Obamination: Spews Final UN Lies

If the Almighty wanted to give the world an enema, he'd stick the tube in Obamination's lie hole. For the 8^th time, Obamination spewed his lies to the UN General Assembly. I reproduce the transcript with my comments, linked to superscripts, following. Click a superscript to read a comment, then press Back Space to return to your place in the spew.

Address by President Obama to the 71st Session of the United Nations General Assembly

The United Nations
New York, New York 

10:29 A.M. EDT

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Mr. President; Mr. Secretary General; fellow delegates; ladies and gentlemen:  As I address this hall as President for the final time, let me recount the progress that we’ve made these last eight years.

From the depths of the greatest financial crisis of our time, we coordinated our response to avoid further catastrophe and return the global economy to growth.  We’ve taken away terrorist safe havens ¹, strengthened the nonproliferation regime, resolved the Iranian nuclear issue ² through diplomacy.  We opened relations with Cuba, helped Colombia end Latin America’s longest war, and we welcome a democratically elected leader of Myanmar to this Assembly.  Our assistance is helping people feed themselves, care for the sick, power communities across Africa, and promote models of development rather than dependence.  And we have made international institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund more representative, while establishing a framework to protect our planet from the ravages of climate change.³

This is important work.  It has made a real difference in the lives of our people.  And it could not have happened had we not worked together.  And yet, around the globe we are seeing the same forces of global integration that have made us interdependent also expose deep fault lines in the existing international order. 

We see it in the headlines every day.  Around the world, refugees flow across borders in flight from brutal conflict.  Financial disruptions continue to weigh upon our workers and entire communities.  Across vast swaths of the Middle East, basic security, basic order has broken down.  We see too many governments muzzling journalists, and quashing dissent, and censoring the flow of information.  Terrorist networks ⁴ use social media to prey upon the minds of our youth, endangering open societies and spurring anger against innocent immigrants and Muslims.  Powerful nations contest the constraints placed on them by international law.

This is the paradox that defines our world today.  A quarter century after the end of the Cold War, the world is by many measures less violent and more prosperous than ever before, and yet our societies are filled with uncertainty, and unease, and strife.  Despite enormous progress, as people lose trust in institutions ⁵, governing becomes more difficult and tensions between nations become more quick to surface.

And so I believe that at this moment we all face a choice. We can choose to press forward with a better model of cooperation and integration.⁶  Or we can retreat into a world sharply divided, and ultimately in conflict, along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion.

I want to suggest to you today that we must go forward, and not backward.  I believe that as imperfect as they are, the principles of open markets and accountable governance, of democracy and human rights and international law that we have forged remain the firmest foundation for human progress in this century.  I make this argument not based on theory or ideology, but on facts -- facts that all too often, we forget in the immediacy of current events. 

Here’s the most important fact:  The integration of our global economy has made life better for billions of men, women and children.  Over the last 25 years, the number of people living in extreme poverty has been cut from nearly 40 percent of humanity to under 10 percent.  That's unprecedented.  And it's not an abstraction.  It means children have enough to eat; mothers don’t die in childbirth. 

Meanwhile, cracking the genetic code promises to cure diseases that have plagued us for centuries.  The Internet can deliver the entirety of human knowledge to a young girl in a remote village on a single hand-held device.  In medicine and in manufacturing, in education and communications, we’re experiencing a transformation of how human beings live on a scale that recalls the revolutions in agriculture and industry.  And as a result, a person born today is more likely to be healthy, to live longer, and to have access to opportunity than at any time in human history. 

Moreover, the collapse of colonialism and communism has allowed more people than ever before to live with the freedom to choose their leaders.  Despite the real and troubling areas where freedom appears in retreat, the fact remains that the number of democracies around the world has nearly doubled in the last 25 years. 

In remote corners of the world, citizens are demanding respect for the dignity of all people no matter their gender, or race, or religion, or disability, or sexual orientation, and those who deny others dignity are subject to public reproach.  An explosion of social media has given ordinary people more ways to express themselves, and has raised people’s expectations for those of us in power.  Indeed, our international order has been so successful that we take it as a given that great powers no longer fight world wars; that the end of the Cold War lifted the shadow of nuclear Armageddon;⁷ that the battlefields of Europe have been replaced by peaceful union; that China and India remain on a path of remarkable growth.

I say all this not to whitewash the challenges we face, or to suggest complacency.  Rather, I believe that we need to acknowledge these achievements in order to summon the confidence to carry this progress forward and to make sure that we do not abandon those very things that have delivered this progress.

In order to move forward, though, we do have to acknowledge that the existing path to global integration requires a course correction.  As too often, those trumpeting the benefits of globalization have ignored inequality within and among nations; have ignored the enduring appeal of ethnic and sectarian identities; have left international institutions ill-equipped, underfunded, under-resourced, in order to handle transnational challenges.

And as these real problems have been neglected, alternative visions of the world have pressed forward both in the wealthiest countries and in the poorest:  Religious fundamentalism; the politics of ethnicity, or tribe, or sect; aggressive nationalism; a crude populism -- sometimes from the far left, but more often from the far right -- which seeks to restore what they believe was a better, simpler age free of outside contamination.

We cannot dismiss these visions.  They are powerful.  They reflect dissatisfaction among too many of our citizens.  I do not believe those visions can deliver security or prosperity over the long term, but I do believe that these visions fail to recognize, at a very basic level, our common humanity.  Moreover, I believe that the acceleration of travel and technology and telecommunications -- together with a global economy that depends on a global supply chain -- makes it self-defeating ultimately for those who seek to reverse this progress.  Today, a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself.

So the answer cannot be a simple rejection of global integration.  Instead, we must work together to make sure the benefits of such integration are broadly shared, and that the disruptions -- economic, political, and cultural -- that are caused by integration are squarely addressed.  This is not the place for a detailed policy blueprint, but let me offer in broad strokes those areas where I believe we must do better together.

It starts with making the global economy work better for all people ⁸ and not just for those at the top.  While open markets, capitalism have raised standards of living around the globe, globalization combined with rapid progress and technology has also weakened the position of workers and their ability to secure a decent wage.  In advanced economies like my own, unions have been undermined, and many manufacturing jobs have disappeared.  Often, those who benefit most from globalization have used their political power to further undermine the position of workers. 

In developing countries, labor organizations have often been suppressed, and the growth of the middle class has been held back by corruption and underinvestment.  Mercantilist policies pursued by governments with export-driven models threaten to undermine the consensus that underpins global trade.  And meanwhile, global capital is too often unaccountable -- nearly $8 trillion stashed away in tax havens, a shadow banking system that grows beyond the reach of effective oversight.

A world in which one percent of humanity controls as much wealth as the other 99 percent will never be stable.  I understand that the gaps between rich and poor are not new, but just as the child in a slum today can see the skyscraper nearby, technology now allows any person with a smartphone to see how the most privileged among us live and the contrast between their own lives and others.  Expectations rise, then, faster than governments can deliver ⁹, and a pervasive sense of injustice undermine people’s faith in the system.

So how do we fix this imbalance?  We cannot unwind integration any more than we can stuff technology back into a box.  Nor can we look to failed models of the past.  If we start resorting to trade wars, market distorting subsidies, beggar thy neighbor policies, an overreliance on natural resources instead of innovation -- these approaches will make us poorer, collectively, and they are more like to lead to conflict.  And the stark contrast between, say, the success of the Republic of Korea and the wasteland of North Korea shows that central, planned control of the economy is a dead end.

But I do believe there’s another path -- one that fuels growth and innovation, and offers the clearest route to individual opportunity and national success.  It does not require succumbing to a soulless capitalism that benefits only the few, but rather recognizes that economies are more successful when we close the gap between rich and poor, and growth is broadly based. And that means respecting the rights of workers so they can organize into independent unions and earn a living wage.  It means investing in our people -- their skills, their education, their capacity to take an idea and turn it into a business.  It means strengthening the safety net that protects our people from hardship and allows them to take more risks -- to look for a new job, or start a new venture.

These are the policies that I’ve pursued here in the United States, and with clear results.  American businesses have created now 15 million new jobs.  After the recession, the top one percent of Americans were capturing more than 90 percent of income growth.  But today, that's down to about half.  Last year, poverty in this country fell at the fastest rate in nearly 50 years.  And with further investment in infrastructure and early childhood education and basic research, I’m confident that such progress will continue. 

So just as I’ve pursued these measures here at home, so has the United States worked with many nations to curb the excesses of capitalism -- not to punish wealth, but to prevent repeated crises that can destroy it.  That’s why we’ve worked with other nations to create higher and clearer standards for banking and taxation -- because a society that asks less of oligarchs than ordinary citizens will rot from within.  That’s why we’ve pushed for transparency and cooperation in rooting out corruption, and tracking illicit dollars, because markets create more jobs when they're fueled by hard work, and not the capacity to extort a bribe.  That’s why we’ve worked to reach trade agreements that raise labor standards and raise environmental standards, as we've done with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, so that the benefits are more broadly shared.

And just as we benefit by combatting inequality within our countries, I believe advanced economies still need to do more to close the gap between rich and poor nations around the globe.  This is difficult politically.  It's difficult to spend on foreign assistance.  But I do not believe this is charity.  For the small fraction of what we spent at war in Iraq we could support institutions¹⁰ so that fragile states don’t collapse in the first place, and invest in emerging economies that become markets for our goods.  It's not just the right thing to do, it's the smart thing to do.

And that’s why we need to follow through on our efforts to combat climate change.  If we don't act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations, and cities submerged and nations displaced, and food supplies decimated, and conflicts born of despair.  The Paris Agreement gives us a framework to act, but only if we scale up our ambition.  And there must be a sense of urgency about bringing the agreement into force, and helping poorer countries leapfrog destructive forms of energy. 

So, for the wealthiest countries, a Green Climate Fund should only be the beginning.  We need to invest in research and provide market incentives to develop new technologies, and then make these technologies accessible and affordable for poorer countries.  And only then can we continue lifting all people up from poverty without condemning our children to a planet beyond their capacity to repair.

So we need new models for the global marketplace, models that are inclusive and sustainable.  And in the same way, we need models of governance that are inclusive and accountable to ordinary people.

I recognize not every country in this hall is going to follow the same model of governance.  I do not think that America can -- or should -- impose our system of government on other countries.  But there appears to be growing contest between authoritarianism and liberalism right now.  And I want everybody to understand, I am not neutral in that contest.  I believe in a liberal political order -- an order built not just through elections and representative government, but also through respect for human rights and civil society, and independent judiciaries and the rule of law.

I know that some countries, which now recognize the power of free markets, still reject the model of free societies.  And perhaps those of us who have been promoting democracy feel somewhat discouraged since the end of the Cold War, because we've learned that liberal democracy will not just wash across the globe in a single wave.  It turns out building accountable institutions is hard work -- the work of generations.  The gains are often fragile.  Sometimes we take one step forward and then two steps back.  In countries held together by borders drawn by colonial powers, with ethnic enclaves and tribal divisions, politics and elections can sometimes appear to be a zero-sum game.  And so, given the difficulty in forging true democracy in the face of these pressures, it’s no surprise that some argue the future favors the strongman, a top-down model, rather than strong, democratic institutions.

But I believe this thinking is wrong.  I believe the road of true democracy remains the better path.  I believe that in the 21st century, economies can only grow to a certain point until they need to open up -- because entrepreneurs need to access information in order to invent; young people need a global education in order to thrive; independent media needs to check the abuses of power.  Without this evolution, ultimately expectations of people will not be met; suppression and stagnation will set in.  And history shows that strongmen are then left with two paths -- permanent crackdown, which sparks strife at home, or scapegoating enemies abroad, which can lead to war. 

Now, I will admit, my belief that governments serve the individual, and not the other way around, is shaped by America’s story.  Our nation began with a promise of freedom that applied only to the few.  But because of our democratic Constitution, because of our Bill of Rights, because of our ideals, ordinary people were able to organize, and march, and protest, and ultimately, those ideals won out -- opened doors for women and minorities and workers in ways that made our economy more productive and turned our diversity into a strength; that gave innovators the chance to transform every area of human endeavor; that made it possible for someone like me to be elected President of the United States.

So, yes, my views are shaped by the specific experiences of America, but I do not think this story is unique to America.  Look at the transformation that's taken place in countries as different as Japan and Chile, Indonesia, Botswana.  The countries that have succeeded are ones in which people feel they have a stake. 

In Europe, the progress of those countries in the former Soviet bloc that embraced democracy stand in clear contrast to those that did not.  After all, the people of Ukraine did not take to the streets because of some plot imposed from abroad.  They took to the streets because their leadership was for sale and they had no recourse.  They demanded change because they saw life get better for people in the Baltics and in Poland, societies that were more liberal, and democratic, and open than their own.

So those of us who believe in democracy, we need to speak out forcefully, because both the facts and history, I believe, are on our side.  That doesn’t mean democracies are without flaws.  It does mean that the cure for what ails our democracies is greater engagement by our citizens -- not less. 

Yes, in America, there is too much money in politics ¹¹; too much entrenched partisanship; too little participation by citizens, in part because of a patchwork of laws that makes it harder to vote.  In Europe, a well-intentioned Brussels often became too isolated from the normal push and pull of national politics.  Too often, in capitals, decision-makers have forgotten that democracy needs to be driven by civic engagement from the bottom up, not governance by experts from the top down.  And so these are real problems, and as leaders of democratic governments make the case for democracy abroad, we better strive harder to set a better example at home.

Moreover, every country will organize its government informed by centuries of history, and the circumstances of geography, and the deeply held beliefs of its people.  So I recognize a traditional society may value unity and cohesion more than a diverse country like my own, which was founded upon what, at the time, was a radical idea -- the idea of the liberty of individual human beings endowed with certain God-given rights.  But that does not mean that ordinary people in Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East somehow prefer arbitrary rule ¹²that denies them a voice in the decisions that can shape their lives.  I believe that spirit is universal.  And if any of you doubt the universality of that desire, listen to the voices of young people everywhere who call out for freedom, and dignity, and the opportunity to control their own lives.  

This leads me to the third thing we need to do:  We must reject any forms of fundamentalism, or racism, or a belief in ethnic superiority ¹³ that makes our traditional identities irreconcilable with modernity.  Instead we need to embrace the tolerance that results from respect of all human beings.

It’s a truism that global integration has led to a collision of cultures; trade, migration, the Internet, all these things can challenge and unsettle our most cherished identities.  We see liberal societies express opposition when women choose to cover themselves.  We see protests responding to Western newspaper cartoons that caricature the Prophet Muhammad.  In a world that left the age of empire behind, we see Russia attempting to recover lost glory through force.  Asian powers debate competing claims of history.  And in Europe and the United States, you see people wrestle with concerns about immigration and changing demographics, and suggesting that somehow people who look different are corrupting the character of our countries.

Now, there’s no easy answer for resolving all these social forces, and we must respect the meaning that people draw from their own traditions -- from their religion, from their ethnicity, from their sense of nationhood.  But I do not believe progress is possible if our desire to preserve our identities gives way to an impulse to dehumanize or dominate another group. If our religion leads us to persecute those of another faith¹⁴, if we jail or beat people who are gay, if our traditions lead us to prevent girls from going to school, if we discriminate on the basis of race or tribe or ethnicity, then the fragile bonds of civilization will fray.  The world is too small, we are too packed together, for us to be able to resort to those old ways of thinking.

We see this mindset in too many parts of the Middle East.  There, so much of the collapse in order has been fueled because leaders sought legitimacy not because of policies or programs but by resorting to persecuting political opposition, or demonizing other religious sects, by narrowing the public space to the mosque, where in too many places perversions of a great faith¹⁵ were tolerated.  These forces built up for years, and are now at work helping to fuel both Syria’s tragic civil war and the mindless, medieval menace of ISIL.

The mindset of sectarianism, and extremism, and bloodletting, and retribution that has been taking place will not be quickly reversed.  And if we are honest, we understand that no external power is going to be able to force different religious communities or ethnic communities to co-exist for long.  But I do believe we have to be honest about the nature of these conflicts,¹⁶ and our international community must continue to work with those who seek to build rather than to destroy. 

And there is a military component to that.  It means being united and relentless in destroying networks like ISIL, which show no respect for human life.  But it also means that in a place like Syria, where there’s no ultimate military victory to be won, we’re going to have to pursue the hard work of diplomacy that aims to stop the violence, and deliver aid to those in need, and support those who pursue a political settlement and can see those who are not like themselves as worthy of dignity and respect. 

Across the region’s conflicts, we have to insist that all parties recognize a common humanity and that nations end proxy wars that fuel disorder.  Because until basic questions are answered about how communities co-exist¹⁷, the embers of extremism will continue to burn, countless human beings will suffer -- most of all in that region -- but extremism will continue to be exported overseas.  And the world is too small for us to simply be able to build a wall and prevent it from affecting our own societies.

And what is true in the Middle East is true for all of us.  Surely, religious traditions can be honored and upheld while teaching young people science and math, rather than intolerance. Surely, we can sustain our unique traditions while giving women their full and rightful role in the politics and economics of a nation.  Surely, we can rally our nations to solidarity while recognizing equal treatment for all communities -- whether it’s a religious minority in Myanmar, or an ethnic minority in Burundi, or a racial minority right here in the United States.  And surely, Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel, but Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land¹⁸ .  We all have to do better as leaders in tamping down, rather than encouraging, a notion of identity that leads us to diminish others.

And this leads me to the fourth and final thing we need to do, and that is sustain our commitment to international cooperation rooted in the rights and responsibilities of nations. 

As President of the United States, I know that for most of human history, power has not been unipolar.  The end of the Cold War may have led too many to forget this truth.  I’ve noticed as President that at times, both America’s adversaries and some of our allies believe that all problems were either caused by Washington or could be solved by Washington -- and perhaps too many in Washington believed that as well.  (Laughter.)  But I believe America has been a rare superpower in human history insofar as it has been willing to think beyond narrow self-interest; that while we’ve made our share of mistakes over these last 25 years -- and I’ve acknowledged some -- we have strived, sometimes at great sacrifice, to align better our actions with our ideals.  And as a consequence, I believe we have been a force for good. 

We have secured allies.  We’ve acted to protect the vulnerable.  We supported human rights and welcomed scrutiny of our own actions.  We’ve bound our power to international laws and institutions.  When we've made mistakes, we've tried to acknowledge them.  We have worked to roll back poverty and hunger and disease beyond our borders, not just within our borders. 

I'm proud of that.  But I also know that we can't do this alone.  And I believe that if we're to meet the challenges of this century, we are all going to have to do more to build up international capacity.  We cannot escape the prospect of nuclear war unless we all commit to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and pursuing a world without them. 

When Iran agrees to accept constraints on its nuclear program that enhances global security and enhances Iran's ability to work with other nations.  On the other hand, when North Korea tests a bomb that endangers all of us.  And any country that breaks this basic bargain must face consequences.  And those nations with these weapons, like the United States, have a unique responsibility to pursue the path of reducing our stockpiles, and reaffirming basic norms like the commitment to never test them again.

We can't combat a disease like Zika that recognizes no borders -- mosquitos don't respect walls -- unless we make permanent the same urgency that we brought to bear against Ebola -- by strengthening our own systems of public health, by investing in cures and rolling back the root causes of disease, and helping poorer countries develop a public health infrastructure.  

We can only eliminate extreme poverty if the sustainable development goals that we have set are more than words on paper. Human ingenuity now gives us the capacity to feed the hungry and give all of our children -- including our girls -- the education that is the foundation for opportunity in our world.  But we have to put our money where our mouths are.  

And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding -- to replace the ravages of war with cooperation -- if powerful nations like my own accept constraints.  Sometimes I'm criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions.  But I am convinced that in the long run, giving up some freedom¹⁹ of action -- not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests, but binding ourselves to international rules over the long term -- enhances our security.  And I think that's not just true for us. 

If Russia continues to interfere in the affairs of its neighbors, it may be popular at home, it may fuel nationalist fervor for a time, but over time it is also going to diminish its stature and make its borders less secure.  In the South China Sea, a peaceful resolution of disputes offered by law will mean far greater stability than the militarization of a few rocks and reefs.

We are all stakeholders in this international system, and it calls upon all of us to invest in the success of institutions to which we belong.  And the good news is, is that many nations have shown what kind of progress is possible when we make those commitments.  Consider what we’ve accomplished here over the past few years. 

Together, we mobilized some 50,000 additional troops for U.N. peacekeeping, making them nimble, better equipped, better prepared to deal with emergencies.  Together, we established an Open Government Partnership so that, increasingly, transparency empowers more and more people around the globe.  And together, now, we have to open our hearts and do more to help refugees who are desperate for a home.

We should all welcome the pledges of increased assistance that have been made at this General Assembly gathering.  I'll be discussing that more this afternoon.  But we have to follow through, even when the politics are hard.  Because in the eyes of innocent men and women and children who, through no fault of their own, have had to flee everything that they know, everything that they love, we have to have the empathy to see ourselves.  We have to imagine what it would be like for our family, for our children, if the unspeakable happened to us.  And we should all understand that, ultimately, our world will be more secure if we are prepared to help those in need and the nations who are carrying the largest burden with respect to accommodating these refugees.

There are a lot of nations right now that are doing the right thing.  But many nations -- particularly those blessed with wealth and the benefits of geography -- that can do more to offer a hand, even if they also insist that refugees who come to our countries have to do more to adapt to the customs and conventions of the communities that are now providing them a home.

Let me conclude by saying that I recognize history tells a different story than the one that I've talked about here today.  There's a much darker and more cynical view of history that we can adopt.  Human beings are too often motivated by greed and by power.  Big countries for most of history have pushed smaller ones around.  Tribes and ethnic groups and nation states have very often found it most convenient to define themselves by what they hate and not just those ideas that bind them together. 

Time and again, human beings have believed that they finally arrived at a period of enlightenment only to repeat, then, cycles of conflict and suffering.  Perhaps that's our fate.  We have to remember that the choices of individual human beings led to repeated world war.  But we also have to remember that the choices of individual human beings created a United Nations, so that a war like that would never happen again.  Each of us as leaders, each nation can choose to reject those who appeal to our worst impulses and embrace those who appeal to our best.  For we have shown that we can choose a better history.

Sitting in a prison cell, a young Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote that, “Human progress never rolls on the wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God.”  And during the course of these eight years, as I've traveled to many of your nations, I have seen that spirit in our young people, who are more educated and more tolerant, and more inclusive and more diverse, and more creative than our generation; who are more empathetic and compassionate towards their fellow human beings than previous generations.  And, yes, some of that comes with the idealism of youth.  But it also comes with young people’s access to information about other peoples and places -- an understanding unique in human history that their future is bound with the fates of other human beings on the other side of the world.

I think of the thousands of health care workers from around the world who volunteered to fight Ebola.  I remember the young entrepreneurs I met who are now starting new businesses in Cuba, the parliamentarians who used to be just a few years ago political prisoners in Myanmar.  I think of the girls who have braved taunts or violence just to go to school in Afghanistan, and the university students who started programs online to reject the extremism of organizations like ISIL.  I draw strength from the young Americans -- entrepreneurs, activists, soldiers, new citizens -- who are remaking our nation once again, who are unconstrained by old habits and old conventions, and unencumbered by what is, but are instead ready to seize what ought to be.

My own family is a made up of the flesh and blood and traditions and cultures and faiths from a lot of different parts of the world -- just as America has been built by immigrants from every shore.  And in my own life, in this country, and as President, I have learned that our identities do not have to be defined by putting someone else down, but can be enhanced by lifting somebody else up.  They don’t have to be defined in opposition to others, but rather by a belief in liberty and equality and justice and fairness. 

And the embrace of these principles as universal doesn't weaken my particular pride, my particular love for America -- it strengthens it.  My belief that these ideals apply everywhere doesn’t lessen my commitment to help those who look like me, or pray as I do, or pledge allegiance to my flag.  But my faith in those principles does force me to expand my moral imagination and to recognize that I can best serve my own people, I can best look after my own daughters, by making sure that my actions seek what is right for all people and all children, and your daughters and your sons. 

This is what I believe:  that all of us can be co-workers with God.  And our leadership, and our governments, and this United Nations should reflect this irreducible truth.

Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

END
11:17 A.M. EDT

1. "We’ve taken away terrorist safe havens" Name one!  Which terrorist safe haven is no longer breeding, training and harboring Muslim terrorists?? Afghanistan? Pakistan?? Iraq??? Iran???? Libya????? Syria?????? Which one, liar!!!!!!
2. "Iranian nuclear issue" Worse than kicking the can down the road, you hastened Iran's nuclear accession! You helped finance it, too. 
3. "ravages of climate change." Anthropomorphic climate change is a Socialist shibboleth; total fallacy. We need an international framework to exterminate Islam and stave off International Socialism. 
4. "Terrorist networks" Islam is the terrorist network, the rest is persiflage. Anger at illegal immigrants: lost jobs, increased social costs, dead victims, rape victims & victims of drunk drivers; why should we be angry?  Muslims: 14 dead in California, 49 dead in Florida, 29 injured in New York; why should we be angry?  They hate us because we do not sell our souls to their demon and need to punish us for not being them. Yet you accuse us of irrational anger!  You exemplify AssWholliness!!
5. "people lose trust in institutions" You never open your lie hole without spewing shit then you wonder why we lose trust?! You screw us at every turn and expect trust? 
6. "integration" 13 newly liberated colonies united to form a national government, they did not integrate; becoming one, they remained 13 united states. You urge us to surrender our sovereignty and submit our health, welfare, wealth and liberty to the whims of an international mob. Go to Hell!!!  You are the great divider: stirring up race war, class envy and Balkanization/identity politics.
   
7. "lifted the shadow of nuclear Armageddon;"  North Korea and Pakistan have nukes, threatening to use them. Iran is working on it and promises to use them. What is the purpose of growing wealth and populations?  Is it not to build and support mighty armies for conquest and empire building to accrue more power for the rulers?
   
8. "making the global economy work better for all people" Translation: global redistribution of wealth;tax us to enrich Africa, Arabia & Asia. Take it to Hell with you!
   
9. "Expectations rise, then, faster than governments can deliver" Governments do not deliver, they plunder. You spew the same old Socialist Agenda.  You demagogues raise and dash unreasonable expectations.
10. "what we spent at war in Iraq we could support institutions" The fallacy of alternative expenditures. We should have nuked Iraq, saving thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Lining the pockets of satraps is not a valid alternative use for that money.
    
11. "too much money in politics" Who raised the most early $ in the Republican primaries? Who won?  Who is raising the most in the general election campaign? Which side are the fat cats of Wall Street contributing to?  We need unfettered free speech and we do not need dead people voting  or your favorites voting twice.
    
12. "Middle East somehow prefer arbitrary rule" Afghanistan & Iraq are governed by the Koran. Egypt partially escaped it. Turkey has backslid into it. Got a clue yet???
    
13. "belief in ethnic superiority" Muslims are the best of peoples for the people as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. 3.110  Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80. We need to eliminate Islam! Islam can not and must not be tolerated!!! https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims
14. "If our religion leads us to persecute those of another faith" It's Islam, Stupid! 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Exactly what part of that do you not comprehend???
15. "perversions of a great faith" CamelShit!!! Islam is what it is: an Arab Mafia, by design, neither hijacked, perverted, twisted nor distorted.  https://www.scribd.com/doc/227418623/Islam-s-Mercenary-Mission-Updated
16. "we have to be honest about the nature of these conflicts" You are not honest, never was and never will be. You lie every time you open your lie hole to spew. It's Islam, Stupid. It was contrived for Moe's personal emolument through the profession of piracy. War sor the sake of $$$, falsely attributed to deity. Go to war and get hair pie in the sky; stay home and go to Hell. The conflict is existential and lasts until Islam is extinct. Let us hasten that happy day! https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims
17. "co-exist" Coexistence with an implacable existential enemy is not possible. Muslims are commanded to conquer the world.  They go to Jihad or to Jannahm. Jihad is the price of their admission to Jannah. https://www.scribd.com/doc/212631107/Jihad-Defined-and-Exemplified-pUpdated  https://www.scribd.com/doc/110516023/No-Justification-in-Islam-for-Terrorism-in-a-Pig-s-Anus
18. "Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land." CamelShit! There was and is no 'Palestine' it's Israel, Stupid!! Rome renamed the Levant after the Philistines as an insult to the Jews after the Bar-Kochba Rebellion. https://www.scribd.com/doc/259351549/Two-State-Solution-Peace-in-a-Pig-s-Anus
19. " giving up some freedom"  Franklin warned that those who give up liberty for security will have neither; he was correct. 

Obamination: ISIL Terrorism Strategy

Seventy four years ago, FDR reacted to the attack on Pearl Harbor, demanding a declaration of war.  Seventy years ago, Harry Truman ended that war by nuking Hiroshima & Nagasaki.  How sad it is that their successors in office are incapable of learning from their historical examples.

    December 6, '15, Obamination spewed shit in response to the San Bernardino Massacre.  That pile of excrement follows, with my contemptuous commentary in block quotes.

Good evening. On Wednesday, 14 Americans were killed as they came together to celebrate the holidays. They were taken from family and friends who loved them deeply. They were white and black; Latino and Asian; immigrants and American-born; moms and dads; daughters and sons. Each of them served their fellow citizens and all of them were part of our American family.

Nobody can feel the afflictive dispensation of bereavement and injury as intensely as those directly involved. Obamination exploits their grief and pain for political gain, a damnable act of AssWholliness.

Tonight, I want to talk with you about this tragedy, the broader threat of terrorism, and how we can keep our country safe.

The massacre happened because our government allowed enemy combatants to form a fifth column on our soil. No Muslims, no massacre.  That is all we need to know about it. 

    The threat of terrorism: "I will cast terror." Terror, in this context, implies inescaable impending doom such that children turn grey, nursing mothers abandon their infants and pregnant women drop their loads.  

     In modern military strategy, that of Pakistan, it means both the ends and the means, the state they wish to impose. 

    The government can do nothing to keep us safe because we are not safe. Muslims lurk among us. We will not be safe until they are expelled and excluded.

The FBI is still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but here is what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by one of their coworkers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas, or that they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home. 

The terrorists were directed and motivated by the damnable words of Allah, aka Satan, spoken by Moe 1400 years ago. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  

    It is sufficient to know that Islamic doctrine is the ultimate cause of the massacre.  ISIS propaganda summons Muslims embedded in Dar ul-Harb to slaughter Harbis, and two of them, damnation be upon them, did. It is enough, foreign command, direction and local conspiracy are indifferent except to potential victims who may be next.

But it is clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against America and the West.

CamelShit!!! "Radicalization" is a damnable lie. Terrorism is normative, not exceptional in Islam. Will cast terror, cast terror, made victorious with terror... who can get a clue?  Click through and read the ayat & ahadith linked above. Get a clue and curse Islam. 

    "Perverted interpretation" is a damnable lie.  8.39 commands warfare against pagans until only Allah is worshiped. 9.29 commands warfare against Christians, Jews & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to extortion.  The sooner the liar goes to Hell, the better.  Read the Qur'an & Sahih Bukhari to see Moe's interpretation of Islam, the only authentic interpretation.

They had stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition, and pipe bombs. So this was an act of terrorism, designed to kill innocent people.

    Acts of terrorism are designed to inflict terror; to create paranoia & confusion so as to make normal life impossible and weaken our will to resist.

Our nation has been at war with terrorists since al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11.

    Who were we at war witth 74 years ago? Was it kamikazes? Was it Panzeers? It was Imperial Japan and Germany, not individual organizations & divisions.  Islam is at war against us and we need to reciprocate.  We need to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth because its damnable doctrines perpetuate war.  

In the process, we’ve hardened our defenses — from airports to financial centers, to other critical infrastructure. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have disrupted countless plots here and overseas, and worked around the clock to keep us safe. Our military and counterterrorism professionals have relentlessly pursued terrorist networks overseas — disrupting safe havens in several different countries, killing Osama bin Laden, and decimating al Qaeda’s leadership.

    Too little, too late.  Reagan should have let Israel finish off Arafat instead, he sent Marines to Beirut to be massacred. Slick Willy should have nuked Iran & Saudi Arabia immediately after WTC1.  Shrub should have nuked Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia immediately after WTC2.

Over the last few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase. As we’ve become better at preventing complex, multifaceted attacks like 9/11, terrorists turned to less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society. It is this type of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009; in Chattanooga earlier this year; and now in San Bernardino. And as groups like ISIL grew stronger amidst the chaos of war in Iraq and then Syria, and as the Internet erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by terrorists to poison the minds of people like the Boston Marathon bombers and the San Bernardino killers.

They are simply reminding Muslims of the forgotten obligation: offensive Jihad.

For seven years, I’ve confronted this evolving threat each morning in my intelligence briefing. 

According to the reports I get, you skip the PDB.  The threat is "convert or die" but, being born Muslim, the threat is not against you, its against us.

And since the day I took this office, I’ve authorized U.S. forces to take out terrorists abroad precisely because I know how real the danger is.

The danger is in Ummah al-Islamiyya, Muslims jointly & severally. Killing a few leaders does not cut the mustard. Islam must become extinct.

As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people.

And you abandoned that responsibility, forsworn in your oath of office.  You are one of the enemy, not one of us.

As a father to two young daughters who are the most precious part of my life, I know that we see ourselves with friends and coworkers at a holiday party like the one in San Bernardino. I know we see our kids in the faces of the young people killed in Paris. And I know that after so much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a cancer that has no immediate cure.

Islam is the cancer, radiation is the answer.  The war continues until Islam is extinct.  Muslims are threatened with Hellfire if they lag behind and promised eternal orgy if they go to Jihad.  Its what Believers do.  Make them quit believing or quit living, one or the other. There is no other solution.

Well, here’s what I want you to know: The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other organization that tries to harm us.

Its Islam, Stupid! ISIL, HAMAS, Hezbollah, etc.  are subsets of Islam.  They all read the Qur'an, obey Allah & emulate Moe. While they believe in Allah, his imperative, threat & promise, there will be no peace. 

You can not destroy ISIL, even if you could, that would not bring peace because other Believers would continue the Jihad.

Our success won’t depend on tough talk, or abandoning our values, or giving into fear. 

Success will come, if it ever does, certainly not with any damn Democrat in power, by destroying their faith: causing them to cease believing in Allah and causing them to be ashamed of ever having believed. 

Appeasement is not one of our values, neither is submission nor surrender.  Old Harry was true to our values when he nuked Japan: saving American lives by killing the enemy.

That’s what groups like ISIL are hoping for.

No, they are hoping we will lose our will to resist and surrender to them.

Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless, and by drawing upon every aspect of American power.

We can not pevail with suicidal rules of engagement that value enemy lives and assets over ours.  We can not prevail by bombing empty buildings. We can not prevail by lying about the identity of the enemy.  We can not prevail by abandoning hard won ground. We can not prevail by allowing sanctuary to the enemy. We can not prevail by ignoring Iran's supplying the enemy at the front with EFPs.

Here’s how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, airstrikes are taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers, infrastructure. And since the attacks in Paris, our closest allies — including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — have ramped up their contributions to our military campaign, which will help us accelerate our effort to destroy ISIL.

There is no effort to destroy ISIL because ISIL is Islam and Islam is ISIL and you are one of them, not one of us.  If you wanted to destroy ISIL, thousands of bombing runs would not have ended with full armament.  If you wanted to destroy ISIL, that armored column approaching Mosul would have been strafed by A10s and destroyed.   

Second, we will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of thousands of Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so that we take away their safe havens.

Your training and equipment provided to Muslims will, sooner or later, be turned on us and our interests int he region.  Shi'ia & Sunni are rivals for power, both are  inimical to us, neither is a friend or allie.  Anyone who reads the Qur'an will know that.

In both countries, we’re deploying Special Operations Forces who can accelerate that offensive. We’ve stepped up this effort since the attacks in Paris, and we’ll continue to invest more in approaches that are working on the ground.

Third, we’re working with friends and allies to stop ISIL’s operations — to disrupt plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them from recruiting more fighters. Since the attacks in Paris, we’ve surged intelligence-sharing with our European allies. We’re working with Turkey to seal its border with Syria. And we are cooperating with Muslim-majority countries — and with our Muslim communities here at home — to counter the vicious ideology that ISIL promotes online.

The vicious ideology is Islam. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped, legislate and rule. All non-Muslims are waging war against Allah and must be converted,  subjugated or killed.  Its Islam, Stupid!!!  We who read the Qur'an & hadith know you to be an accursaed liar.

Fourth, with American leadership, the international community has begun to establish a process — and timeline — to pursue ceasefires and a political resolution to the Syrian war.

There is no ceasefire but hudna, for a maximum of ten years in Islam. There is no political resolution, only conquest or defeat. Any replacement for Assad will be worse.  You and Shrub caused this situation with your damned fool "democracy project" & "Arab Spring".

Doing so will allow the Syrian people and every country, including our allies, but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal of destroying ISIL — a group that threatens us all.

Other Muslims do not want to destroy ISIL, they want to use it against rivals for power, keeping it out of their own cities.

This is our strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by our military commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65 countries that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly examine our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to get the job done. 

The job will not be done until Islam is extinct. When that happy day comes, there will be no more ISIL.  

That’s why I’ve ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review the visa program under which the female terrorist in San Bernardino originally came to this country.

Visas do not cut the mustard. Expel and exclude all Muslims. Let no Muslim cross our border except on the way out.  Its Islam, Stupid!

And that’s why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.

Now, here at home, we have to work together to address the challenge. There are several steps that Congress should take right away.

To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun.

You can not stop Muslims from getting guns, knives, machetes, razors, hatchets and hammers. You need to get them out of here. Send them all home!!! 

Those who perpetrated the San Bernardino Massacre were not on the no fly list and two of their weapons were procured in straw buyer deals.  

What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.

What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist to live among us and kill our fellows at will?

We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject any gun safety measures. But the fact is that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies — no matter how effective they are — cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual is motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology. What we can do — and must do — is make it harder for them to kill.

You can only, and seek to, make it more difficult for us to defend ourselves. You are exploiting national grief for political gain, shame on you and every AssWhole who voted for you!

Next, we should put in place stronger screening for those who come to America without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether they’ve traveled to warzones. 

Just screen out the damn Muslims! Keep it simple, Stupid.

And we’re working with members of both parties in Congress to do exactly that.

Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against these terrorists. 

Congress should issue a declaration of war on Islam and order you to prosecute that war effectively to the last Musalim.

For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of airstrikes against ISIL targets. I think it’s time for Congress to vote to demonstrate that the American people are united, and committed, to this fight.

Impeaching, convicting and removing you from office is the first step.

My fellow Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the terrorist threat. Let me now say a word about what we should not do.

We should not be drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria. 

We should use our technical advantage against them: bomb them wherever you find them with Daisy Cutters, MOABs and Neutron Bombs.  Every base, every training camp, every occupied city and every military asset up in smoke without regard or regret for collateral damage. 

And quit supplying and training Muslims, they are the enemy.

That’s what groups like ISIL want. They know they can’t defeat us on the battlefield. ISIL fighters were part of the insurgency that we faced in Iraq. But they also know that if we occupy foreign lands, they can maintain insurgencies for years, killing thousands of our troops, draining our resources, and using our presence to draw new recruits.

The strategy that we are using now — airstrikes, Special Forces, and working with local forces who are fighting to regain control of their own country — that is how we’ll achieve a more sustainable victory. And it won’t require us sending a new generation of Americans overseas to fight and die for another decade on foreign soil.

Here’s what else we cannot do. We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam.

Only because you are a Goddamn Muslim. Its Islam, Stupid. We who read the Qur'an, hadith and Islamic law will not be deceived by your lies any more than we were deceived by  Shrub's. 

In 1778, before the reconquest of Israel, before American boots polluted the soil of the Hijaz, the Barbary Pirates sacked our merchantmen 'cuz it was "written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."  So Tripoly's Ambassador to England told Jefferson & Adams. Who will get a clue?

That, too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world — including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject their hateful ideology.

Anyone who rejects the damnable doctrines of Islam, is no Muslim, he is either an infidel, a hypocrite or an apostate.  Muslims are thugs and killers. Islam was founded by a barbarian war lord for his own personal emolument through plunder and extortion. 

Islam is the cult of death:  "We love death more than you love life." 'Cuz being killed in battle gets them out of the fire and into Allah's celestial bordello.

Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim. 

How many of the 270 Million Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Yazidis, Animists, pagans & Zoroastrians slaughtered by Muslims since 623 were Muslims?  Shi'ia and Sunni kill each other 'cuz they are rivals for power since before the battle of Karbala.  We are their primary target.

If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.

Exactly what Goddamn part of this escapes your comprehension: 

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

???

That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some Muslim communities.

Kill them wherever you find them, strike terror, terrify and fight those who... until... are not extreme, they are normative in Islam.  Moe spread terror by assassinations, genocide, barbarian rapine and burning crops.  The founder's preaching & example are normal, not extreme.

This is a real problem that Muslims must confront, without excuse. Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups like ISIL and al Qaeda promote; to speak out against not just acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.

Muslims must reject Islam and apostatize. That which you would have them condemn is  intrinsic  to the core of Islam.  It is enshrined in the Qur'an & exemplified in the Sunnah and can not be abjured short of apostasy.

But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination.

"Radicalization" is a Goddamn lie!  Its Islam, Stupid!! Believers are defined in 9.111 & 49.15. Click through and get a clue.  

It is the responsibility of all Harbis wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth, to reject, condemn, curse and campaign for the extinction of Islam.  Expelling and excluding Muslims from Dar ul-Harb is the first step towards regaining security.

It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country.

It is your responsibility to enact a criminal enterprise test on all who enter America.  Members of the Mafia, whether Italian or Arabic must be excluded. Admit no Muslims because they belong to the war cult, originally an Arab Mafia.

It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim Americans should somehow be treated differently.

There are no Muslim Americans. Islam and Americanism are mutually exclusive.  Muslims in America are an enemy fifth column and must be expelled.

Because when we travel down that road, we lose.

We lose when you lie about the identity of the enemy: its Islam, Traitor!

That kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups like ISIL.

Tolerating Islam and lying about it is the betrayal of our values: the divine origin of the rights to life, liberty, free expression, self government and property ownership.

Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.

Muslims, all Muslims are enemies sworn to the destruction of our way of life.  This is true no matter where they are dispersed over the face of the earth.  They are obligated by enslavement to Allah, to fight us until we submit.

My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a belief in human dignity — that no matter who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like, or what religion you practice, you are equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law.

Those who hold themselves superior because of their enslavement to Satan; who deny the sanctity of our blood & property and our human rights are not equal, they are 'more equal'. To Hell with them.  The practice of Islam is inimical to our lives and liberties.  Get a clue!

Even in this political season, even as we properly debate what steps I and future Presidents must take to keep our country safe, let’s make sure we never forget what makes us exceptional.

Our organic documents are the national treasures that make America exceptional.  Your AssWholliness: the abomination of desolation standing in the temple of liberty, is destroying this nation.

Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear;
that we have always met challenges — whether war or depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks — by coming together around our common ideals as one nation, as one people.

American patriots and Muslims are enemies, not one people. They are here to conquer, not to assimilate.

 So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt America will prevail.

Thank you. God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Obamination: Counter ISIL Strategy

C-Span posted a rough transcript derived from closed captioning of Obamination's spew at the Pentagon. Rather than bore you to tears with the entire pile of crap, I will pull out the most important chunks for dissection.

    The stupid, dishonest discourse is long and redundant; like all of Obamination's spews. The most effective con men inject a little truth into their spiels to rope in the suckers. Obamination is no exception.

. I WANT TO SAY AGAIN THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE QUICK. THIS IS A LONG-TERM CAMPAIGN.

    This nation has been under attack by Muslims motivated by the damnable doctrines of Islam since 1778.  Our first foreign war was against the Barbary Pirates

    So long as Muslims infest the earth believing in Allah, his imperatives, threat & pomise, a significant sub set of them will wage Jihad in the hope of avoiding Hell fire and gaining ready admission to Allah's celestial bordello.

    Islamic holy war is timeless, it spans the period from 623 when Moe attempted his first razia on camel caravans to the last day when the world will end. Here is a clue for you:  Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526.

    This war will not end while the earth is infested with Muslims. If Muslims abandon Jihad in favor of trade, commerce or agriculture, Allah will curse them with a blanket of disgrace until they return to Jihad, which is the "original religion of" Islam. Here is another clue for you:  Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455.

IT WILL TAKE TIME TO ROOT THEM OUT AND DOING SO MUST BE THE JOB OF LOCAL FORCES ON THE GROUND WITH TRAINING AND AIR SUPPORT AND COALITION.

    It is not possible to root them out; they pop up like weeds from the wombs of Muslimas. Terrorists are born, not made. Nobody has the political will to kill 1.3 billion Muslims.

    The highlighted clause refers to Peshmerga, Shi'ia militias, Iran's militia and various 'moderate' terrorist organizations. 

    If you are a sheep and two wolves are fighting over the right to eat you, which one will you root for? Will you stand in his corner as his trainer?  Only if you are a damned fool, which Obamination clearly is.

 WE HAVE SEEN WHEN WE HAVE AN EFFECTIVE PARTNER ON THE GROUND ISIS CAN BE PUSHED BACK.

    Muslims are our enemies, neither friends, partners nor allies. Allah expressly forbids equal and subordinate relations with kuffar; Muslims must be superior. Here are some clues for you:  3.28, 3.118, 4.89, 4.144, 5.51, 5.57.

    Kobane is once again under attack and at risk of being lost. The Peshmerga to not have sufficient strength to hold territory for long and Iraq & Turkey don't want them to obtain it.

ISIL IS SURROUNDED BY COUNTRIES AND COMMUNITIES COMMITTED TO ITS DESTRUCTION.

    ISIL is an alias for Islam. Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Emirates are all Muslim satrapies. They are all rivals for power;  some of them are using various terrorist groups including ISIL as proxies in their power struggles. Whomever comes out on top will eventually attack us.  Its Islam, Stupid!  Find out what Islam is here: Islam 101 For Politicians.

ISIL IS BACKED BY NO NATIONS AND RELIES ON FEAR. IT ALIENATES THOSE UNDER ITS FEAR AND CREATES NEW ENEMIES.

    ISIL is backed by Obamination and Turkey. All the aid we give to rival gangs will eventually fall into the hands of ISIL through conquest or mergers as is happening in Syria. Its Islam, Stupid!  When you aid and train one set of Muslims you are engaged in treason.

    The indigenous Christians, Kurds, Yazidis and Shi'ia lack the equipment and skill to mount an effective resistance, nobody will aid the Christians, and most of the victimized populations lack the will to fight.

WE WILL CONTINUE TO CRACKDOWN AN ISIL'S ILLIS LICIT FIGHTING AROUND THE WORLD.

   
    Crack down?  A few timid pinprick air attacks, less than half the sorties flown discharge ordinance, and a great deal of bluster accomplish little in the short run and nothing in the long run while Muslims continue breeding like rats and acquiring nuclear weapons & delivery systems.

    "Illicit fighting" ??  Since when is Imperialism legal? Would Imperialist attacks be fine with you if they did not enslave, rape and kill civilians?  Its Islam, Stupid!!!  Its Jihad: "war against non-Muslims".  It  entails terrorism and genocide. Here are some clues for you: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 

    Jihad is undertaken continuously, on Islamic initiative, without provocation.

I MADE IT CLEAR TO MY TEAM THAT WE WILL DO MORE TO TRAIN AND EQUIP THE MODERATE OPPOSITION IN SYRIA.

    Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war is treason. Congress: do your duty; introduce articles of impeachment for providing aid and comfort to Muslims.

ALL OF THIS SAID, OUR STRATEGY RECOGNIZES THAT NO AMOUNT OF MILITARY FORCE WILL END THE TERROR THAT IS ISILILLED. AS IRAQI CITIES AND TOWNS ARE LIBERATED WE WORK WITH IRAQ AND THE UNITED NATIONS TO REBUILD THE SECURITY SERVICES AND GOVERNANCE THEY NEED AND WE CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE EFFORTS OF THEIR PRIME MINISTER TO FORGE AN INCLUSIVE IRAQI GOVERNMENT UNITING ALL PEOPLE OF IRAQ. AND IN SYRIA, THE ONLY WAY THE CIVIL WAR ENDS IN A WAY THEY CAN UNITE IS A TRANSITION TO A GOVERNMENT THAT SERVES ALL SYRIANS.

    Terrorism can only be ended by ending the existence of Islam. When all Muslims are apostate or dead, then and only then will Islamic terrorism cease. 

    We can not rebuild what never existed.  Iraq is populated by and governed by Muslims. Under that condition, no victory is possible. We lose in every case no matter what we do.

    Do we need a government that includes the criminal element?  Do we need rapists, robbers and drug dealers in congress and cabinet posts?  Do we need to include ISIS members an sympathizers, too?  Oh, wait; we already do: al-Ikhwan members are in the White House. DHS and military officer corps.

    The new Syrian regime might serve Sunni, it might serve Shi'ia; depending on who comes out on top.  It will not serve and will persecute Alawites, Christians and  Druze.  Its Islamic, Stupid!

 ISIS POSES A THREAT BEYOND THE REGION OBVIOUSLY. WE HAVE SEEN DEADLY ATTACKS IN KUWAIT, EGYPT AND OTHER PLACES AND WE SEE A GROWING PRESENCE IN LIBYA AND ESTABLISHING FOOTHOLD IN NORTH AFRICA, MIDDLE EAST, AND SOUTHEAST ASIA. I HAVE CALLED ON THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO UNITE AGAINST THE EXTREMISM IN THE FIGHT THE UNITED STATES CONTINUES TO LEAD. WHEN NECESSARY TO PREVENT ATTACKS AGAINST OUR NATION, WE WILL CONTINUE TO PARTNER WITH NATIONS FROM AFGHANISTAN AND NIGERIA TO BUILD UP THEIR SECURITY FORCES AND WORK DAY AND LIGHT WITH ALLIES AND PARTNERS TO DISRUPT TERRORIST NETWORKS AND STOP ATTACKS AND SMOTHER CELLS OF ISIS THAT MAY BE DEVELOPING IN OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD.

    One substantial subset of the "International Community": the Muslim countries, is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

    ISIL is not extremism: it is normative Islam as Moe preached and practiced it. For clues, go to Amazon and get one of the biographies by Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Kathir or Ibn Sa'd.  The latter has a good collection of Moe's extortion lettes.

    Muslims are enemies, neither allies nor partners of  Western Civilization.  Islam is the terrorist network.  Wherever two or more Muslims are gathered, there is a cell of ISIS.  Its Islam, Stupid!

SO OUR EFFORTS TO COUNTER VIOLENT EXTREMISM MUST NOT COVER ANY GROUP BECAUSE OF THEIR FATH

    Genocidal, terrorist Jihad is normative Islam, not extremism. Its practitioners have not distorted, perverted nor hijacked Islam, they are obeying Allah and emulating Moe. Its Islam, Stupid!

    Any Group: ISIS. ISIL, al-Qaeda, HAMAS, Hizbollah?  Muslims!!!!!  Its Islam, Stupid!  They do what they do because they believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise.  Believers are only those who Allah's wet work, fighting in the cause of world domination, killing & being killed. They get Brownie Points for acts of terrorism. Jihad is their get out of Hell free card.  Here are some clues for you:  9.38-39, 9.111, 9.120, 49.15, 61.9-12..

IT IS ALSO TRUE WHY ULTIMATELY IN ORDER FOR US TO DEFEAT TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE ISIL AND al-Qaeda IT IS GOING TO REQUIRE US TO DISCREDIT THEIR IDEAS. THE TWISTED THINKING THAT DRAWS VULNERABLE PEOPLE INTO THEIR RANKS.

    Their ideas: Islam is God's law which must be imposed upon the entire world by force if necessary. Only Allah has the right to be worshipped. Only Allah has the right to rule and govern.  Infidels must be converted, enslaved, subjugated or killed.  Jihad is ordained for them and is their get out of Hell free card. If they go to Jihad, they return with spoils or gain ready admission to Allah's celestial bordello where they will spend their days drinking win and sporting with two houris who grow new hymens and as many as 70 Christian or Jewish women taken from the fire for their sexual pleasure.

    That is not "twisted thinking", its Islam, Stupid! Islam recruits mujahideen with fabricated tales of infidel oppression & injustice and promises of great reward: avoiding Hell and getting into Paradise.  The Qur'an, hadith & Islamic jurisprudence tell Muslims what they must do and why.  "The Book Of Jihad" gives them a concise cost/benefit analysis.

IDEAOLOGIES ARE NOT DEFEATED WITH GUNS BUT WITH BETTER IDEAS.

   
    Christianity is the better idea. Muslims are brainwashed with denials of critical core Christian doctrine. You need to disprove Islam; to discredit Allah & Moe before Muslims can consider conversion to Christianity.  

    You need to prove to them that Allah is Satan and Moe was a vile, evil false prophet.  Brig. S.K. Malik told us that we must destroy their faith in order to win. Its on page 60 of "The Quranic Concept Of War".

    The evidence you need is in the Qur'an, hadith & Sira.  Base a full length feature docudrama on those texts, produce it, dub it into the languages understood by Muslims and distribute it.  Three screen plays sit on the shelf because nobody has the courage to undertake the mission. If you really want to defeat ISIL, you will produce and distribute one of them.

THE UNITED STATES WILL CONTINUE TO DO OUR PART BY WORKING WITH PARTNERS TO COUNTER ISIL'S HATEFUL PROPAGANDA AND CONFIRM WITH WORDS AND DEEDS WE WILL NEVER BE AT FIGHT WITH ISLAM.

    Those are the words of a damned fool or a traitor if not both. We were at war with Islam: two Barbary Wars in the 19^th century.  Islam declared and is prosecuting war against us; we need to mount an effective counter attack and remove it from the face of the earth. The survival of liberty depends on it.

    Thomas Jefferson asked Tripoli's Ambassador to England by what right they attacked us.

" The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The generic declaration of war is found in Surah At-Taubah 9.29.    Its legal codification is found in Reliance Of The traveller book o, chapter 9.8.  The practical application is exemplified in Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386.  Note how Sidi's answer to Jefferson runs parallel to Al-Mughira 's reply to the Persian general.  Why did two men, so far separated chronologically and geographically, answer the same question in the same way?

BUT AROUND THE WORLD, WE ARE ALSO GOING TO INSIST ON PARTNERING WITH MUSLIM COMMUNITIES AS THEY SEEK SECURITY AND PROSPERITY AND DIGNITY THEY DESERVE. WE WILL EXPECT THOSE COMMUNITIES TO STEP UP IN TERMS OF PUSHING BACK AS HARDS -- HARD AS THEY CAN ALONG WITH PEOPLE OF GOOD.

    As explained in detail above, Muslims are our enemies, neither friends, allies nor partners; such relationships with infidels are explicitly forbidden. 

    Muslims do not seek security and dignity; they seek global conquest. Their prosperity derives from plunder and extoriton, not honest toil.

    They deserve to be ushered into Hell. Harry Truman showed you how to do it. Muslims are not people of good faith and good will, they are Satan's slaves. They are the real world's nearest equivalent to orcs and vampies.  They do not push back against terrorism, they sponsor it.

THIS LARGER BATTLE FOR HEARTS AND MINDS IS A GENERATIONAL ISSUE. IT WILL NOT BE WON OR LOST BY THE UNITED STATES ALONE. IT WILL BE DECIDED BY THE COMMUNITIES THAT COUNTRIES LIKE ISIS TARGET. IT WILL BE UP TO SCHOLARS AND CLERICS TO KEEP REJECTING WARPED UNDERSTAND UNDERSTANDINGS OF IRAN AND THEM TO KEEP THEIR YOUNG CHILDREN FROM JOINING SUCH GROUPS.

    The battle for hearts and minds will only be won by emancipating Muslims from enslavement to Satan. The struggle against Islam will not be won by Muslims; enemy forces inimical to human life & liberty.

    The warped understandings belong to Dr. Jasser and others who conceive of Islam as a personal religion unrelated to issues of war, peace and governance.  The scholars and clerics of Islam are part of the problem, not part of the solution until they convert to Christianity to curse & condemn the damnable doctrines of Islam.  Children of Muslims are born into the world's largest terror group: Islam.

IT WILL BE UP TO GOVERNMENTS TO ADDRESS THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC GRIEVANCES THAT TERRORIST EXPLOIT.

    Islam is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. Hell is raised by Muslims because they are Muslims who believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise, not because they are ignorant, impoverished, repressed, occupied or suppressed.