Friday, October 17, 2014

Kerry is Condemned by His Lies: Its Islam, Stupid!!!

Kerry's Malignant Apology for Islam The Secretary of State, like the President who appointed him, is a G'd'd liar. His recent apology for Islam is reproduced below with crucial lies linked to my commentary which follows. In my commentary, I have cited and provided links to the Qur'an, Sahih Bukhari, Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.  Islam's scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence prove Kerry's words to be a shitspew.
Secretary Kerry: October 2014 » ISIL's Dehumanization of Women and Girls

ISIL's Dehumanization of Women and Girls


Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
October 14, 2014


Just days after we saw the best of humanity when Malala Yousafzai and Kailash Satyarthi were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, we again confront the worst of inhumanity in ISIL. No one needed a reminder of ISIL’s depravity and evil. But now we have the latest example.

ISIL now proudly takes credit for the abduction, enslavement, rape, forced marriage, and sale of several thousand Yezidi and other minority women and girls—some as young as 12 years old. Just as despicably, ISIL rationalizes its abhorrent treatment of these women and girls by claiming it is somehow sanctioned by religion. Wrong. Dead wrong.

ISIL does not represent Islam and Islam does not condone or honor such depravity. In fact, these actions are a reminder that ISIL is an enemy of Islam. The international community and religious leaders of all faiths have strongly and repeatedly condemned ISIL’s horrific acts; we urge them to reiterate their commitment by condemning in the strongest possible terms the commodification of women and children as spoils of war, including through their subjection to horrific physical and sexual violence, intimidation, and deprivation of liberty.

These acts transgress all definitions of human dignity and those individuals responsible must be identified and held fully accountable. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Cathy Russell said it best: “Such viciousness against innocents exposes ISIL's blatant rejection of the most basic progress we have made as a community of nations and the universal values that bind civilization.” The United States will not stand by as ISIL uses fear, violence and oppression to achieve its goals.

To stop ISIL’s campaign of terror and horror against the Syrian and Iraqi people, we remain steadfast in our efforts to lead the international coalition to degrade and defeat ISIL. The United States will keep tracking ISIL’s abduction, enslavement, sale, rape, forced marriage, and abuse of women and girls. We will keep working with the new Government of Iraq to respond to ISIL’s brutality against women and girls from all communities in Iraq, including vulnerable minority populations.


enslavement = sanctioned by religion

    Re-examine the crucial sentences: "ISIL now proudly takes credit for the abduction, enslavement, rape, forced marriage, and sale of several thousand Yezidi and other minority women and girls—some as young as 12 years old. Just as despicably, ISIL rationalizes its abhorrent treatment of these women and girls by claiming it is somehow sanctioned by religion."

    Secretary of state Kerry equates the evil of enslavement and rape to claiming religious sanction for it.  "Allah told us to do it" = rape & enslavement. The absurdity of the statement stands out like a sore thumb.

sanctioned by religion

    Surah Al-Mu'minun states that the believers are successful, meaning that they will be admitted to Allah's celestial bordello. It then lists several attributes of those successful believers. Two of those attributes are relevant to this issue: modesty and chastity.   The exception clause stands out like a Yaws lesion.

23:5. And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

23:6. Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then, they are free from blame;

    Tafsir al-Jalalayn: "except from their spouses, that is, to their spouses, and what [slaves] their right hands possess, that is, concubines, for then they are not blameworthy, in having sexual intercourse with them.

    Tafsir Ibn Kathir: "[...]those who protect their private parts from unlawful actions and do not do that which Allah has forbidden; fornication and homosexuality, and do not approach anyone except the wives whom Allah has made permissible for them or their right hand possessions from the captives. [...]"

  1. Captivating and enslaving women is assumed.
  2. Sexually exploiting them is explicitly permitted.

Islam does not condone

    "Right hands possess" is frequently repeated in the Qur'ran. A flagrant example is included above.  Moe not only permitted it, he  exemplified it for emulation by Muslims in all places, at all times.  Moe raped Safiya after killing her family.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 513:

Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz bin Suhaib:

Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet took Safiya as a captive. He manumitted her and married her." Thabit asked Anas, "What did he give her as Mahr (i.e. marriage gift)?" Anas replied. "Her Mahr was herself, for he manumitted her."

Click the link and read the variant ahadith which provide more detail. Moe also permitted his companions to rape captives.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:
Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."

commodification of women and children as spoils

    Surah Al-Ahzab has a clue for you: "a group o them you killed and a group you made captives"

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

    Who were the two groups?  Tafsir Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.  "[...](a group you killed, and a group you made captives.) Those who were killed were their warriors, and the prisoners were their children and women. [...]"

    Shari'ah is not silent on the matter. Reliance of the Traveller declares that captured women and children are enslaved by default.
09.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive,
they become slaves by the fact of capture, and
the woman's previous marriage is immediately
annulled.

dignity

    The Profit implicitly denied our human dignity and rights. Read between the lines.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

individuals responsible

    How in Hell do you hope to identify the specific individuals who perpetrate the war crimes?  How will you kill them?  You have not tried those most responsible for 9/11 yet.  You leave those who perpetrated the Benghazi Massacre at large.

    Did killing bin Ladin and Zarqawi  end the war?  Killing every card carrying member of ISIS won;t end it either. There will always be more Muslims to step forward to fill the gaps.  Only those who fight to make Islam dominant, killing and being killed are believers. 9.33, 9.111, 49.15.

    Muslims go to war and Allah's celestial bordello or go to Hell:9.38-.39  set the stage.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

   

    So long as Muslims believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise, they will continue to attack.  If you seek peace, cause them to apostatize or die. There are no alternatives.

keep tracking

    We need effective actions, not tracking. You stood by while thousands were enslaved and slaughtered, hundreds of thousands dispossessed and displaced. Instead of striking when the iron was hot, while a long convoy was arrayed before Mosul, you dithered; you stood by pissing & moaning when you should have sent a Warthog to strafe the column when it was an easy target. 

condemning in the strongest possible terms

    The strongest possible terms are imprecatory prayers for the immediate death and eternal damnation of the evil doers.
No Muslim will abjure these texts which sanctify, mandate and exemplify the evils you so blithely bitch about. 

3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

Curse Allah for sanctifying and commanding Muslims to engage in imperialism, genocide & terrorism. Curse Muhammad for exemplifying those acts for Muslims to emulate in all places, at all times. Curse Islam because it is a continuing war crime against humnity.

    ISIS, HAMAS, Hizbollah, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram and the rest of the alphabet soup are false fronts diverting your attention from the real enemy: Islam. Islam is the lowest common denominator of terrorism. It must be eradicated.



Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Bibi: "Its Not Islam, Its Militant Islam"; CamelShit!

Bibi: "Its Not Islam, Its Militant Islam"; CamelShit!




[Transcription] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speech at the United Nations General Assembly September 29, 2014 Thank you, Mr. President, Distinguished delegates, I come here from Jerusalem to speak on behalf of my people, the people of Israel. I've come here to speak about the dangers we face and about the opportunities we see. I've come here to expose the brazen lies spoken from this very podium against my country and against the brave soldiers who defend it.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The people of Israel pray for peace.

But our hopes and the world's hope for peace are in danger. Because everywhere we look, militant Islam is on the march.

It's not militants. It's not Islam. It's militant Islam. Typically, its first victims are other Muslims, but it spares no one. Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Kurds – no creed, no faith, no ethnic group is beyond its sights. And it's rapidly spreading in every part of the world. You know the famous American saying: "All politics is local"? For the militant Islamists, "All politics is global." Because their ultimate goal is to dominate the world.

Now, that threat might seem exaggerated to some, since it starts out small, like a cancer that attacks a particular part of the body. But left unchecked, the cancer grows, metastasizing over wider and wider areas. To protect the peace and security of the world, we must remove this cancer before it's too late. Last week, many of the countries represented here rightly applauded President Obama for leading the effort to confront ISIS. And yet weeks before, some of these same countries, the same countries that now support confronting ISIS, opposed Israel for confronting Hamas. They evidently don’t understand that ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree.

ISIS and Hamas share a fanatical creed, which they both seek to impose well beyond the territory under their control.

Listen to ISIS’s self-declared caliph,Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. This is what he said two months ago: A day will soon come when the Muslim will walk everywhere as a master… The Muslims will cause the world to hear and understand the meaning of terrorism… and destroy the idol of democracy. Now listen to Khaled Meshaal, the leader of Hamas. He proclaims a similar vision of the future: We say this to the West… By Allah you will be defeated. Tomorrow our nation will sit on the throne of the world.

As Hamas's charter makes clear, Hamas’s immediate goal is to destroy Israel. But Hamas has a broader objective. They also want a caliphate. Hamas shares the global ambitions of its fellow militant Islamists. That’s why its supporters wildly cheered in the streets of Gaza as thousands of Americans were murdered on 9/11. And that's why its leaders condemned the United States for killing Osama Bin Laden, whom they praised as a holy warrior.

So when it comes to their ultimate goals, Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas.

And what they share in common, all militant Islamists share in common: • Boko Haram in Nigeria; • Ash-Shabab in Somalia; • Hezbollah in Lebanon; • An-Nusrah in Syria; • The Mahdi Army in Iraq; • And the Al-Qaeda branches in Yemen, Libya, the Philippines, India and elsewhere.

Some are radical Sunnis, some are radical Shi'ites. Some want to restore a pre-medieval caliphate from the 7th century. Others want to trigger the apocalyptic return of an imam from the 9th century. They operate in different lands, they target different victims and they even kill each other in their quest for supremacy. But they all share a fanatic ideology. They all seek to create ever expanding enclaves of militant Islam where there is no freedom and no tolerance – Where women are treated as chattel, Christians are decimated, and minorities are subjugated, sometimes given the stark choice: convert or die. For them, anyone can be an infidel, including fellow Muslims.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Militant Islam's ambition to dominate the world seems mad. But so too did the global ambitions of another fanatic ideology that swept to power eight decades ago.

The Nazis believed in a master race. The militant Islamists believe in a master faith. They just disagree about who among them will be the master… of the master faith. That’s what they truly disagree about. Therefore, the question before us is whether militant Islam will have the power to realize its unbridled ambitions.

There is one place where that could soon happen: The Islamic State of Iran. For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words: We will export our revolution to the entire world.

Until the cry "There is no God but Allah" will echo throughout the world over… And ever since, the regime’s brutal enforcers, Iran's Revolutionary Guards, have done exactly that.

Listen to its current commander, General Muhammad Ali Ja'afari. And he clearly stated this goal. He said: Our Imam did not limit the Islamic Revolution to this country… Our duty is to prepare the way for an Islamic world government… Iran's President Rouhani stood here last week, and shed crocodile tears over what he called "the globalization of terrorism." Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran's global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries on five continents since 2011 alone. To say that Iran doesn't practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees.

This bemoaning of the Iranian president of the spread of terrorism has got to be one of history’s greatest displays of doubletalk.

Now, Some still argue that Iran's global terror campaign, its subversion of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists. They say things are changing. They point to last year's elections in Iran. They claim that Iran’s smooth talking President and Foreign Minister, they’ve changed not only the tone of Iran's foreign policy but also its substance. They believe Rouhani and Zarif genuinely want to reconcile with the West, that they’ve abandoned the global mission of the Islamic Revolution.

Really? So let's look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago: We have a fundamental problem with the West, and especially with America. This is because we are heirs to a global mission, which is tied to our raison d'etre… A global mission which is tied to our very reason of being.

And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one. He says: How come Malaysia [he’s referring to an overwhelmingly Muslim country] – how come Malaysia doesn't have similar problems? And he answers: Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order.

That's your moderate. So don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive. It’s designed for one purpose, and for one purpose only: To lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran's path to the bomb. The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces, and leave it with the capacity of thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium. This would effectively cement Iran's place as a threshold military nuclear power. In the future, at a time of its choosing, Iran, the world’s most dangerous state in the world's most dangerous region, would obtain the world’s most dangerous weapons.

Allowing that to happen would pose the gravest threat to us all. It’s one thing to confront militant Islamists on pick-up trucks, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It’s another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction. I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists. That didn't happen. And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria's chemical weapons capability. Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons. Ladies and Gentlemen, Would you let ISIS enrich uranium? Would you let ISIS build a heavy water reactor? Would you let ISIS develop intercontinental ballistic missiles? Of course you wouldn’t. Then you mustn't let the Islamic State of Iran do those things either.

Because here’s what will happen: Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charm and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. It's then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world. There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat: Iran's nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled. Make no mistake – ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The fight against militant Islam is indivisible. When militant Islam succeeds anywhere, it’s emboldened everywhere. When it suffers a blow in one place, it's set back in every place. That’s why Israel’s fight against Hamas is not just our fight. It’s your fight. Israel is fighting a fanaticism today that your countries may be forced to fight tomorrow.

For 50 days this past summer, Hamas fired thousands of rockets at Israel, many of them supplied by Iran. I want you to think about what your countries would do if thousands of rockets were fired at your cities. Imagine millions of your citizens having seconds at most to scramble to bomb shelters, day after day. You wouldn't let terrorists fire rockets at your cities with impunity. Nor would you let terrorists dig dozens of terror tunnels under your borders to infiltrate your towns in order to murder and kidnap your citizens. Israel justly defended itself against both rocket attacks and terror tunnels. Yet Israel also faced another challenge. We faced a propaganda war. Because, in an attempt to win the world’s sympathy, Hamas cynically used Palestinian civilians as human shields. It used schools, not just schools - UN schools, private homes, mosques, even hospitals to store and fire rockets at Israel.

As Israel surgically struck at the rocket launchers and at the tunnels, Palestinian civilians were tragically but unintentionally killed. There are heartrending images that resulted, and these fueled libelous charges that Israel was deliberately targeting civilians.

We were not. We deeply regret every single civilian casualty. And the truth is this: Israel was doing everything to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties. Hamas was doing everything to maximize Israeli civilian casualties and Palestinian civilian casualties. Israel dropped flyers, made phone calls, sent text messages, broadcast warnings in Arabic on Palestinian television, always to enable Palestinian civilians to evacuate targeted areas.

No other country and no other army in history have gone to greater lengths to avoid casualties among the civilian population of their enemies. This concern for Palestinian life was all the more remarkable, given that Israeli civilians were being bombarded by rockets day after day, night after night. As their families were being rocketed by Hamas, Israel's citizen army – the brave soldiers of the IDF, our young boys and girls – they upheld the highest moral values of any army in the world. Israel's soldiers deserve not condemnation, but admiration. Admiration from decent people everywhere.

Now here’s what Hamas did: Hamas embedded its missile batteries in residential areas and told Palestinians to ignore Israel’s warnings to leave. And just in case people didn’t get the message, they executed Palestinian civilians in Gaza who dared to protest.

No less reprehensible, Hamas deliberately placed its rockets where Palestinian children live and play. Let me show you a photograph. It was taken by a France 24 crew during the recent conflict. It shows two Hamas rocket launchers, which were used to attack us. You see three children playing next to them. Hamas deliberately put its rockets in hundreds of residential areas like this. Hundreds of them.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a war crime. And I say to President Abbas, these are the war crimes committed by your Hamas partners in the national unity government which you head and you are responsible for. And these are the real war crimes you should have investigated, or spoken out against from this podium last week.

Ladies and Gentlemen, As Israeli children huddled in bomb shelters and Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system knocked Hamas rockets out of the sky, the profound moral difference between Israel and Hamas couldn’t have been clearer: Israel was using its missiles to protect its children. Hamas was using its children to protect its missiles.

By investigating Israel rather than Hamas for war crimes, the UN Human Rights Council has betrayed its noble mission to protect the innocent. In fact, what it’s doing is to turn the laws of war upside-down. Israel, which took unprecedented steps to minimize civilian casualties, Israel is condemned. Hamas, which both targeted and hid behind civilians – that a double war crime - Hamas is given a pass.

The Human Rights Council is thus sending a clear message to terrorists everywhere: Use civilians as human shields. Use them again and again and again. You know why? Because sadly, it works.

By granting international legitimacy to the use of human shields, the UN’s Human Rights Council has thus become a Terrorist Rights Council, and it will have repercussions. It probably already has, about the use of civilians as human shields.

It’s not just our interest. It’s not just our values that are under attack. It’s your interests and your values.

Ladies and Gentlemen, We live in a world steeped in tyranny and terror, where gays are hanged from cranes in Tehran, political prisoners are executed in Gaza, young girls are abducted en masse in Nigeria and hundreds of thousands are butchered in Syria, Libya and Iraq. Yet nearly half, nearly half of the UN Human Rights Council's resolutions focusing on a single country have been directed against Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East – Israel. where issues are openly debated in a boisterous parliament, where human rights are protected by independent courts and where women, gays and minorities live in a genuinely free society.

The Human Rights… (that’s an oxymoron, the UN Human Rights Council, but I’ll use it just the same), the Council’s biased treatment of Israel is only one manifestation of the return of the world’s oldest prejudices. We hear mobs today in Europe call for the gassing of Jews. We hear some national leaders compare Israel to the Nazis. This is not a function of Israel’s policies. It's a function of diseased minds. And that disease has a name. It’s called anti-Semitism.

It is now spreading in polite society, where it masquerades as legitimate criticism of Israel. For centuries the Jewish people have been demonized with blood libels and charges of deicide. Today, the Jewish state is demonized with the apartheid libel and charges of genocide. Genocide? In what moral universe does genocide include warning the enemy's civilian population to get out of harm's way? Or ensuring that they receive tons, tons of humanitarian aid each day, even as thousands of rockets are being fired at us? Or setting up a field hospital to aid for their wounded? Well, I suppose it's the same moral universe where a man who wrote a dissertation of lies about the Holocaust, and who insists on a Palestine free of Jews, Judenrein, can stand at this podium and shamelessly accuse Israel of genocide and ethnic cleansing.

In the past, outrageous lies against the Jews were the precursors to the wholesale slaughter of our people.

But no more.

Today we, the Jewish people, have the power to defend ourselves. We will defend ourselves against our enemies on the battlefield. We will expose their lies against us in the court of public opinion. Israel will continue to stand proud and unbowed.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Despite the enormous challenges facing Israel, I believe we have an historic opportunity.

After decades of seeing Israel as their enemy, leading states in the Arab world increasingly recognize that together we and they face many of the same dangers: principally this means a nuclear-armed Iran and militant Islamist movements gaining ground in the Sunni world.

Our challenge is to transform these common interests to create a productive partnership. One that would build a more secure, peaceful and prosperous Middle East.

Together we can strengthen regional security. We can advance projects in water, agriculture, in transportation, in health, in energy, in so many fields.

I believe the partnership between us can also help facilitate peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Many have long assumed that an Israeli-Palestinian peace can help facilitate a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab World. But these days I think it may work the other way around: Namely that a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab world may help facilitate an Israeli-Palestinian peace.

And therefore, to achieve that peace, we must look not only to Jerusalem and Ramallah, but also to Cairo, to Amman, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh and elsewhere. I believe peace can be realized with the active involvement of Arab countries, those that are willing to provide political, material and other indispensable support. I’m ready to make a historic compromise, not because Israel is occupying a foreign land. The people of Israel are not occupiers in the Land of Israel. History, archeology and common sense all make clear that we have had a singular attachment to this land for over 3,000 years.

I want peace because I want to create a better future for my people. But it must be a genuine peace, one that is anchored in mutual recognition and enduring security arrangements, rock solid security arrangements on the ground. Because you see, Israel's withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza created two militant Islamic enclaves on our borders from which tens of thousands of rockets have been fired at Israel.

These sobering experiences heighten Israel's security concerns regarding potential territorial concessions in the future. Those security concerns are even greater today. Just look around you.

The Middle East is in chaos. States are disintegrating. Militant Islamists are filling the void.

Israel cannot have territories from which it withdraws taken over by Islamic militants yet again, as happened in Gaza and Lebanon. That would place the likes of ISIS within mortar range – a few miles – of 80% of our population.

Think about that. The distance between the 1967 lines and the suburbs of Tel Aviv is like the distance between the UN building here and Times Square. Israel’s a tiny country. That’s why in any peace agreement, which will obviously necessitate a territorial compromise, I will always insist that Israel be able to defend itself by itself against any threat. Yet despite all that has happened, some still don't take Israel’s security concerns seriously. But I do, and I always will. Because, as Prime Minister of Israel, I am entrusted with the awesome responsibility of ensuring the future of the Jewish people and the future of the Jewish state.

And no matter what pressure is brought to bear, I will never waver in fulfilling that responsibility.

I believe that with a fresh approach from our neighbors, we can advance peace despite the difficulties we face.

In Israel, we have a record of making the impossible possible. We’ve made a desolate land flourish. And with very few natural resources, we have used the fertile minds of our people to turn Israel into a global center of technology and innovation.

Peace, of course, would enable Israel to realize its full potential and to bring a promising future not only for our people, not only for the Palestinian people, but for many, many others in our region.

But the old template for peace must be updated. It must take into account new realities and new roles and responsibilities for our Arab neighbors. Ladies and Gentlemen, There is a new Middle East. It presents new dangers, but also new opportunities. Israel is prepared to work with Arab partners and the international community to confront those dangers and to seize those opportunities. Together we must recognize the global threat of militant Islam, the primacy of dismantling Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and the indispensable role of Arab states in advancing peace with the Palestinians.

All this may fly in the face of conventional wisdom, but it’s the truth. And the truth must always be spoken, especially here, in the United Nations.

Isaiah, our great prophet of peace, taught us nearly 3,000 years ago in Jerusalem to speak truth to power. לְמַעַן צִיּוֹן לֹא אֶחֱשֶׁה וּלְמַעַן יְרוּשָׁלִַם לֹא אֶשְׁקוֹט עַד-יֵצֵא כַּנֹּגַהּ צִדְקָהּ וִישׁוּעָתָהּ כְּלַפִּיד יִבְעָר.

For the sake of Zion, I will not be silent.

For the sake of Jerusalem, I will not be still.

Until her justice shines bright, And her salvation glows like a flaming torch.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Let's light a torch of truth and justice to safeguard our common future.

Thank you.



It's not Islam. It's militant Islam

    How did Egypt, Yemen, Iraq, Iran and the Levant come under Islamic domination?  Islamic conquest!  Its Islam, Stupid! Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Allah sanctified it, Moe exemplified it. Read the relevant verses and see for yourself.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

    Islam is militant by design. If it was not militant, it would not be Islam. What part of  "fight those who... until" do you not understand? Islam is neither passive nor anodyne. There is no pacifist Islam. The Qur'an ordains Jihad for Muslims in 2.216.

militant Islamists

    Muslims, no adjectives required. If they obey Allah and emulate Moe, they are violent and blood thirsty. What part of "fight them until" & "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you" do you not comprehend?

    Islamism is the call to impose Islam on the entire world by force. Ibn Khaldun, the great Islamic historian, has a clue for you. Its Islam, Stupid.
Muqaddimah Chapter3  Ch_3_31
In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.

branches of the same poisonous tree

    If it is composed entirely of Muslims acting in obedience to Allah; emulating Moe then it is Islam.  The names of the various "terrorist groups" serve to divert our attention from the real source of terrorism: the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur'an and exemplified in he hadith and sunnah.

Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas.

    Its Islam, Stupid!  All the rest, the cloud of names obscuring the view, is designed to prevent us from identifying the enemy whose doctrine demands our destruction: Islam.

all militant Islamists share in common

    Its Islam, Stupid!  They are Muslims; they obey Allah and emulate Moe. They hope to obtain admission to Allah's celestial bordello by waging war against us.

ISIS must be defeated

    Its Islam, Stupid!  Islam must be eradicated. Muslims believe that they go to war or Hell. Fear of the fire is a terrible stick; Allah's bordello is an attractive carrot. While Muslims believe, they remain a threat. 

partnership

    Muslims are our enemies, not our partners.  Muslims are expressly forbidden to form equal or inferior relationships with infidels.  Machiavelli was wrong: the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend, he may be another enemy.

peace

    While there is one believing Muslim alive on the face of the earth, Israel will have neither peace nor security regardless of any delusion of alliance or partnership with Islamic states.  Israel is the ultimate blasphemy: living proof of the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose  promise is void.  Allah promised irreversible conquest.  Israel recovered part of her land.  Muslims can  never tolerate that.  They are obligated to reconquer Israel.

historic compromise

    Only a damned fool thinks that concessions, good will gestures and ceding land  will yield peace; they only embolden the enemy; they are signs of weakness and lack of will to defend oneself.  Like Charlie Brown, Israel never learns; Abbas, like Lucy, will always snatch the ball away at the last instant.

truth must always be spoken

    Bibi did speak some important truths in this speech, but he ruined it with one big lie: "Its not Islam...".  ISIS & HAMAS  are Islam. Their is no difference between their actions and doctrines and those of Islam as preached and practiced by Moe.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

IslamE^3

Expel,Exclude,Eradicate Islam E3ISIS,HAMAS,IS,Fatah,PLO, al-Qaeda,Tehrik-e-Hurmat-e-Rasool,al-Nusrah Front,Boko Haram,
                                      Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis,Ansar al-Shari'a,Army of Islam, Jundallah,Harakat-Ul Jihad Islami, etc. et al

  • Expel
  • Exclude
  • Eradicate.
[Click bold blue underlined numbers and text to read authentic source texts.]

Islam entails terrorism: 

  • I will cast terror
  • To strike terror: 8.57
  • To terrify thereby: 8.60
  • Allah cast terror
  • Terrorism is a righteous good deed: 9.120
  • Moe:  terrifies Jews more than Allah: 59.13
  • Allah rewards acts of terrorism: 9.120
  • Moe: made victorious with terror

Muslims must obey Allah Moe

  • Obey Allah and his Messenger:  8.1
  • Selectivity is not allowed: 2.85
  • Moe is their role model: 33.21

Muslims are threatened with Hellfire if they do not wage war

Muslims are promised Paradise if they wage war

Islam is violent; Muslims are violent:

Use this hashtag to link to this post: 

#IslamE^3





Thursday, September 25, 2014

Obomination: Shitspew at the Security Council

Obamination: Shitspew at the Security Council Obama Farts

Remarks by the President at U.N. Security Council Summit on Foreign Terrorist Fighters

United Nations
New York, New York

3:11 P.M. EDT



PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you, His Excellency, the Secretary-General, for his statement.  I'll now make a statement in my capacity as President of the United States.

Mr. Secretary-General, heads of state and government distinguished representatives, thank you for being here today. 

In the nearly 70 years of the United Nations, this is only the sixth time that the Security Council has met at a level like this.  We convene such sessions to address the most urgent threats to peace and security.  And I called this meeting because we must come together -- as nations and an international community -- to confront the real and growing threat of foreign terrorist fighters.   

As I said earlier today, the tactic of terrorism is not new. So many nations represented here today, including my own, have seen our citizens killed by terrorists who target innocents.  And today, the people of the world have been horrified by another brutal murder, of Herve Gourdel, by terrorists in Algeria.  President Hollande, we stand with you and the French people not only as you grieve this terrible loss, but as you show resolve against terror and in defense of liberty.

What brings us together today, what is new is the unprecedented flow of fighters in recent years to and from conflict zones, including Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa, Yemen, Libya, and most recently, Syria and Iraq.

Our intelligence agencies estimate that more than 15,000 foreign fighters from more than 80 nations have traveled to Syria in recent years.  Many have joined terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda’s affiliate, the Nusrah Front, and ISIL, which now threatens people across Syria and Iraq.  And I want to acknowledge and thank Prime Minister Abadi of Iraq for being here today. 

In the Middle East and elsewhere, these terrorists exacerbate conflicts; they pose an immediate threat to people in these regions; and as we’ve already seen in several cases, they may try to return to their home countries to carry out deadly attacks.  In the face of this threat, many of our nations -- working together and through the United Nations -- have increased our cooperation.  Around the world, foreign terrorist fighters have been arrested, plots have been disrupted and lives have been saved. 

Earlier this year at West Point, I called for a new Partnership to help nations build their capacity to meet the evolving threat of terrorism, including foreign terrorist fighters.  And preventing these individuals from reaching Syria and then slipping back across our borders is a critical element of our strategy to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL.

The historic resolution that we just adopted enshrines our commitment to meet this challenge.  It is legally binding.  It establishes new obligations that nations must meet.  Specifically, nations are required to “prevent and suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting or equipping” of foreign terrorist fighters, as well as the financing of their travel or activities.  Nations must “prevent the movement of terrorists or terrorist groups” through their territory, and ensure that their domestic laws allow for the prosecution of those who attempt to do so.

The resolution we passed today calls on nations to help build the capacity of states on the front lines of this fight -- including with the best practices that many of our nations approved yesterday, and which the United States will work to advance through our Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.  This resolution will strengthen cooperation between nations, including sharing more information about the travel and activities of foreign terrorist fighters.  And it makes clear that respecting human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law is not optional -- it is an essential part of successful counterterrorism efforts.  Indeed, history teaches us that the failure to uphold these rights and freedoms can actually fuel violent extremism.

Finally, this resolution recognizes that there is no military solution to the problem of misguided individuals seeking to join terrorist organizations, and it, therefore, calls on nations to work together to counter the violent extremism that can radicalize, recruit, and mobilize individuals to engage in terrorism.  Potential recruits must hear the words of former terrorist fighters who have seen the truth -- that groups like ISIL betray Islam by killing innocent men, women and children, the majority of whom are Muslim. 

Often it is local communities -- family, friends, neighbors, and faith leaders -- that are best able to identify and help disillusioned individuals before they succumb to extremist ideologies and engage in violence.  That’s why the United States government is committed to working with communities in America and around the world to build partnerships of trust, respect and cooperation. 

Likewise, even as we are unrelenting against terrorists who threaten our people, we must redouble our work to address the conditions -- the repression, the lack of opportunity, too often the hopelessness that can make some individuals more susceptible to appeals to extremism and violence.  And this includes continuing to pursue a political solution in Syria that allows all Syrians to live in security, dignity, and peace

This is the work that we must do as nations.  These are the partnerships we must forge as an international community.  And these are the standards that we now must meet.  Yet even as we’re guided by the commitments that we make here today, let me close by stating the obvious.  Resolutions alone will not be enough.  Promises on paper cannot keep us safe.  Lofty rhetoric and good intentions will not stop a single terrorist attack.

The words spoken here today must be matched and translated into action, into deeds -- concrete action, within nations and between them, not just in the days ahead, but for years to come. For if there was ever a challenge in our interconnected world that cannot be met by any one nation alone, it is this:  terrorists crossing borders and threatening to unleash unspeakable violence.  These terrorists believe our countries will be unable to stop them.  The safety of our citizens demand that we do.  And I’m here today to say that all of you who are committed to this urgent work will find a strong and steady partner in the United States of America. 

I now would like to resume my function as President of the Council.  And I will now give the floor to the other members of the Security Council.

END
3:19 P.M. EDT






confront the threat of foreign terrorist fighters.

    The threat is from believing Muslims. Where they were born makes no difference. Foreign or domestic, they are Believers first and foremost. Open the Qur'an and read 9.111 & 49.15. Who are believers and what do they do?

    What do they believe? Allah's imperatives, threat and promise. "Fight them", go to war or go to Hell, go to war and enter Paradise. Injure or enrage disbelievers to get extra credit.

resolve against terror

    Terror is what the enemy: Muslims wish to inflict upon us. They seek to destroy our will and resolve; our ability to mount an effective defense and counter attack.

    Muslims believe that they will be blessed if they wage war on us and damned if they sit at home.  They will cease from troubling when they no longer believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat & promise or no longer live.

    Ex-Muslims are the best; dead Muslims are second best. Who has the political will to convert terrorists to either form? Summon up some resolve and take appropriate action.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur'anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent's heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

    There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam's strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
 cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent's
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur'an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

what is new

    The increased scope. scale, intensity and frequency of terror attacks are the novelty.  They result from failure to counter attack effectively. 

    The weakness and irresolve we displayed in Korea & Vietnam served to encourage Muslims to attack.  Our miserable failure to retaliate effectively after Pan Am 103 and the seizure of our embassy in Tehran followed by failure to respond to attacks on embassies in Africa and the USS Cole further emboldened terrorists.

    In 1805 we fought the first Barbary War. Ten years later we had to do it again because we did not finish the job. Muslims are not defeated until they are exterminated because they are blessed if they attack and damned if they don't.

foreign fighters

    Believing Muslims claiming admission tickets to Allah's celestial bordello.   

build their capacity

    Political will, not capacity is lacking. Islamic regimes use terrorists as proxies to seize territory and power which they hope to accumulate into a new caliphate.  Iran, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are not about to cease sponsoring terrorists.

across our borders

   Congress passed legislation to fence the southern border. Obamination refuses to enforce it and construct the fence, leaving our border open to terrorists.

 strategy to destroy

    A skunk by any other name stinks. Named terror groups are aliases, false fronts to conceal the involvement of Islam.  Its Islam, Stupid!!!  Terrorism will continue until Islam is extinct. If you want to stop terrorism, exterminate Islam.

    Plant the seeds of doubt and introspection. fertilize and water them until they sprout into apostasy.  Expose Muslims to evidence of the true character and works of Allah and his Profiteer.  Show them that Allah is Satan and Moe was a demon possessed false prophet who practiced pederasty, necrophillia, rape, murder, plllage and plunder for his own emolument.

   
If you won't do that, then you are a traitor to Western Civilization and the whole human race.

counterterrorism

    Kill the terrorists. Nuke the countries that harbor, finance and facilitate their attacks. Eradicate Islam from the face of the earth. Anything less guarantees defeat, death and enslavement.

fuel violent extremism

    Islam is intrinsically violent. The teachings and works of Muhammad set the standard, defining and exemplifying Islam. They are normative, not extreme.

military solution

    Surrender is not a solution, it would leave us enslaved. There is no negotiation, no compromise with existential attack. There is only one solution: the extinction of Islam.  

misguided individuals

    Believers. Muslims obeying Allah; emulating Moe. Jihad is what Islam is; what Muslims do on penalty of eternal damnation if they shirk.

violent extremism

    Islam as defined and exemplified by Moe. Read its canonical texts; get a clue.

radicalize

    Where Obamination goes, feces flows. The difference between the terrorist and Joe Camel is belief. Believers are defined and described in two ayat, linked here. Read them and curse liars who shield Islam from condemnation.

recruit, and mobilize

    With the exception of a few Morons, mentally ill individuals and criminals, Muslims are born, not recruited.

    Mobilization is done by Imams in mosques and books, videos & web sites where the Qur'an & hadith are used to rouse the rabble to fight0

the truth

    Walid Shoebat and a few others saw the truth: Islam is Satanic, the devil's doctrine of perpetual war.  They apostatized.  All Muslims should.

 betray Islam by killing

    Where Obamination goes, feces flows. "Kill them wherever you find them.", "fight them until", "fight those who...until", "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you".   Islam is betrayed by apostates, not believers who obey Allah and emulate Moe.  Genocidal conquest is what Islam is; what Muslims do.


disillusioned individuals

    Disillusioned Muslims apostatize, believers wage terrorism.

extremist ideologies

  • Only Allah has the right to be worshipped.
  • Only Allah has the right to rule and govern.
  • Disbelievers must be converted or killed.
Those ideas are not extremist, they are normative Islam as Moe preached and exemplified it.

engage in violence

    What did Moe do? 86 battles in 10 years, he participated in 17 of them. He commanded Muslims to wage perpetual war. He said that he was commanded to fight with men until they testify that only Allah has the right to be worshipped. Its Islam, Stupid!!!!

partnerships

    Allah expressly forbids Muslims from equal and inferior relations with infidels. Islam must be superior.  Muslims are given permission to deceive us in the matter of false friendship to protect themselves and advance the cause of Islam. Get a clue. 3.28  5.51   9.33   Muslims are not our friends, allies nor partners, they are our enemies.

conditions


    Usama bin Ladin was a western educated engineer and very wealthy. Many of his co-conspirators were middle and upper class medical and law students. 

    Islamic terrorism is a result of belief in Islamic doctrines, not grivances, deprivations, oppression or suppression.

extremism and violence

    Its Islam, Stupid!!! It is what Moe preached and practiced for Muslims  to emulate in all places; at all times.

political solution

    Are there Conservative Republicans in Obamination's cabinet?  Has he appointed any to the federal courts?  But there are Ikhwan members in the White House and DHS, even in the Pentagon.  Have they solved our problems?  Why would it work in Syria?

security, dignity, and peace

    The polar opposite of Islam. Get a G'd'd clue from the mouth of the Profit.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

    This post contains conclusions drawn from facts found in Islam's canonical texts. The documents listed below contain quotes from and links to those texts. Intelligent men of good will who read those quotes will curse Islam because it is evil by design.