Sunday, September 09, 2012

The Right to Peace: Terrorism

The Right to Peace: Terrorism A/HRC/20/31

Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory
Committee on the right of peoples to peace

    This report contains the draft declaration on the right to peace. The draft is a prime example of irrational arrogance, mixing International Socialism and anthropomorphic global warming but I am not going to detail those issues in this post because I want to concentrate on its worst provision.

    Article 7 on page six of the nine page report contains the worst provision of the draft declaration on the right to peace.

Article 7. Resistance and opposition to oppression
1. All peoples and individuals have the right to resist and oppose oppressive colonial, foreign occupation or dictatorial domination (domestic oppression).
2. Everyone has the right to oppose aggression, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, violations of other universally recognized human rights, and any propaganda in favour of war or incitement to violence and violations of the right to peace..

    The UN & OIC are subjecting us to Orwellian double speak.  Their attitude is "Justice is just for us Muslims.".  "Oppressive" & "dictatorial" apply to any government that resists Islamic conquest. Not submitting to Islam is not only  oppression1, it is "waging war against Allah and his Messenger"2.

    Article 7 is an indirect endorsement of HAMAS & Hezbollah, construing their genocidal3 terrorism as "legitimate resistance" while, in reality, it is offensive conquest. The UN's inability to define terrorism stems from the OIC's insistence on excluding the actions of HAMAS & Hezbollah from the definition. 

    To comprehend the falsity of the Muslim narrative, we must read the HAMAS Charter. Article 11 holds a crucial clue: conquest.  [Emphasis added.]

...because Palestine is an Islamic Waqf throughout all generations and to the Day of Resurrection. Who can presume to speak for all Islamic Generations to the Day of Resurrection? This is the status [of the land] in Islamic Shari’a, and it is similar to all lands conquered by Islam by force, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest4,...

    The Jews were occupied by the Byzantines, and had a "right to resist" but their rebellion against Rome had been brutally suppressed.  Caliph Umar conquered the region in 638 but instead of returning the land to its rightful owners, he seized it for Islam, extending its empire.  In 1948, the Jews were still occupied, and retained their right to resist.  When they overthrew their British occupiers and declared independence, the Arab League declared genocidal conquest, which the Jews had and still retain a legitimate right to resist.

    Mortars and rockets fired into Israel are not legitimate resistance, they are violations of the right to peace. Morality, history and international law are being inverted right before our eyes.  The massacre of the Fogel family was not legitimate resistance, it was terrorism; a fundamental violation of the right to peace.  The UN Human Rights Council is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem. 

  1. 14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought victory and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate, arrogant dictator (who refuses to believe in the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and destruction.

  2. 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
    `Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [] [Emphasis added.]

  3. Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
    Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
  4. 13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

No comments: