Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Innocence of Muslims, Guilt of Muhammad, Treason of the State Department

Innocence of Musims, Guilt of Muhammad, Treason of the State Department
    The U.S. Embassy in Cairo issued a most disgusting statement; an apology to the brethren of the 19 G'd'd Muslims who wreaked havoc on us eleven years ago.  The statement is tantamount to treason and should result in the removal from office of the President and Secretary of State.  I have reproduced the statement below, inserting superscripts linked to my commentary which follows below the video and the horizontal line.  [Click a superscript to read the associated comment, use your Back space key to return to your place in the statement.]


The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals1 to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims2 – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions3. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response4 to the enemies of democracy5. Respect for religious beliefs6 is a cornerstone of American democracy7. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse8 the universal right of free speech9 to hurt the religious beliefs10 of others


"Innocence of Muslims"

    Many Muslims are descendants of early victims of Islam who were converted at sword point or forced to convert by the impoverishing imposition of jizya.  They may be Muslims in name only or secular; they may be unaware of the evil character of Moe or the damnable doctrines & practices given 'divine' sanction by his 'revelations'.  But they are part of the Ummah al-Islamiya and form the lower level base of support for the believers who engage in terrorism. 

    Defeating terrorism requires confronting Islam on the ideological battlefield, something our government is unwilling to do.  The ideological plane of this war is left to the private sector.  The video sampled in the clip used as an excuse for the barbarian rampage in Egypt and Libya  has the potential to be a powerful weapon in this battle: the equivalent of a Little Boy & Fat Man which brought WW2 to an end in the Pacific.  If the demon's slaves have not prevailed to pull it down from You Tube, you will find it embedded below.   I want you to watch it and share it.  lets make it go viral!


    The article at the Atlantic is my first introduction to this work of art.  It ain't perfect. The man cast as Moe seems a bit young for the role.  The murder of Kinana is not exactly as it happened.  The murder of Um Quirfa is accurately depicted. 

    By Jesus, until last year I had not darkened the door of a theater since 1967.  My recent visit was to a free movie honoring the 70th. anniversary of a relative.  But, If I find this movie in the local theater, I blessed will go and watch it, with great joy and pleasure.  And then I will publish a more complete review. 

    So, it pisses off Muslims. That is a good thing; it gets their attention.  Let them watch it and listen.  Let the few who are literate turn to the two Sahihs, Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah, Tabari's Tahrik, Ibn Sa'd's Sira and The Sealed Nectar seeking facts to disprove the film's accurate depiction of Moe.  They will find only confirmation of the worst of it. 

    Muslims need to learn the truth about Moe & Allah even more than we do.  They must, to escape eternal damnation, emancipate themselves from Allah's yoke of slavery.  Once they know the fatal facts, those who retain a scintilla of vestigial morality will apostatize.  If enough of them do so at one time, the Salafis will not be able to kill all of them and the empire of Islam which Moe built will crumble into dust. 

    Moe really was a lunatic, suffering hallucinations as a side effect of epileptic seizures. He really did perceive that he had wrestled with a demon, was possessed, and set out to commit suicide. He really did marry the six year old daughter of his closest friend.  He really did suborn murder. he really did attribute divine sanction to rape, pillage & plunder. Islam really is pure, unmitigated evil and that is the God blessed truth. 

History Recycles 

    Those who will not learn from history really will be doomed to repeat it.  When America declared independence, she lost the protection of the English Navy and her merchantmen were sacked and their crews held for ransom or sold into slavery.  The new nation was nearly bankrupted by exaction of tribute.  Adams and Jefferson asked Tripoli's Ambassador by what right they attacked us.  His answer should serve as a life saving lesson, but it has been widely ignored. 

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.

Where have we seen that before?  Only in the most authentic of the hadith collections: Sahih Bukhari; a Persian general got a similar answer from one of Umar's generals. 

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." 4.53.386

We could have learned from that, but we did not.  We could have learned from the ravings of the "blind sheikh", but we did not.  We could have learned from the threats issued by Usama bin Ladin, but we did not.  We have one more chance, with the confession of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will we ever learn? [Emphasis added.]

Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest of the world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole. http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/gitmo20090310.pdf

One sentence stands out beyond the rest:  "Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity." That vital clue meshes with an infamous statement found in one codeification of Shari'ah.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg. 141  PDF 154

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

    Muslims do not require provocation to attack us.  They attack us because we are not Muslims, that is provocation enough.

  1. Rev. Terry Jones and the creators of "Innocence of Muslims" are not misguided, Muslims are.  Both have read the Qur'an and at least one sira, Muslims are misguided: they believe that excrement, Jones and the movie's creator recognize Islam for what it is: a demonic system of intra-species predation.  
  2. Dr. Ali Sina has said that it is necessary to insult Muslims in order to get their attention, sort of like whacking a stubborn mule with a piece of lumber. The objective is education, not injury. 
  3. When did you condemn the Qur'an because of its insults and execrations against Jews & Christians?  When did you condemn its declaration of genocidal warfare against us?   Take your tongue out of Satan's anus long enough to condemn these egregious verses:  1:6, 2:161, 5:60, 9:29, 9:30, 98:6.
  4. The fitting response to genocidal conquest; existential war is extermination.  Instead, Slick Willy treated it as a common criminal matter. Shrub sent men to bleed and die where he should have sent nukes.
  5. Democracy is mob rule, as likely to result in tyranny as good government. Our founders gave us a limited, representative republic, whose existential  enemy should be exterminated, not appeased & apologized to.  
  6. Evidently you respect the belief that "Only Allah has the right to be worshiped."; I do not, I condemn it because it is a denial of my rights as a Christian. Evidently you respect the belief that Allah demands continuous conquest; I do not, I condemn it because it is the basis of existential warfare against us.  Evidently you respect the belief that a Prophet must make "a great slaughter" before holding prisoners for ransom; I do not, I condemn the sanctification of genocide.  Evidently you respect the belief that Infidels may be attacked without provocation, their widows raped and their orphans sold into slavery; you can go to Hell with the Muslims. 
  7. The cornerstone of our republic is individualism. Freedom of religion means freedom to choose among legitimate religions or none at all, without having any religion imposed by force or law.  If you had read and understood 3:85, 3:110, Bukhari 6.60.80 and 8:39, you would know that Islam contravenes our rights; imposing itself by force. 
  8. This blog post is not an abuse of free speech, it is an effort to educate and arouse fellow citizens so that they will rise up as one disrespectfully demanding the extinction of Islam.  Paul Revere's ride was not an abuse of free speech.  "Innocence of Muslims", International Judge the Koran Day and International Judge Muhammad Day are not abuses of free speech, they are legitimate warnings of clear, imminent and persistent danger.  
  9. Inoffensive speech does not require protection. It is specifically offensive speech: expressions of fact and logical opinion which piss off violators of human rights that requires the protection afforded by the first amendment.  Moe had his critics murdered, they needed protection; they did not have it. 
  10. Charlie Brown said it best "Nobody likes having his cherished beliefs questioned." Muslims believe that they serve Allah by killing and terrorizing us.  There is nothing wrong about exposing and offending that belief!


tngilmer said...

I watched the clip and I must say the acting was terrible. It came across as an Islamic version of the three stooges.

Anonymous said...

Really nice article but have to go deep into the islam.
when criest was alive god never say'd to promote christianity it was the people who needed power promoted it. and criest had told there will be one last prophet coming after me and he say'd that god exist and by the time muhammad was prophet. there was already a war and god sayed to promote islam. if god would have told criest to promote christianity he would have done the same way but rather then that he stayed quiet as he didnt had any permission from god. as for muhammad(TUS) he was promoting islam as per god order there were lot of hurdles which u will not understand.and god say'd to him that he will be last prophet.

you should read about imam ali, hasan and husain sacrifise before giving more comment on islam.
you will understand everything how islam was Established.

AjNaBeE said...

Really nice article but have to go deep into the islam.
when criest was alive god never say'd to promote christianity it was the people who needed power promoted it. and criest had told there will be one last prophet coming after me and he say'd that god exist and by the time muhammad was prophet. there was already a war and god sayed to promote islam. if god would have told criest to promote christianity he would have done the same way but rather then that he stayed quiet as he didnt had any permission from god. as for muhammad(TUS) he was promoting islam as per god order there were lot of hurdles which u will not understand.and god say'd to him that he will be last prophet.

you should read about imam ali, hasan and husain sacrifise before giving more comment on islam.
you will understand everything how islam was Established.

Ben said...

Sure, the casting and acting leave something to be desired. I am primarily interested in the content, and I found it to be more accurate than I expected.

Moe was foretold in the Bible, indirectly as a false prophet and deceiver: an antichrist. Jesus said he would send the Holy Spirit, he did not say that he would send a Profit.

Feel free to explore the older posts in this blog and follow the links.

Anonymous said...

This website is a lie. Defaming Islam by telling lies can only be done by Jews ans some Christians.

Dont forget that Islam is in Quran that is still intact since the first day It was revealed and God promised to protect It until the last day of this world. It is good that such websites are helping non Muslims to find truth about Islam by studying authentic books. These types of fake websites are only helping Islam to spread. Thanks for that :)

Blog do Fraguglia said...

It is sad to see that the ocident want to cause no offence to Islam but pusnishing christianity instead. Politicians stinks.

Sevulla said...

2 points.

The film looks like it was made by 15 year olds. How hard would it have been to actually film on the desert or even a beach ffs.

As for attacking ship and robbing them, that was standard practice at the time by most navies. The British Navy were the largest at it.

This woeful movie does show up the ridiculous reaction that Muslims have to any film they do not like.

Asif said...

Another stone to the beliefs of Islam and the Muslims. It is since the days of the Crusades that the political regimes has been devided more than the boundaries or wealth but on the basis of muslim and non-muslim beliefs.

Unfortunate for the Muslim world that they believe in Issa (Jesus) and Musa (Moses) also as the prophets that they cannot downplay them like the jews and christian can. Its humility that the Muslims does not do that either.

@Ben: Who said Muhamamd (PBUH) was anti-christ. His followers believe Christ as another Prophet and gives him the same respect as a prophet. And for the holy spirit, we believe that Christ will reappear as a muslim in the last phase of this world to establish that Islam, in its true sense, the ultimate religion sent by God.

Anonymous said...

madugu said...
The writer should know that muhammad is not the found of islam, but islam have existed since the time of Abraham(Ibrahim)down to Jesus and muhammad. any person that goes against their teaches and likeness, is an infidel just like pharaoh and other God forseeken people in d history of d world. Allah is absoulte great

Anonymous said...

essemmunI saw some bits of genius, but really, what need to be done is to make a movie with some good acting, and the absolute horrific sense-shattering cinematic efects to get attention. Don't make a joke about this, as this short film seems to be, a joke. No, make it an obscenity, a perversion, as true as it can be made, with all the ugly, perverted doings of these people. If they don't like the truth.....The Bible says the beast will wage war against the saints, and will prevail. I believe islam is that beast, to the horror of us all.

Anonymous said...

Christ came into the world, to turn the sinners back to God. For all have sinned, and come short of His glory. Christ came as a final sacrifice for human sins.

It was not people who wanted power to promote Christianity. Those were the early Roman church and crusaders who are not true Christians. Christians are followers of Christ, who freely acknowledged His teachings and warnings, i.e. to repent and turn over a new leaf, while there is still time. Christ promote true religion, i.e. by faith from the heart, not of works...while works is a manifestation of true inner faith and spirit of what it represents.

As for Islam ( i don't know alot, so i will refrain from commenting untrue statements), while the early facts might be true of the religion but personally, i think it got out of hand from a handful who promote extremism and violence.

Religion should be personal and free to choose, not impose by force or killings.

Anonymous said...

Christ did not say there was another last prophet. He said He himself will return, and bring back His sheep to Heaven, his true followers. He said what he did and said came from God himself, else he would not been able to do so much, even as to prophesize his own death and resurrection....because his words came from God and God brought him back to life, and went back to Heaven to be with his heavenly father.

He who comes from God, listens to God.

Obviously, your source is different from the bible. Each to his own, no need to slander or issue threats. Obviously, anyone who can read or write is educated and deserves respect, not just human respect but rather his own free will to choose: God or Hell.

Dude said...

Christs whole life was promoting Christianity and he commanded his followers to do the same. He also never said there would be any more major prophets after him.

Anonymous said...

can't wait to watch this movie. an egyptian friend of mine (decent fellow) was conversing with me about god. he queries "we accept jesus, why do christians not accept muhammed?" i reply "jesus healed the sick, and taught us to care for the widows and children. muhammed taught you to kill and rape the widows and children" he was baffled.. do they really not know what thier own koran says? the answer is NO..

Ben said...

Dear Anonymous,

Most Muslims can't read. Only 17% have read the Koran in their native tongue. They know only what the Imams tell them. That is why this movie project is vitally necessary.

Ben said...

Dear Anonymous,

This blog is here so that you can learn. Most posts have several links to Islam's canon: follow them and read.

Ben said...

Dear Asif,
Elsewhere on this blog you will find a post entitled "The Defamation of Jesus Christ". Please read it carefully.

Ben said...

Dear Anonymous,
You are welcome. I have two smaller blogs which get few hits, but most of them go to resource posts containing links to Islam's canon in various languages and formats.

What I post is true and I am proud to provide my readers with means of verification.

Asif said...


There is no defamation of Jesus..not a true muslim would do that...cause he is also a highly respected prophet of this religion..

@anonymous: Muhammad never taught us to kill or rape widows and children..for your kind information, no war during the time of Muhammad was initiated by the muslims...had that been done, and if you have any small idea of the art of warfare, muslims would have never been able to win with a smaller and inferior force. Go ahead with the books of history and you will see that in no war fought during that time muslims had a bigger force than their opponents.

And for the rape of widow and child, which most of the Jews and Christians are so happy to bring front every time they talk about Muhammad, is all a misrepresentation.

Yes, Muhammad married a number of widows and even a very young lady. however, have you ever heard from them that they were raped or ill-treated at any point of time? the answer is NO. The young girl he married to is the source of majority of Hadith that muslims know related to how you maintain the respect of your family and wife/wives.

And just to add some point of God-ism. Wasn't Jesus born to virgin Mary? Christians believe that, Jews believe that, Muslims believe that. We all believe it because our belief lies that God do strange things that is beyond our understanding. Jesus could bring the dead to life, heal people by touching.. Do Christians or the Jews or the Muslims go to ask why or how he could do that? We don't.There were all the good devine reasons for that. Muhammad married a lot, some widows or some young. There are some devine reasons for that too...it is just beyond our capacity of understanding.

Anonymous said...

Jews were recognised as the people of the book, i.e. the bible.

Jesus said, Know the truth and the truth will set you free. And the truth is, we have all sinned since the days of Adam and Eve.No amount of animal sacrifice can fully atone our sins (known and subconsciously known), these sacrifice can only appease God's wrath temporarily while His merciful and patience hoping we will have true repentance. Can we live a pure and sinless and blameless eyes? Maybe before men, but we cannot hide from God. The law was given to us, by Moses to the Jews. Yet God himself has revealed to Adam and Eve, that the seed of Adam will defeat Satan who cause all these evils and sufferings to befalls on us.

Who is this seed? Jesus Christ, as foretold by God to Prophet Isaiah, Isaiah 7:14 that he is to be born of a virgin and his name is Immanuel (God is with us). In the same book, chapter 53, it describes how this seed and saviour is to be offered as sacrifice, bearing all our sins upon him that we may be reconciled to God, by faith. That's why we remember Jesus on Christmas (not his actual birthday) and his resurrection (which is our hope).

His life and His death is an example to us. Not one of accumulating wealth, killing, marrying.

Jesus said in front of Pontius Pilate, that His kingdom is not of this world, else his servants or followers will fight.

Jesus said, his meat is to do the will of his father (God) who sent him.

Know the truth, and the truth will set you free. Not strange at all.

Anonymous said...

Excellent posting as usual. The film is very amateurish at best, but to spark such a reaction by the uneducated fanatical masses within the Middle East clearly shows that these people are not ready for Freedom of Speech and many of our other rights. They are still culturally stuck in the past and have barely progressed intellectually since the founding of Islam. This religion IS the sole reason why they have all of the issues that they do. I am not a member of an Abrahamic faith and I tend to have issues with them, but the only one that is truly a deadly virus is Islam. We need to eradicate it completely.

Anonymous said...

People in the Middle East suffer from a personality illness caused directly by Islam. Islam creates a sort of polarizing personality that extends from one end of the spectrum to the other. On the one hand you have a person that is deeply devout and loving of their fellow Muslims, yet that same person also has deep-seated hatred in their hearts towards outsiders and anything they consider a threat.

Completely lacking from Islam is any sort of teaching that would be familiar to most Christians, namely, loving your fellow man for no other reason than the fact that we are all children of God. Christianity teaches us to love the sinner but hate the sin. Islam teaches to hate the sin and cut the head off the sinner.

Such an odd religion. It would be difficult to see how the world would have adopted this religion except for the fact that it has been physically forced upon the people by all preceeding generations. No where is there any opportunity to think for oneself or to use logic and reasoning to guide someone onto a better path.

Islam has single handedly caused the intellectual and cultural retardation of an entire group of people.

BeThePeace said...

And just what is the difference when George Bush/every other US politician when they invoke 'God' in their speeches to incite the civilians to condone the wars they start!? Just the other side of the same holy war that will neve end unless ALL PEOPLE realise we are ALL ONE.
eesh WAKE UP sheeple...and I mean that with LOVE.
Love, Peace, Happiness, Truth, Unity

BeThePeace said...

And just what is the difference when George Bush/every other US/UK politician when they invoke 'God' in their speeches to incite the civilians to condone the wars they start!? Just the other side of the same holy war that will never end unless ALL PEOPLE realise we are ALL ONE.
eesh WAKE UP sheeple...and I mean that with LOVE.
Love, Peace, Happiness, Truth, Unity

Ben said...

Be the Peace,
Compare Surahs 2,3,8, 9, 33, 48, 49 & 61 of the Koran to the Red Letter Edition of any New Testament translation. The difference is stark. Christianity neither sanctifies nor mandates genocidal, terrorist offensive conquest. The Koran does. Get a clue.

Anonymous said...

The prophecy tells about Ahmad; 'Servant of God' whom will war to correct the wrongs and bringing judgement based on the law of God. He will also liberate Arabia from worshiping molten images. Wilderness (desert), villages and cities will glorify God since then. As can be seen today, whole of Arabia are worshiping,praising God and singing words of God daily.

And we continue reading Isaiah 42:18 - 25; about Children of Israel, whom will still be deaf and blind neglecting the message brought by this 'Servant of God'.

In Isaiah 42:1, it is not a coincidence upon seeing the writing of both אתמך (Atmc) אחמד (Ahmd). And the word before אתמך (Atmc), is עבדי (Abedi~My Servant). For indeed, It is indicating Ahmad; Abedallah (Ahmad; Servant of God).

Not to mention אתמך (Atmc) is a special term foretelling the coming of a righteous man and is used only ONCE throughout the entire Book. [could this be a copying error or an intended error?]

Children of Israel have been foretold upon the coming of Ahmad but sadly, only a few accepts.

Ben said...

You can not simultaneously assert that the Bible is corrupted and cherry pick it as evidence of Moe's Prophethood. That logical fallacy may work on retarded victims of consanguinity, but it will not fly with intelligent and educated people.

The Old Testameht prophecies refer to Jesus, not to Moe. References to Moe consist of warnings of false prophets to come and are found in the New Testament.

By the way: Moe's given name was Kauthar. Muhammad & Ahmad are titles reserved for deity; a murdering rapist, pedophile & warmonger ain't qualified for the title.