Sunday, March 18, 2012

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization The Draft Resolution "Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief" contains only minor changes, essentially maintaining the malignant malarkey of HRC 16/18  passed last year. 

    Now that the draft has been submitted and posted to the web, you can expect to see and hear more assertions of victory.  The self-appointed experts will tell us that the "defamation of religions' meme has been abandoned; proved by the boiler plate paragraphs carried over from last year's resolutions. 

    The draft will be discussed and probably adopted by consensus  Tuesday March 20, 2012.  There is nothing we can do to stop it. The good news is that the resolution has no enforcement mechanism, its only effect is adding false moral support to Islam's victim card narrative and its persecution of indigenous minorities. 

    The draft was submitted by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC; its initiative is Islamic. 

free expression

   Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and
expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information
can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,


    Am I the only one who perceives the inversion of fact and fantasy?  Freedom of opinion & expression is the central target of the resolution.  They demand that we tolerate the intolerable: perpetuation, propagation & promotion of the concept of divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world through deception, aggressive wars of conquest and terrorism.  Islam asserts a divine mandate to kill us; rape & enslave our widows and orphans while seizing our real & personal property.

    The strategic objective of the resolution is the enactment & enforcement of national & international legislation criminalizing all criticism of Islam.  When I write "Muhammad was a terrorist.", which is substantiated ty Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220, I mention something impermissible and should be killed according to Islamic law.  They want that law enforced! That is the purpose of the draft resolution. 

defamation

    While the defamation meme is implicit rather than explicit in this resolution, the Draft Resolution on "Freedom of religion or belief" contains, in the seventh paragraph on its second page, an important clue to reality.  Do not overlook this clue!

Emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have
adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all
members of the religious community concerned;

freedom to terrorize

Allah said that he would cast terror: 3:151 & 8:12.  Allah said that he cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and emulate Moe.  If Islam is equated with terrorism, then it must be prohibited by law. 

    Islam is an inseverable package deal: all or nothing, specified in 2:85. Believers fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed specified in  9:111.  Believers who take any step to injure or enrage disbelievers get extra credit for an upgrade to their seat in Allah's Celestial Bordello. 

    My right to freedom of opinion & expression; to state the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, must be subordinated to the Muslims' right to engage in terrorism. 

intolerance


    Islam imposes the death penalty for apostasy, including reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.  The penalty is explicitly stated in Reliance of the Traveller O8.1; the list of apostatizing acts in O8.7 tells us what is impermissible to mention.  The rule is extended to dhimmis (conquered Jews & Christians) in O11.10.  Islam does not tolerate criticism of Moe & Allah.  Moe had critics murdered

    The OIC is demanding, through the agency of the Human Rights Council, that we be exhorted and compelled to tolerate a war cult, disguised as a religion, which perpetuates genocidal conquest

Expresses deep concem at the continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping,
negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,
as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and
groups aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular when condoned by Governments;

derogatory stereotyping

    "Muslims are genocidally violent" has meaning as a derogatory stereotype precisely because Islam is genocidally violent (alleged defamation) and Muslims are adherents to Islam.  History shows us that the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were perpetrated by Muslims, on orders of the caliph.  The defamation meme is malignantly false, ostensibly eliminated yet deeply embedded in the resolution.  That which is intrinsically infamous can not be defamed. 

programmes and agendas

    What they have in mind is the Dutch, Swiss & Austrian freedom parties and "Islamophobic" comments and campaign advertisements by American politicians. 

Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and
related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this
context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take
effective measures, as set forth in the present resolution, consistent with their
obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such
incidents;

incidents

    The reference is to Fitna, the 15 minute documentary by Geert Wilders, the Motoons, International Burn the Koran Day & International Judge the Koran Day.   If it is critical of Islam and receives high profile public attention, it is an incident, according to the OIC. 

advocacy & incitement

    Words have meanings, but the standard meanings do not apply when Muslims utter them.  Spoken by Muslims and their dhimmis, words mean what Muslims want them to mean, not what we expect them to mean.  Exposing Islam's advocacy of hatred and incitement to genocidal violence is, in their double speak, advocacy & incitement.   Nothing illustrates that fact better than this Mooning. 

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."

 

Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on
religion or belief;

measures to criminalize

    Anyone not suffering from cranial-rectal juxtaposition should recognize that as a demand to outlaw Fitna, the Motoons and every expression critical of Islam. 

Friday, March 16, 2012

A Wad of Crap: CAIR's Pormotion of Shari'ah

A Wad of Crap: CAIR's Pormotion of Shari'ah On March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below, including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red parenthetical comment from BNI.  

    The letter solicits money to finance CAIR's campaign to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to address below.

OH, GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR

 

Our strategy is working

 As-salaamu alaykum (peace be to you),

Alhamdulillah (all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the introduction and passage of  anti-sharia laws nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida, New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the bills or allowed them to expire.

But the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.

 

Almost 40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign to demonize Islam and marginalize American Muslims.

The people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we currently lack. They are using their resources to exploit and promote ignorance, fear and religious hatred. Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.

 

I ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional bills from becoming the law of the land.

 CAIR can’t do it alone. We need your help.

 CAIR is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working (Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise – needed to fight the campaign to enact anti-sharia laws.

Please do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

 Please - RIGHT NOW - send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500, $1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

May God bless you.
Thank you again,

 

Nihad Awad
CAIR National Executive Director

Donations qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist affiliations)

Please send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook, Twitter, and other networks.

To volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state, contact CAIR.

 


effort to block introduction

    Democratic systems of government involve legislation introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic authoritarianism. 

    Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators. What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are not. 

anti-sharia laws

    The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not mention Shari'ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.  By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari'ah, CAIR admits the fact that Shari'ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari'ah did not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.

campaign

    While several organizations and individuals are speaking out about the threat posed by Shari'ah, and promoting state and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.

well-financed

    How much money is involved, and what is its source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper & magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

    Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon, in which case it is demonic and its critics are merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam's deity is depicted by its founder, in Malik's Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people "for the fire".

"I created these for the Fire and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the Fire."


In the Noble Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal 67, Allah demands "great slaughter" as Moe's price of admission to his celestial bordello. 

It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land.


Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

    Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and Islam because the two are incompatible. 

donors and resources

    The implication is that the anti-Shari'ah campaign is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself? 

    The sentence from which the previous four headings were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors & resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is palpable.

ignorance

    Exactly how do those "well financed" campaigners exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about Shari'ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote ignorance? How does publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate cases arising in the last three decades exploit and promote ignorance?   Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari'ah also exploit and promote ignorance?


fear

    The founders of this nation observed and experienced tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe others almost daily.

    CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur'an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).


    Moe attributed his military success to terror inflicted on his victims. 

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 ...1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey. ...
Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 ...I have been made victorious with terror...

    Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur'anic Concept of War

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent's heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.


We have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

    For prime examples of religious hatred, see the Qur'an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding Allah why he wants to burn us. 

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way 

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

   
    Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the worst of living creatures. 

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

9:30. And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , - so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

 

unconstitutional

cruel and unusual punishments  


How does Shari'ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you. How does that square with the first Amdt?

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

014.0 THE PENALTY FOR THEFT
014.1 A person's right hand is amputated.
whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the
Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,
when he:
(a) has reached puberty;
(b) is sane;
(c) is acting voluntarily;
(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:
1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:
at the market prices current) at the time of the
theft;
(e) from a place meeting the security
requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)
for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);
(f) provided there is no possible confusion
(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of
theft or for some other reason.
If a person steals a second time, his left foot is
amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and
if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a
fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does
not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then
his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but
loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but
before he has been punished for it, then nothing is
amputated. After amputation, the limb is
eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times
was the means to stop the bleeding and save the
criminal's life).

 

religious test

How does Shari'ah square with Article VI?

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.


Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary
condition of being a Muslim, evidently feeling that
uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he
must be Muslim, upright (def: 024.4), sane, and
learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up
plaintiffs' cases, recording what is done in each
case and the judge's decisions, and must be able to
distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.
The above four conditions are obligatory,
there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary
must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of
the caliph are that he be:
(a) Muslim (H: so that he may see to the best
interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it being
invalid to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.
even to rule non-Muslims.)

 

equality

indemnity

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies
the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate
to the death or injury's type of intentionality and
other relevant circumstances that determine the
amount of a male Muslim's indemnity (def:
04.2-6 and 04.13).)
The indemnity for the death or injury of a
woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.
The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is
one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The
indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth
of that of a Muslim.

testimony

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a
witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:
c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child
or insane person, even when the child's testimony
regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at
play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify"
(Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as
goes without saying);

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally
acceptable when it concerns cases involving property,
or transactions dealing with property, such
as sales:
(1) two men;
(2) two women and a man;
(3) or a male witness together with the oath
of the plaintiff.
024.8 If testimony does not concern propcrty,
such as a marriage or prescribed legal penalties,
then only two male witnesses may testify (A:
though the Hanafi school holds that two women
and a man may testify for marriage).
024.9 If testimony concerns fornication or
sodomy, then it requires four male witnesses (0:
who testify, in the case of fornication, that they
have seen the offender insert the head of his penis
into ber vagina).


    Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

Thursday, March 01, 2012

Islamophobia: UN Censorship Agenda 2012

Islamophobia: UN Censorship Agenda 2012 Call it Islamophobia, defamation of Islam, defamation of religions, vilification or negative stereotyping, it still implies and entails criminalizing the questioning, criticism and exposure of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam.  The name and the rhetoric change; the intention does not.  The OIC & UN seek to codify the following into international & national law:

    At the opening of the 19th session of the Human Rights Council February 28, 2012, Ekmeleddin_Insanoglu, Secretary General of the OIC, made revealing remarks which expose the true agenda of Islam and the UN.  At the time of this writing, no new draft resolutions on this subject have been uploaded to the HRC extranet, but I presume that one will be shortly before March 20.  I have excerpted the relevant paragraphs, adding links to two previous resolutions mentioned in the speech

Islamophobia is a contemporary manifestation of racism. Combating Islamophobia as well as
vilification of all religions and denigration of symbols and personalities sacred to all religions
is a matter of priority at the OIC. We regret that events representing constitutionalization and
institutionalization of Islamophobia continue to unfold. Most disconcerting is Islamophobia
being used as an instrument of electoral politics. This is a dangerous trend that needs to be
arrested. It threatens the multicultural fabric of societies. It could seriously undermine
international community's efforts aimed at interfaith harmony that could underwrite peace
and security- particularly so in a world faced with the menace of terrorism. There is an urgent
need to initiate and sustain 'preventive cultural diplomacy.

It is in this context that OIC took the initiative embodied in the resolution 16/1 8. This session
marks the first anniversary of the consensual passage of this resolution. It was based on the
eight points that I mentioned during my address to the 15th session of the Council in
September 201 0. I am glad that these points found resonance with all the negotiating partners
and resulted in a process of consensus building. We must now build on the consensus. It is
with this. in mind that I initiated - with the presence and participation of US Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton, Baroness Ashton and other Ministers - the Istanbul Process for a
consensual implementation of this resolution. The process seems to be going forward with
the last meeting held in Washington and the next to be scheduled in the EU region. OIC will
also be hosting an event this year to further the Process. We believe it is important to have a
structured engagement. We must address the grey areas and the whole package of interrelated
issues by accommodating all concerns of all parties. The alternative approach in resolutions '
16/18 at HRC and 66/167 at UNGA has put the decade of polarization and politicization
behind us. This enables us to address the real issues and chart out a sustainable and result-oriented
course of action at the national and the international levels. Recent events
characterized by loss of lives in Norway and Afghanistan underscored the importance of
concerted and consensual international action. OIC has demonstrated ability to build consensus
on the most sensitive of international issues. We look forward to being reciprocated in the same spirit.

Islamophobia

    Phobia implies irrationality.  There is nothing irrational about fear & loathing of Islam because terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament1 of Islam.

racism

    What race is Islam? It originated in Arabia, but it enslaved millions of Africans & Asians through conquest. Ideology & religion are dynamic, but race is static and immutable.  We do not hate Muslims because of their skin color, we hate their belief2 that they have a divine mission to convert or enslave us through conquest.

    Muslims use false accusations of racism to denigrate & calumniate its critics because they can not refute the facts we present. 

vilification of all religions

    In the Qur'an, Jews are those who "earned your anger" & Christians are those who "went astray". We are described as the "worst of living creatures". They recite Surah Al-Fatiha seventeen times each day, reminding Allah why he should burn us. 

denigration of personalities

    Truthfully describing Muhammad as a lecherous pedophile who married a six year old girl, arranged the divorce of his daughter in law so he could add her to his harem and ordered the murder of critics is denigration of a sacred person but denial of Christ's paternity, divinity, crucifixion, death & resurrection and depicting him as a  warlord who will return to lead the Muslims in the final genocide 3 is perfectly ok. 

constitutionalization

    It is nearly certain that this is a reference to the anti-Shari'ah movement to pass legislation and constitutional amendments to exclude foreign law, including Shari'ah from our court system. 

instrument of electoral politics

    That is an obvious reference to campaign advertisements and 'debate' statements critical of Islam.  They want to criminalize criticism of Islam by candidates for office. 

interfaith harmony

    Translation: submission to Islam.  The sentence including that phrase is a thinly veiled threat of war.

polarization

    The sentence containing that word is a reference to the dispute over the 'defamation of religions' meme. The position of Western Civilization is that defamation and legal protection from its effects belong to individuals, not to religions. Our side views the defamation meme as an existential threat to freedom of expression.  Islam views freedom of expression as subordinate to their sensitivities. Muslims are sensitive because they know that Islam is an impious fraud but are so heavily invested in it that they can not acknowledge the fact. 

defamation


    The claim that Res16/18 eliminated the defamation meme and associated conflict is malignant malarkey.  There is no significant difference between defamation and negative stereotyping.  A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1, passed Dec. 19, '12 along with A/66/167, emphasizes that "that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;".

    At the opening of Session 19, http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10082hrcopeningqatar.pdf" target="_blank" style="font-weight: bold;">Qatar's Minister of State for Foreign Affairs had this to say:

The international community still faces a major challenge
due to the worsening impact of racist practices, racial
discrimination, acts of violence and related conflicts. These
practices have become evident in the defamation and negative
stereotyping of religions, as well as in the incitement to violence
against people on the basis of their religion or belief.

       


  1. 3:151, 7:4, 8:12, 8:57 8:60, 33:26, 59:2, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
  2. Islam is inseverable, all or nothing. 2:85 strictly prohibits selectivity, making Islam a package deal.  Believers are only those who "fight in Allah's cause", which is to make Islam dominate the world.  
  3. "In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world."

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Qur'an Burning; Idiot's Attitude: Respect for Islam

Qur'an Burning; Idiot's Attitude: Respect for Islam The video has disappeared from the AP article at Yahoo News. It is still available at the N.Y. Times.  48 seconds into the video, general John Allen , Cmdr of Nato forces:

"I assure you, I promise you, this was not intentional in any way and I offer my sincere apology for any offense this may have caused."


    The article quotes the White House spokesman thusly.

Press secretary Jay Carney says it was a "deeply unfortunate incident" that does not reflect the respect the U.S. military has for the religious practices of the Afghans.


I highlighted one clause that appears in other articles, but not within quotes. I do not know whether Carney uttered or implied the sentiment expressed in the highlighted clause. 

    From Reliefweb, we learn of a U.N. statement expressing the same "respect", describing remarks by SRSG Kubiš.

He stressed that the United Nations deeply respects the Islamic faith, traditions and culture of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.


    From CBSNEWS we learn that a military source said that the Qur'ans were removed from the prison library because they "contained extremist messages or inscriptions".  The implication is that prisoners had made marginal notes. Exactly what was in those notes? Were they operational or motivational messages? 

        How would operational notes get out of the prison to those who would implement them?  What is the difference between motivational messages and the Qur'an, which exhorts Muslims to conquer the world?  If we don't want them to have access to incitement to violence, then they should not have been given access to Qur'ans, hadith, tafsir  & jurisprudence or the writings of Maududi, Qutb, Al-Banna or Azam.   Is there any limit to the stupidity & hypocrisy of our traitors?

    Yeah, General, Taliban are sure to believe that Qur'ans were collected, removed and sent to the garbage pile purely by accident, without intent to destroy them.  We did not want the prisoners to use them, the books are not in our language, and we did not want the marginal notes to get out, so we disposed of the, permanently.  You placed yourself in a bad position: you are either incompetent or a liar.  Which is it, or  are you both? 

    Removing the Qur'ans is not your error. Burning them is not your mistake. Doing it in public, within  sight of the enemy is a fatal mistake which has led to a dozen deaths and will probably cause more death and suffering.  Next time, incinerate the crap privately, in a proper facility and don't advertise it. 

    Do any of those involved, including the White House, Department of Defense, Department of State and United Nations comprehend the plain meaning of words?  They said that they "respect Islam".   Three classes of people "respect Islam": ignoramuses, damned fools and Muslims. Unfortunately, those classes are not mutually exclusive. 

    If you can respect a mercenary war cult whose doctrines sanctify genocidal conquest, terrorism & slavery, then you have a terrible mental or moral defect sufficient to warrant your removal from the gene pool of the human race and from high office. 

    Islam is not incidental to the Accursed Abomination and its aftermath; it is the central issue.  Allah's damnable imperatives, promises and threats which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen to slaughter 3000 innocent people, are at the core of the problem.  It is not possible to remove and permanently exclude  Afghanistan from membership in the set of terror sponsoring states without first removing Islam; Allah's yoke of slavery from the souls and necks of the people of Afghanistan and their regime.  So long as they remain Muslim, all the blood and treasure we have expended there are wasted, sacrificed to the demon of political correctness. 

    Brigadier General S.K. Malik gave us the key to victory in page sixty of "The Quran'ic Concept of War" but our leaders are traitors, unwilling to seize the key, insert it in the lock and turn it.  Pay particular attention to the sentences I have emphasized in this crucial quote.

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
 cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent's
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur'an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.


    If we do not destroy Islam, nuking Afghanistan & Pakistan is our only hope of victory: there will be no alternative to complete extermination. The people of those enslaved nations must be made to comprehend the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose threat and promise are vain.  They must throw off Islam's yoke of slavery or they must be exterminated.  Emancipation is morally superior to extermination.  We needed to get started eleven years ago. 

Monday, February 20, 2012

ROPMA

ROPMA

Update 02/20/12: The demise of tafsir.com broke the links to Tafsir Ibn Kathir.  The links have been changed to point to equivalent text at Islam-Universe.Relevant  references to Shari'ah have been added because they confirm the obvious better than anything else can. 

 

So Islam is "a great religion of peace" ? Explain these topic titles from Ibn Kathir's Tafsir. Click them and read their contents.  Why did Allah  command and order Muslims to commit aggression?

So terrorism is haram? Explain these tafsir which explain 8:60 and 8:12!!


    In Tafsir Ibn Kathir, you see the ayat which enjoin offensive warfare and the ahadith which confirm them, but you do not see their practical application.  For that you must turn to Shari'ah: Islamic law which is based on the Qur'an & hadith.

    Reliance of the Traveller is the most well known codification of Shari'ah. It reflects the fiqh of the Shafi'i school of Islamic law.  It is divided into books, each of which bears a letter as its name. Book O codifies the laws related to justice, including the definition, communal obligation & performance of jihad. 

    Reliance defines Jihad as "war against non-Muslims". It is a communal obligation, binding on all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have responded to the front.  Jihad must be performed in every year, and it is performed against disbelievers while they are in their own countries, peacefully minding their own affairs.

    The caliph makes war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to annual extortion payments called jizya.  He fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. 

    That is not my opinion, I did not pull it out of any orifice, it is plain and clear on the face of the text of Reliance of the Traveller, which is certified authentic and accurate by sheikhs of  al-Azhar University at Cairo.  

    Would you like a second opinion? Try Risala, the handbook of fiqh belonging to the Maliki school of Islamic Law.  Risala defines jihad as " a technical term for the Muslim fighting the unbelievers who have no treaty with the intention of elevating the word of Allah or presenting Islam". Muslims must invite disbelievers to Islam. If they reject Islam, they must demand jizya. If  refused, they must wage war. 

    Would you like a third opinion?  Try Hedaya, the handbook of fiqh belonging to the Hanifi school of Islamic Law.  From Hedaya, we learn that jihad must be undertaken at all times by some party of the Muslims.  We learn that "destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels even though they be not the first aggressors".   We also learn that jizya is a punishment for infidelity and a payment in lieu of destruction. 

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari'ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law, based on the Qur'an & hadith which are the primary sources of Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and imposes its law on the entire society.

    The fact that Shari'ah imposes corporal punishments including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility to impose a total exclusion on Shari'ah, but it does not. In the last three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in American courts.

    Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it is all or nothing; a package deal.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.


If Muslims reject part of the Qur'an, they will be disgraced in this world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad, corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of marriage, divorce & child custody. 

    I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most widely accepted codification of Shari'ah.  These rulings impact issues of equality, dignity, justice and 'family law'.  They come from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller. 

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

    The following table includes links to the three main codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane & archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller
Risala
Hedaya Volume II

Amazon.com: Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic ...

www.amazon.com/Reliance-Traveller-Classic-Manual.../0915957728
 40 reviews - $25.33 - In stock
Text: English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised edition (July 1, ...


The hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles Hamilton. ... Volume 2 of 4 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback - May 30, 2010)

Buy new$51.75 $37.78

11 new from $28.10 1 used from $58.20 
In Stock
[PDF] 

Reliance of the Traveller and Tools for the Worshipper.

www.shafiifiqh.com/maktabah/relianceoftraveller.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
Reliance of the Traveller and. Tools for the Worshipper. A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW BY AHMAD IBN. NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD) ...
[PDF] 

Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki Fiqh. 'Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -. 386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) ...

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic laws

Internet Archive BookReader - The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check that your ...


The second gif follows; it displays the Qur'anic ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari & Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah's commands to fight
    • Moe's confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist's interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam's initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of business
      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and pay jizya
        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.


The most important points of the law of Jihad