Trump Clueless Before Congress 02.28.'17

I found  a transcript of President Trump's address to Congress at NPR. While I agree with most of the content and philosophy behind it, I concentrate here on the part from which I am compelled to dissent vociferously.  I have selected  a few non contiguous lines from the speech for dissection.  Superscripts in the excerpt are internally linked to my comments which follow below the horizontal line.

Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. We are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical¹ Islamic terrorism².  According to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorism and terrorism-related offense since 9/11 came here from outside of our country³. We have seen the attacks at home, from Boston to San Bernardino, to the Pentagon, and yes, even the World Trade Center. We have seen the attacks in France, in Belgium, in Germany, and all over the world. It is not compassion but reckless to allow uncontrolled entry⁴ from places where proper vetting⁵ cannot occur.  

That is why my administration has been working on improved vetting procedures, and we will shortly take new steps to keep our nation safe and to keep those out⁶ who will do us harm.

As promised, I directed the Department of Defense to develop a plan to demolish and destroy ISIS⁷, a network of lawless⁸ savages⁹ that have slaughtered Muslims and Christians and men and women and children of all faiths and all beliefs. We will work with our allies, including our friends and allies¹⁰ in the Muslim world, to extinguish¹¹ this vile enemy¹² from our planet.

America has spent approximately $6 trillion¹³ in the Middle East. All the while our infrastructure at home has crumbled. With this $6 trillion, we could have rebuilt our country twice, and maybe even three times, if we had people who had the ability to negotiate¹⁴.

---

radical

    Radical refers to the root. The root of Islamic terrorism is the Qur'an & sunnah but the radical prefix postulates the existence of an anodyne form of Islam which does not involve terrorism. No such anodyne Islam exists.  Even if terrorism were stricken from the Qur'an & sunnah, which is impossible, Jihad would remain: genocidal conquest. Islamic supremacism, triumphalism & imperialism would not be tolerable even without terrorism!  

Islamic terrorism

    Here are the roots of terrorism:
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  *Use the  <= next ayat  link at top center of the page at Islam Awakened to advance to the next verse.

    The best description of terror relates to Qiyama: the last day when Allah will seize you and cast you into the fire.  
 

Children turning white headed, pregnant women aborting and men seeming to be drunk. That is the condition they wish to impose: simultaneously the ends and the means!  Who can obtain a clue?  Read page 59 of "The Quranic Concept Of War" and get a clue if you are able.

outsiders

    Outsider or home grown, what's the difference? The Brothers Tsarnaev were 'refugees', Nidal Hasan was born here. Plenty of potential terrorists are already here, we need to deport them, not import more!  

entry

    Jesus Christ may have compassion for everyone, but only a fool expresses compassion for existential foes by importing them  to our soil where they have easy access to soft targets. The Boston Marathon bombing was the fruit of foolish compassion.

vetting

    Tashfeen Malik  was passed through five stages of vetting. She was admitted; with her husband Syed Rizwan Farook, she slaughtered fourteen innocent people at a Christmas party.  What damned fool believes it is possible to vet Muslims and separate the passive & anodyne (for the moment) from those with the will to kill?  

keep out

    Millions of them are already here, why bring in more?  Expel those already present and keep the rest out!!!  Who would do us harm?  Every damned Muslim is obligated to do us harm!!!   "Jihad is ordained for you" 2.216. It is Islamic law, binding on all Muslims. Those who do not participate are doomed to a "painful torment" or "painful punishment" which means: go to war or go to Hell! Use the Next Ayat link at the top center of the page to advance to the next ayat until you reach 78.31.

    9.5 commands Muslims to "kill them wherever yoiu find them".  9.29 commands them to fight us until we are subjugated and make annual extortion payments.  9.120 promises Brownie Points for acts intended to injure or enrage us.  9.123 commands fighting the nearest kuffar.  What could possibly go wrong???

ISIS

    Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines of Islam, are the enemy. The Islamic State In Syria is one manifestation of Islam. If you could eliminate ISIS by exterminating its fighting forces, there would still be 1.3 billion Muslims infesting the earth and dozens of terrorist groups to carry on the Jihad.   World War 2 was not won and ended until the fat lady sang over Hiroshima & Little Boy & Fat Man  brought supernumerary sunrise to Japan.  Defeating their navy and air forces was not enough.  Who can get a clue?

    If vampires were real instead of mythical, what would happen if  we left one alive?  So it is with Islam: one surviving Muslim will breed or recruit more and the Jihad will resume because the alternative is going to Hell.  Martyrdom is the only sure ticket to Allah's celestial orgy with two perpetual virgins and up to 70 Jewish & Christian women taken from the fire. Who can get a clue?

lawless

    Islam entails imposition of shari'ah which is primarily derived from the Qur'an and sunnah.  It requires a minimum of one military expedition against kuffar in every year when it is possible.  The laws of Jihad are summarized for us in "The Book Of Jihad"; reading its table of contents should be sufficient to piss off any sentient man of good will.  

savages

    Savage people from primitive tribes, one of which contrived Islam and imposed it on others by the sword. Islam is a divine sanction for what savages are already inclined to do: plunder.  Ibn Khaldun, a Tunisian Arab displaced by the Spanish reconquista, wrote of Arabs in unflattering terms.  Who can get a clue?  

friends & allies

    Only an ignorant fool believes he has Muslim friends & allies! Allah expressly forbids equal & inferior relationships with kuffar!  Muslims must be superior as per 9.33. This is a get your head out of the sand moment!!  Muslims are explicitly commanded not to take us as friends allies or partners!!! 3:28, 3:118,   4:89,  4:139,  4:144,  5:51,  5:57, 58:14,  58:22,  60:1,  60:13
Who can get a clue?       

extinguish

    You can not extinguish a great smoldering mass. The Islamic State is not  the only inimical manifestation of Islam. If you could eliminate it, a new organization would rise up from the Ummah to  rival al-Qaeda in the rush to replace it.  As explained above, while one Believing slave of Allah lives, the war will continue!

    Kinetically, you must wipe out all their training camps and assembly areas. You must kill all their leaders and bomb & strafe their funeral processions.  If you got'em, smoke'em!

    Ideologically, you must prove to Muslims: the entire Ummah, that Allah is an impotent idol unworthy of worship and obedience. You must induce mass apostasy or the Jihad will never end.  Once again I refer the clueless to page 60 of "The Quranic Concept Of War".

vile enemy

    They torture, rape, enslave & plunder. They prevail by terrorism. They practice asymmetrical  warfare.  Victory requires their extinction.  Who shall get a clue?

$6 trillion

    Every dollar and every drop of blood spent in Afghanistan and Iraq is wasted and was so before the first shot was fired.  You can no more make a civilized nation out of Muslims than a silk purse from a sow's ear.   Shrub should have nuked Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq & Saudi Arabia off the face of the earth immediately after the accursed abomination.

negotiate

    What do you negotiate with an implacable  existential foe who believes he has a divine mandate to conquer you?  Just kill half of us?  Just take 25 states?  Carter, Clinton & Shrub thought they could get peace by sacrificing Israel.  Those are damned fools and traitors.  

        There is nothing to negotiate; there is something to exterminate: Muslims. Who can get a clue?

Calumny by Innuendo

One of my Facebook friends gave me a link to an article by Dan Gardner . The article, entitled The not so great Islamist menace  and published on an Ottawa Citizen web site, is interesting because of the author's attitude. 

    Subsequent to reading the article, I became involved in the reader discussion. While there are several interesting replies, I singled this one out because it deserves a thorough rebuttal which will not fit in the small space allocated by the web site's comment system.

Ozy3

10:03 PM on January 5, 2011

People on this board have actually attacked Gardner for relying on hard facts, rather than promoting warped perceptions that they enjoy. They are angry because Gardner is undermining the luxurious and uncomplicated hatred they feel towards a group linked only by a religious belief. They don't want to question that hatred or see the targets of their anger as human beings. One poster is even implying that Muslims don't deserve sympathy because no matter what he or she may be like as an individual, the religious affiliation renders them unworthy of compassion.

This is the definition of dehumanizing. When Ann Coulter calls for carpet bombing Muslim countries and forcibly converting survivors to Christianity, she gets a standing ovation. But 65 years ago, that idea was called "The Final Solution". How did we forget so quickly when we swore "Never Again"?

And these views being aired in Canada, of all places? What have we become?

Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/great+Islamist+menace/4058778/story.html#ixzz1AFu2Spcj

hard facts

    The opening paragraphs are full of attitude & perception, not hard facts. The last two sentences of the second paragraph stands out.

It’s Muslims. Or if you’re a little more careful with your language, it’s radical Muslims, or “Islamists.”

    Sorry, Mr. Gardner, responsibility for Islamic terrorism is not the property of any of the three listed entities. Muslims are people who have recited the Shehada three times in Arabic and subsequently obey Allah and his Messenger or whose fathers did.  The other two entities are fallacies whose mention is a token of political correctness and factual error. 

    Responsibility for Islamic terrorism is the province of Islamic doctrine and the texts & clerics who propagate it.  The Qur'an sanctifies & mandates terrorism. The hadith & Sira exemplify it for Muslims to emulate.

    One subsequent sentence stands out as an exemplar of arrogance in the guise of  'hard facts'.

"So the danger is big and growing, and Islamists are the source. Right?"

    When  you cite one botched suicide bombing and a Mumbai style attack that was thwarted by good police work, and use them to stake a case that Islamic terror does not pose a real proximate and persistent threat of death and injury, you are not being serious, you are being flippant and arrogant. How many deaths and serious injuries would have resulted if the bomb had not detonated prematurely? Fortunately, we will never know, that blood was not splattered.  To assert that the toll would be insignificant to the victims and their families is the height of inhumane indifference.

    The perpetrator and frustrated perpetrators had something in common: Islam, which commands them to participate in genocidal world conquest using terrorism as a battle tactic of asymmetrical warfare. Islam, not 'Islamists' is the 'source'. 

    'Islamists' implies that normative Islam is apolitical, a personal religion. It is not. Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise founded for the personal emolument of its founder through the professional practice of piracy and extortion. 

    The founder of Islam became a warlord when he emigrated to Yathrib, which he took over and renamed Medina. He seized both 'spiritual' and temporal power. He made all the decisions in his theocracy. Let doubters & dissenters observe what he said in Allah's name in 33:26.

    Next we come to the abuse of statistics.

"The European Union’s Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2010 states that in 2009 there were “294 failed, foiled, or successfully executed attacks” in six European countries. This was down almost one-third from the total in 2008 and down by almost one-half from the total in 2007."

   
    Two hundred ninety-four attacks were failed, foiled or executed, in a declining trend. What was the planned scale of those attacks? How many others were in the planning stages but not carried out?   Failed and foiled attacks render the threat negligible and of course the trend is irreversible. Tell that to those injured in the most recent failed attack.  Tell it to one of the victims seriously injured in Madrid or London.  Chortle about it to a father whose wife and child were killed at the school in Beslan.  Thank you very much for your vacuum headed assurances.

   

"As for who’s responsible, forget Islamists. The overwhelming majority of the attacks— 237 of 294 — were carried out by separatist groups, such as the Basque ETA. A further 40 terrorists schemes were pinned on leftist and/or anarchist terrorists. Rightists were responsible for four attacks. Single-issue groups were behind two attacks, while responsibility for a further 10 was not clear."

    How many people do the ETA and other splinter groups kill? How does that statistic compare to the number of victims maimed and killed by Muslim terrorists?   Its as if the attacks on London, Madrid and Beslan never happened because there were more, smaller attacks by others that failed or were thwarted. 

    They did it once, they promise to do it again. That is the stuff of terror, of induced paranoia that will eventually make civil society impossible. And it is all reduced to insignificance and dismissed by an irrelevant and reversible statistical trend. 

warped perceptions  

    Here we have a thinly veiled ad hominem attack, totally devoid of substance; a prime exemplar of innuendo.

luxurious hatred

    Critics of Islam are accused of bigotry because we object to the unholy consequences of damnable doctrines which impel men to the most barbarian acts of mass murder in the name of their demon who demands blood sacrifice: "great slaughter". 

religious belief

    They believe that they have a divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world; a divine license to kill us, rape our widows, enslave our children and seize our real and personal property for their own profit. We are supposed to respect & tolerate that belief and allow them to implement it. Yeah, right.

• 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
• 33:27.  And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • "My judgement is that their fighters should be killed and their children and wealth should be seized.'' [The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah]
  • Relevant Islamic law
    • Reliance of the Traveller
      • o9.0    jihad defined
      • o9.1    religious obligation thereof & Islamic initiative
      • o9.8    perpetual war on Jews & Christians
      • o9.13  captive women and children enslaved
• Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
  Narrated Anas bin Malik:
  Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have." 

targets of their anger

    Here we have an exemplar of the victim card. Muslims are victims because we react with anger to their attacks upon us. Resistance is evil, we should surrender, submit and suffer enslavement instead.  Yeah, right.

religious affiliation renders them unworthy of compassion

    The innuendo continues. LibTards can't comprehend the intrinsic evil of Islam. The fact that most Muslims are victims of Islam changes nothing. They impose it on new victims.  There are two possible ways to break the cycle: emancipate them from slavery to Allah or kill them.

dehumanizing

    Moe dehumanized his companions by enslaving them to Allah, for whom they fight, kill and are killed. LibTards can not comprehend the meaning of believers. The infliction of Islam is similar to a vampire bite, it dehumanizes its victims.

Ann Coulter

    Ann's excellent suggestion, expressed in hyperbole, has the ring of truth which LibTards can't hear.  Because Allah promises victory and makes the Muslim's eternal destiny dependent on participation in jihad,  When you believe that you will go to Hell if you don't go to war, you go to war. Because of that doctrine, Islam can not be defeated, it must be eradicated, a fatal fact which LibTards can not comprehend.

"The Final Solution"

    The innuendo continues with linkage to Hitler. Were Jews conspiring to dominate the world? Were they genetically inferior, carriers of disease and spreaders of insurrection? Were Jews behind every problem suffered by Germany?  The fact is that Jews were scapegoated, used as convenient targets to focus undeserved anger and hatred.  

"Never Again"

    Why should there be a pogrom against Jews?  What Hitler did was a horrific crime against humanity: genocide against innocent people.  The arrogant LibTard calumniates those of us who criticize and condemn Islam by suggesting that we want to emulate Hitler's genocide.  In reality, we want to preserve ourselves and innocent humanity from intra-species predation by Muslims motivated by Islam which promises them eternity in Allah's celestial bordello if they wage war against us and threatens them with eternal Hellfire if they refuse.   We  very much prefer to emancipate Muslims from Allah's yoke of slavery by fighting the war on the ideological front. Unfortunately, our governments lack the intelligence and courage to wage the intellectual war. If they do not wise up soon we will eventually be forced to resort to nukes. 
   
    We can have life, liberty and prosperity or we can have Islam, we can not have both. Which do you chose?  How do you chose to defeat Islam? 

• International Qur'an Petition
• Expose Islam On Film Petition
• Congress Debate Qur'an Petition
• Target: Mecca Petition

Will you sign these petitions, cross post them and propagate them by email or are you part of the problem?