Showing posts with label Taqiyya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taqiyya. Show all posts

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Unforgivable Negligence


(Originally posted at OpposingIslam)

By Debi Brand



And I am reminded, as ibn Kathir provides in his tafsir, “Allah states that there are disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers among the bedouins.” (Surah At-Tawbah 9: 97-99)

The bedouins spoken to above were those among the first group of followers of the alleged “Prophet of Islam,” the Muslims of his day.

If then, in the time of the alleged presence on this earth of the alleged “Prophet,” in his following were “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers,” what fool among us now fails to regard today also in every group of Muslims are “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers”?

And regarding that fact, what coward among us, what fool among us, what Leader, will send, or lead men into war wherein they are expected to count as allies those from Muhammad’s Ummah and do so failing to provide for the above-stated reality: among the Muslims are “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers”?

Moreover, regard or refuse to do so, the believers among that group will be those who live by that written in “The Book of Allah,” they will be those who live by all in the Sunnah of “Allah’s Messenger,” lock, stock, and barrel of it.

Therefore, unless willing to accept your place among the derelict, you had better know, and know well, what orders and guidance are in those works, because they will be the orders the believer will follow, all others they will reject.

They will follow “Allah’s” orders, they will follow the same of “Allah’s Messenger.” Thus, unless you and your orders, goals, and commands fall in line with the above “Allah” orders, the believer will reject your orders, and execute “Allah’s” orders.

The disbelievers referred to above are those who openly reveal they disbelieve the lot of Muhammad’s message. The Hypocrites among the Muslims, they are those who conceal the disbelief in Islam they hold in their hearts, thus, outwardly, to save their skins, they pretend to be believers. 

They are the ones we claim are “Moderate Muslims.”

The Qur’an states concerning these hypocrites, “They hide within themselves what they dare not reveal to you.” (Surah Al “Imran: 154) They dare not reveal their disbelief to the believers, as touched on above, aiming to stay alive.

What’s more, at times the believers in “Allah’s Book,” they too, to the unbeliever, “hide within themselves what they dare not reveal to you.” Until the moment is right, opportunity ripe for the taking,  that is, then the mask they hurl aside.

Sahih of Al-Bukhari speaks to that concept this way: “Abu Ad-Darda said, “We give a smile for some people while our hearts curse them.” (Bukhari, Book of Al-Adab [Good Manners].)

Why in this world would such a hadith state that, what in this world could it possibly mean?

Expounding on, “Let not the believers take the disbelievers as friends instead of the believers….” Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir, answers that for us:


Allah prohibited His believing servants from becoming supporters of the disbelievers, or to take them as comrades with whom they develop friendship, rather than the believers ….except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al Bakhari said, that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.”


Footnotes thereat provide on the “Taqyah”: “To shield what is in one’s heart.” (Tafsir, ibn Kathir, Surah 3. Al ‘Imran:28, Vol. 3. P.142.)

For such reason, if you are taking as our “allies” those who hold as sacred in their hearts that in “Allah’s Book” and you are commanding those entrusted to your leadership to trust in the alleged trustworthiness of your alleged “ally,” you had better know—and make known you know it—you know and regard what is in “Allah’s Book.”

In other words, just state it, Mr. President, and have your Generals do likewise, this is a Russian Roulette game you are willing to play, for the chance of mission-success—mission: our rule, our ways, our traditions, overruling the inveterate rules, ways, traditions of Muhammad in the hearts and minds of “those who believe."

Just make it clear, right up front, in pursuit of the above mission, this is a sting to our core that you are willing to chance absorbing the pain thereof, and absorb that pain not just once, not just twice, not just thrice, but if need be endlessly.

State clear, Sir, unlike “Muhammad’s” rule thus his sunnah, “A believer is not stung twice (by something) out of one and the same hole,” we will be. (al-Bukhari, Book of Al-Adab [Good Manners]).

Footnote provided on the just cited sahih, reads, “A believer should be on the alert and benefit by his experience to avoid faults in future and is not deceived twice.” (Ibid.)

Under the heading, “The Believer Does Not Provide Opportunity to be Stung Twice From One (And the Same) Hole,” Sahih Muslim speaks to the above-cited sunnah-contrast to our practiced idiocy. (V. 4. Book Pertaining to Piety and Softening of Hearts.)

Ibn Sa’d, and others do also, Sa’d providing, “The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: Verily, a believer is not stung twice from the same hole. You will not return to Makkah to declare, rubbing your cheeks, that you had befooled Muhammad twice.” (Kitab Al-Tabaqat Al-Kabir, Vol. II, P. 51.)

But we will oblige the believer with such bragging rights. Do so again and again, and again, as history records concerning such.

Therefore, Mr. President, just make it clear to the troops beneath your command, in this mission, part of their mission is to pretend a believer is something other than what “the Book of Allah” declares a believer is.

State fact clear, Sir: you are asking our soldiers to take as allies those who hold in their hearts regard for the “Book of Allah,” thus regard for the orders and examples of the “Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger.”

And given this “ally” of ours holds such in his heart, at some point, if half a chance avails itself, that “ally” is certain to reveal that which he holds in his heart. Act in accordance with that. And at that moment, whatever you, your “war-plans,” and your policies have provided to that believer as easy prey will be harvested as just that.

Once again, homes, hearts, and lives will absorb the pain of the stupidity and cowardice in our leaders in face of Islam. Because far too many of our leaders are by choice ignorant on the doctrines of Islam, thus to cowardly to candidly address what is written therein. So once again, at the hands of one of our “allies,” a believer, who, we like fools, claimed as one of our allies, three more U.S. Soldiers fell.

What purpose did the death of these men serve?

Here follows that answer:


It is more humiliating for the disbelievers and more comforting to the hearts of the faithful that the believers kill the disbelievers by their own hands. Allah said to the believers of this Ummah,

“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands, and disgrace them, and give you victory over them, and heal the breast of a believing people [9:14].” ( Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Ibid, (Vol.4), PP. 268 - 269.)


Tafsir Ma ‘ariful Qur’an rendition of that verse and a couple others included here with it reads this way: [“Allah” commanded] “And give those who disbelieve the ‘good’ news of a painful punishment.” (Surah Al-Taubah: 9: 3) “Kill the Mushriks wherever you find them.” ( 9: 5.)

It follows that with, “Fight them, so that Allah should punish them at your hands and disgrace them, and help you win against them and bring relief to bosoms of a believing people, [14] and remove the rage of their hearts…. [15.]” (Surah Al-Taubah : 9, as stated, Ma’ariful Qur’an Vol 4 rendered.)

In concluding this, Mr. President, once more, you Sir -- as were to no-avail asked your predecessors -- are asked, begged, to find within yourself the courage and discipline to acquaint yourself with that in “Allah’s Book.”

Sir, once again, you are asked and begged, to regard the facts of what comprises the doctrines of Islam. Demand the same of your Generals and Commanders. Do so, before you ask our men and women in uniform to take as allies those who believe in that book.

Choosing to follow in the footsteps and practice of your immediate predecessors in this conflict, with respect to the above, and thus, electing to neglect the above voiced request and plea for you to attend to the duty stated and called for, will be for you just as it was for them: except for the Cross, unforgivable negligence.

(As originally posted at: Unforgivable Negligence, at OpposingIslam)


Sunday, October 14, 2012

Muslims and Dhimmis Covering Camel Crap: Interfaith Alliance-Truth About American Muslims

What is the truth about American Muslims? Questions and Answers
 

http://interfaithalliance.org/americanmuslimfaq


   
The deception begins with an appeal to authority: listing 21 organizations endorsing their propaganda.  But content is key: either factual or false. This blog post will point out the most important malignancies contained in the screed.  I have excerpted the main points in the screed, using them as headings.  The screed begins with a diversionary question.

What is the truth about American Muslims?

        Muslims are Muslims, American, European, Arabian or Asian, they have submitted to Allah and recited the Islamic creed. American Muslims are not a special sub set of the Ummah just because they reside in America.  Islam has a standard doctrine set which is enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's sunah.  The truth with  which we must be concerned is the truth about Islam: the doctrines and practices which it imposes on Muslims and seeks to impose upon the whole world, by stealth or by force as required by the circumstances.  . 

religious liberty

    The rights, liberties and privileges of citizens, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution are individual rights, liberties and privileges, applying to individual citizens jointly and severally, not to religions or other associations.

    The free exercise clause applies to religions, not to continuing criminal enterprises.  Religions, rightly understood, are eleemosynary and beneficent institutions whose mission is worship and right relations between men, society and God.  Islam does not fit that mold; it is a way of life: predation on the rest of the human race, not a religion.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial. 

    `The faith component of Islam serves two purposes: first and foremost, it motivates Muslims to participate in Jihad for the emolument of Moe and his caliphs. Second, it serves as a camouflage to prevent its victims from recognizing Muslims as predators.("Great religion of peace.")

    Moe, speaking for Allah, issued imperatives, a threat and a promise, the latter two serving to ensure compliance with the imperatives.  Surah An-Naba' contains the primary description of Islamic Paradise & Perdition.  Parts of the description are scattered through the Qur'an.  You need to be aware of them to form an accurate judgment; I ask that you follow these links and read the relevant ayat before proceeding. 

Which do you choose: Allah's celestial bordello or the fire?  Allah has a carrot and a stick to motivate his slaves.  The headings are linked to the relevant ayat.

Allah's Promise

    If you participate in Jihad, for pure and pious motives, I will forgive your sins and admit you to my celestial bordello. 

Allah's Threat

    If you do not join the Jihad when called, I will cast you into Hell. 

Jihad Imperatives

    Jihad is ordained for Muslims, though they may dislike it; Allah knows what is best for his slaves. The ordinance is in 2:216. In Surah Al-Anfal ("Spoils of War") 8:39 commands perpetual war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  8:57 commands Muslims to deliver harsh treatment to their defeated victims to terrorize prospective victims, thus reducing their ability and will to mount an effective defense.  8:60 commands Muslims to maximize their military force so as to terrorize their prospective victims. 

    9:29 commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against people with scriptural religions until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments in lieu of destruction. .  9:123 commands Muslims to attack disbelievers nearest them first.

    Muslims and their Dhimmis will assert falsely that those ayat do not mean what they plainly say, that they are mis-translated, mis-interpreted or taken out of context.  The links above go to a translation authorized by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which lets you see the full context and translator's footnotes.  To gild the lilly, I now add links to 37 parallel translations, a word by word breakdown of the ayat, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, & al-Jalalayn, confirming ahadith and Shari'aj so that all doubt may be dispelled. 

Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is primarily offensive, not defensive. This fact is found, somewhat encrypted, in Reliance O9.1, cited above and Hedaya 2:9:1:141 which states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The permanent nature of Jihad is codified in page 140, see the marginal note.   The matter of Jizya being in lieu of destruction is in Hedaya, page 218.

extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam

    That shibboleth is full of malignant, malicious malarkey.  Moe preached and exemplified Islam. What Moe preached and exemplified is normative Islam, not extremism.  Extremists are a figment of fertile imaginations; heads full of fecal matter.  Believers exist, extremists do not. Read 8:1 in context through 8:6.  What is the meaning of "spend" and "go out "? I will save you the research: believers are only those who join the jihad, fighting in Allah's cause, which is total global domination.  Believers sold their souls to Allah so they fight in his cause, killing and being killed for admission to his celestial bordello after they die. 

conflate all of Islam with extremist violence

    Same shibboleth, different expression. It remains malicious, malignant malarkey.  Islam is what Moe preached and practiced.  "Extremist violence" is often used as a code phrase for terrorism, which is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Follow the links to the fatal facts.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

    9:120 is of particular interest for this critical clause:  "nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness." Terrorism is a :deed of righteousness: which earns extra credit towards moving up one level in Allah's celestial bordello.

small factions within Islam

    Jihad, war against Infidels, is ordained for Muslims; all Muslims, not just a few.  It is how Allah tests them to see which are the real believers. Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya: binding on all until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  However, failure to go or at least desire to threatens with the fire.  See Sunan Ibn Maja 2763, Riyad Us-Saliheen 1341 and 1348. How did a "small faction" conquer half the known world in a few centuries?

extremist theology

    Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to rule. Only Islam is accepted.  Muslims are the best of people as they drag us in chains to Islam: 3:110, Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80

acts of violence

by radical individuals and groups

must not be used to condemn Islam itself

    What did Allah command Muslims to doWho must Muslims emulate? What did he exemplify for them to emulate?

    When an institution is founded by a man who said this, the institution is condemned by its founding:

«بُعِثْتُ بَيْنَ يَدَيِ السَّاعَةِ بِالسَّيْفِ حَتَّى يُعْبَدَاللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَجُعِلَ رِزْقِي تَحْتَ ظِلِّ رُمْحِي، وَجُعِلَتِ الذِّلَّةُ وَالصَّغَارُ عَلَى مَنْ خَالَفَ أَمْرِي، وَمَنْ تَشَبَّهَ بِقَومٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُم»

 

(I was sent with the sword just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

Manners in Speech

The Benefits of Iron

Sahih Bukhari Ch. 61[Bewley]

    An institution, whose founder, after its founding, dictated and dispatched extortion letters in the name of the institution and followed up with armed conquest is condemned by its founder and its mission, which is mercenary & martial. 

understanding and respect

     We come to understand Islam when we read its canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, jurisprudence & biography. Islam is not respectable and people who are informed and moral will never respect it.

religious

    Religious law is no problem, when it confines itself to internal and spiritual matters, without negatively impacting non-members. The Shari'ah of Salat is no problem, it does no external harm if a Muslim must repeat his prayers if he farts.

    The law of Zakat is a problem, because it requires 1/8 of the amount collected to be paid to terrorists. See Reliance of the Traveller H8.17.

enforce or interpret religious law

    "Courts may not, and do not, apply religious law in deciding contracts disputes, divorce or child custody cases or even in refereeing disputes over control of houses of worship."  The Center for Security Policy, in their report on Shari'ah in state courts, reveals that 21 cases involved marriage issues, 17 cases involved child custody issues, 5 cases involved Shari'ah contract law, 3 cases involved Shari'ah doctrine, 2 involved Shari'ah property, 1 case involved due process issues  law and 1 case involved both marriage & custody issues.  The decisions were Shari'ah compliant in 15 cases. See Tables 3 & 4 on page 45 of the report.

charitable giving

    Zakat, the Muslim charity tax, pays a 1/8 share to terrorists. Giving Zakat to Infidels is strictly prohibited. H8.24

political movement

    Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise: a war crime against humanity, not a political movement.  It conflates the spiritual and temporal powers.  It seeks world domination through stealth and conquest, but its founding mission was its founder's personal emolument.

spoken out against extremist violence

    Camel Crap! That is the most egregious lie! What they label as extremist is normative Islam.  They can not and will never abjure Islamic violence because to do so is a death warrant.  Islamic law explicitly forbids denying anything belonging to the Qur'an, which includes the Jihad genocide and terror imperatives found in Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah.  To abjure them entails apostasy, punishable by execution as per Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7.

  “Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives.  There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism.
The devil is in the details: Muslims lie by al-Taqiyya and kitman. In the present case, kitman is employed: they are obscuring their private definition of innocent. Only Muslims can be innocent, all others are infidels subject to arbitrary destruction

    Islam considers non-Muslims to be rebels against Allah and prescribes hudud for them: crucifixion, execution, amputation or expulsion. The details are in 5:33. The Qur'anic expression is "wage war against Allah and his Messenger". The Qur'an does not define it, but Tafsir Ibn kathir does.  "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. "

freedom of expression and religious liberty

    Each year for the last decade, the OIC has pushed resolutions through the UN demanding criminalization of criticism of Islam. The resolutions condemn associating Islam with terrorism & human rights violations.  Islamic blasphemy law, found in Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7, is applied to conquered Jews & Christians in O11.10.

Jihad

    Offensive, genocidal, terrorist conquest is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Defined in Shari'ah as war against non-muslims, two translators of the Qur'an list the benefits of engaging in Jihad and the costs of abandoning it. Scroll to the bottom of the page and read the footnote 2:190.

  forbids forced conversion

    8:39 declares a fight until loop against pagans. Its terminal condition is compound: cessation of resistance and a monopoly for Allah.  Islamic law implements it thusly: "The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim.  3:110 is said to mean bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks. 

ethical conditions under which it is permissible to fight

`The basic law of Jihad is laid down in this hadith:  Sahih Muslim 19.4294. It does not say what makes war holy, but it does list acts which profane it:

  1. embezzling spoils
  2. killing children
  3. mutilating bodies
  4. fleeing from the enemy

The first two items in that list are the same. If you do not understand this, read and re-read Reliance O9.13 until you obtain a clue.
Moe ordered his generals in the field to offer three choices:

  1. embrace Islam
    1. join the jihad
  2. pay extortion and accept subhuman status

if the second choice was refused, they stayed in place as Muslims and did not collect spoils. If the third choice was rejected, the general implored Allah's aid

misuse the term “jihad”

 to give a religious veneer to their

violent political movements and tactics.

    Moe did that. Modern terrorists are obeying Allah and emulating Moe. 

require women to be covered

    Umar recognized Sauda, one of Moe's wives answering a call of nature  and harassed her, resulting in the hijab rule.

four wives

    The Qur'an permits it. Moe had 9 wives at once.  Shari'ah permits it. In England, Muslims can have 4 wives living on welfare. 

honor killings

    Denial is not proof.  'The Qur'an is proof 18:74. Islamic law is proof: Reliance O1.2(4). A companion of Moses allegedly killed a boy on assumption that he would go astray and dishonor his parents; that Allah would replace him with one better.  There is no retaliation for killing one's own child or grandchild. 

Taqiyya

    Muslims are prohibited to form inferior and equal relationships with infidels.  Doing so is taken as a sign of hypocrisy except in the case of the Muslim who deceives infidels for his own protection or the promotion of Islam.  3:28. See also Tafsir Ibn kathir

Sharia

    If Moe said it in Allah's name or did it, its Shari'ah. Allah is to be obeyed and Moe emulated.  Many provisions of Shari'ah are 180° out of phase with our Constitution and laws. A Muslim can compel his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry the man of his choice. He can divorce his wife by thrice saying "i divorce you:. There is no alimony or child support. A divorced Muslima loses child custody if she remarries.  An Infidel divorced by a Muslim can not obtain child custody.  Infidels can not testify in court.  The indemnity paid for the death of a Muslim is 100 camels, for a Muslima, 50, for a Christian, 33, for a Zoroastrian, 15.

    In this blog post, I have given you links to two codifications of Shari'ah. Now I add a third: the Maliki's Risala, which is shorter and more legible than Reliance & Hedaya.  This link goes directly to the law of Jihad.