Ramadan in Israel: Muslim murders 13-year-old Israeli girl in her bed, is celebrated as hero by “Palestinians”

Ramadan in Israel: Muslim murders 13-year-old Israeli girl in her bed, is celebrated as hero by “Palestinians”


The above article, posted earlier at Jihad Watch. Here follows my comments posted there on it:

Basic Sunnah, as the following hadith and others attest to, spotlighting the actions of one among those, the “prophet” called the best among his followers:

It was reported from Iyas bin Salamah, from his father, who said: “The Messenger of Allah appointed Abu Bakr as commander over us to fight a battle against some people among the idolators [sic]. So we attacked at night, killing them, and our code word that night was: ‘Amit, amit’ (put to death, put to death). Salamah said: “That night, I killed seven idolators [sic] in their homes with my own hand.” (Dawud, Vol.3, The Book of Jihad, Chapter 93. Attacking the Enemy During the Night.)

 Basic Islam, basic Sunnah of the so-called prophet.

Why Jihadists Kill “Gays”

Why Jihadists Kill “Gays”

On the above article posted this morning at Jihad Watch, here follows, my comments posted thereat:

.. very briefly here, in short, revered works of tafsir provide, alongside the prohibition for men to see more than the one needed eye of potentially marriageable females is the prohibition for them to look at the beardless boys.

Why? Because as is so with the female, if the Muslim “man” sees the eyes, the hand, the feet, God forbid, the forearm and so forth, there is danger of lust.

So it is with the beardless boy, according to the works of the revered scholars of Islam.

Therefore, the prohibition comes under the Islamic tenet of prevention–barring the way and means to the final act of sin, by making illegal and “sinful” as the final act of sin all actions that lead to it.

In brief, as hadith provides, “Allah curses the ogler and the ogled at.” (as spoken to in Vol. 2 of the highly revered Comprehensive Qur’an Commentary, Ma’ariful Qur’an, p.458.)

As the same source provides on the just-cited hadith, “It means that the curse of Allah falls on anyone who looks at someone in an evil way, someone who is a non-Mahram; that is, someone outside the count of those in the family he is permitted to see because marriage with them is forbidden for ever.” (Ibid.)

 It goes on, providing, “this is why such a nazir, the onlooker of the other, comes under the curse of Allah. As for the manzur ilaihi, the one looked at lustfully, the same curse will apply subject to his or her having deliberately and invitingly caused such a look to be cast.”

What’s more, with respect to “Allah’s curse,” Surah Al-Nisa provides, “…the one whom Allah curses you shall find no helper for him.” (Vs. 52.) Exegesis on the said verse, by the same stated source above, and others, states, hadith provides, the Messenger of Allah said, “ Cursed is he who does what the people of Lut used to do.” It adds on that, the hadith was “Narrated by Razin and appearing in Mishkat, the reference is to the male homosexual.”

 But hadith, as the same source and others provide, also includes the female in the above said curse, as we read in the following hadith and others:

The Holy Prophet has cursed the effeminate from among men (who, in dress and looks, emulate women – like transvestites) and he has cursed the masculinized from among women (who, in dress, looks and ways, act man-like), And he said: ‘Expel them from your homes’” (Bukhari, from Mishkat) 

 And the same revered work provides, on those who earn the curse of Allah, “’la ‘nah” being the Arabic Qur’anic word. “la ‘nah’ (translated as ‘curse’ in absence of a more exact equivalent) means being far removed from the mercy of Allah, extremely debased and disgraced.” It continues, “For such accursed ones admonitions are very stern.”

 It continues, providing, “The Holy Qur’an says: (The accursed, wherever they be, are to be caught and killed massacre-like.) (33:61) This is their disgrace in the present life.”

 Therefore, “Orlando.”

Camel Shit Exposed! Jihad is Offensive, not Defensive!!!

Muslims, dhimmis & apologists falsely assert that Jihad is exclusively defensive. Islamic law proves them to be liars. I am exhibiting and providing links to the relevant pages of the legal codes of the Hanafi, Maliki & Shafi'i schools of Islamic law.
Read them and understand that Jihad is offensive & aggressive, undertaken on Islamic initiative.

Hedaya Volume II Book IX, Chapter II Page 143
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n155/mode/2up

For the benefit of those who can not tolerate the archaic font, archaic vocabulary and poor print quality, I present a cleaned up version of the substantive part of the vital paragraph. with bold emphasis added.

When the Muslims enter the enemy's country, and besiege the cities or strong holds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them to embrace the faith, because Ibn Abbas relates of the prophet that " he never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the faith. " If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary to war with them, because that which was the design of the war is then obtained without war.  The prophet, moreover, has said "we are directed to make war upon men until such time as they shall confess there is no God but one God; but when they repeat this creed, their persons and properties are in protection."  ---If they do not accept the call to the faith, they must then be called upon to pay Jizya, or capitation-tax; because the prophet directed the commanders of his armies so to do; and also, because by submitting to this tax, war is forbidden and terminated, upon the authority of the Koran.

https://archive.org/stream/TheRisala/TheRisala-ATreatiseOnMalikiFiqh#page/n283/mode/2up/



Here is an enlargement of the pertinent part:



Reliance Of The Traveller is the fiqh of the Shafi'i school, a widely accepted code.
http://concit.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/reliance2_complete.pdf#page=620
o9.8 begins on page 620 of the pdf, 602 of the text.



Here is the pertinent part enlarged for easy reading:


    I have now exhibited to you relevant passages from the Islamic law of the Hanafi, Maliki & Shafi'i schools of Islamic law. The three agree that it is necessary to invite infidels to Islam before attacking them.

    The Shafi'i fiqh specifically gives Surah At-Taubah 9.29 as its scriptural basis; take a close look at it: 

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Click through, read the entire surah and see if there is any defensive element in it.  Then read Ibn Kathir's tafsir of 9.29; is defense mentioned therein?

    Would Muslims be required to issue dawah before attacking if infidels were attacking them?  Risala explicitly answers in the negative.

    Moe's orders to his commanders in the field are reported in Sahih Muslim 19.4294. I quote the pertinent part.

If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them...

    When Umar sent the Muslim army to Persia, a Persian general asked why they were attacking. The answer is found in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386; I quote the pertinent part.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."

8.39  9.29 are fight...until loops with compound terminal conditions Neither one has any element of defense in its text or context.  9.123 has neither defensive element nor terminal condition.  What did Moe say about them?

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635
    Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: I am commanded to fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah (direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. When they do that, their life and property are unlawful for us except what is due to them. They will have the same rights as the Muslims have, and have the same responsibilities as the Muslims have.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."


Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 92, Number 388:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
When Allah's Apostle died and Abu Bakr was elected as a Caliph after him, some of the Arabs reverted to disbelief, 'Umar said to Abu Bakr, "How dare you fight the people while Allah's Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight the people till they say 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah' And whoever says: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' saves his wealth and his life from me unless he deserves a legal punishment justly, and his account will be with Allah! Abu Bakr said, "By Allah, I will fight him who discriminates between Zakat and prayers, for Zakat is the Compulsory right to be taken from the wealth By Allah, if they refuse to give me even a tying rope which they use to give to Allah's Apostle, I would fight them for withholding it." 'Umar said, 'By Allah, It was nothing, except I saw that Allah had opened the chest of Abu Bakr to the fight, and I came to know for certain that was the truth."

    The Profit said he was commanded/ordered to fight with men/the people until they recite shehada and do things his way. There is no element of defense in any of the ahadith relating to the Jihad imperative.