The Archbishop recited a long screed, full of redundant turds, I shall attempt to mark them with bold font emphasis and deal with them as topic headers in my commentary below the screed. Particularly egregious concepts may be marked with superscripts internally linked to my comments.
Since I did not discover this until early Sunday morning, and found statements by the Secretary General and Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah along with the Fez Plan, I will try to limit the time wasted on each screed and re-use as much commentary as I can.
The Fez Plan Of Action is a 30 page report full of the usual standard United Nazis boilerplate including references to HRC Res 16/18, which, implemented by the Istanbul Process, is designed to strip us of our right to free expression.
Intervention of
Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the
United Nations
Launch of the Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes
United Nations, New York, 14 July 2017
Excellencies, Distinguished Fellow Panelists,
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am very pleased to be present at the launch of this Plan of Action, which is meant to help “better understand, articulate and encourage the potential of religious leaders to prevent incitement and the violence that it can lead to, and to integrate the work of religious leaders within broader efforts to prevent atrocity crimes” (p. 3).
The fruit of three years of hard work, the Plan is intended primarily for religious leaders and workers, but also helpfully includes detailed recommendations for States and state institutions, civil society organizations, and the media, conscious that preventing genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity requires the contributions and collaboration of each of us and all our communities and institutions.
While the Holy See is not able to support every one of the 177 targets flowing from the Plan’s nine groups of thematic recommendations and 35 objectives, the plan as a whole represents a major, practical step forward in fostering a culture and society consistent with what the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit called the Responsibility to Protect.
I would like to share three brief reactions.
First, I wish to underline the emphasis in the Plan that “States have the primary responsibility to protect populations from atrocity crimes, as well as their incitement.” This is in line with Articles 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome, which states the responsibility to protect falls primarily, but not exclusively, on national authorities. Then the international community is called upon, “as appropriate, [to] encourage and help States to exercise this responsibility.” This encouragement and help can take many forms, among which I would like to recall the duty to refrain from inciting tension and conflict in third States that could constitute the prelude, the scene or still worse, the breeding ground for committing the hateful crimes in question.
There has been some focus recently on the role of religious leaders in preventing atrocity crimes — and this is good, because religious leaders have much to contribute — but, at the end of the day, religious leaders and organizations obviously do not have the resources by themselves to stop atrocities. While they can influence behavior and mentalities, they do not possess the resources and instruments of stopping mass atrocities that only States possess, like law enforcement agencies and armed forces. While I heartily welcome the spotlight on the helpful role of religious leaders, it is important to maintain the crucial focus on the primary responsibility of national governments and the international community to act to protect the innocent from savage acts.
My second point is that, as the Plan helpfully emphasizes, “religious leaders and actors can” — and I would add, do — “play a particularly influential role” in preventing atrocities, “because they have the potential to influence the behavior of those who follow them and share their beliefs.”1
Negatively, this influence has been abused by those religious leaders who have misused their authority and influence to spur or justify atrocities. Positively, it has been seen in the many more religious leaders who have condemned such abuses, stressing that violence against others in the name of God is a great blasphemy against the name of God and the greatest disservice to religion itself.2
Religious leaders and communities are called to uphold the Responsibility to Protect by engaging in interreligious dialogue and promoting peace in their communities. Their vocation is to carry out and inspire actions aimed at helping the building of societies based on respect for life and human dignity, charity, fraternity2.5, which goes far beyond tolerance, and solidarity.
The Plan offers religious leaders many helpful good and best practices in order to inoculate those who come to their houses of worship from the half-truths that ideologues can use to incite them to hating rather than loving, and attacking rather than serving, their neighbor3. The very existence of a Plan directed toward religious leaders is also a humble recognition by the international community that those who are being incited by pseudo-religious motivations for violence aren’t going to be effectively persuaded out of it by secular argumentation from so-called infidels or by economic materialism. They need, rather, valid religious arguments that show that extremists’ violence-inducing exegesis is unfaithful to the text and to the God they’re claiming to serve; they need persuasive counterarguments that plant the seeds of peace and eradicate the weeds of violence.4
The phenomenon of religiously motivated violence is a particular challenge with regard to the defense and protection of Freedom of Religion or Belief.5 Understanding the motivations that lie at the root of terrorism and violence is complex and requires careful reflection and analysis, all the more so when there is a religious dimension to it6. Religious leaders are uniquely placed to offer such reflection. Pope Francis has helped to open up spaces for this reflection to occur so that religious leaders are able to contribute to the sensitive debate about religiously motivated terrorism.
Acknowledging explicitly the religious dimension of some expressions of violent extremism is fraught with danger7, and we can understand the reluctance of governments and international bodies to do so. Thus, the most important contribution of religious leaders to this debate is to help people understand that acknowledging the religious dimension of some violent extremism, or more precisely the manipulation of religion for violent ends8, does not mean equating religion, or a particular religion, or an entire religious community, with violence.9
In his April 28 address to the participants of the International Peace Conference in Cairo, Pope Francis emphasized that “religion is not a problem but a part of the solution10.” In order to “counter effectively the barbarity of those who foment hatred and violence,” he said, “we need to accompany young people, helping them on the path to maturity and teaching them to respond to the incendiary logic of evil by patiently working for the growth of goodness, … daily turn[ing] the polluted air of hatred into the oxygen of fraternity.”
For religious leaders to carry out this service, he said, it’s essential that religion not “be relegated to the private sphere, as if it were not an essential dimension of the human person and society,” because such secularizing tendencies can add fuel to the fires being stoked by those who want to instrumentalize religious motivations toward violent ends. Confining religion only to the intimate sphere of the person risks the development of a culture of intolerance, which is one reason why national authorities must recognize and ensure religious freedom as an inalienable fundamental human right.
The public good that comes from religion needs to be appreciated and promoted so that religious leaders can better, Pope Francis continued in Cairo, “unmask the violence that masquerades as purported sanctity, … denounce violations of human dignity and human rights, … expose attempts to justify every form of hatred in the name of religion11, and … condemn these attempts as idolatrous caricatures of God.” 12
My third and last point involves the importance of religious leaders’ participation in meaningful interreligious dialogue, which is the focus of the fifth thematic recommendation.
This is something that Pope Francis has been stressing by both word and action since his 2013 election. “Interreligious dialogue,” he wrote in the exhortation that charts the path of his pontificate, “is a necessary condition for peace in the world.” He elaborated on that conviction this January in his annual address to the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See. He described how interreligious dialogue, beyond the many direct fruits that come from it for believers, provides the peoples of the world a paradigm to discuss their differences, grow in mutual appreciation of others’ perspectives, and journey together toward peace and other common goals.
Religiously motivated men and women, moved as they are by the call of God to reverence the other’s God-given dignity and love their neighbor, he said, have a special responsibility to show everyone how to converse about the deepest and most important matters and to work respectfully through what may divide. Moreover, they show adherents how to fight injustice and root out the personal and social causes of discord that can lead to war, to renounce violence and vengeance in vindicating one’s rights, to transcend selfishness and the hatred that calcifies through lack of forgiveness, and to carry out the works of mercy that build a culture of peace.13
That’s why the role and work of religious leaders and believers in general, and interreligious dialogue in particular, are crucial not just in preventing incitement to violence among susceptible coreligionists, but in fostering incitement to virtue and thereby creating the type of peaceful and inclusive societies in which atrocity crimes are ethically unacceptable, indeed, unimaginable.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Launch of the Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes
United Nations, New York, 14 July 2017
Excellencies, Distinguished Fellow Panelists,
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am very pleased to be present at the launch of this Plan of Action, which is meant to help “better understand, articulate and encourage the potential of religious leaders to prevent incitement and the violence that it can lead to, and to integrate the work of religious leaders within broader efforts to prevent atrocity crimes” (p. 3).
The fruit of three years of hard work, the Plan is intended primarily for religious leaders and workers, but also helpfully includes detailed recommendations for States and state institutions, civil society organizations, and the media, conscious that preventing genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity requires the contributions and collaboration of each of us and all our communities and institutions.
While the Holy See is not able to support every one of the 177 targets flowing from the Plan’s nine groups of thematic recommendations and 35 objectives, the plan as a whole represents a major, practical step forward in fostering a culture and society consistent with what the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit called the Responsibility to Protect.
I would like to share three brief reactions.
First, I wish to underline the emphasis in the Plan that “States have the primary responsibility to protect populations from atrocity crimes, as well as their incitement.” This is in line with Articles 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome, which states the responsibility to protect falls primarily, but not exclusively, on national authorities. Then the international community is called upon, “as appropriate, [to] encourage and help States to exercise this responsibility.” This encouragement and help can take many forms, among which I would like to recall the duty to refrain from inciting tension and conflict in third States that could constitute the prelude, the scene or still worse, the breeding ground for committing the hateful crimes in question.
There has been some focus recently on the role of religious leaders in preventing atrocity crimes — and this is good, because religious leaders have much to contribute — but, at the end of the day, religious leaders and organizations obviously do not have the resources by themselves to stop atrocities. While they can influence behavior and mentalities, they do not possess the resources and instruments of stopping mass atrocities that only States possess, like law enforcement agencies and armed forces. While I heartily welcome the spotlight on the helpful role of religious leaders, it is important to maintain the crucial focus on the primary responsibility of national governments and the international community to act to protect the innocent from savage acts.
My second point is that, as the Plan helpfully emphasizes, “religious leaders and actors can” — and I would add, do — “play a particularly influential role” in preventing atrocities, “because they have the potential to influence the behavior of those who follow them and share their beliefs.”1
Negatively, this influence has been abused by those religious leaders who have misused their authority and influence to spur or justify atrocities. Positively, it has been seen in the many more religious leaders who have condemned such abuses, stressing that violence against others in the name of God is a great blasphemy against the name of God and the greatest disservice to religion itself.2
Religious leaders and communities are called to uphold the Responsibility to Protect by engaging in interreligious dialogue and promoting peace in their communities. Their vocation is to carry out and inspire actions aimed at helping the building of societies based on respect for life and human dignity, charity, fraternity2.5, which goes far beyond tolerance, and solidarity.
The Plan offers religious leaders many helpful good and best practices in order to inoculate those who come to their houses of worship from the half-truths that ideologues can use to incite them to hating rather than loving, and attacking rather than serving, their neighbor3. The very existence of a Plan directed toward religious leaders is also a humble recognition by the international community that those who are being incited by pseudo-religious motivations for violence aren’t going to be effectively persuaded out of it by secular argumentation from so-called infidels or by economic materialism. They need, rather, valid religious arguments that show that extremists’ violence-inducing exegesis is unfaithful to the text and to the God they’re claiming to serve; they need persuasive counterarguments that plant the seeds of peace and eradicate the weeds of violence.4
The phenomenon of religiously motivated violence is a particular challenge with regard to the defense and protection of Freedom of Religion or Belief.5 Understanding the motivations that lie at the root of terrorism and violence is complex and requires careful reflection and analysis, all the more so when there is a religious dimension to it6. Religious leaders are uniquely placed to offer such reflection. Pope Francis has helped to open up spaces for this reflection to occur so that religious leaders are able to contribute to the sensitive debate about religiously motivated terrorism.
Acknowledging explicitly the religious dimension of some expressions of violent extremism is fraught with danger7, and we can understand the reluctance of governments and international bodies to do so. Thus, the most important contribution of religious leaders to this debate is to help people understand that acknowledging the religious dimension of some violent extremism, or more precisely the manipulation of religion for violent ends8, does not mean equating religion, or a particular religion, or an entire religious community, with violence.9
In his April 28 address to the participants of the International Peace Conference in Cairo, Pope Francis emphasized that “religion is not a problem but a part of the solution10.” In order to “counter effectively the barbarity of those who foment hatred and violence,” he said, “we need to accompany young people, helping them on the path to maturity and teaching them to respond to the incendiary logic of evil by patiently working for the growth of goodness, … daily turn[ing] the polluted air of hatred into the oxygen of fraternity.”
For religious leaders to carry out this service, he said, it’s essential that religion not “be relegated to the private sphere, as if it were not an essential dimension of the human person and society,” because such secularizing tendencies can add fuel to the fires being stoked by those who want to instrumentalize religious motivations toward violent ends. Confining religion only to the intimate sphere of the person risks the development of a culture of intolerance, which is one reason why national authorities must recognize and ensure religious freedom as an inalienable fundamental human right.
The public good that comes from religion needs to be appreciated and promoted so that religious leaders can better, Pope Francis continued in Cairo, “unmask the violence that masquerades as purported sanctity, … denounce violations of human dignity and human rights, … expose attempts to justify every form of hatred in the name of religion11, and … condemn these attempts as idolatrous caricatures of God.” 12
My third and last point involves the importance of religious leaders’ participation in meaningful interreligious dialogue, which is the focus of the fifth thematic recommendation.
This is something that Pope Francis has been stressing by both word and action since his 2013 election. “Interreligious dialogue,” he wrote in the exhortation that charts the path of his pontificate, “is a necessary condition for peace in the world.” He elaborated on that conviction this January in his annual address to the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See. He described how interreligious dialogue, beyond the many direct fruits that come from it for believers, provides the peoples of the world a paradigm to discuss their differences, grow in mutual appreciation of others’ perspectives, and journey together toward peace and other common goals.
Religiously motivated men and women, moved as they are by the call of God to reverence the other’s God-given dignity and love their neighbor, he said, have a special responsibility to show everyone how to converse about the deepest and most important matters and to work respectfully through what may divide. Moreover, they show adherents how to fight injustice and root out the personal and social causes of discord that can lead to war, to renounce violence and vengeance in vindicating one’s rights, to transcend selfishness and the hatred that calcifies through lack of forgiveness, and to carry out the works of mercy that build a culture of peace.13
That’s why the role and work of religious leaders and believers in general, and interreligious dialogue in particular, are crucial not just in preventing incitement to violence among susceptible coreligionists, but in fostering incitement to virtue and thereby creating the type of peaceful and inclusive societies in which atrocity crimes are ethically unacceptable, indeed, unimaginable.
Thank you for your kind attention.
religious leaders
Jews and Christians are not raising Hell, Muslims are. And their 'religious leaders' spur them on. Only damned fools dream that Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs will suddenly reverse course and tell Muslims to quit raising Hell. The plan is designed to lull us into thinking that is possible. Those are Mafia leaders, not leaders of a religion.Here's a 'religious leader' for you: https://www.memri.org/tv/sheik-yousuf-al-qaradhawi-allah-imposed-hitler-upon-jews-punish-them-allah-willing-next-time-will
Here is another;
incitement
"Prophet, urge the Believers to fight!" "Stimulation of the desire for Jihad"; those are clues for you who are clueless. Muslims are commanded to do Jihad and threatened with eternal damnation if they do not. They are promised great rewards in this world and the next if they comply. What is the "best deed" in Islam? What is its' highest peak? Ignorant, clueless damned fool!!!hatred
Wala wal' Bara: Love and Hate for the sake of Allah!!! We went astray and earned his wrath. He curses us., He calls us the worst of living creatures. He wants Muslims to torment, terrify and kill us in this world and he will burn us in the next. Pious Muslims who observe the five compulsory salat curse us 17 times every day! It is not possible to expunge the hatred from Islam!!! It is built in.The most accursed Qur'an, denigrated by reasonable people as the "Unholy Koranus", is full of incitement to violence.
-
4:95. Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good (Paradise), but Allâh has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward;
- 5:35. O you who believe! Do your duty to Allâh and fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive hard in His Cause as much as you can. So that you may be successful.
- 9:19. Do you consider the providing of drinking water to the pilgrims and the maintenance of Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah) as equal to the worth of those who believe in Allâh and the Last Day, and strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh? They are not equal before Allâh. And Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers).
- 9:41
- 9:73
- 9:86
-
8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.
-
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
-
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
-
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
- 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
That is offensive, not defensive war, as per "Reliance Of The Traveller" o9.1, o9.8, Hedaya 2.144 & Risala Ch. 30.2(b). Any sentient adult with a functioning brain knows that you do not stop and issue dawah for three days before responding to an attack! Al-Misri gives it away when he writes "provided he has first invited them to Islam".
pseudo religious
Craig Winn called it the "Profitable Prophet Plan" in "The Prophet Of Doom". Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. Islamic clerics have nothing to do with God or genuine religion. Islam's faith component is false & malignant, serving to disguise it and motivate Muslims to murder.violence
Such as the ongoing wars in Iraq & Syria and the terror attacks scattered all over the world?prevent atrocity crimes
There is only one way to prevent war crimes: exterminate the warmongers. the Pope has no influence on Muslims and the Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are spurring them on. Only a damned fool thinks that will be reversed.genocide
Why would a believer in Allah try to suppress genocide? Ever read Surah Muhammad 47.4? 'When you have killed and wounded many of them'... Then there is Surah Al-Anfal 8.67 wherein Allah tells Moe that his price of admission to the celestial oir orgy is "great slaughter".Did Moe really mean tht? What did he do?
- http://qurancomplex.gov.sa/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=33&l=eng&nAya=26# 33_ 26
- http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/059.html#005.059.447
war crimes
The war is a crime! Attacking innocent people, plundering their goods and enslaving them is criminal in itself. The ostensible purpose of Jihad is Allah's good pleasure through establishing and extending Islam's domain. The real purpose of Jihad is accrual of spoils. Hedaya is the fiqh of the Hanafi madhab, used in India and the Ottoman Empire. Get a clue for Chrissake!!!
This is a pull yer head outta yer arse moment: Infidels may be attacked without provocation and the purpose of Jihad is slaves & plunder. It's the law!
states
The only way, in the short term, to prevent terror attacks is to remove all of the potential terrorists from Dar al-Harb. Leave no Muslims where Allah's writ does not run. No Muslims, no terrorism.In Dar al-Islam, where Sunni & Shi'ia frag each other, take the F out of way and the E out of elephant.
breeding ground
Terrorists are bred in the wombs of Muslimas, regardless of geography. First world, third world, Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Harb is irrelevant. Terrorism springs from Allah's imperatives, threat and promise, not from poverty, illness, ignorance, repression, occupation, unemployment or any other maundering fantasy of LibTards.role of religious leaders
influential role
The Pope does not rule the world! He has no influence over Muslims. They do not give a damn what he says. They could not care less about the sermons of Franklin Graham. And their Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are spurring them on to Jihad.negative influence
Islam is not a religion, it is a Mafia and Imams, Mullahs & Ayatollahs are not religious leaders, they are Mafia leaders. Allah is Satan, not God. Allah commands Muslims to do Jihad, terrorism & genocide and threatens them with his fire pit if they do not. He promises them eternity in his celestial orgy if they do. That is what Islamic leaders preach and nobody can change that reality.respect
life
dignity
Until you testify that only Allah has the right to be worshiped, your blood and wealth are not sacred to Muslims and you have no human rights!charity
Islamic charity is for Muslims only. Zakat is not paid to infidels. Look it up in Reliance, if memory serves, it is in book h.fraternity
Fraternity, like charity, is for Muslims only. Muslims are commanded not to befriend infidels and to shun their infidel fathers and siblings.3:28, 3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 5:57, 9:23 , 58:14, 58:22, 60:1, 60:13
tolerance
Yeah, right. Kill them wherever you find them, fight them... curse them... very tolerant!!! /sarchalf-truths
Malignant malarkey! There is no truth in the Unholy Koranus! No distortion, twisting, perverting or hijacking is required to inculcate hatred, incite violence and provoke genocidal terrorism. That crap is built into the Medinan verses. The hadith and sunna are full of it. Check the table of contents of Ishaq's Sira as translated by Guillaume. Raid! Ghazwa! Attack! Murder! Assassination! With numerous iterations of each. There might be a reason for that. Can you get a clue? 27 Ghazwat & 47 Sariyas in ten years! That is a clue for you.freedom of Religion
Freedom of religion is for religions, not Mafias. How in the name of Christ can you leave anyone free to believe he has a divine commission to convert, kill or enslave you, which ever comes first? Muslims are obligated to wage war until pagans are Muslim or dead and we are subjugated and pay extortion in a state of subjection. What part of that do you not comprehend?They are told Allah will burn them if they do not fight us and admit them to his orgy if they do. They prefer hair pie with cherries to the fire pit. Their freedom ends where our rights begin!!!
Islam entails obedience to Allah, who commands Muslims to wage war against us. Islam entails emulation of Moe, who enslaved,raped, murdered and plundered infidels. Muslims who do not do those things are liable to the fire. They meet Allah with a sign of hypocrisy. According to its mastermind, 9/11 was an act of worship!!!
"Only Allah has the right to be worshiped." That outlaws Christianity, you Damned Fool!!! Jews & Christians conquered by Muslims, in a state of dhimmitude, are forbidden to pray aloud in public, hold processions, ring bells, sell wine or pork, build or maintain churches. Read the Pact Of Umar!!! Read Reliance Of The Traveller!!! Get a God Blessed clue for Chrissake!!!
religiously motivated
"Boy, does you believe?" "Then go kill some infidels and I will admit you to my whore house in the sky after you die. " !Islam is presented to them as a religion, supposedly from the creator of the world. He gave it all to Moe and their role is to seize and hold it. Believers are only those who fight in his cause, killing and being killed. How will you break their Iman???
religious dimension
Get your head out of your anus! Wipe the crap from your eyes and read the Unholy Koranus. Read Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4 along with it. Moe created an Arab Mafia disguised by a thin veil of false faith. Muslims believe it, which makes them implacable existential enemies to the human race.The root word of religion means '"to bind". Moe met his companions under a tree, shook their hands and took their bayah to wage Jihad as long as they live. That is one binding part.
The penalty for not doing Jihad is eternity in the fire. That is another binding part. Then there is the penalty for apostasy: death in this world and fire in the next. What real religion recruits and retains by force? What real religion rewards its acolytes with loot? What real religion awards Brownie Points for acts intended to injure or enragedisbelievers?
There are two possible solutions: make them quit believing or quit breathing. Which will it be?
extremism
Islamic violence is intrinsic; not bida. The alphabet soup of terrorist groups added nothing to Islam but new weapons & tactics. They are not perverting, hijacking or distorting Islam, they are obeying Allah and emulating Moe.manipulation of religion
The concept is false & malignant!! Islam was created from ancient Arab Paganism, bits of Zoroastrianism and bits of the Bible & non canonical texts. The mission of Islam is mercenary: Moe's personal emolument. The Unholy Koranus and sahih ahadith collections contains clues for the clueless. Moe said his provision was under the shadow of his spear. Fath al-Bari says that means war plunder. He said the spoils belong to Allah and his messenger. Allah told him that his interest was ransom money but Allah's was "great slaughter". He said that Allah made him "wealthy through conquests". He said that Ceasar & Khosrau would be ruined and his companions would spend their treasures in Jihad. He said he was made victorious with terror and the keys to the treasures of the world were brought to him and placed in his hand. He said that spoils of war were not allowed to previous Prophets but Allah saw his weakness and humility so he made spoils lawful for him.Only an Idiot, Cretin, Moron or damned fool can fail to connect those dots and see Islam for what it is: Arab Mafia disguised in religious vestments. Islam was created to induce Muslims to do just what they are doing!!! It has not been manipulated, twisted, distorted, perverted or hijacked!
equating Islam to terrorism
CamelShit!!! Malignant Malarkey!!! Right out of the numerous United Nazi Resolutions endlessly reaffirming that terrorism can not and must not be equated to or associated with any religion. The Fez Action Plan includes that boilerplate by reference.Who said:
- "I will cast terror"
- "I cast terror"
- "To strike terror"
- "to terrify"
- "to injure or enrage"
- "you are more of a terror"
- "I have been made victorious with terror" ???????
religion is not the problem
Islam is the problem!!! Islam is not a religion, it is a predatory way of life with religious, social, economic, governmental and military components. The religious component serves as a disguise and troop motivator.Victims see the religious texts and ritual, so they can not recognize the wolf pack. Believers fight to the death because they believe they will be rewarded by hair pie with cherries in a celestial orgy or damned in eternal fire if they sit at home.
religion is not the solution!
Muslim clerics are part of the problem, not the solution. They perpetuate the lies that motivate Muslims to raise Hell. That can not change. They can not be reformed short of apostasy which would cost them their street cred.The Pope and most of the Cardinals, Bishops and Priests are part of the problem, not the solution. They deny the objective factual reality of Islam's true nature, mission and works. They peddle the 'great religion of peace' delusion. They support the delusional Goddamned Fool United Nazi resolutions that deny the truth and demand censorship of those who tell it.
interreligious dialogue
Totally worthless & useless; counterproductive. Muslims lie, they play semantic games, manipulating the meaning of words. They conceal the doctrine of abrogation. They conceal damning verses in the Unholy Koranus and hadith. They love 5.32 but never cite the verse that follows it. They will never tell you that "wage war against Allah" "includes disbelief". They can expel, execute, crucify or mutilate you just because you do not believe in Allah.Entering into dialogue with Satan's slaves without first reading the Unholy Koranus, hadith & sira is a damned fool's errand. Don't do it!
weeds of violence
There is no element of truth In Islam. It is all malignant malarkey. Violence is intrinsic to Islam, by design. The Archbishop should know that if he had read the Unholy Koranus and one of the six canonical hadith collections. Who will get a clue?common goals
Peace in a pig's anus!
Peace is the condition of the world after Islam has completed its global conquest. Until that happy day, there is permanent war. Moe said Jihad would abide until Judgment Day. Allah commands Muslims not to be weak and sue for peace. But you don't know that 'cuz you did not read the Unholy Koranus and Sunan Abu Dawud.The goal of Islam is enriching Moe and his successors through accrual of spoils: ransom, fei, jizya & ganimah. The goal of Muslims is the supreme success: admission to Jannah, hopefully al-Firdhaus, where they will spend half the day popping cherries and the other half wining and dining.
Thee is no common ground. We have nothing in common. We do not share values. We do not share a deity. We do not share goals. Only liars and damned fools pretend otherwise.
Believers
Believers are defined in three surahs of the Unholy Koranus.The first five verses of Surah Al-Anfal are a bit obscure. Comprehending the meaning of Believers requires looking up instances of spending and going out.
Surah At-Taubah and Surah Al-Hujuraat leave nothing to chance: Believers 'fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed'.
Allah's cause is to make Islam dominate; rule the world as per 9.33 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65.
Attacking Neighbors
How can an a Moron rise to the rank of Archbishop? If he was of normal intelligence, he might glean a clue from Surah At-Taubah 9.123, which commands Muslims to attack the disbelievers nearest them.idolatrous caricatures of God
Allah hates his creation. He created the Black race "for the fire" and said "I don't care". Turn to the third volume of Mishkat ul-Masabih, page 117 and get a clue. Allah guides whom he will and misguides whom he will, the great deceiver. Allah will pluck Muslims from the fire and replace them with Christians. And their ain't 70 virgins, you only get two, the rest if so lucky, are Jewish and Christian women pulled from the fire for your sexual gratification . You are an ignorant damned fool 'cuz you will not read the Unholy Koranus and hadith!!!culture of peace
Everything in that paragraph is CamelShit! Islam affords no dignity to Infidels, denying the sanctity of our blood & treasure and denying our human rights. Read Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and get a God Blessed Clue for Chrissake!!!Muslims only love other Muslims! They hate infidels 'cuz Allah hates us and requires them to share his loves and hates as documented in another comment above.
Islamic love, compassion, mercy and respect are for Muslims only!!! Peace is only after Islamic conquest is complete and Dar al-harb has been subsumed by Dar al-Islam. Islam is permanent war. 'Culture of Peace' is the ultimate CamelShit! There is and can be no such entity while one damned Muslim lives on the face of the earth. One Muslim Believer will always breed or recruit more and resume the Jihad. Failure to do so assures his eternal damnation.
