly what Moe did 1400 years ago.  When poets criticized him in verse, Moe had them murdered.  Such a nice man. How great a role model. In the last decade of his life, Moe started a battle on the average of every six weeks.  How peaceful! 

    Moe married the six year old daughter of his best friend; she was still playing with dolls three years later when he consummated the marriage.  There areseveral muttawir ahadith describing her age, another gives it as seven.   Exposing these facts is condemned as "hate speech".

    Moe commanded the Muslims to wage perpetual war culminating in global conquest; until only Allah is worshiped and Jews & Christians are subjugated and submit to annual extortion. Moe raided one local Jewish settlement, killing all the men and adolescent boys after they surrendered. Exposing these facts is condemned as "inciting violence". 

    No! !!!   Hate speech is telling Allah 17 times per day why he should burn us. "1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way  1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).  "

    Hate speech is cursing us: "2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined. " 

    Hate speech is defaming us: "98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

    Incitement to violence is: "8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 

    Incitement to violence is: "9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

    Incitement to violence is threatening eternal damnation for shirking and promising eternity in the celestial whore house for participating in violence: "9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things. "

"61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!  61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

    What do you call a cult whose demon demands great slaughter as the price of admission to paradise?  What do you call a cult that promises rewards for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers? 

    I have not engaged in hate speech neither have I engaged in incitement to violence.; I have described and documented them.  Not "radicalism"; not "extremism"; that is standard, off the shelf, mainstream Islam, violent by design because Moe got his income from plundering his victims.    Like it or not, that is the fatal fact. If you doubt it, you can find full documentation here: Islam's Mercenary Mission. 

    OIC Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, was quoted thusly:

He added that the reports of the OIC Islamophobia Observatory for the years 2009 and 2010 had included several warnings about an organized political form which the extreme right may transform into through its parties’ legislation.

    They want to make it illegal to organize parties  and campaign on anti-Islamic platforms.   Their apologists are already bitching bitterly about statements made by Gingrich, West, Cain and other candidates.

    Read between the lines, see what they are really doing, wake up, wise up and rise up.  The traitors who do Islam's bidding must be removed from power in the next election cycle.  Those who are weak kneed,. and lack the courage to speak out must be removed with them and replaced by true patriots. Collaborating with the enemy is not acceptable!

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

Geert Wilders Trial: Refresher Course

The purpose of this blog post is to remind readers of the background information essential to comprehending the resumption of the trial of Geert Wilders.

    This quote is from an English translation of the summons which lists the accusations against  Geert Wilders.  The summons is 24 pages long, detailing many statements.


The aforementioned summoned person is charged with the fact that
1.
he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 8 August 2007 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, intentionally offended a group of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) intentionally in
- De Volkskrant and/or
- on the internet on the website www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)
placing (having placed) and/or showing (having showed) and/or having heard one or more texts and/or images and/or footage and/or audio fragments with the following content:
(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, ‘Enough is enough: prohibit the Quran’)
„A moderate Islam does not exist. It does not exist because there is no distinction between Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that is it. And Islam means the Quran and nothing but the Quran. And the Quran is the Mein Kampf of a religion that intends to eliminate others and that refers to those others – non-Muslims – as unfaithful dogs, inferior beings. Read the Quran, this Mein Kampf, again. In whatever version, you will see that all the evil that the sons of Allah commit to us and themselves originates from this book (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, page 305, February 2006).‟...

2.
he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 7 October 2006 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to hatred of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) in
- De Volkskrant and/or
- De Pers and/or
- Dagblad De Limburger-Limburgs Dagblad and/or
on the internet
- on the website www.geenstijl.nl and/or www.pvv.nl and/or
- on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep and/or
- on the website www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)

 [Emphasis added.]

    Notice the prominent mention of Fitna, the publication of which is the basic issue, condemned by many government leaders, the OIC, and the Secretary General of the United Nations.  The summons goes on to describe the images in the video and list statements made therein.

    The first charge is intentionally offending Muslims.  The statute, cited on the last page of the summons,  makes the issue cut and dried.

Article 137c Dutch Penal Code
  • o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
  • o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

 Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
  • o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
  • o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

    Truth is not a defense in the statute.  How shall the defendant establish proof of his intent?  The law, as written, criminalizes truthful speech on the grounds of perceived insult & inciting hatred, discrimination or violence.

    Geert Wilders is an elected member of the Dutch Parliament, in that position, he is entitled to discuss public policy.  Islamization is a legitimate subject for public discourse; it is taking place in Europe.

    Fitna can be viewed in its entirety by clicking this link. It is divided into two parts on Youtube.  I will embed the two parts here so that you can view them.
You will see a few verses from the Qur'an  and an English translation .  You will hear an Arabic recitation and see graphic depictions of the practical application of the verses. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37w-aXGk8M0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwwsnAr3rY8

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:
“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”
    Who expressed hatred in that video?  Who incited violence in that video?    The Qur'an, not Geert Wilders  is the source of hate and incitement.  Wilders exposed hate & incitement, he did not perform it.

    My earlier blog posts relevant to the trial are linked in the list below.