Friday, September 21, 2012

Innocence of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights

Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

    Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make out the important points in the screed.

Both the film and the czrtoons are malicious and deliberately provocative. The film  particularly portrays a disgracefully distorted image of Muslims and the High Clmmissioner has stated clearly she understands why people would want to protest strongly against the film but obviously the cartoons as well and makes clear their right to do so, but peacefully .

And, nevertheless, we obviously absolutely condemn the killings in Bengazi and the killings that have taken place since then we understand around thirty people have now died liniked to the film in particular and there's no possible justification for the violence and destructive reactions.  We urge religious and political leaders to make a major effort to restore calm and we welcome the fact that very senior Muslim figures have been saying similar things about ...writing about these provocations--stupid provocations. 

    I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons, but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam, where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: "Innocence of Muslims"and Muslim reaction to it.  Here is the video for those who have not yet viewed it or need a refresher. 

malicious and provocative

    Of course they are provocative, they are intended to provoke thought and inquiry.  And people are inquiring about whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content of the video.  Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to insult Muslims to get their attention.  I agree with him.  In my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious.  Hebdo seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French cartoonist  shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a new order of magnitude. 

They wound up Pat real tight, didn't they! Of course he is factually and logically right.

distorted image

    The video does not portray Muslims in general, it portrays Moe and his companions.  The portrayal of Moe is accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian warlord and false prophet.  Ample documentation of the fatal facts is provided here:

    Because Islam is what Moe said and did, the video also portrays Islam accurately.  It is pure, unmitigated evil: a continuing crime against humanity-- predation.  When Moe declares that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved and property seized, he is describing the central mission of Islam. 

original religion

    What is the "original religion" of Islam?  What is the economic system of Islam?  I will let Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.


    How did Moe get his income?  The Qur'an & hadith have clues for you. 

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.


Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah's Apostle he would ask, "Has he left anything to repay his debt?" If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend's funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, "I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. "


Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: ...It is mentioned from Ibn 'Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, "My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

    This is a blog post, not a college course.  If you want more detail, read these related blog posts: 


    Muslims do not require provocation to attack infidels.  Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be killed.  Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition against innocent infidels in every year.  Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.

The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.


    Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense carying the death penalty.  Infidels are to be destroyed as per the quote from Hedaya shown above.  Moe's need for income caused him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin reading at page  213.

free expression

    The first amendment was created because, in a representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of impending danger.  Thomas Jefferson bought a 'Qur'an to learn the doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars.  Since the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe, criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.

    The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan.  Now they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training about enemy doctrine.  George Washington said it best. 

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. 
George Washington 

No comments: