Tuesday, March 07, 2017

Trump's New Travel Ban 03-06- '17 Useless!

Trump's New Travel Ban 03-06- '17 Useless! Update 03/11/'17
Two AssWholes intervened to get a Muslim through Muslim Ban 1.0, and the Muslim molested a little girl thanks to their AssWhollery. Daniel Greenfield has the story at Front page. I want you to read it!
President Trump still lacks the SISU required to name the enemy and the doctrine that makes it inimical.  Terrorism is not a function of nationality, it is a function of belief in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise.

    Terrorists believe that they are on a divine mission to punish us for not being Muslims and to make Allah's word & law dominant on a global scale.   While they believe that Allah wants them to conquer us and will aid them in their struggle and grant them victory, they are difficult to  deter or stop.  While they believe that if they terrorize us, Allah will forgive their sins, save them from his fire and admit them to his celestial orgy, they will persevere.  While successive generations adhere to those beliefs, the Jihad will not end, it will continue until the last day as Moe prophesied.

    While President Trump, other politicians, preachers and teachers prefix 'radical' or synonyms to Islamic Terrorism, they lie to us, projecting a maundering pretense that Islam is an anodyne & benevolent religion of peace and terrorism is a function of hijacking, perversion, distortion or 'extremism'.
<!--Insert Trump.gif here.

    Allah, in his book, is recorded as saying that he would and did cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers so that Moe and his army were victorious in battle.   He commanded Muslims to fight pagans until religion is his alone, 'people of the book' until they are subjugated and extorted. He commanded Muslims to start with the disbelievers nearest them. He commanded Muslims to strike terror and terrify by harsh brutality of defeated enemies and amassing great military power.

.    Moe said that he was made victorious with terror. He terrorized prospective victims with assassinations, genocide, extortion letters and barbarian plunder.
What part of that is not understood?

    Muslims do not need to come from Dar al-Islam or failed states to be dangerous. They do not need to be card carrying members of  ISIS or other groups to be dangerous. They just need to believe and have the will to kill. You can not test for that.  They can conceal it until the moment is right.  That is what Farook & Malik did. Had Farook's parents and wife been kept out of the country, fourteen Californians would still be alive and another 14 would not be faced with  large medical expenses. Tafsheen Malik passed five vetting interviews.  That is a clue for you, who can grasp it??!

    The temporary ban is necessary and insufficient.  We need a permanent, total and retroactive ban on Muslims.  This is a human rights issue: our right to live in peace, free from the threat and use of violence. We have a right to view parades without being plowed into by cars and trucks. We have a right to go shopping and attend school without being knifed or shot. We have a right to attend parties and visit night clubs without being shot.  We have a right to view races and walk down the sidewalk and through parks without being dismembered by bombs.  

    This is a pull your head out of your arse moment: until Muslims are removed and excluded from our borders, the threat of terrorism will continue and escalate.

    Religious liberty? God blessed right! You have a  right to believe in and worship the deity of your choice or none at all.  You do not have a right to attack, kill, enslave, rape or plunder anyone because he does not share your superstition.   Islam entails attacking, terrorizing, raping, killing, plundering and enslaving disbelievers. What is the meaning of "kill them wherever you find them"? Is that a command or a suggestion? What is the meaning of  "fight them until" ?  What is the meaning of "fight those who until"? What is the meaning of "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you"?  What is the meaning of 'Jihad is ordained for you"?   Allah commands Muslims to emulate Moe. Moe threatened, attacked, killed, raped, plundered and enslaved disbelievers  The practice of Islam is incomplete without performing those acts, putting the shirker in danger of the fire.  The World Trade Center attack was an act of Islamic worship!  Let that sink in for a moment, then read about it: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/gitmo20090310.pdf

    Show me the Constitutional  Article, Section & Clause wherein you find rights to attack, kill, plunder, rape & enslave disbelievers; I will show you the right to manifest,  practice, & propagate Islam.

    Right to immigrate? The Constitution confers no rights on non resident aliens!!! The privilege is ours to grant, not theirs to demand.

    Mercy & compassion for refugees? Those fleeing well deserved destruction in Gaza & Syria?  Have you so soon forgotten Sirhan Sirhan?  Have you no memory of the brothers Tsarnaev?  Refugees, damn you!!!  Refugees!!! Like those who slaughtered more than 100 Frenchmen; like those raising Hell in Germany and Scandinavia.  They take a swing at the king, miss his neck and he retaliates so they are refugees; yeah, right.

    They are slaves of Satan, obligated to do us any possible injury.  All of them! Since we invaded Afghanistan in retaliation, the obligation of Jihad is fard ayn, look it up and get a clue. You can not tell the MINO from the Believer until they kill you, then it's too late.

    The order is so full of loop holes, exceptions and waivers as to be meaningless. It is so full of reporting requirements as to be onerous.   Just declare Islam to be an international terrorist organization with all its apendent bodies and ban its devotes.

    Next time, nominate and elect a genuine Conservative who has read the Qur'an & hadith so he understands the enemy of the human race.
EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the Nation from terrorist activities by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1.  Policy and Purpose.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks, including those committed by foreign nationals.  The screening and vetting protocols and procedures associated with the visa-issuance process and the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) play a crucial role in detecting foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism and in preventing those individuals from entering the United States.  It is therefore the policy of the United States to improve the screening and vetting protocols and procedures associated with the visa-issuance process and the USRAP.
(b)  On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States).
(i)    Among other actions, Executive Order 13769 suspended for 90 days the entry of certain aliens from seven countries:  Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.  These are countries that had already been identified as presenting heightened concerns about terrorism and travel to the United States.  Specifically, the suspension applied to countries referred to in, or designated under, section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), in which Congress restricted use of the Visa Waiver Program for nationals of, and aliens recently present in, (A) Iraq or Syria, (B) any country designated by the Secretary of State as a state sponsor of terrorism (currently Iran, Syria, and Sudan), and (C) any other country designated as a country of concern by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence.  In 2016, the Secretary of Homeland Security designated Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as additional countries of concern for travel purposes, based on consideration of three statutory factors related to terrorism and national security:  "(I) whether the presence of an alien in the country or area increases the likelihood that the alien is a credible threat to the national security of the United States; (II) whether a foreign terrorist organization has a significant presence in the country or area; and (III) whether the country or area is a safe haven for terrorists."  8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12)(D)(ii).  Additionally, Members of Congress have expressed concerns about screening and vetting procedures following recent terrorist attacks in this country and in Europe.
(ii)   In ordering the temporary suspension of entry described in subsection (b)(i) of this section, I exercised my authority under Article II of the Constitution and under section 212(f) of the INA, which provides in relevant part:  "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."  8 U.S.C. 1182(f).  Under these authorities, I determined that, for a brief period of 90 days, while existing screening and vetting procedures were under review, the entry into the United States of certain aliens from the seven identified countries -- each afflicted by terrorism in a manner that compromised the ability of the United States to rely on normal decision-making procedures about travel to the United States -- would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.  Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.
(iii)  Executive Order 13769 also suspended the USRAP for 120 days.  Terrorist groups have sought to infiltrate several nations through refugee programs.  Accordingly, I temporarily suspended the USRAP pending a review of our procedures for screening and vetting refugees.  Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to jointly grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.
(iv)   Executive Order 13769 did not provide a basis for discriminating for or against members of any particular religion.  While that order allowed for prioritization of refugee claims from members of persecuted religious minority groups, that priority applied to refugees from every nation, including those in which Islam is a minority religion, and it applied to minority sects within a religion.  That order was not motivated by animus toward any religion, but was instead intended to protect the ability of religious minorities -- whoever they are and wherever they reside -- to avail themselves of the USRAP in light of their particular challenges and circumstances.
(c)  The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by litigation.  Most significantly, enforcement of critical provisions of that order has been temporarily halted by court orders that apply nationwide and extend even to foreign nationals with no prior or substantial connection to the United States.  On February 9, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to stay or narrow one such order pending the outcome of further judicial proceedings, while noting that the "political branches are far better equipped to make appropriate distinctions" about who should be covered by a suspension of entry or of refugee admissions.
(d)  Nationals from the countries previously identified under section 217(a)(12) of the INA warrant additional scrutiny in connection with our immigration policies because the conditions in these countries present heightened threats.  Each of these countries is a state sponsor of terrorism, has been significantly compromised by terrorist organizations, or contains active conflict zones.  Any of these circumstances diminishes the foreign government's willingness or ability to share or validate important information about individuals seeking to travel to the United States.  Moreover, the significant presence in each of these countries of terrorist organizations, their members, and others exposed to those organizations increases the chance that conditions will be exploited to enable terrorist operatives or sympathizers to travel to the United States.  Finally, once foreign nationals from these countries are admitted to the United States, it is often difficult to remove them, because many of these countries typically delay issuing, or refuse to issue, travel documents.
(e)  The following are brief descriptions, taken in part from the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 (June 2016), of some of the conditions in six of the previously designated countries that demonstrate why their nationals continue to present heightened risks to the security of the United States:
(i)    Iran.  Iran has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and continues to support various terrorist groups, including Hizballah, Hamas, and terrorist groups in Iraq.  Iran has also been linked to support for al-Qa'ida and has permitted al-Qa'ida to transport funds and fighters through Iran to Syria and South Asia.  Iran does not cooperate with the United States in counterterrorism efforts.
(ii)   Libya.  Libya is an active combat zone, with hostilities between the internationally recognized government and its rivals.  In many parts of the country, security and law enforcement functions are provided by armed militias rather than state institutions.  Violent extremist groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), have exploited these conditions to expand their presence in the country.  The Libyan government provides some cooperation with the United States' counterterrorism efforts, but it is unable to secure thousands of miles of its land and maritime borders, enabling the illicit flow of weapons, migrants, and foreign terrorist fighters.  The United States Embassy in Libya suspended its operations in 2014.
(iii)  Somalia.  Portions of Somalia have been terrorist safe havens.  Al-Shabaab, an al-Qa'ida-affiliated terrorist group, has operated in the country for years and continues to plan and mount operations within Somalia and in neighboring countries.  Somalia has porous borders, and most countries do not recognize Somali identity documents.  The Somali government cooperates with the United States in some counterterrorism operations but does not have the capacity to sustain military pressure on or to investigate suspected terrorists.
(iv)   Sudan.  Sudan has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1993 because of its support for international terrorist groups, including Hizballah and Hamas.  Historically, Sudan provided safe havens for al-Qa'ida and other terrorist groups to meet and train.  Although Sudan's support to al-Qa'ida has ceased and it provides some cooperation with the United States' counterterrorism efforts, elements of core al-Qa'ida and ISIS-linked terrorist groups remain active in the country.
(v)    Syria.  Syria has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1979.  The Syrian government is engaged in an ongoing military conflict against ISIS and others for control of portions of the country.  At the same time, Syria continues to support other terrorist groups.  It has allowed or encouraged extremists to pass through its territory to enter Iraq.  ISIS continues to attract foreign fighters to Syria and to use its base in Syria to plot or encourage attacks around the globe, including in the United States.  The United States Embassy in Syria suspended its operations in 2012.  Syria does not cooperate with the United States' counterterrorism efforts.
(vi)   Yemen.  Yemen is the site of an ongoing conflict between the incumbent government and the Houthi-led opposition.  Both ISIS and a second group, al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have exploited this conflict to expand their presence in Yemen and to carry out hundreds of attacks.  Weapons and other materials smuggled across Yemen's porous borders are used to finance AQAP and other terrorist activities.  In 2015, the United States Embassy in Yemen suspended its operations, and embassy staff were relocated out of the country.  Yemen has been supportive of, but has not been able to cooperate fully with, the United States in counterterrorism efforts.
(f)  In light of the conditions in these six countries, until the assessment of current screening and vetting procedures required by section 2 of this order is completed, the risk of erroneously permitting entry of a national of one of these countries who intends to commit terrorist acts or otherwise harm the national security of the United States is unacceptably high.  Accordingly, while that assessment is ongoing, I am imposing a temporary pause on the entry of nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, subject to categorical exceptions and case-by-case waivers, as described in section 3 of this order.
(g)  Iraq presents a special case.  Portions of Iraq remain active combat zones.  Since 2014, ISIS has had dominant influence over significant territory in northern and central Iraq.  Although that influence has been significantly reduced due to the efforts and sacrifices of the Iraqi government and armed forces, working along with a United States-led coalition, the ongoing conflict has impacted the Iraqi government's capacity to secure its borders and to identify fraudulent travel documents.  Nevertheless, the close cooperative relationship between the United States and the democratically elected Iraqi government, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of United States forces in Iraq, and Iraq's commitment to combat ISIS justify different treatment for Iraq.  In particular, those Iraqi government forces that have fought to regain more than half of the territory previously dominated by ISIS have shown steadfast determination and earned enduring respect as they battle an armed group that is the common enemy of Iraq and the United States.  In addition, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, the Iraqi government has expressly undertaken steps to enhance travel documentation, information sharing, and the return of Iraqi nationals subject to final orders of removal.  Decisions about issuance of visas or granting admission to Iraqi nationals should be subjected to additional scrutiny to determine if applicants have connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations, or otherwise pose a risk to either national security or public safety.
(h)  Recent history shows that some of those who have entered the United States through our immigration system have proved to be threats to our national security.  Since 2001, hundreds of persons born abroad have been convicted of terrorism-related crimes in the United States.  They have included not just persons who came here legally on visas but also individuals who first entered the country as refugees.  For example, in January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple terrorism-related offenses.  And in October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, Oregon.  The Attorney General has reported to me that more than 300 persons who entered the United States as refugees are currently the subjects of counterterrorism investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(i)  Given the foregoing, the entry into the United States of foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism remains a matter of grave concern.  In light of the Ninth Circuit's observation that the political branches are better suited to determine the appropriate scope of any suspensions than are the courts, and in order to avoid spending additional time pursuing litigation, I am revoking Executive Order 13769 and replacing it with this order, which expressly excludes from the suspensions categories of aliens that have prompted judicial concerns and which clarifies or refines the approach to certain other issues or categories of affected aliens.
Sec. 2.  Temporary Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern During Review Period.  (a)  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall conduct a worldwide review to identify whether, and if so what, additional information will be needed from each foreign country to adjudicate an application by a national of that country for a visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat.  The Secretary of Homeland Security may conclude that certain information is needed from particular countries even if it is not needed from every country.
(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the worldwide review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security's determination of the information needed from each country for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 20 days of the effective date of this order.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence.
(c)  To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening and vetting of foreign nationals, to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists, and in light of the national security concerns referenced in section 1 of this order, I hereby proclaim, pursuant to sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), that the unrestricted entry into the United States of nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.  I therefore direct that the entry into the United States of nationals of those six countries be suspended for 90 days from the effective date of this order, subject to the limitations, waivers, and exceptions set forth in sections 3 and 12 of this order.
(d)  Upon submission of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed from each country for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request that all foreign governments that do not supply such information regarding their nationals begin providing it within 50 days of notification.
(e)  After the period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion in a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the information requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately shared information through other means.  The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security may also submit to the President the names of additional countries for which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States.
(f)  At any point after the submission of the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment, as well as the names of any countries that they recommend should be removed from the scope of a proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section.
(g)  The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this order within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 90 days of the effective date of this order, a third report within 120 days of the effective date of this order, and a fourth report within 150 days of the effective date of this order.
Sec. 3.  Scope and Implementation of Suspension.
(a)  Scope.  Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:
(i)    are outside the United States on the effective date of this order; 
(ii)   did not have a valid visa at 5:00 p.m., eastern standard time on January 27, 2017; and 
(iii)  do not have a valid visa on the effective date of this order.
(b)  Exceptions.  The suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order shall not apply to:
(i)    any lawful permanent resident of the United States;
(ii)   any foreign national who is admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the effective date of this order;
(iii)  any foreign national who has a document other than a visa, valid on the effective date of this order or issued on any date thereafter, that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission, such as an advance parole document;
(iv)   any dual national of a country designated under section 2 of this order when the individual is traveling on a passport issued by a non-designated country;
(v)    any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; or
(vi)   any foreign national who has been granted asylum; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
(c)  Waivers.  Notwithstanding the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order, a consular officer, or, as appropriate, the Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Commissioner's delegee, may, in the consular officer's or the CBP official's discretion, decide on a case-by-case basis to authorize the issuance of a visa to, or to permit the entry of, a foreign national for whom entry is otherwise suspended if the foreign national has demonstrated to the officer's satisfaction that denying entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship, and that his or her entry would not pose a threat to national security and would be in the national interest.  Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, any waiver issued by a consular officer as part of the visa issuance process will be effective both for the issuance of a visa and any subsequent entry on that visa, but will leave all other requirements for admission or entry unchanged.  Case-by-case waivers could be appropriate in circumstances such as the following:
(i)    the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, is outside the United States on the effective date of this order, seeks to reenter the United States to resume that activity, and the denial of reentry during the suspension period would impair that activity;
(ii)    the foreign national has previously established significant contacts with the United States but is outside the United States on the effective date of this order for work, study, or other lawful activity;
(iii)   the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or professional obligations and the denial of entry during the suspension period would impair those obligations;
(iv)    the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship;
(v)the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
(vi)    the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee) and the employee can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;
(vii)   the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA;
(viii)  the foreign national is a landed Canadian immigrant who applies for a visa at a location within Canada; or
(ix)    the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government-sponsored exchange visitor.
Sec. 4.  Additional Inquiries Related to Nationals of Iraq.  An application by any Iraqi national for a visa, admission, or other immigration benefit should be subjected to thorough review, including, as appropriate, consultation with a designee of the Secretary of Defense and use of the additional information that has been obtained in the context of the close U.S.-Iraqi security partnership, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, concerning individuals suspected of ties to ISIS or other terrorist organizations and individuals coming from territories controlled or formerly controlled by ISIS.  Such review shall include consideration of whether the applicant has connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations or with territory that is or has been under the dominant influence of ISIS, as well as any other information bearing on whether the applicant may be a threat to commit acts of terrorism or otherwise threaten the national security or public safety of the United States.
Sec. 5.  Implementing Uniform Screening and Vetting Standards for All Immigration Programs.  (a)  The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall implement a program, as part of the process for adjudications, to identify individuals who seek to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis, who support terrorism, violent extremism, acts of violence toward any group or class of people within the United States, or who present a risk of causing harm subsequent to their entry.  This program shall include the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identifying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that applicants are who they claim to be; a mechanism to assess whether applicants may commit, aid, or support any kind of violent, criminal, or terrorist acts after entering the United States; and any other appropriate means for ensuring the proper collection of all information necessary for a rigorous evaluation of all grounds of inadmissibility or grounds for the denial of other immigration benefits.

(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the program described in subsection (a) of this section within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the effective date of this order.

Sec. 6.  Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017.  (a)  The Secretary of State shall suspend travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall suspend decisions on applications for refugee status, for 120 days after the effective date of this order, subject to waivers pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.  During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication processes to determine what additional procedures should be used to ensure that individuals seeking admission as refugees do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures.  The suspension described in this subsection shall not apply to refugee applicants who, before the effective date of this order, have been formally scheduled for transit by the Department of State.  The Secretary of State shall resume travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP 120 days after the effective date of this order, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall resume making decisions on applications for refugee status only for stateless persons and nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that the additional procedures implemented pursuant to this subsection are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of  the United States.
(b)  Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any entries in excess of that number until such time as I determine that additional entries would be in the national interest.
(c)  Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the entry of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States, including in circumstances such as the following:  the individual's entry would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement or arrangement, or the denial of entry would cause undue hardship.
(d)  It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees.  To that end, the Secretary of State shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.
Sec. 7.  Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of Inadmissibility.  The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority permitted by section 212(d)(3)(B) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(3)(B), relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing directives or guidance.
Sec. 8.  Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System.  (a)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry exit tracking system for in-scope travelers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive set forth in subsection (a) of this section.  The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the effective date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the effective date of this order.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit further reports every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational.
Sec. 9.  Visa Interview Security.  (a)  The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1202, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions.  This suspension shall not apply to any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the IOIA; or traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government.
(b)  To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fellows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that nonimmigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected.
Sec. 10.  Visa Validity Reciprocity.  The Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements and arrangements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment.  If another country does not treat United States nationals seeking nonimmigrant visas in a truly reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by that foreign country, to the extent practicable.
Sec. 11.  Transparency and Data Collection.  (a)  To be more transparent with the American people and to implement more effectively policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available the following information:
(i)    information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, affiliation with or provision of material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national-security-related reasons;
(ii)   information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and who have engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States; 
(iii)  information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including so-called "honor killings," in the United States by foreign nationals; and
(iv)   any other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses.
(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall release the initial report under subsection (a) of this section within 180 days of the effective date of this order and shall include information for the period from September 11, 2001, until the date of the initial report.  Subsequent reports shall be issued every 180 days thereafter and reflect the period since the previous report.
Sec. 12.  Enforcement.  (a)  The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with appropriate domestic and international partners, including countries and organizations, to ensure efficient, effective, and appropriate implementation of the actions directed in this order.
(b)  In implementing this order, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including, as appropriate, those providing an opportunity for individuals to claim a fear of persecution or torture, such as the credible fear determination for aliens covered by section 235(b)(1)(A) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A).
(c)  No immigrant or nonimmigrant visa issued before the effective date of this order shall be revoked pursuant to this order.
(d)  Any individual whose visa was marked revoked or marked canceled as a result of Executive Order 13769 shall be entitled to a travel document confirming that the individual is permitted to travel to the United States and seek entry.  Any prior cancellation or revocation of a visa that was solely pursuant to Executive Order 13769 shall not be the basis of inadmissibility for any future determination about entry or admissibility.
(e)  This order shall not apply to an individual who has been granted asylum, to a refugee who has already been admitted to the United States, or to an individual granted withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture.  Nothing in this order shall be construed to limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture, consistent with the laws of the United States.
Sec. 13.  Revocation.  Executive Order 13769 of January 27, 2017, is revoked as of the effective date of this order.
Sec. 14.  Effective Date.  This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., eastern daylight time on March 16, 2017.
Sec. 15.  Severability.  (a)  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
(b)  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the lack of certain procedural requirements, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements.
Sec. 16.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
     March 6, 2017.






-->

Friday, March 03, 2017

Gorka: War Inside Islam Not Against Us?

Gorka War Inside Islam Not Against Us?
    Sun Tzu advised us to know ourselves and our enemy.  President Trump and his advisers should follow that sage advice.
In an interview with national public radio, Dr. Gorka was asked about the identity of the enemy.  Click the link in the interviewer's name to read the entire transcript.  I have added superscripts to the quotes below, linking them to my commentary which follows below the horizontal line.

INSKEEP: Well, the bottom-line question, of course, is is Islam itself1 the enemy here?

GORKA: Well, of course it isn't2. That would be asinine. As I've written in my book, this isn't a war with Islam, this is a war in Islam3. As the king of Jordan, King Abdullah, as the president of the most populous Arab nation in the world, President Sisi, has stated, this is a war for the heart of Islam. Which version is going to win, an atavistic, 7th century, blood curdled version such as propagated by al-Qaida and ISIS or whether it's going to be the one that is our allies4' version5, the Jordanian, Egyptian the Emirates?

It's not a war with Islam. That would be absurd. It is a war inside Islam. And we want to see our friends4 win that war.


Robert Spencer included this quote  at Jihad Watch in a piece by John Guandolo. 
Speaking at CPAC this past weekend, Gorka stated:  “Zuhdi (Jasser) knows it better than anybody because he understands that this isn’t about poverty or lack of education6. It’s about people who are fighting for7 the soul of Islam – not a war with Islam, but a war inside Islam; as King Abdullah, as General Sisi has said, for which version8 is going to win.”

    On John Batchelor's radio show March 2, '17, Dr.  Gorka said that "the enemy is radical Islamic Terrorism9." ...



Is Islam the enemy?

    Islam is the enemy threat doctrine, not the enemy.  The people who believe the threat doctrine are the enemy: Ummah al-Islamiyya.  That means every Muslim on the face of the earth.

of course it isn't

    Technically true: Muslims are the enemy.  They are commanded by the demon they worship, to kill us wherever they find us, fight pagans until only Allah is worshiped, fight Jews & Christians until we are subjugated and submit to annual extortion payments and to fight the nearest disbelievers first.  They are promised admission to Allah's celestial orgy if they do and threatened with eternity in his fire pit if they do not.  If they believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise, they can not stop waging war.

    While there is one Believing Muslim on the planet, he will recruit and breed more until they can resume Jihad because Jihad is their way of life and  get out of Hell free card.

    Details for the doubtful:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims

war in Islam

    If the Jihad is between Salafists & MINOs or between Sunni & Shia,  then why did Muslims conquer infidel lands to create an empire stretching from the border of China to the border of France?  This is how they answered when asked by a Persian general:  Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." That story is from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

    Why did they attack the fledgling United States before we had boots on the ground in the Hijaz, while Israel was dominated by the Ottoman Empire and we had inflicted no offense?  Thomas Jefferson went to London to ask their Ambassador and was told  a story similar to that told to the Persians centuries before:  
It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[25]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

Got a clue?  Is it true?  Click through and read the original sources if you remain clueless: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  *Use the  <= next ayat  link at top center of the page to advance to the next verse.

our allies

    Egypt, the Gulf Emirates & Saudi Arabia are our enemies, neither friends, allies nor partners!  They are populated and governed by Muslims who are commanded by their demon to conquer the world.  Their demon expressly proscribes inferior and equal relationships with kuffar!  What part of "take not as friends" does Dr. Gorka not comprehend?   3:28, 3:118,   4:894:1394:1445:515:5758:1458:2260:160:13 Islam & Muslims must be superior! 9.33

version

    Saudi Arabia is ruled by proponents of Wahhabism. Moe said that Allah would, every 100 years, send someone to renovate Islam. Abd al-Wahhab was one such renovater,  the Islamic equivalent of a Puritan.  It's Islam, Stupid! What Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago.

    Iran  is populated and governed by Shia Muslims.  Both Sunni & Shi'ia read the Qur'an, believing in Allah's imperatives, threat and promise.  Both sponsor terrorism.  They share the goal of  world conquest. The difference is over who should be caliph, originally  Ali or  Abu Bakr.

    Mohammad Zhudi Jasser professes a mythical personal, apolitical & passive Islam that rejects imperialism & terrorism.  His version is 180° out of  phase with mainstream Islam. His maundery rejects the Qur'an, hadith & shari'ah and has no chance of prevailing against those with the masses, money, weapons and will to kill.  Both Saudi Arabia and Iran would execute him as an apostate.

not poverty or ignorance

    Jihad is doctrine driven, not grievance driven.  Real or imagined grievances are used as recruiting tools but the real recruiting tool is the forgotten obligation: the fard al-kifaya of offensive Jihad.  Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition in every year. Such expeditions are undertaken on Islamic initiative.  In this pdf file you can read the most relevant ayat, ahadth and Islamic law. Pay particular attention to Reliance Of The Traveller, o9.8: dawah is a prerequisite to attack.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/101110757/Jihad


fighting for

    Ostensibly to please Allah, really to accrue loot. They fight for power and over who will wield it.  The conflict between Sunni & Shia is over who rules the roost.  If the Jihad was internal, they would not be attacking kuffar in Europe and America.  They are simultaneously fighting us and their Muslim  power rivals.

which version

    Islam is what Moe preached: the Qur'an and what he did: his sunnah and sira. If it ain't what Moe said and did, it ain't Islam!  Sunni or Shia, they're all 'slimes at heart!   There is no peaceful, benevolent Islam. No such thing can exist. Islam is reviving after a colonial period of dormancy.  It is not evolving, distorted, perverted nor hijacked, it is unrestrained and financed by oil revenue.

radical Islamic terrorism

    An accursed lie!  Radical means the root. Prefixing it to Islam implies existence of anodyne and violent forms of Islam. No anodyne form exists. Anodyne Islam is an impossibility.  The Qur'an, sunnah and sira are malevolent and mercenary, not benevolent and anodyne. They define and exemplify Islam.  

    Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy!  Terrorism is intended to weaken the will and ability of victims to mount an effective defense against Islam. Get the details here:  
https://www.scribd.com/doc/110516023/No-Justification-in-Islam-for-Terrorism-in-a-Pig-s-Anus

Wednesday, March 01, 2017

McMaster: Exemplar of Ignorance or Accursed Liar?

Gen. McMaster: Exemplar of Ignorance or Accursed Liar? Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam who included the video in a new post.
General McMaster's military education preceded the censorship movement, so he should have had some exposure to the truth about Islam. he both studied and taught at the war college.

    On Veterans Day 2014, Gen. McMaster spoke to ROTC members at Georgetown University. I have excerpted two important parts of that speech.  I have inserted superscripts and linked them to my commentary below the horizontal line.

The stakes are high because we are engaged today, as previous generations were engaged, against enemies that pose a great threat0 to all civilized peoples. As previous generations defeated Nazi facism, Japanese imperialism, and communist totalitarianism and oppression, we will defeat these enemies who cynically use a perverted interpretation1 of religion to incite hatred and violence.


Enemy organizations2 like Al Qaeda and ISIL seek to perpetuate ignorance3, foment hatred4, and use that hatred as justification for the murder of innocents5. They entice masses of undereducated6, disaffected7 young men with a sophisticated campaign of propaganda, disinformation, and brainwashing8.






Last week I started to write about this subject but did not finish; I am including that stub here.
Hat tip: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/nsa-mcmaster-islamic-state-uses-perverted-interpretation-of-religion!

“We are engaged today, as General George C. Marshall’s generation was engaged, against enemies who pose a great threat to all civilized peoples. As our World War II generation defeated Nazi Fascism and Japanese imperialism, and as later generations defeated Communist totalitarianism, we will defeat today’s enemies, including terrorist organizations like Daesh2, who cynically use a perverted interpretation1 of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents.” — Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, speech to Virginia Military Institute, Center for Leadership and Excellence, November 21, 2016

In this video also, from May 2016, McMaster says this same thing. At 14:43, McMaster refers to “groups like ISIL, who use this irreligious ideology9, this perverted interpretation of religion to justify violence. They depend on ignorance, and the ability to recruit vulnerable segments of populations to foment hatred, and then use that hatred to justify violence against innocents.”


    I am not able to draw a conclusion at this pont. It may be that after eight years of kissing 'crat ass the General has become habituated to spewing the party line.  





great threat

    Who are those enemies and what is the threat? It's Islam, Stupid!  Every Muslim on the face of the earth is commanded by Allah to participate in Jihad, by the hand, tongue, pen, purse or heart. Those who meet Allah without scars of Jihad meet him with a mark of hypocrisy which makes them liable to the fire.

    The threat is existential: "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah' And whoever says: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' saves his wealth and his life from me unless he deserves a legal punishment justly, and his account will be with Allah!".  
That threat is from page 237 of the ninth volume of Sahih Bukhri, the most authentic of the hadith collections. Your life and wealth are forfeit to Muslims until you become one!  

    At present, Muslims can not defeat us in conventional warfare but Pakistan has nukes and Iran is working on them. When they mate ICBMs and nukes, the game will change in their favor.  In the mean time, they wear us down with the death of a thousand cuts.

    Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. The most explicit of them was sent to the rulers of Ayala, a port city in Jordan. Reasonable men of good will will read that letter and curse Islam, demanding its extinction.  
http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.2.73.3

Volume 1, Parts II.73.3
They said: The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, wrote to Yuhannah Ibn
Rubbàh and (other) chiefs of the people of Aylah: You are safe. I praise Allah before
you; there is no God but He. I will not fight against you unless I write to you (in
advance). So, join the fold of Islam or [P. 29] pay the jizyah. Obey Allah and His
Apostle and the messengers of His Apostle, honour them and dress them in nice
clothes, other than the uniform of the ghazis. Provide Zayd with good clothes. If my
messengers will be pleased with you, I shall also be pleased with you. The jizyah is a
known thing. If you like that, peace might prevail over the land and sea; you should
obey Allah and His Apostle. You will not be required to pay dues you have been
paying to the Arabs and the 'Ajamis, and you will pay the dues to Allah and His
Apostle. If you send them (my messengers) back and do not please them, I shall not
accept anything from you, and shall wage war against you and make your young
ones captive and shall stay your elders. Verily, I am the Apostle of Allah to
communicate the truth. I believe in Allah, His Books and His Apostles. I believe in
Masih Ibn Maryam (Messiah son of Mary) who is His word, to be His Apostle. Come
to me before you face the evil. I have given advice to my messengers about your
affairs. Pay three wasag (Wasaq is a camel-loadequal to sixty sa`s, each sa` being
equal to four mudds, and each mudd is equal to 1-1/3 lbs., thus a wasaq is equal to
nearly four maunds of Pakistan.) of barley to Harmalah. Verily, Harmalah has
recommended your case. Had there been no Allah and this (recommendation) I
would not have had any correspondence with you and you would have seen armies
marching against you. If you obey my messenger, verily, Allah is your defender and
(also) Muhammad and those who follow him. Verily, my messengers are Shurahbil,
Ubayyi, Harmalah and Hurayth lbn Zayd al-Tá'i. If they conclude a treaty, I shall
approve of it and you will be under the guarantee of Allah and Allah's Apostle
Muhammad. Salàm to you. If you obey, you should arrange provisions for the people
of Maqna to go to their land. 

perverted interpretation

    Only one man was authorized to interpret the Qur'an:  the one who first recited it. Moe's interpretation is called his sunnah and consists of the hadith and sira. The terrorists act in obedience to Allah, emulating Moe. Terrorism is normative Islam, neither perversion, distortion nor hijacking. Get a clue!!!

Enemy organizations

     It's Islam, Stupid!  All the rest: the alphabet soup of terror groups are appendent bodies built around power hungry individuals each of whom thinks he should be the caliph. All of them consist of believing Muslims, none of them would exist without  Believing Muslims.

ignorance

    Islam is only interested in its canonical  texts and warfare. With the exception of the technology needed for Jihad, modern education is not of value to Islam.

    Participation in Jihad is a function of belief, not ignorance. Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and Usama bin Ladin were Western trained engineers. Al-Zawahiri is a doctor. Many medical, law and engineering students have gone splodydope.

hatred

    Muslims are required to love what Allah loves and hate what he hates. The doctrine is Wala wal Bara. Allah hates disbelievers, so Muslims must hate us, too.  The Qur'an  demonizes  and curses  Jews & Christians.

innocents


    Only Muslims are innocent, all others are rebels against Allah, deserving the death penalty.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers & dissenters to :
to get a clue.

undereducated

    Terrorism is a function of belief, not education. They believe that if they get martyred, they go directly to Jannah to sport with two houris who grow new hymens.  They believe that, if they do not fight, they will wind up in the fire. Those are powerful  motivations to those who believe.

disaffected

    Jihad is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. Those who are mentally and or emotionally impaired may be easier to recruit, but plenty of apparently normal young Muslims have joined the jihad.

brainwashing

    It's Islam, Stupid!  Remove brain, insert Koran. Islam inculcates hatred and incites violence.  The obligation to fight is emphasized, as are the relative costs/benefits of fighting or shirking.

irreligious ideology

    Ignorant fools consider Islam to be a religion, passive, anodyne and an equally valid pathway to God. It is none of those things! Islam is an Arab Mafia created for Moe's personal emolument through the accrual of spoils of war.  I disrespectfully direct deniers, doubters & dissenters to:
to get a clue.

Partisan Response To The State Of The Union '17: 'Crat Shit!

Partisan Response To The State Of The Union '17: 'Crat Shit! I found a transcript of the 'crat response here.
The Democrats sent out  a folksy yet smug, smarmy AssWhole  to contradict Trump.  The Obama don't care // unaffordable care act was sold on the basis of lies and continues on the basis of lies.  Gov. Steve Beshear engaged in class warfare, dividing his audience by economic status.  But I leave all that aside to concentrate on the important concepts. I quote out of context  and insert superscripts internally linked to my comments which follow below the horizontal line.


And it taught me to embrace people who are different from me, not vilify1 them.

Another commitment now being tested is to our national security. Look, make no mistake, I am a military veteran2 myself and I know that protecting America is a president's highest duty. Yet President Trump is ignoring serious threats to our national security from Russia3, who is not our friend, while alienating our allies4 who fought with this side-by-side and are our friends in a dangerous world.

His approach makes us less safe and should worry every freedom-loving American. Instead, President Trump has all but declared war5 on refugees6 and immigrants7. Look, the president can and should enforce our immigration laws, but we can protect America without abandoning our principles8 and our moral obligation9 to help those fleeing war10 and terror, without tearing families apart11 and without needlessly jeopardizing12 our military men and women fighting overseas.

You know, another Republican president, Ronald Reagan, once said "In America, our origins matter less than our destination" and that is what democracy13 is all about.









<iframe width="655" height="369" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QRt-Ay6tj4U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



vilify

    That sentence is a prime example of projection: Beshear tries to vilify Trump by implying that Trump's criticism of Islamic terrorists and wet backs  is vilification of innocent people.  Terrorists have slaughtered innocent citizens, sacrificing them to Satan and wet backs broke the law by coming here and remaining here.  

military veteran

    The unstated false premise in that sentence is that military service  is a shield that confers immunity from criticism for misrepresenting a loyal president's statements and intentions.

Russia

    Russia is a potential threat, as is China. If we display weakness, they will take advantage. Bashear mentions Russia as a diversion to divert attention from the 3000+  innocent victims of Islamic terrorists sacrificed to Satan on our soil in the last 17 years. He conflates potential danger with real and proximate danger.  

alienating  allies

    France is hardly an ally. Turkey is an enemy. The free riders of NATO deserved the lecture they got.  But we need to scratch the surface so we can see through the shit to the unstated false premise embedded in the offending sentence.  

    Bashear implies, falsely, that Trump's concentration on the real and proximate threat posed by invading Muslims alienates Muslim allies.  The fact is: Muslims are enemies, not allies! Several Quranic ayat expressly forbid equal and inferior relationships with kuffar. Read'em and get a clue.  
 3:28, 3:118,   4:894:1394:1445:515:5758:1458:2260:160:13

declared war


           Declaration of war is a Congressional prerogative, the President does not declare war. Non resident aliens do not have rights under the constitution.  There is no right to come to America, that is a privilege granted to a select ew under the law.

    Congress should have declared war on Islam in '01 because Muslims are the enemy and Islam is the enemy threat doctrine.  Such a declaration would include the rapefugees & gimmigrants.

refugees

    The Syrian Muslims engaged in hijra are not refugees: they are rapefugees & gimmigrants. They have invaded Europe on a grand scale, which combines with European PC idiocy to confer immunity as they rape and riot while plundering the welfare states of Europe.  Those Syrians, with the exception of the Christian minority rejected by Obamination, flee from Syrian cities dominated by rebels 'cuz the regime is trying to bomb the rebels into oblivion.  Most of them are sympathetic to the rebels.

    The African Muslims and others from areas of Dar al-Islam not at war are gimmigrants and mujahideen engaged in hijra: demographic conquest.

immigrants

    We have immigration laws and rules, let those who desire to immigrate follow them.  There is nothing immoral about building a wall to keep the wet backs from bringing drugs disease and crime into our nation.  

    Allowing Muslims to immigrate is the height of suicidal stupidity: Muslims are at war with us 'cuz we are not Muslims. We need to send them home and keep them out!

our principles

    National suicide, defeat, surrender and submission are not our values!  Victory at any cost to preserve life, liberty & prosperity are our values.  Giving sanctuary to enemy combatants disguised as refugees is not our value. Allowing terror training camps to proliferate is not our value. letting terrorists live is not our value. Worrying about their wives and brats is not our value. Hiroshima & Nagasaki reflect our values.

moral obligation

    We have no moral obligation to our enemies.  Christians feel a sense of obligation to rescue persecuted Christians suffering genocide at the hands of Muslims but this nation is secular, not a theocracy.  

fleeing war

    Syrians flee a war of their own making. Most of the so called refugees are in sympathy with the rebels. If the rebels were not trying to seize power from the Assad regime, there would be no war and no refugees.  The wealthy Gulf Emirates won't take them in 'cuz they know the score and do not want to be subverted.

tearing families apart

    This fits the pattern of the parricide who pleads for mercy on the basis of being an orphan.  If they stayed home, they would not be deport able aliens and  their brats would not be US citizens and there would be no threat of separation.  The 14th amendment  is for emancipated slaves, not Mexicans.

jeopardizing

    Our service personnel are not jeopardized by naming and shaming the enemy, they are jeopardized by sending them into harm's way with insufficient men and material burdened by suicidal rules of engagement intended to avoid offense to the enemy.  
The grandchildren of Little Boy & Fat Man should have been sent instead.

democracy

    Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.  Our founders wisely gave us a constitutionally limited representative republic. Last November, we chose to restore it.

US Army spits on Christian soldiers, names Muslim chaplain as their spiritual leader

US Army names Muslim chaplain spiritual leader of 14,000 mostly Christian soldiers

My comments, posted moments ago at Jihad Watch, on the affront to Christian soldiers detailed in the above article:



This is an absolute spit in the face of every Christian soldier.
Is there a Commander in Chief with the courage and will to speak to and correct this spit on Christianity and this victory of Islam?
Or will he and his subordinate “leaders” stand by in silence, while Christianity is walked upon and Islam is bowed to and hallowed?