My Answer to Khizer Khan.

If I am not in error, Mr. Khan is an immigration lawyer and holds a position of leadership[ in a mosque. Thus it is likely that he is more aware of the Qur'an, The Reliance Of The Traveller And Tools Of The Worshiper, Tafsir Al-Jalalayn and the two Sahihs & various sunan than the mill run of Muslims. At last report, only 17% of the Ummah has read the Qur'an in a language they comprehend.

Khizer Khan said in an NPR interview, that, in the eyes of our creator, we are all equal.  Is he ignorant of 3.110 & Bukhri 6.60.80 along with 98.6 or is he an abominable liar?  The doctrines of Islam contradict those in the Declaration of Independence: Muslims are the best of people, for the people, as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks.

Ghazala Khan, when prompted by the interviewer, declared Islam to be peaceful. Is she ignorant of Surahs Al-Anfal, At-Taubah, Muhammad, Al-Hujuraat & As-Saff? Is she unaware of the books of Jihad contained in each of the six sittah? Does she know about Reliance Book O, Chapter 9 sections 0....14?

The interviewer invoked "radical Islamic terrorism". Radical means to the root. Terrorism springs from these roots:   3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 

Terrorism is normative, not exceptional, perverted, distorted or hijacked. Allah would and did cast terror. Allah commands Muslims to strike terror and terrify. Moe said he was made victorious with terror. Allah told Moe he was more a terror to the Jews than Allah. This ain't rocket science, and numerous posts in this blog document it.

Amita Kelley leads Mrs. Khan to repeat the lie.  Dichotomy between Islamic faith and terrorism is an article of faith among LibTards.

Khan tells us that equal protection under the 14th amdt. is Islamic law, having told us that shari'ah is incompatible with the Constitution.  These people assume that we are stuipid, ignorant and gullible!

He continues to spew a mixture of fact and fiction, describing marriage laws. 25 cases in American courts have involved Islamic law, several of them involving divorce and child custody disputes. Opposition to Shari'ah and legislating to prohibit its application by our courts is rational, not fear or hate mongering!

If Islam is so bad in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewere, and you want to bring your children out of it to freedom, then why do you bring Islam with you? Why not leave it at the border; drop it like a bag of garbage and forget it? 

14 Californians are dead, Mrs. Khan, because the father of Sayed Farook was allowed to immigrate. Had he been excluded, those 14 would live today and another 14 would not have bullet wounds and hospital bills. 49 Queers are dead in in Orlando and 50 wounded who would be alive and whole today if Omar Mateen's father had been kept out, as all Muslims should be and would be if we had honest, patriotic leaders instead of traitors in Washington.

Non resident aliens do not have rights under our Constitution. There is no right to invade America and there is no right to perform hijra. We seek immigrants, not settlers. There is a difference, and we know that it is impossible to separate MINOs from Believers. There is no way to determine which applicants for immigration would try to slaughter us and no way to predict the behavior of the offspring they carry with them or breed here.

Islam is a relation to terrorism. Allah and his Messenger are terrorists!  What part of "I will cast terror",  "To strike terror",  "to terriofy thereby" and "I have been made victorious with terror" is beyond your comprehension???   If you believe that Allah is God and Moe was the perfect man, you are a terrorist and should be excluded!

Mr. Khan, being a lawyer you should know that the USA is a representative republic, not a democracy. There is no relationship between form of governmet and excluding enemy combatants. Democracy, republicanism and monarchy alike should seek to exclude and expel subversive elements.  Islam is a subversive element, seeking to destroy all unislamic forms of government as per Maududi's "Jihad In Islam", pg. 10.

How would we deal with home grown "bad people"?  We incarcerate them when they are caught and successfully prosecuted.  But Islam is a war crime and Muslims are war criminals. Exclusion is the only preventative. That includes expelling those Muslims who were born or reverted within our borders.  No Muslims: no terrorism. It is that simple.

Muslims are the problem, not part of the solution. Terrorism is an Islamic sacrament. 9/11 was an act of Islamic worship. The practice of Islam is incomplete without Jihad, terrorism and genocide, rape, pillage, plunder & slavery. There is no right to p;erform such acts; therefore there is no right to manifest, practice and propagate Islam.

Ghazala, love and respect are only for fellow Muslims, not extended to infidels. Muslims can no more abjure terrorism than they can abjure Allah, Moe or any part of the Qur'an. I cite Reliance O8.0...7 which list the punishment for and acts entailing apostasy. You can not reject any part of Islamic law, that includes 8.39, 9.29, 9.120 & 9.123. But you can lie to us about those imperatives as per 3.118.

Trump did not ban Muslims from America. He proposed a temporary ban on entry until we can figure out what the Hell is going on. He is not in power yet; has no authority. But if he knew about Islam, as exposed in this blog, his ban would be total, permanent  and retroactive.

Mr. Khan, where in Islam do you find liberty, equal protection and equal justice? An infidel can not testify. If killed by accident, his blood wit is one third that of a Muslim's. If his father is a Muslim, he is disinherited. A Christian, divorced by a Muslim can not obtain custody of her children. Do you know that the blood and treasure of infidels are halal to Muslims and we have no human rights until we become Muslims? That is in Bukhari 1.8.387.


http://www.npr.org/2016/08/01/488270596/watch-khizr-khan-says-trump-should-have-patience-and-tolerance-for-criticism