Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Obamination: Brain Farts At The U.N.

Obamination: Brain Farts at the U.N.

    I am trying to capture the worst of the gusts and pin them down to hurl outrage at them.  If you want to read the prepared remarks in context, follow this link
PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentlemen:  Each year we come together to reaffirm the founding vision of this institution.  For most of recorded history, individual aspirations were subject to the whims of tyrants and empires.  Divisions of race and religion and tribe were settled through the sword and the clash of armies.  The idea that nations and peoples could come together in peace to solve their disputes and advance a common prosperity seemed unimaginable.

founding vision

    It ain't International Socialism, it is preventing or limiting war. Since war can only be ended by exterminating warmongers, and nobody has the political will to do that, the U.N. has failed miserably in its mission. 

tyrants and empires 

    Nothing changed. The greatest part of the world's population still suffers under tyranny. Democracy is in name only in China & Russia. Tyrants rule over the 'Muslim world'.

Divisions of race and religion

    Is the fart head entirely clueless?  Syria is Sunni vs Shi'ia.  Similar sectarian terrorism is happening elsewhere on a smaller scale. The U.N. has no clue what to do about it, dithering as the slaughter continues unabaited.

solve  disputes

    Existential conflict can not be negotiated.  Predators can not be appeased; they must be exterminated.  Islam seeks politicide & genocide in Israel, nothing less will satisfy it.  No negotiation, sacrifice, compromise, good will gestures or elaborate plans and schedules will change that fact. Only the extermination of Islam can solve this problem.

common prosperity

    Redistribution of wealth and income brings common poverty, not prosperity.  Socialism is a bad idea, frequently proved detrimental; its time for it to be buried in the outhouse of history.

Now, five years after the global economy collapsed, and thanks to coordinated efforts by the countries here today, jobs are being created, global financial systems have stabilized, and people are once again being lifted out of poverty.  But this progress is fragile and unequal, and we still have work to do together to assure that our citizens can access the opportunities that they need to thrive in the 21st century.

jobs are being created 

    Jobs are being destroyed, by Obama Don't Care, not created. There is no recovery, there is a Depression. There will be no opportunities until we get your boot off of our necks.

Together, we’ve also worked to end a decade of war.  Five years ago, nearly 180,000 Americans were serving in harm’s way, and the war in Iraq was the dominant issue in our relationship with the rest of the world.  Today, all of our troops have left Iraq.  Next year, an international coalition will end its war in Afghanistan, having achieved its mission of dismantling the core of al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11.

decade of war

    The war does not consist of our invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The war is terrorism: Every damn attack, from WTC1 through Boston including Fort Hood and the Navy Yard.  The war is alive whenever and wherever the question arises whether a fire, explosion or shooting might be Islamically inspired.

    The war continues every time we flinch in reaction to a new or repeated threat from al-Zawahiri & co.

dismantling al-Qaeda

    The enemy is Islam, not al-Qaeda. We left Afghanistan & Iraq under the control of Muslims. We sacrificed billions of dollars and thousands of lives without gaining anything.

For the United States, these new circumstances have also meant shifting away from a perpetual war footing.  Beyond bringing our troops home, we have limited the use of drones so they target only those who pose a continuing, imminent threat to the United States where capture is not feasible, and there is a near certainty of no civilian casualties.  We’re transferring detainees to other countries and trying terrorists in courts of law, while working diligently to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay.  And just as we reviewed how we deploy our extraordinary military capabilities in a way that lives up to our ideals, we’ve begun to review the way that we gather intelligence, so that we properly balance the legitimate security concerns of our citizens and allies with the privacy concerns that all people share.

perpetual war

    The war started in the 18th century, with the Barbary Pirates. It did not end in 1815 because we allowed Islam to continue to exist. It will continue so long as one Muslim continues to believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise.

civilian casualties

    When the family and friends of terrorists are killed in drone attacks or otherwise, they are not civilian casualties neither are they collateral damage. They are Muslims: members of the enemy.

transferring detainees

    Those catch & release enemy combatants are returning to the battlefield. They should have been executed, not taken captive.

trying terrorists

    Terrorism is not domestic street crime, it is war.  It does not fit the crime & punishment paradigm.  Terrorists must be executed and the nations that sent them must be nuked.  Their ideology that motivates them must be eradicated.

Security & Privacy

    Security can not be obtained and maintained by surveillance or invasion of privacy.  Groping little old ladies and small children at airports has not prevented one attack.  The Boston bombing could have been prevented, but our fart head leaders did not follow up on warnings from Russian intelligence officers.

    Security can only be obtained by expeling and excluding enemy personnel from our soil and denying them access to soft targets. Those who believe that Allah requires human sacrifice and will reward them with a better seat in his celestial bordello for any act to injure or enrage us must be ushered into Hell.

As a result of this work, and cooperation with allies and partners, the world is more stable than it was five years ago.  But even a glance at today’s headlines indicates that dangers remain.  In Kenya, we’ve seen terrorists target innocent civilians in a crowded shopping mall, and our hearts go out to the families of those who have been affected.  In Pakistan, nearly 100 people were recently killed by suicide bombers outside a church.  In Iraq, killings and car bombs continue to be a terrible part of life.  And meanwhile, al Qaeda has splintered into regional networks and militias, which doesn't give them the capacity at this point to carry out attacks like 9/11, but does pose serious threats to governments and diplomats, businesses and civilians all across the globe.

allies and partners

    Check the Qur'an: equal and inferior relationships with infidels are explicitly forbidden. No Muslim is our allie or partner, they are our enemy.


   The slaughter in Kenya happened because nobody bothered to eliminate Islam from Somalia. Pakistan should have been nuked immediately after the second attack on the WTC.  We foolishly neglected to eliminate Islam from Iraq, let them kill each other. The more dead Muslims, the better.

al Qaeda

    "Its Islam, Stupid!".  Jihad is ordained for Muslims. Jihad is war against everyone else. It is to be carried out until the last day. It requires great slaughter to please Allah. Allah cast terror and made Moe victorious with terror. But fart heads can not obtain a clue.

Just as significantly, the convulsions in the Middle East and North Africa have laid bare deep divisions within societies, as an old order is upended and people grapple with what comes next.  Peaceful movements have too often been answered by violence -- from those resisting change and from extremists trying to hijack change.  Sectarian conflict has reemerged.  And the potential spread of weapons of mass destruction continues to cast a shadow over the pursuit of peace.


    Its about power: who will wield it and reap the windfalls of corruption more than the division between sects.  Your meddling made matters worse, increasing the casualties and reducing regional stability. You are arming and training our enemy. The name for that is treason.

How should we respond to conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa -- conflicts between countries, but also conflicts within them?


    Either sit down, shut up and take some side bets or kill them all and let Allah sort them out.   Existential conflict can not be stopped short of extinction. Where indigenous Christians are being attacked, we should arm and train the Christians so that they can defend themselves by killing our common enemies.

How do we address the choice of standing callously by while children are subjected to nerve gas, or embroiling ourselves in someone else’s civil war?

standing callously by  

    When a pack of jackals fights a pack of hyenas, we have no dog in that fight. Kill them all and let Allah sort them out or sit down and shut up. The UN can not act because Asad's patron will veto any effective resolution in the Security Council. Allowing Saddam to ship his chemistry set to Syria was not a wise move.

What is the role of force in resolving disputes that threaten the stability of the region and undermine all basic standards of civilized conduct?  What is the role of the United Nations and international law in meeting cries for justice?

role of force

    There is no alternative to kinetic force. Existential conflicts can not be ended short of extermination.

role of law

    Law without an enforcement mechanism is reduced to empty words and rituals. The enforcement mechanism must be superior in strength to the combined fighting forces.

Agreement on chemical weapons should energize a larger diplomatic effort to reach a political settlement within Syria.  I do not believe that military action -- by those within Syria, or by external powers -- can achieve a lasting peace.  Nor do I believe that America or any nation should determine who will lead Syria; that is for the Syrian people to decide.  Nevertheless, a leader who slaughtered his citizens and gassed children to death cannot regain the legitimacy to lead a badly fractured country.  The notion that Syria can somehow return to a pre-war status quo is a fantasy.

It’s time for Russia and Iran to realize that insisting on Assad’s rule will lead directly to the outcome that they fear:  an increasingly violent space for extremists to operate.  In turn, those of us who continue to support the moderate opposition must persuade them that the Syrian people cannot afford a collapse of state institutions, and that a political settlement cannot be reached without addressing the legitimate fears and concerns of Alawites and other minorities.

political settlement  

    Syria has a hereditary dictatorship, not politics. The Syrian people can not determine their government, it determines their existence.  There is no solution short of invasion, occupation and total eradication of Islam from Syria. Anything less guarantees failure. If you do not have the political will to impose a secular society and government, and maintain them by force, then forget about it.


    There is none and can be none. Syria's is a bastard regime and anything that succeeds it will be a bastard regime imposed and maintained by force.

There’s no Great Game to be won, nor does America have any interest in Syria beyond the wellbeing of its people, the stability of its neighbors, the elimination of chemical weapons, and ensuring that it does not become a safe haven for terrorists.

safe haven for terrorists.

    Tell us, fart head, where have the leaders of HAMAS had their head office for the last several decades?  Your fabulistic fantasy would piss off the Pope. Unfortunately I do not have his patience. I want you impeached and removed from office.

We will dismantle terrorist networks that threaten our people.  Wherever possible, we will build the capacity of our partners, respect the sovereignty of nations, and work to address the root causes of terror.  But when it’s necessary to defend the United States against terrorist attack, we will take direct action.

dismantle terrorist networks

    Dismantle Islam. Islam is the terrorist network, all else is persiflage.

root causes of terror

    Islamic doctrine, enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified in Moe's sunnah, is the root cause of terror.  Uncover those roots through these links:
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

For the full quotes and more, including quotes from the "Mariful Qur'an" and "The Life of Muhammad", visit these blog posts:

    Defend America by causing Muslims to cease believing in Allah's imperatives, threat & promise.

And finally, we will not tolerate the development or use of weapons of mass destruction.  Just as we consider the use of chemical weapons in Syria to be a threat to our own national security, we reject the development of nuclear weapons that could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region, and undermine the global nonproliferation regime.

nuclear arms race

    Either tolerate it or invade, occupy and de-Islamize Iran. Put up or shut up. There is no alternative. If you keep fooling around, Iran will have and use nukes and it will be too late to do anything about it.  They quit believing in Allah, quit living, or get and use nukes. Your choice. Which will it be?

So what does this mean going forward?  In the near term, America’s diplomatic efforts will focus on two particular issues:  Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, and the Arab-Israeli conflict.  While these issues are not the cause of all the region’s problems, they have been a major source of instability for far too long, and resolving them can help serve as a foundation for a broader peace.

Arab-Israeli conflict

    Fart head!!! "Its Islam, Stupid!".  9:29 commands perpetual war against Jews. 7:167 says that Allah will continually send someone to torment and humiliate the Jews. Tafsir Ibn kathir tells us that Jesus will return to lead the Muslims in the final genocide. Muhammad said that the gates of Paradise will not open for Muslims until they slaughter the last Jew.

    Allah promised the Muslims that he would give them the land through conquests and nobody could take it back in 13:41. By recovering and retaining some of the land Umar stole from them, Israel is the ultimate blasphemy: living proof of the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises are void.  Muslims can not and will never tolerate that, and anyone who claims otherwise is a fool or a damned liar.
    While there is Islam, peace is impossible! Muslims want genocidal conquest, not peace.  The problem can only be resolved by eliminating Islam.

I must be honest, though.  We're far more likely to invest our energy in those countries that want to work with us, that invest in their people instead of a corrupt few; that embrace a vision of society where everyone can contribute -- men and women, Shia or Sunni, Muslim, Christian or Jew.  Because from Europe to Asia, from Africa to the Americas, nations that have persevered on a democratic path have emerged more prosperous, more peaceful, and more invested in upholding our common security and our common humanity.  And I believe that the same will hold true for the Arab world.


    I have not yet heard the truth roll off your tongue. I do not expect that I ever will hear it. Obamination and honesty are polar opposites.

democratic path

    Democracy always devolves into majority plunder of minorities.  Our founders wisely decided that limits must be set on government power and popular sentiment to prevent government from becoming the evil it was created to prevent.  Areas where tribalism, feudalism and Islam prevail can not be democratic. Democracy and Islam are polar opposites, totally incompatible.  Changing government structure will not bring about the aptitudes and attitudes required to maintain democracy.  Those aptitudes and attitudes must come first.

    The Roman Empire had an elected Senate. European powers with Parliaments built colonial empires. Hitler was elected.   Trade in fantasy for reality.

I have made it clear that even when America’s core interests are not directly threatened, we stand ready to do our part to prevent mass atrocities and protect basic human rights.  But we cannot and should not bear that burden alone.  In Mali, we supported both the French intervention that successfully pushed back al Qaeda, and the African forces who are keeping the peace.  In Eastern Africa, we are working with partners to bring the Lord’s Resistance Army to an end.  And in Libya, when the Security Council provided a mandate to protect civilians, America joined a coalition that took action.  Because of what we did there, countless lives were saved, and a tyrant could not kill his way back to power.

prevent mass atrocities

    What would you have done about the genocides committed by the Ottoman Empire, Stalin, Mao & Pol Pot?  Yeah, right. What are you doing about the slaughter of Christians in Pakistan, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt?  Yeah, right.

    You armed and trained forces inimical to us and brought them to power. You are still covering up the scandalous slaughter which resulted one year ago. Benghazi? Yeah, right. 

Sunday, September 15, 2013

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia A/HRC/24/NGO/122
Written statement* submitted by the Organization for
Defending Victims of Violence, a non-governmental
organization in special consultative status

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

    Twelve years ago, more than 3,000 innocent people were victimized by violent terrorists. Our government failed to protect them.  Those who died in the abominable attacks can not be defended. Those maimed and terrorized can only be defended by eliminating the the ideology which motivated the attackers.

    This is a case of self-described defenders of victims defending the attacker instead of the victims. It is an inversion of morality and denial of objective factual reality.  I am making an H1 heading out of each pertinent point in the first paragraph, and revealing the truth with evidence from Islam's canonical texts including the Qur'an, hadith and Islamic law. [All emphasis added for clarity.]

"Islamophobia can be described a enmity and hatred towards them or illogical fear from
Muslims. This definition includes discrimination against Muslims in the form of rejecting
them from political, economic, social and public life, believing in the subjugation of Islam
and Muslims towards the West and the assumption of Islam being a political and violent
ideology and not a religion."

enmity & hatred

5:14. And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant, but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection (when they discarded Allâh's Book, disobeyed Allâh's Messengers and His Orders and transgressed beyond bounds in Allâh's disobedience), and Allâh will inform them of what they used to do.  

illogical fear

    Terrorism is infliction of fear.  What is illogical about that reaction to vicious attacks and continued threats? 


    Is it possible for a rational and informed person to avoid rejecting Islam and its adherents?  How can a rational and informed person fail to demand the expulsion and exclusion of potential terrorists from our soil? 


    Follow this link to Surah At-Taubah 9:29 and and read each of the thirty odd parallel translations.  Do expressions such as  "brought low", "humbled","state of subjection" mean anything to you? 

    Follow this link to The Reliance of the Traveller,  Book O11.5 and read about the social restrictions imposed upon conquered Christians by Shari'ah. We are not allowed to ring church bells, display crosses, hold public processions, pray aloud in public or build new churches.


    Islam does not separate the temporal and spiritual realms, it conflates them. Mosque and state are one entity. Muhammad ran both as autocratic dictator. Islam must replace all unislamic governments as unjust and tyrannical. Muslims are obligated to conquer and convert the entire world.

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought victory and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate, arrogant dictator (who refuses to believe in the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and destruction.

"Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments
anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and
programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The
purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and
programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the standard-bearer of
Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the
establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the earth—not just a
portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the earth should
be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one particular nation,
but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and
welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is the
programme of well-being for all humanity." [Jihad in Islam--Maududi pg. 10]

"In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united in (Islam), so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them 408at the same time." [Ibn Khaldun--Muquaddimah Ch. 3.]


    Allah said something about violence: he issued commands to engage in it, threatening Muslims who shirk with Hell fire and promising those who fight admission to his celestial bordello

2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.  

8:59. And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allâh's Punishment).

8:60. And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

    The founder of Islam, damnation be upon him, confirmed the obvious and let us know what he thinks of us. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims, its open season and we have no human rights.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

    Islamic law codifies those damnable imperatives. The Shafi'i school's  "The Reliance of The Traveller", Book I, Chapter 9 codifies the law of Jihad.
O9.0 defines Jihad as "war against non-Muslims", deprecating Jihad an-Nafs, which CAIR and other liars swear by.  O9.1 discusses the communal obligation to attack passive infidels in every year, declaring all who know of the obligation to be in sin if it is not performed when possible.  O9.8  declares that "The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until...", citing 9:29 as its scriptural basis.  The next section declares that "The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim.".  O25.9, item 8 declares it a duty of subordinate rulers bordering on infidel lands to wage war and distribute the plunder.

    The Hanifi school's Hedaya, Volume II, pg. 140, declares that "War must be carried out by some party of the Muslims at all times." and "Destruction of the sword is incurred by Infidels although they be not the first aggressors. ". 

not a religion

    The "original religion" of Islam is Jihad: waging war against the rest of the world. Jihad is preferred as a way of life over trade, commerce and agriculture. If Muslims abandon Jihad, Allah will curse them. 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
    Obtain a clue, for Chrissake!!! The mission of Islam is mercenary, not spiritual.  All we need to prove that fatal fact is a few ayat & ahadith.  How many camels can a stone idol ride and eat? How much money can it spend?  Who gets the spoils?  What is Allah's prime motivating factor? What was Moe's prime motivator?  Those are clues for all whose brains are not between their buttocks.

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger." So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad ) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

    Moe wanted ransom money, Allah wants genocide. Got a clue yet?   Allah saw Moe's weakness & humility and made spoils lawful for him.  Yeah, right.  Allah, what a great idol: he gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world, enriched him through conquests and made him victorious with terror!

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah's Apostle he would ask, "Has he left anything to repay his debt?" If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend's funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, "I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. "

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:
The Prophet said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
 Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    I am selecting the most important paragraphs for criticism. use the title link to read the entire report in context. 

"For example according to a poll in 2010, only 37 percent of Americans had positive views
of Islam,1 and according to another poll in the same year around one third of American
voters believed that Muslims should not be allowed to run for president.2 This trend is on
the rise in America, to an extent that in 2011 Americans' positive views towards Islam has
dropped to 30 percent.3"

    More than one third of Amrericans suffer from analencephalopathy, which is why Obama was elected our first Muslim Traitor.  Public opinion is trending against Islam because more people are becoming informed, learning about the damnable doctrines and practices of the war cult.

"The ODVV believes that if international human rights bodies had timely intervened and taken
proper measures against religious extremism, the roots of most of these problems would
have been dried both in the Middle East and the West. The United Nations failure in timely
and genuine concentration on the subject of dialogue among civilizations and religions, and
also failure in serious confrontation with any form of insulting individuals religions, and
failing to clarify the boundaries between freedom of expression and defamation have all
resulted in most of these dormant processes to rejuvenate again."


    Terrorizing and subjugating minorities is not extremism; it is standard operating procedure in Islam.  If the Security Council had wanted to suppress terrorism including hijacking and fraggings, the Soviet Union would have vetoed any such move because the PLO was their client and cat's paw. Suppressing terrorism requires eliminating Islam entirely. Nobody in power is willing to propose that, much less to take effective action.

    Believers have sold their souls to Satan for admission to his celestial bordello. They fight in his cause: world domination, killing and being killed.  Allah promises admission to his bordello for participation in Jihad. He promises extra credit toward an upgrade for any act to injure or enrage disbelievers. He threatens shirkers with eternal damnation.  Terrorists are believers, trying to earn brownie points, not extremists. While there are believers there will bn genocidal conquest and terrorism.


    There is nothing to say to Islam except "Go to Hell!".  Anything else is submission, and we who love life & liberty will not submit. There is no common ground between us and those who have sworn enmity and eternal warfare.

insulting Islam

    In Islamic law, slander is "anything the hearer might not like". Truth is not a defense. Any negative expression about Islam, Allah or Moe gets a dhimmi killed. I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers & dissenters to The Reliance of The Traveller:  R2.2, O8.01, O8.7O11.10.and O9.14.

freedom of expression & defamation

    Bitching bitterly about insulting or defaming Islam is part of the campaign to outlaw all criticism of the war cult so that we will not be able to name and shame the enemy.  Describing the damnable doctrines and practices of Islam as I have done in this blog post, with reference to its canon of scripture, tradition and jurisprudence, would be punishable by death under Shari'ah.  We who are aware and alert are not willing to submit to that.  We have a First Amendment right to share our knowledge and our resolve with our fellow citizens. We will not yield that right!

    By exploiting "Islamophobia", Muslims hope to erect a legal shield to prevent all questioning and criticism of their war cult. The character, sayings and actions of the cult's founder discredit it, so we must be prevented from uttering & publishing the fact that Moe married a six year old girl and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old.  We must be prevented from revealing his having sex with prisoners of war. We can't mention the fact that he suborned murder and assassination.  Allah forfend our mentioning his racism. 

    A good offense is the best offense.  Disrespectfully demand that Islam be defrocked, stripped of  first amendment protection and expelled from America.