Friday, March 03, 2017

Gorka: War Inside Islam Not Against Us?

Gorka War Inside Islam Not Against Us?
    Sun Tzu advised us to know ourselves and our enemy.  President Trump and his advisers should follow that sage advice.
In an interview with national public radio, Dr. Gorka was asked about the identity of the enemy.  Click the link in the interviewer's name to read the entire transcript.  I have added superscripts to the quotes below, linking them to my commentary which follows below the horizontal line.

INSKEEP: Well, the bottom-line question, of course, is is Islam itself1 the enemy here?

GORKA: Well, of course it isn't2. That would be asinine. As I've written in my book, this isn't a war with Islam, this is a war in Islam3. As the king of Jordan, King Abdullah, as the president of the most populous Arab nation in the world, President Sisi, has stated, this is a war for the heart of Islam. Which version is going to win, an atavistic, 7th century, blood curdled version such as propagated by al-Qaida and ISIS or whether it's going to be the one that is our allies4' version5, the Jordanian, Egyptian the Emirates?

It's not a war with Islam. That would be absurd. It is a war inside Islam. And we want to see our friends4 win that war.


Robert Spencer included this quote  at Jihad Watch in a piece by John Guandolo. 
Speaking at CPAC this past weekend, Gorka stated:  “Zuhdi (Jasser) knows it better than anybody because he understands that this isn’t about poverty or lack of education6. It’s about people who are fighting for7 the soul of Islam – not a war with Islam, but a war inside Islam; as King Abdullah, as General Sisi has said, for which version8 is going to win.”

    On John Batchelor's radio show March 2, '17, Dr.  Gorka said that "the enemy is radical Islamic Terrorism9." ...



Is Islam the enemy?

    Islam is the enemy threat doctrine, not the enemy.  The people who believe the threat doctrine are the enemy: Ummah al-Islamiyya.  That means every Muslim on the face of the earth.

of course it isn't

    Technically true: Muslims are the enemy.  They are commanded by the demon they worship, to kill us wherever they find us, fight pagans until only Allah is worshiped, fight Jews & Christians until we are subjugated and submit to annual extortion payments and to fight the nearest disbelievers first.  They are promised admission to Allah's celestial orgy if they do and threatened with eternity in his fire pit if they do not.  If they believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise, they can not stop waging war.

    While there is one Believing Muslim on the planet, he will recruit and breed more until they can resume Jihad because Jihad is their way of life and  get out of Hell free card.

    Details for the doubtful:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims

war in Islam

    If the Jihad is between Salafists & MINOs or between Sunni & Shia,  then why did Muslims conquer infidel lands to create an empire stretching from the border of China to the border of France?  This is how they answered when asked by a Persian general:  Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." That story is from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

    Why did they attack the fledgling United States before we had boots on the ground in the Hijaz, while Israel was dominated by the Ottoman Empire and we had inflicted no offense?  Thomas Jefferson went to London to ask their Ambassador and was told  a story similar to that told to the Persians centuries before:  
It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[25]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

Got a clue?  Is it true?  Click through and read the original sources if you remain clueless: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  *Use the  <= next ayat  link at top center of the page to advance to the next verse.

our allies

    Egypt, the Gulf Emirates & Saudi Arabia are our enemies, neither friends, allies nor partners!  They are populated and governed by Muslims who are commanded by their demon to conquer the world.  Their demon expressly proscribes inferior and equal relationships with kuffar!  What part of "take not as friends" does Dr. Gorka not comprehend?   3:28, 3:118,   4:894:1394:1445:515:5758:1458:2260:160:13 Islam & Muslims must be superior! 9.33

version

    Saudi Arabia is ruled by proponents of Wahhabism. Moe said that Allah would, every 100 years, send someone to renovate Islam. Abd al-Wahhab was one such renovater,  the Islamic equivalent of a Puritan.  It's Islam, Stupid! What Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago.

    Iran  is populated and governed by Shia Muslims.  Both Sunni & Shi'ia read the Qur'an, believing in Allah's imperatives, threat and promise.  Both sponsor terrorism.  They share the goal of  world conquest. The difference is over who should be caliph, originally  Ali or  Abu Bakr.

    Mohammad Zhudi Jasser professes a mythical personal, apolitical & passive Islam that rejects imperialism & terrorism.  His version is 180° out of  phase with mainstream Islam. His maundery rejects the Qur'an, hadith & shari'ah and has no chance of prevailing against those with the masses, money, weapons and will to kill.  Both Saudi Arabia and Iran would execute him as an apostate.

not poverty or ignorance

    Jihad is doctrine driven, not grievance driven.  Real or imagined grievances are used as recruiting tools but the real recruiting tool is the forgotten obligation: the fard al-kifaya of offensive Jihad.  Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition in every year. Such expeditions are undertaken on Islamic initiative.  In this pdf file you can read the most relevant ayat, ahadth and Islamic law. Pay particular attention to Reliance Of The Traveller, o9.8: dawah is a prerequisite to attack.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/101110757/Jihad


fighting for

    Ostensibly to please Allah, really to accrue loot. They fight for power and over who will wield it.  The conflict between Sunni & Shia is over who rules the roost.  If the Jihad was internal, they would not be attacking kuffar in Europe and America.  They are simultaneously fighting us and their Muslim  power rivals.

which version

    Islam is what Moe preached: the Qur'an and what he did: his sunnah and sira. If it ain't what Moe said and did, it ain't Islam!  Sunni or Shia, they're all 'slimes at heart!   There is no peaceful, benevolent Islam. No such thing can exist. Islam is reviving after a colonial period of dormancy.  It is not evolving, distorted, perverted nor hijacked, it is unrestrained and financed by oil revenue.

radical Islamic terrorism

    An accursed lie!  Radical means the root. Prefixing it to Islam implies existence of anodyne and violent forms of Islam. No anodyne form exists. Anodyne Islam is an impossibility.  The Qur'an, sunnah and sira are malevolent and mercenary, not benevolent and anodyne. They define and exemplify Islam.  

    Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy!  Terrorism is intended to weaken the will and ability of victims to mount an effective defense against Islam. Get the details here:  
https://www.scribd.com/doc/110516023/No-Justification-in-Islam-for-Terrorism-in-a-Pig-s-Anus

1 comment:

Uncle Vladdi said...

Who is this absurd and asinine Dr. Dorka, anyway, and what are his qualifications to be taken at all seriously on a topic about which he either obviously knows nothing, or knows but is so scared he is quite prepared to sacrifice the rest of our lives in order to cover his own ass?